Judge swears in ALL-WHITE jury for O.J. trial --- You call that fair???
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080912/ap_on_re_us/oj_simpson
Judge swears in all-white jury for O.J. trial
By LINDA DEUTSCH, AP Special Correspondent Fri Sep 12, 4:20 AM ET
LAS VEGAS - An all-white jury will judge O.J. Simpson and a co-defendant on
kidnapping and robbery charges after defense lawyers lost a contentious
courtroom battle to include two African-American women on the panel.
ADVERTISEMENT
District Attorney David Roger gave the judge what he called "race neutral"
reasons for removing the two with his peremptory challenges, and defended
the final makeup of the jury chosen late Thursday night, saying that two of
six alternate jurors are black.
Both of the women who were removed had strong religious views, and the
prosecutor said he thought one of them would be inclined to "forgive"
Simpson while the other said she was hesitant to send anyone to prison.
Simpson's 1995 acquittal on murder charges came from a predominantly black
jury.
Clark County District Judge Jackie Glass said she saw no evidence of a
systematic exclusion of African-Americans. The current panel also is made
up of nine women and three men.
(snip)
Wayne
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9B1777EB9EB15r...@216.168.3.70...
Sal Video
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9B1777EB9EB15r...@216.168.3.70...
Reality_CheckŠ
> The govt is gonna try and frame him again.
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080912/ap_on_re_us/oj_simpson
>
> Judge swears in all-white jury for O.J. trial
OJ lives like a "white man", so why shouldn't he be tried like a "white man"
?
bigdog
It's about as fair a the predominantly black jury who let that
murdering sonofabitch walk the first time.
I say we give OJ a fair trial and then hang him.
May that scumbag piece of shit die in jail. I hope he never draws
another breath as a free man.
NA
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Both of the women who were removed had strong religious views, and the
> prosecutor said he thought one of them would be inclined to "forgive"
> Simpson while the other said she was hesitant to send anyone to prison.
The first jury being excused is bullshit, but the second was is a
obvious good idea. How many fundy christians do you think they put on
death row murder cases? Are
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:11:31 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>
>> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>>> The govt is gonna try and frame him again.
>>>
>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080912/ap_on_re_us/oj_simpson
>>>
>>> Judge swears in all-white jury for O.J. trial
>>
>> OJ lives like a "white man", so why shouldn't he be tried like a
>> "white man" ?
>
White men never murder their cheatin' wives ?
Bill DeFranzo
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9B1777EB9EB15r...@216.168.3.70...
YES! It was fair. His attorneys were involved in the jury selection.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On 13 Sep 2008 00:56:17 GMT, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:
>
>> John-Pierre Pigglesworth <gree...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> news:vm1mc4d152pp6e4qo...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:10:08 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> John-Pierre Pigglesworth wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:11:31 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>>>>>>> The govt is gonna try and frame him again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080912/ap_on_re_us/oj_simpson
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Judge swears in all-white jury for O.J. trial
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OJ lives like a "white man", so why shouldn't he be tried like a
>>>>>> "white man" ?
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Because he's never proven that he can behave like one, that's why.
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> White men never murder their cheatin' wives ?
>>>>
>>
>> and even if they are (wrongfully)acquitted,white people don't cheer
>> about it.
>>>
>>> Please don't insult educated people by trying to defend Simpson.
>>
>> I never would.
>>
>> If black people want real "equality",then it shouldn't matter what
>> racial makeup the jury is.
>>
>> I suspect most blacks called for jury duty probably saw the OJ trial
>> and truthfully stated they could not be impartial.
>
>
> The fact is, Simpson should have been put away long ago. They now
> have another chance and I hope they make good. Also, this is not a
> color thing with me.
You're lying again, racist.
crazy ned funk
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9B1777EB9EB15r...@216.168.3.70...
Fuck OJ!
r wiley
President Obama can pardon him next January.
rw
Illinois Boy
> The govt is gonna try and frame him again.
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080912/ap_on_re_us/oj_simpson
>
> Judge swears in all-white jury for O.J. trial
>
Why not, the people he killed were all white.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:cJDyk.31$nl3.8@trnddc05:
>
> YES! It was fair. His attorneys were involved in the jury selection.
>
>
>
Simpson's lawyer objected but the judge told him to shove it. From the
article
"Defense attorneys for Simpson and co-defendant Clarence "C.J." Stewart,
who are both black, moved to dismiss the entire jury panel and start again
but the judge rejected the motion."
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:kr6dnYV_os0Lu1bV...@earthlink.com:
HAHAHA. You mean you still believe OJ was guilty of those killings in 95??
You're one of those sheeple who believe whatever the media tells him.
OJ was framed then and they're doing it again now.
BDK
@yahoo.com says...
Jeezus, do you huff paint EVERY day?
Your brain is pickled..
ROTFL.
--
BDK
BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster
Poetic Justice
> In article <Xns9B17D8A96FFA6r...@216.168.3.70>, xeton2001
> @yahoo.com says...
>> Illinois Boy <illin...@earthlink.net> wrote in
>> news:kr6dnYV_os0Lu1bV...@earthlink.com:
>>
>>> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>>>
>>>> The govt is gonna try and frame him again.
>>>>
>>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080912/ap_on_re_us/oj_simpson
>>>>
>>>> Judge swears in all-white jury for O.J. trial
>>>>
>>> Why not, the people he killed were all white.
>>>
>> HAHAHA. You mean you still believe OJ was guilty of those killings in 95??
>> You're one of those sheeple who believe whatever the media tells him.
>>
>> OJ was framed then and they're doing it again now.
>>
>>
Why would someone kill two people to frame OJ?
OJ never brought out anyone who framed him other than the Police, now
he's in a different State and in a different City with totally different
law enforcement laws and people....
Just who is out to get him this time?
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:17:58 -0500, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
> MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>>HAHAHA. You mean you still believe OJ was guilty of those killings in
>>95?? You're one of those sheeple who believe whatever the media
>>tells him.
>>
>
> How do you know he DIDN'T kill them?
>
I don't know it. Quite possible he did kill them. But the case against
him was not very strong, The state was caught repeatedly planting evidence
and committing perjury and that tainted all the evidence.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:ogPyk.31746$bx1....@bignews1.bellsouth.net:
>>>
>>> OJ was framed then and they're doing it again now.
>>>
>>>
>
> Why would someone kill two people to frame OJ?
>
Now that is really stupid. No one said that's what happened.
Velouria
<xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I don't know it. Quite possible he did kill them. But the case against
> him was not very strong, The state was caught repeatedly planting evidence
> and committing perjury and that tainted all the evidence.
Why oh why couldn't *you* have been standing in the path of that
speeding white Bronco?
-V
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:34:36 -0600, "Reality_Check©"
> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>
>> John-Pierre Pigglesworth wrote:
>>> On 13 Sep 2008 00:56:17 GMT, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> John-Pierre Pigglesworth <gree...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>> news:vm1mc4d152pp6e4qo...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> John-Pierre Pigglesworth wrote:
> eventually.
Is that the fairy-tale delusion you suffer from?
Reality_CheckŠ
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:24:48 -0600, "Reality_Check©"
Your "thoughts" and $3.95 will get you a Grande Decaf Latte at Starbucks.
RD (The Sandman)
news:Xns9B188F45D7073r...@216.168.3.70:
Oh? Who was caught planting evidence? Particularly repeatedly.
> and committing perjury
About the word "nigger".
> and that tainted all the
> evidence.
And you don't think that jury nullification had anything to do with it?
--
Sleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman)
http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman
"Be who you are and say what you feel...Because those that
matter...don't mind...And those that mind...don't matter."
tiny dancer
"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9B1A638A...@216.196.97.136...
What the hell? I thought the guy on Court TV said 'they'd be covering the
live testimony in a moment'? I came back up to my sewing room and now that
crappy Tru TV is on again. WTF is up with this?
td
z
who's there?
OJ
OJ who?
OK, you can be on the jury.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:35:26 -0600, "Reality_Check©"
Drink your Latte ... loser.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sep 12, 9:00 pm, John-Pierre Pigglesworth <greet...@yahoo.com>>>> John-Pierre Pigglesworth <greet...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>
>>>>> John-Pierre Pigglesworth wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:11:31 -0600, "Reality_CheckŠ"
>>>>>> <Real...@Check.it> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>>>>>>>> The govt is gonna try and frame him again.
>>
>>>>>>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080912/ap_on_re_us/oj_simpson
>>
>>>>>>>> Judge swears in all-white jury for O.J. trial
>>
>>>>>>> OJ lives like a "white man", so why shouldn't he be tried like a
>>>>>>> "white man" ?
>>
>>
>>>>>> Because he's never proven that he can behave like one, that's
>>>>>> why.
>>
>>
>>>>> White men never murder their cheatin' wives ?
>>
>>
>>> and even if they are (wrongfully)acquitted,white people don't cheer
>>> about it.
>>
>>>> Please don't insult educated people by trying to defend Simpson.
>>
>>> I never would.
>>
>>> If black people want real "equality",then it shouldn't matter what
>>> racial makeup the jury is.
>>
>>> I suspect most blacks called for jury duty probably saw the OJ
>>> trial and truthfully stated they could not be impartial.
>>
>> The fact is, Simpson should have been put away long ago. They now
>> have another chance and I hope they make good. Also, this is not a
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> well sure; the law is when you can convict somebody on one charge not
> because of any evidence pro or con, but because you think he shouldn't
> have gotten off on another charge.
Worked for Al Capone ...
RD (The Sandman)
news:qoyzk.27982$IB6....@bignews8.bellsouth.net:
Who knows? ;)
tiny dancer
I knew I shouldn't have put the damn channel on to begin with.
td < slapping myself silly >
Ronald Helm
<tinyda...@nospamhotmail.com> wrote:
>
>What the hell? I thought the guy on Court TV said 'they'd be covering the
>live testimony in a moment'? I came back up to my sewing room and now that
>crappy Tru TV is on again. WTF is up with this?
>
>
>td
>
Does our once beloved Cour TV ever televise live trials since morphing
to TruTV?
Ron
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
cadf5b...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
That really is about the only fair way of doing it. Nearly everybody has
been brainwashed by the media into believing OJ was guilty 13 years ago.
Not me - i know the cops tried to frame him.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9B188F45D7073r...@216.168.3.70:
>
>>
>> I don't know it. Quite possible he did kill them. But the case
>> against him was not very strong, The state was caught repeatedly
>> planting evidence
>
> Oh? Who was caught planting evidence? Particularly repeatedly.
>
>
Furman. You don't believe those were OJ's gloves they found do you?? Do
you really believe OJ had the foresight to wear gloves and then proceeded
to lose BOTH gloves - one at the crime scene and the other at his own
house??. The two worst possible placed to lose them!!
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:54f636e4-e5b1-4862...@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
It wasn't speeding, you ignosaurus. It was going exceptionally slow which
proves it was NOT an escape attempt. THINK, you hater.
tiny dancer
Give me a break. For what purpose? OJ was a pisseed off wife-beater who
lost it.
BDK
@yahoo.com says...
I hope you're never on a jury, and never even a witness to anything more
important than jaywalking, as it seems that you're totally deranged.
Next you'll be telling us you know who the "real killer" was.
BDK
@yahoo.com says...
Who is he hating, you, or OJ?
I love you kooks, I wouldn't want to lose a single one of you.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
Cops frame people all the time, you idiot. Don't ask why. Cops are just
crazy.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:MPG.2339078f8...@news.buckeye-express.com:
>
> I hope you're never on a jury, and never even a witness to anything
> more important than jaywalking, as it seems that you're totally
> deranged.
>
> Next you'll be telling us you know who the "real killer" was.
HAHAHA. More namecalling from the board laughingstock.
tiny dancer
You are calling me an idiot? Yeah, that gives you lots of credibility.
Of course cops frame people all the time. But not in this case. Even the
'ugly-assed' shoes eventually showed up.
You do know OJ *confessed* to his former manager, don't you?
td
Scout
And with this in mind....tell me again why we want to impose all these
additional punishments you claim are needed?
Scout
<coughing from the smoke>
...... time for a new irony meter.......
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
wrote:
>
> So, we're waiting. Who's the 'real' killer?
I don't know. It may have been OJ. Could have been anyone. But i do
know the cops tried to frame him. Cops do that all the time and that's
why the media has been so harsh on OJ. The OJ trial exposed all the
police corruption and the govt told the media to NOT talk about
that.
z
wrote:
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> messagenews:Xns9B1AE7B24711Br...@216.168.3.70...
>
> >z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote in news:0e010a5e-c283-453d-b217-
> > cadf5b2ff...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> knock knock
> >> who's there?
> >> OJ
> >> OJ who?
> >> OK, you can be on the jury.
>
> > That really is about the only fair way of doing it. Nearly everybody has
> > been brainwashed by the media into believing OJ was guilty 13 years ago.
> > Not me - i know the cops tried to frame him.
>
> Give me a break. For what purpose? OJ was a pisseed off wife-beater who
> lost it.
it's pretty clear; cops framed him, and he was guilty. the
preponderance of evidence is in favor of both those propositions. most
likely: the cops framed him, BECAUSE he was guilty.
you can't tell me that doesn't happen a lot of the time; cops have a
damn good idea who's guilty, they know from past experience that a lot
of the evidence won't work in court, so they buff it up a little. on
the one hand, they're just trying to get criminals off the street and
are frustrated by what they see as dysfunctional court systems;
they're trying to protect the citizens. on the other hand, the courts
are just trying to make sure the innocent don't get railroaded by the
police either deliberately or by accident; they're trying to protect
the citizens. everybody means well, and as a result the whole thing
sucks. but not badly enough that we change things. the story of human
existence.
z
wrote:
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> messagenews:Xns9B1B6EBCD2B0Dr...@216.168.3.70...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "tiny dancer" <tinydancer...@nospamhotmail.com> wrote in
> >news:rVGzk.36458$De7....@bignews7.bellsouth.net:
>
> >> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote
> >> in messagenews:Xns9B1AE7B24711Br...@216.168.3.70...
> >>>z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote in news:0e010a5e-c283-453d-b217-
> >>> cadf5b2ff...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
>
> >>>> who's there?
> >>>> OJ
> >>>> OJ who?
> >>>> OK, you can be on the jury.
>
> >>> That really is about the only fair way of doing it. Nearly everybody
> >>> has been brainwashed by the media into believing OJ was guilty 13
> >>> years ago. Not me - i know the cops tried to frame him.
>
> >> Give me a break. For what purpose? OJ was a pisseed off wife-beater
> >> who lost it.
>
> > Cops frame people all the time, you idiot. Don't ask why. Cops are just
> > crazy.
>
> You are calling me an idiot? Yeah, that gives you lots of credibility.
>
> Of course cops frame people all the time. But not in this case. Even the
> 'ugly-assed' shoes eventually showed up.
>
> You do know OJ *confessed* to his former manager, don't you?
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
but the blood splatter evidence never made sense. i'm pretty familiar
with henry lee, and you really can't classify him as "soft on crime".
his observations/analysis of the blood splatter point only to somebody
adding it on way after the deed was done; and there wasn't any
effective counter to that from the prosecution.
of course that doesn't negate all the other evidence that does show
that oj was guilty. but once you've opened the jury's mind to the very
likely possibility that some of the evidence was obviously faked, it's
hard to keep them from wondering if maybe all the evidence was faked,
not so obviously.
z
> Next you'll be telling us you know who the "real killer" was.
>
bin laden has never provided an alibi for that day.
z
> z wrote:
> > On Sep 12, 9:00 pm, John-Pierre Pigglesworth <greet...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >> On 13 Sep 2008 00:56:17 GMT, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:
>
> >>> John-Pierre Pigglesworth <greet...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> >>>news:vm1mc4d152pp6e4qo...@4ax.com:
>
> >>>> <Real...@Check.it> wrote:
>
> >>>>> John-Pierre Pigglesworth wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
good point.
z
> >> OJ lives like a "white man", so why shouldn't he be tried like a
> >> "white man" ?
>
> > Because he's never proven that he can behave like one, that's why.
that's true; black murderers use knives a lot more often than white
murderers. shame on him.
Poetic Justice
RD (The Sandman)
Just who caught him planting those gloves? All you are doing is stating
a supposition.
BDK
@yahoo.com says...
Poor kooktard, living in a fantasy world.
BDK
4g...@earthlink.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
I quit buying them, even at a case at a time, I was running out of the
damn things. Too many kooktards blowing them up.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sep 15, 3:49 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>> z wrote:
>>> On Sep 12, 9:00 pm, John-Pierre Pigglesworth <greet...@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 13 Sep 2008 00:56:17 GMT, Jim Yanik <jya...@abuse.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>>> John-Pierre Pigglesworth <greet...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:vm1mc4d152pp6e4qo...@4ax.com:
>>
>>>>>> <Real...@Check.it> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> John-Pierre Pigglesworth wrote:
Of course it was.
z
i've heard that bin laden is secretly a muslim.
BDK
b171fb...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, gzuc...@snail-mail.net
says...
How can that be? Non kookpages say the same thing!!