Kenneth Bianchi's last will and testament
creepie
Bianchi would have said anything to gain sympathy rather than contempt,
leniency rather than justice. Most serial killers feel pity and
sympathy for only ONE soul on earth: themselves. Abuse certainly
contributes to criminal behavior, but it is hardly a valid excuse or
even an explanation. I would wager that thousands of people have had
identical abusive backgrounds to Bianchi's, some much, much worse, and
these individuals never brutally raped, tortured or murdered anyone.
In <19970108135...@ladder01.news.aol.com> jen1...@aol.com
(Jen1orbit) writes:
>
>Hello,
> The following is the text of a will that Kenneth Bianchi wrote
out
>after he was arrested and charged with being one half of the Hillside
>Strangler serial killing duo, but before his trial and conviction. I
don't
>know if the will is still valid, Kenneth might have updated or changed
it,
>but these are his exact words:
>
>"I, Kenneth A Bianchi, being of sound mind and body, do hereby write
this,
>my last will and testament. To my son Ryan I leave all my worldly
goods,
>as little as that may be, it goes to him with my deepest love. It is
>profound to me that I have had to experience more confusion and
mistrust
>and insincerity in society, if only the right people had been wise
enough
>to follow through with their responsibilities, during the years of
forming
>me into the mold of adulthood, I wouldn't be where I am now. There's a
>sadness in misunderstanding, an emptiness like a hollow egg. The egg
which
>can produce life in two ways, one in creation and one in sustenance
and
>not realizing the potential of either."
>
> I think Kenneth's words show a keen insight into the tragedy of
his
>own life, an understanding of how his child abuse contributed to his
>killings, and a factual statement of sadness/rage towards this
society.
>The fact that he wrote this out as a last will and testament, leads me
to
>believe that it genuinely states his deepest feelings and beliefs.
> Thank you, Kenneth, for briefly and eloquently summing up the
mindset
>of many serial killers, and dispelling the myth of serial killers
being
>some type of unfeeling monsters who are incapable of seeing their own
>lives and actions from a true perspective.
> JOE
Jen1orbit
D. Cool
jen1...@aol.com (Jen1orbit) wrote:
True perspective, you've gotta be kidding!!!!
I think Kenneth Bianci shows that he shifts the blame for his
unspeakable behaviour to those who were not "wise enough to follow
through with their responsibilities". What a crock of shit! Bianci's
rage at society is nothing compared to societies rage at him. What an
arrogant piece of shit to think he'll ever leave anything to his son
other than a lifetime of shame and embarrassment.
D. Cool
Jen1orbit
d_co...@innet.com (D. Cool) Wrote:
>True perspective, you've gotta be kidding!!!!
>I think Kenneth Bianci shows that he shifts the blame for his
>unspeakable behaviour to those who were not "wise enough to follow
>through with their responsibilities". What a crock of shit! Bianci's
>rage at society is nothing compared to societies rage at him. What an
>arrogant piece of shit to think he'll ever leave anything to his son
>other than a lifetime of shame and embarrassment.
>D. Cool
You are entitled to your negative opinions of Kenneth and his last
will and testament, but I never kid about things. IMHO, society has no
right to feel rage at Kenneth, because society created Kenneth. I know
people don't accept my societal responsibility arguments, but I believe
them to be completely accurate. But i'll spare you the whole explanation.
Bottom line, I feel that Kenneth very likely was justified in his rage at
society, and his last will & testament states his true feelings quite
eloquently. You want to condemn his actions, go ahead. I just don't see
how anybody can condemn him, on a personal basis. You have not lived,
since birth, the life of Kenneth Bianchi. You have lived the life of D.
Cool. So judge yourself however you see fit, and don't be arrogant enough
to pass judgement upon the true reality of Kenneth's life. That's my
perspective, obviously you and most other people feel absolutely entitled
to condemn Kenneth as a person. Oh well, do as you see fit. I'm sure
Kenneth did as he saw fit. JOE
Captain Scarlet
Jen1orbit wrote:
>
> I think Kenneth's words show a keen insight into the tragedy of his
> own life, an understanding of how his child abuse contributed to his
> killings, and a factual statement of sadness/rage towards this society.
If you think of human beings as nothing more than brainless puppets
that are molded and remote-controled by "society" then poor Ken would
be right...
Its so easy to blame "society" for a lack of self-control, but there
are millions of people who have endured tragedy or have been abused in
one way or another who don't have murderous lust fantasies.
Bianchi probably lured his victims to their death by using this
"genuine," "eloquent" and "deep" routine. It's about as sincere as Ted
Bundy's phony broken arm.
later
-b
CrimenCrim
"The following is the text of a will that Kenneth Bianchi wrote
out
after he was arrested and charged with being one half of the Hillside
Strangler serial killing duo, but before his trial and conviction. I don't
know if the will is still valid"
Bianchi has written quite a few of them, I believe the one you posted is
the first.
K -
Raving Dave
In article <19970108135...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,
jen1...@aol.com (Jen1orbit) wrote:
> I think Kenneth's words show a keen insight into the tragedy of his
> own life, an understanding of how his child abuse contributed to his
> killings, and a factual statement of sadness/rage towards this society.
You do know that you are delusional, don't you, Joe? I mean, what the fuck
do you know about Kenneth Bianchi? If we go along with your minimal
mindset, we could come to the conclusion that it's so great that his
parents abused him, that the Bianchis made Kenneth wear a dress and made
him give his mom cunninglingus because they had this "sadness/rage toward
this society...." Have you heard of the phrase "the cycle of shit?"
> Thank you, Kenneth, for briefly and eloquently summing up the mindset
> of many serial killers, and dispelling the myth of serial killers being
> some type of unfeeling monsters who are incapable of seeing their own
> lives and actions from a true perspective.
I have one word for you: sociopath.
Dave
Jen1orbit
I think the term "amoral soul dead person with a lot of justifiable
rage", would be a more accurate way of describing me. JOE
ScotChick1
Thank you, Kenneth, for briefly and eloquently summing up the mindset
of many serial killers, and dispelling the myth of serial killers being
some type of unfeeling monsters who are incapable of seeing their own
lives and actions from a true perspective.
Ah, so Kenny/Steve is the one you said we'd be surprised about when you
finally announced the next object of your affections, Sondra? Well, it
makes for good theatre, anyway.
Elestria
scotc...@aol.com (ScotChick1) wrote to JOE: Ah, so Kenny/Steve is the
one you said we'd be surprised about when you finally announced the next
object of your affections, Sondra? Well, it makes for good theatre,
anyway.
***
JOE is Jen1Orbit. I am SONDRA, screen name Elestria.
Ken Bianchi does happen to be on cordial terms with me, and in fact has
recently sent me some very interesting information about your patron saint
and the rest of your group there at C&C. But I am not working on Bianchi's
case, nor do any of the stories I am working on involve any "objects of
affections." The only object of my affections is Danny Rolling. Just
because I am working on other stories, having finished the Rolling story,
that does not mean my social life follows suit.
Clearly the intrigue of vicious gossip and malicious speculations attracts
your attention more than serious long-term first-person exclusive original
research into the subjects of your studies.
While we're on the subject of who is "really" who, perhaps you'd like to
comment on the "true identity" of LIZ SLACK, writing from Box 666 in
Danville, Illinois? I have the strangest feeling the pictures she's been
sending out to serial killers enclosed with her flirtatious letters look a
lot like YOU.
Good luck with your documentary, LIZ.
The Erisian Elestria
The rule is perfect: In all matters of opinion our adversaries are insane.
- Mark Twain
Elestria
dles...@earthlink.net wrote:
*Since you brought it up* -- a couple of weeks ago, (when you wrote me
that 7-part email/post message) you said that your engagement to Rolling
was off. You also said that Rolling didn't want to accept this and was
hoping you'd change your mind.
I have only been responding to things that you write about in the ng,
which is fair game. Therefore, my question is, when did Rolling become
the "only object of your affections" again, and how did he convince you
to try once more? Have you set the date?
***
Here we go with my personal life again. Nothing to do with true crime. I
did say we are no longer engaged. I also said our relationship continues
the same as ever. We have no plans for marriage.
Hopefully this is enough to satisfy your curiosity about this personal
matter.
SL
dles...@earthlink.net
Elestria wrote:
> The only object of my affections is Danny Rolling. Just
> because I am working on other stories, having finished the Rolling
dles...@earthlink.net
Elestria wrote:
>
> dles...@earthlink.net wrote:
> *Since you brought it up* -- a couple of weeks ago, (when you wrote me
> that 7-part email/post message) you said that your engagement to Rolling
> was off. You also said that Rolling didn't want to accept this and was
> hoping you'd change your mind.
> I have only been responding to things that you write about in the ng,
> which is fair game. Therefore, my question is, when did Rolling become
> the "only object of your affections" again, and how did he convince you
> to try once more? Have you set the date?
>
> Here we go with my personal life again. Nothing to do with true crime. I
> did say we are no longer engaged. I also said our relationship continues
> the same as ever. We have no plans for marriage.
>
> Hopefully this is enough to satisfy your curiosity about this personal
> matter.
Oh nooooooooo, you're not going to pin that one on me. I quote you
from your post from Jan.12th '97:
> The only object of my affections is Danny Rolling. Just
> because I am working on other stories, having finished the Rolling
> story that does not mean my social life follows suit.
For whatever reason (don't ask me why, call a shrink), *YOU* are the
one who continuously posts re: your "personal matters". I didn't ask
you, someone else did.
I'm gonna let you in on a little secret (shhhh) : when someone asks you
a personal question... You don't *have* to answer! It gets better: if
you think you're just gonna explode if you don't respond...
you can skip the posting in the ng and discuss your personal stuff only
in email!
Naturally, we're all aware that you *must* post. It's the only way to
plug and promote your favorite topic -- You.
As I stated earlier, I am only responding to the things *you* bring up
in your posts. As long as you relentlessly jabber on about your
personal crap and your self promotions; we'll be here, keeping you
honest. It's time to quit your whining about everybody else and take a
long look in the mirror.