On Monday, January 15, 2024 at 6:51:14 p.m. UTC-5, Zobovor wrote:
> THE TRANSFORMERS issue #43 is the first and last adaptation of a story from the Sunbow television series. It's entitled "The Big Broadcast of 2006," just like the 1986 third-season cartoon episode of the same name, and it was most likely a filler issue to allow Bob Budiansky to prepare for the planned second volume of TRANSFORMERS UNIVERSE. That second collection never materialized as such, but Bob got to take a month off writing the monthly comic anyway! (Many of the issues he wrote would eventually appear in the back pages of the comic book, so his work didn't completely go to waste.)
It is a shame that there was never a sequel to the Transformers Universe. I read and reread the Universe profiles so many times such that the comics fell apart. I read the Universe profiles more often than I read the Marvel comics or cartoon episodes. Those profiles slotted to the back pages of the comics were extremely inconvenient. Whoever wrote them was not as good as Budiansky. I'm surprised that, by 2024, no one still has not collected those back page profiles into a single book and filled in missing characters like Scorponok.
> The issue was printed on April 26, 1988, with a pull date of August 1988. As a frame of reference, the cartoon episode in question first aired on November 12, 1986, so the story was about seventeen months old by this point. Audiences had seen it on television a full year and a half prior to this issue being printed. Given that the third season of the show featured toys from 1985 and 1986, this issue was hardly a star vehicle for Hasbro's contemporary product line. Perhaps the nicest thing that can be said is that it did, at least, feature toys in the comic like Ultra Magnus and Wreck-Gar that Bob Budiansky steadfastly refused to incorporate into the regular comic book. Given that THE TRANSFORMERS: THE MOVIE already existed as a Marvel comic book adaptation, this issue works best as a sequel to that story, a follow-up to the "one possible future" exploits of the characters from the far-flung year 2005.
It would be a terrible sequel. I can think of better Season 3 episodes that would be a better sequel to the comic book adaption. One example would be Dark Awakening. However, it was implied in the comic adaption that Rodimus killed Galvatron when he threw him into a wall. Any sequel would have to explain how Galvatron survived that and the subsequent explosion of Unicron for those very, very, very, few readers who have not seen the cartoon.
> Herb Trimpe illustrated the front cover, but it's a fairly ugly rendition of Rodimus Prime and Galvatron fighting as rocks crumble all around them. Galvatron has disturbingly beady eyes, and he's missing the equipment on his back as well as his arm cannon. Rodimus is likewise missing the spoiler on his back, and for some reason he's wearing Princess Leia cinnamon buns on his head. I always thought that the cover art was supposed to entice potential readers and convince them to pick up the comic from the newsstands. But this is such a terrible piece of art.
I definitely agree. Herbe Trimpe was a great cover artist. His covers of Marvel TF #11 and #12 were great and dynamic. This is the worst cover he has done.
> The Quintessons dismiss the Junkions as a "herd of morons" who realize the Junkions fiercely defend their native planet, despite being made of worthless garbage. This is, at least, consistent with the reason why Wreck-Gar declared, "Stop, thief!" in THE TRANSFORMERS: THE MOVIE and attacked the Autobots after their shuttle crashed on Junkion and attempted to make repairs using the garbage on-hand. The Quintessons realize more subtlety will be required if they want to recover their lost canister. The Junkions are summoned by a signal from their television set-up. "Trust me, I know what I'm doing," one of them quips, the second such reference to Sledge Hammer! in this comic book. The Quintessons insert hypnotic commands into the broadcast signal, essentially making the Junkions their unwitting slaves. (It seems like there were a lot of stories in the 1980's about television enslaving the masses. I'm sure it was meant as a meta-commentary on the state of society. If this story had been written today, the Quintessons would have used TikTok.)
I can think of many things nowadays that are worse than TikTok. The corporate media in the United States is just as bad. Whether they are ABC, NBC, Fox, CNN, PBS and so on. They are all bad.
> I get that this is a filler issue, and was probably produced on a tight schedule, but there are so many sloppy artwork mistakes. When Omega Supreme arrives on Junkion, the dialogue balloon saying "The Autobots—here? This is indeed the promised land!" is attributed to Omega Supreme instead of Galvatron. When Rodimus Prime and Galvatron square off, and Rodimus quips, "A scrapyard... an appropriate place for you to meet your end, Galvatron!" it's Cyclonus who is drawn responding, "You're the one who will be junk, Rodimus Prime!" Also, a new line of Rodimus dialogue is added: "I've defeated you before, Galvatron, when we fought in the machineworld, Unicron! And I can do it again!" suggesting that this is literally the first time Rodimus and Galvatron have met since The Transformers: the Movie, evidently ignoring the other twenty-one other cartoon episodes that took place between the movie and this one that DIDN'T receive Marvel Comics adaptations.
The Big Broadcast of 2006 was the only cartoon episode in which Rodimus and Galvatron came to blows. There was also only one other episode in which they fought; that was Starscream's Ghost but the fight was off-screen. So, they may have met many times before but they never fought until then.
Maybe that's why the decision makers behind the Marvel Comics picked this episode to adapt: they wanted an episode in which they fought and it was only this episode.
> In the aftermath, the Autobots have no idea what happened, and the Junkions are also clueless. The Quintessons realize their journal is still tumbling into space, and the information it contains could potentially ruin them if anyone learns what's inside it. It's an incredibly unsatisfying resolution to what was not originally intended as a one-part story. The contents of the canister were revealed in the episode "The Quintesson Journal," but that story was never adapted by Marvel Comics, making this story, essentially, a teaser that never goes anywhere. Within the context of the comic, we never actually find out what the canister is, or why it's so important. A fully self-contained story would have made a much better adaptation!
Agreed. That is one of the many reasons why they chose poorly when they decided on Big Broadcast of 2006 to adapt. I liked the episode because of the cultural references. Any episodes with Wreck-Gar in it would be good because he tends to use cultural references. But it was not a good episode to pick as a sequel to The Movie comics.
> Also, speaking strictly from a marketing standpoint, all the characters featured in this issue were no longer being produced as toys. If the true purpose of the cartoon and comic book was to get kids to buy Transformers toys, then it made little sense to feature characters like Rodimus Prime, Ultra Magnus, the Sharkticons, etc. who were no longer in toy stores by 1988. Even if this issue made you really want to own Rodimus or Galvatron (for some reason), you were already out of luck.
This was the most baffling filler issue ever. It was completely out of the blue, didn't fit with what was going on in the comics, had characters that did not appear in the comics before or since. The two UK issues that filled in Marvel TF #33, #34 were baffling for the same reasons but at least the decision-makers presented them as examples of the UK comic for US readers to enjoy and why they chose them. This issue they didn't even bother to present or explain why. It's just there as a filler.
Unlike the two UK filler issues, they went to the trouble of getting a writer and artist to do this filler. Why not just pick a current character to write about and call it a day like they did with Marvel TF #16? I would like to know why the decision-makers decided to adapt a year-old episode and why they picked this one.
> Curiously, this wasn't the only cartoon episode planned for a Marvel Comics adaptation. Work was done, at one point, on adapting the cartoon story "The Dweller in the Depths" for a Marvel issue, but work on the issue was halted for some reason (perhaps due to the lackluster response to this issue!) and the issue was never completed. We didn't even know about this at all until Marvel inker Dave Hunt was selling off some completed pages in 2015.
Holy crap. I didn't know this. That is very interesting! Even after 40 years I am still learning new things about G1. I am still waiting for someone to reveal why cartoon and toy Galvatron have completely different colour schemes. Can someone finally explain that after 40 years?
> Zob (seriously, I would have been fine without this issue entirely)
Me too. Worst TF cover ever, bad art, bad adaptation of a good episode, inconclusive ending and so on. Can't think of anything good to say about it.