On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 9:56:06 PM UTC-4, Zobovor wrote:
> On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 11:55:58 AM UTC-6, Iaclonus Warp wrote:
>
> People who come to BotCon and go, "that was 30 years ago, don't remember, sorry" are obviously not invested in their craft.
Fair point... though, in some cases, you can't really fault them for wanting to talk about current projects and update fans on their latest exploits (OTOH... with the prices that a lot of guests charge for signatures these days, maybe it's *not* that unreasonable for them to just be expected to talk about the subject of the convention... though, for the record, Mr. Dille signed stuff for free).
I think things are different between actors and writers, too. Some actors seem to have worked on so many different shows back then that they forgot most of the dialogue a few days after recording the episode. Even though the writers were reportedly blitzing through the scripts at a breakneck pace, they really did seem to relish the opportunities for creative world-building that TFs, in particular, afforded them (IIRC, the Earl Kress interview from the Rhino DVDs also attested to this). So it's understandable that they'd still have fond, vivid memories of that time period... Mr. Dille described it as almost a renaissance of syndicated animation, when the sheer volume and popularity of "toaster shows" (i.e. cartoons designed to sell product... in Dille vernacular, the opposite of "squishy shows"-- Looney tunes etc.) created a unique level of creative freedom... which is how we ended up with the gonzo genius of stuff like "Inhumanoids", which Mr. Dille said was his favourite creation of the era...
> > All of the wildlife seen on Quintessa in TFTM is the result of Quintesson
> > experimentation... so not just the Sharkticons and Quintesson guards, but all
> > the marine life, as well...
>
> That's interesting. I wonder if they can all transform? All the little fishies and squids and such?
Yeah, it was the lack of obvious alt-modes that had me thinking that the squid et al. were proper indigenous life of the planet. But I guess they may indeed have transformation capabilities. Then again, since the Quintessons weren't actually the ones who imbued the Cybertronians with transformation, we shouldn't necessarily assume that all of their later creations would have the ability.
Come to think of it, it *is* a little odd that the Sharkticons and Guards *can* transform... I guess the Quints just independently thought it was a cool idea sometime in the last 11 million years...? Or they could have been watching Cybertron for a few eons and been inspired by the Autobots... only to lose track of their surveillance sometime before they started searching for Cybertronians around 2005...
> Somewhere on the Interwebs, you can find a concept drawing that Floro Dery put together (presumably for The Transformers: the Movie) of planet Cybertron in its robot mode.
>
> Wait, here we go:
>
>
http://tinyurl.com/cybertron-robot
Sweet! I... can't remember if I've seen that before. Feels vaguely familiar.
I especially like the random-crap-repurposed-as-a-pseudo-sword accessory (what *is* that? A massive underground ore deposit?)... reminds me of a Beast Machines non-show Maximal...
> It would have been a lot less vague if they had gone with some of the early lines from the script instead of fiddling and tampering with it endlessly. In an early draft, during the scene when Galvatron is battling Hot Rod inside the depths of Unicron's innards, he says something like, "Wait! Would you extinguish me without knowing my name? My true name is...MEGATRON!"
Come to think of it, it *is* rather strange that Megatron would just let himself be re-named without so much as a complaint. Always seemed extremely proud of his name...
> > Mr. Dille would not comment as to which of the two Cycloni created by Unicron
> > is, in fact, the "real" one. He said that either Bombshell or Skywarp could
> > be the genuine article, and that fans are free to make their own decision...
>
> I really don't think it has to be an either/or scenario. I've come to accept that they're both the "real" Cyclonus, just as much as all three Reflector robots are the "real" Reflector. (Not saying both Cyclonuses have a shared mind like Reflector, though I guess it's possible.) We saw two Cyclonuses on screen in The Transformers: the Movie, and in "Five Faces of Darkness," so why are we so quick to dismiss it?
I appreciate the objectivity of that interpetation, but it just feels... messy.
The Sweeps are clearly meant to be the horde of duplicates. Cyclonus having a clone that's never clearly acknowledged in the script seems so unnecessary and incongruous... I'd be much happier to just think of Scourge and the Sweeps as the "Armada" to which Unicron is referring...
... though I will admit that there's a certain charm to concluding that the two different voice actors and animation models are owing to the fact that Cyclonus was really two different guys all the way through Season 3... a certain maddening, convoluted charm...
> > Speaking of Insecticons getting reformatted, Mr. Dille *did* confirm that the
> > multitudinous nature of the Sweeps was due to the fact that they were
> > originally created from Insecticon clones.
>
> Hhh. See, this one kind of rubs me the wrong way. The clones never spoke or transformed to robot mode at any point during the first or second season, so the Insecticons we saw in the movie must have been the originals. And, if you want to get really picky, both Shrapnel and Bombshell were required to generate the clones, and Bombshell did not get turned into a Sweep! Still, the clone theory is a popular one and it does make sense on some levels.
To be clear, Mr. Dille didn't explicitly state that the *original* Shrapnel and Kickback were *not* the ones being reformatted into Sweeps. I just like to entertain the possibility that they were just clones, to account for the later appearances of the Insecticons in TFTM and beyond (though *those* guys could also just as easily be leftover clones... if you choose to believe that they would survive Shrapnel's death).
> > Plus, he alluded to Mr. Kasem having a reputation for being rather
> > belligerent (or, at the very least... prickly) during recording sessions, so
> > there's probably a *lot* more to the story...
>
> Everything I've read about Kasem suggests that he was a difficult, cantankerous primadonna. He made all these demands about making Shaggy from Scooby-Doo into a vegetarian, and quit the role when Hanna-Barbera wouldn't comply. (And then resumed the role when Hanna-Barbera gave in, but that's a whole 'nother story.)
Wow... I had not heard that bit... I had tended to think of Mr. Kasem as the marginalized victim in the whole Carbombya debacle (though mildly xenophobic humour at the expense of despots *was* a lot more palatable to mainstream audiences in 1986)... but that, combined with Mr. Dille's comments, really casts it in a new light...
> Zob (you DO mean Iaclonus Shell, don't you?) #pokeabearwithasharpstickandrun
Naw naw... I'm fully tolerant of both options, these days... chacun a son gout...
J (... <suppressed ominous eye twitch>...<gathering beads of forehead sweat>...)