The Secret Behind the Secret (from skeptic.com)
Eric Python
What is Attracting Millions to the Law of Attraction?
by Ingrid Hansen Smythe
Psst! Have you heard The Secret? If not, the first thing you need to know is
that The Secret isn’t a secret, and this in itself should set your skeptical
alarm bells ringing, since whenever the very name of a thing is a contradiction
of the thing itself, it is easy to imagine that the bridge up ahead may be
washed out.
The Secret is a simple New-Age notion that is the subject of a recent and wildly
successful book by Rhonda Byrne and DVD by Rhonda Byrne of Prime Time
Productions. The secret is “The Law of Attraction” that asserts what you think
creates what you feel, and these feelings flow from your body as magnetic energy
waves over vast distances, which then cause the universe around you to vibrate
at the same energy level as your feelings. If your feelings are negative,
negative experiences will inevitably flow right back, positive feelings elicit
positive experiences. Like attracts like. “Thoughts are sending out that
magnetic signal that is drawing the parallel back to you. It always works; it
works every time, with every person.”1 Thus there is no such thing as accident
or coincidence; it is you, the individual, who brings misery on yourself because
of your toxic thinking. But the good news, Eeyore, is this: if you can only
alter your thoughts, and therefore your feelings, you can actually cause the
universe around you to vibrate at a positive energy level and the desires of
your heart will come to be realized! All you have to do is Ask — Believe —
Receive.2 You just have to visualize what you want, feel good about it, and then
ask the universe (and ask once only, oh ye of little faith) — and whatever you
can imagine can be yours. “This is like having the universe as your catalogue
and you flip through it and go, ‘Well I’d like to have this experience and I’d
like to have that product and I’d like to have a person like that’ … It is you
just placing your order with the universe. It’s really that easy … [Just] start
to have different beliefs like there is more than enough in the universe,
everything goes right for me … have the belief ‘I’m not getting older, I’m
getting younger.’ We can create it the way we want it.”3
This is excellent news indeed for those of us who previously thought that
something like aging was not optional. There are 100 assertions that constitute
the backbone of The Law of Attraction,4 including:
• Whatever is going on in your mind is what you are attracting.
• Thought = creation. If these thoughts are attached to powerful emotions (good or bad) that speeds the creation.
• Those who speak most of illness have illness, those who speak most of prosperity have it, etc.
• It’s OK that thoughts don’t manifest into reality immediately (if we saw a picture of an elephant and it instantly appeared, that would be too soon).
• Everything in your life you have attracted. Accept that fact; it’s true.
• You get exactly what you are feeling.
• What you think and what you feel and what actually manifests is always a match — no exception.
• You don’t need to know how the universe is going to rearrange itself.
• How long??? No rules on time; the more aligned you are with positive feelings the quicker things happen.
• Size is nothing to the universe (unlimited abundance if that’s what you wish). We make the rules on size and time.
• If you turn it over to the universe, you will be surprised and dazzled by what is delivered. This is where magic and miracles happen.
• The Hows are the domain of the universe. It always knows the quickest, fastest, most harmonious way between you and your dream.
• Our job is not to worry about the “How”. The “How” will show up out of the commitment and belief in the “what”.
• We are mass energy. Everything is energy. Everything.
• An affirmative thought is 100 times more powerful than a negative one.5
One needn’t quarrel with the psychology behind some of The Secret’s hysterically
cheery rah-rah motivational coaching. For instance, their “Don’t Be A Negative
Sourpuss” philosophy has its roots in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, a
psychological approach to altering maladaptive, unrealistic, and negative
thoughts in an effort to change feelings and, as a result, behavior. It is
hardly revolutionary to claim that attitude and negative feeling-states can have
an impact on goal attainment. Who among us has not had the experience of trying
to accomplish some task, only to fall prey to our Inner Idiot who keeps telling
us, “You’ll never learn this,” or “You’re an impostor,” or “You hate this,” and
these irrelevant messages lead to avoidance of the task, depression, and the
dreaded self-fulfilling prophecy. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy can help rid the
individual of unhelpful self-talk, and this inevitably leads to more successful
living — no supernatural intervention required.
Imagining that we are like magnets is not an especially harmful mental exercise
in metaphorical thinking, but when metaphor slips into metaphysics, problems
with The Secret become glaringly apparent. The Secret relies heavily on fuzzy
thinking, and nowhere is this fuzziness demonstrated better than by the fact
that The Secret is actually proposing two completely different systems for
achieving one’s goals and then blurring the line between those systems — in
effect, selling the system that works on the back of the one that doesn’t. On
the one hand, we are told that all that is required to get what we desire is to
ask, believe, and receive. For example: A little boy wants a bike, he believes
he will get a bike, he gets a bike (as dramatized in The Secret DVD). On the
other hand, we are told that we can’t merely ask, believe, receive. “A lot of
people watch The Secret and they say, ‘Well, I’m sitting around visualizing my
millions coming into my lap.’ Well, they’ll come take your furniture away. And
then how are you going to visualize [when you’re living] on the curb? You’ve got
to act on it.”6 So, a little boy wants a bike, he gets a paper route to earn
money to get a bike, he gets a bike. In the first scenario, the supernatural is
required. In the second scenario, a paper-route is required. The second scenario
is the one that most of us recognize as the only one that will actually work, in
which a person has an “idea,” then acts on that idea, and then gets the desired
results. The second system renders irrelevant the first system.
The testimonial of the editor of the Chicken Soup for the Soulbooks, Jack
Canfield, provides an excellent example of the first system
(ask-believe-receive) getting the credit for the second system
(idea-action-results). He tells us that he visualized earning $100,000 (even
writing the desired amount on a bill worth far less and tacking it to the
ceiling above his bed) and focused his mental energy only on the goal of
attaining the money. He tells us that he had absolutely no idea how he was going
to get the money — he simply focused on believing that he would get the money,
somehow. But how? For four weeks he had no breakthrough ideas but then, one day
in the shower, he remembered that he had written a book and, if it was published
(particularly if he sold 400,000 copies and he made a quarter on each) he just
might achieve his financial goals. Of course the book was published, and the
results were only a few thousand dollars shy of 100,000 dollars.7
Mr. Canfield attributes his success to knowing and applying the principles of
The Secret — he literally attracted 100,000 dollars through good feelings,
positive energy, and the power of visualization. Is it possible, however, that
this is a misattribution, and that the actual reason for his success is that he
suddenly remembered that he had written a book, got it published, and
subsequently earned money from it? You know, the way all other authors do it.
The post hoc ergo propter hoc (after this therefore because of this) fallacy
would appear to be working overtime in the minds of enthusiastic Secreteers. “It
happened because I wished for it,” the Secreteer would say, instead of the more
obvious explanation, “It happened because I worked for it.”8
Perhaps the believer in The Law of Attraction imagines that to use both systems
in conjunction is more powerful than using just the one. It seems to me that
this is like a woman using some form of birth control and then lying back and
affirming “I will not get pregnant! I will not get pregnant!” It seems obvious
that it is the birth control, and not the positive thinking, that is getting the
job done. Certainly affirmations alone do nothing to prevent pregnancy — any
woman who believes otherwise is undoubtedly a mother. The Secreteers seem to
think that positive affirmations and happy feelings affect the probability of an
occurrence, but it would seem that the only odds that are being improved in the
above example are the odds of having a pretty lousy time.
Other lines are also expertly blurred by the editors of The Secret DVD. For
example, we are shown a man visualizing himself attracting a car and — no
surprises here — magically getting the car. But here an objection arises — if
everybody knows The Secret, won’t there be a mad dash for all the good stuff and
no one will get anything? Not to worry. Not everyone wants the same things, we
are told — and here there is a visual of an Indian snake charmer, followed by a
little Chinese woman in a boat with a bunch of domestic fowl. Apparently, the
Indian man and the Chinese woman don’t want a car. (“We don’t all want BMWs,” we
are told, and this is undoubtedly correct.9 Some people want Hummers.) “The
truth is there’s more than enough good to go around. There’s more than enough
creative ideas, there’s more than enough power, there’s more than enough love,
there’s more than enough joy.”10 So in one breath we’re talking about attracting
a car — with the next breath we’re suddenly talking about attracting love and
joy and other emotions sans wheels or an engine. Add to the above the following
quote: “Wise people have always known this … Why do you think that 1% of the
population earns around 96% of all the money that’s being earned? Do you think
that’s an accident? It’s no accident. It’s designed that way. They understand
something. They understand The Secret.”11 Ah, there it is then. It is the wise
people who have the money and the BMWs. Are we to conclude that the Indian man
and the Chinese woman are fools? The deeply offensive racial overtones are hard
to ignore, as are the sexist slurs — for instance, during the delivery of the
above quotation, the visual is of a boardroom full of white, cigar-smoking male
executives. Evidently social inequality and injustice, a lack of resources,
several thousand years of patriarchy, oppression and inequality between the
sexes — all the usual explanations as to why people don’t have money are
incorrect. Social factors are irrelevant in a world where “You are the only one
who creates your reality. It is only you; every bit of it you.”12
What about the scientific claims upon which The Law of Attraction is based? Such
as: Our thoughts are magnetic and travel as energy and vibration for vast
distances. “It has been proven scientifically that an affirmative thought is
hundreds of times more powerful than a negative thought.”13 “It is no more
difficult to attract on a scientific level something that we consider huge to
something we consider infinitesimally small.”14 “Our physiology creates disease
to give us feedback, to let us know we have an imbalanced perspective and we’re
not loving and we’re not grateful.”15 “Even under a microscope you’re an energy
field.”16 “You’ve got enough power in your body to illuminate a whole city for
nearly a week.”17 These are extraordinary claims that surely require
extraordinary evidence, which The Secreteers do by using the word “science” over
and over, as if merely saying the word is the same as doing it — as if feeling
good about science will attract more science into your life.
“Quantum physics really begins to point to [The Secret],” says a proponent of
The Law of Attraction. “It says that you can’t have universe without mind
entering into it. The mind is actually shaping the very thing that is being
perceived.”18 Here, then, we have an authority on the subject telling us that
our minds create reality. First, however, it seems obvious that a universe
without sentient minds perceiving it is entirely possible, given that this was
the story on Earth for the first 13 billion years. Second, it would seem that
this particular proponent of The Law of Attraction is using an understanding of
quantum physics based more on the questions that Schrödinger was trying to
answer, rather than on the answers themselves. Does the mind of the observer
truly shape reality as claimed? After all it is true that, at the quantum level,
a scientist has great difficulty recording and measuring particles and their
interactions without changing the results of the investigation. Is this because
the scientist’s mind is influencing the experiment? Is it because the scientist
perceived the experiment and, as a result of perceiving, changed the results?
No. The answer is far more mundane. To put it in crudely simplistic terms, as
soon as the scientist switches on the light to see what’s going on, other
particles, like photons, get in the way. It is the photons that are responsible
for messing up the results, not the thoughts of the experimenter.19 This
explanation has the obvious disadvantage of being extremely boring and must be
ruled out on the basis that it doesn’t support the “create your own reality”
claim.
Besides scientific gibberish, The Secret DVD props up faltering dogma by relying
on charismatic representatives and a lot of smooth talk, which is so expert and
cleverly edited it is easy to miss the false premises, tautologies, red
herrings, straw men, non sequiturs, and other varieties of fuzzy thinking.
However, even if The Law of Attraction was logically consistent and
scientifically sound, the moral implications of a Law such as this are alarming.
Interestingly, some of the difficulties with The Law of Attraction are similar
to those encountered by believers in The Law of Karma, and comparing and
contrasting the two yields some curious insights.20
It is the business of both laws to explain why good and evil befall us, and both
laws come to the conclusion that the fault is exclusively ours. In neither
system can there be accident or coincidence — we are all at all times getting
exactly what we deserve, and what we have attracted.21 The Law of Attraction
seems particularly suited to the modern temperament though, given that with
karma, you might have to wait a thousand lifetimes to get the good things you
deserve, whereas with The Law of Attraction everything is possible in this
lifetime. No waiting! Better service! The Law of Attraction might be said to be
the lazy person’s karma, since karma is based on doing, whereas the Law of
Attraction is based on feeling. This is also handy for the modern American, who
is quite busy enough as it is. In addition, karma is concerned exclusively with
morality (specifically good and evil deeds), but The Law of Attraction is
concerned only with positive feeling vibrations, which needn’t necessarily be
connected to pesky morality at all.22
When dealing with instances of extraordinary evil, however, both The Law of
Karma and The Law of Attraction break down rather spectacularly. Imagine a
particularly hideous situation — a healthy young girl is raped and tortured,
hacked to pieces, her remains stuffed into a plastic bag and thrown in the
trash. What the believer in karma is forced to admit, as morally repugnant as it
may be, is that this girl deserved what happened to her. There is no innocent
suffering in a universe where we all, at all times, are getting what we deserve.
The believer in karma must also conclude that this event is in some sense good
because this girl rid herself of an enormous amount of bad karma and is bound to
come back to a glorious life next time around. Likewise, a philosophy that
claims we are always getting what we ask for, and that nothing is accidental,
must also believe that this girl in some sense deserved what happened to her
because she attracted this evil to her. (Remember the law: “Everything in your
life you have attracted. Accept that fact; it’s true.”) One might protest that a
young girl has not yet developed the “magnetic powers” to attract anything to
her — but one must then ask at what age do these powers develop, and does it
really make the situation any less tragic? If a 12-year-old boy can attract a
shiny new bike, can a 12-year-old girl attract a rapist and killer? It would
seem the answer is yes, since there are 12-year-old girls who come to such a
brutal demise. Perhaps, though, 12 is too young to attract such powerful evil;
is it really better, though, if we imagine the rape, dismembering, and
plastic-bag-stuffing of a 25-year-old woman? A 35-year-old mother of three? A
grandmother? Can we really feel comfortable ever saying that people attract
fatal accidents, illness, trauma, and death?
It gets worse, for what can the believer in karma or The Law of Attraction
possibly say about an event such as the Holocaust? Again, the believer in karma
is forced to say that each and every individual got what he or she deserved and
that karmic justice was served. “Whatever one deserves … he deserves by virtue
of his actions and he gets all that he deserves and only that which he deserves.
Nothing which accrues to a doer on account of his actions is ever lost and
nothing accrues to him on account of anything other than his actions.”23 What
about those who hold the belief that, through your feeling-state, you attract
either positive or negative events? Here is a little visualization for the
believer in the Law of Attraction: Imagine looking each of those six million
Jews in the eye and telling every one of them that due to the negative
feeling-states they were each projecting, they were all, in effect, asking for
it. They got what was coming to them because, “What you think and what you feel
and what actually manifests is always a match — no exception.”
The Secreteers say that “There is no such thing as coincidence… Everything
happens by principles and laws in our universe.”24 How can this be true in the
face of such evil? Does The Law of Attraction simply not apply in some cases?
Why not? Why does the believer in this alleged “law” jump to credit The Law of
Attraction for a little boy magically receiving a bike from the universe, or for
a motivational speaker landing a spot on the Oprah show, but fail to mention
dead girls stuffed into plastic bags or six million Jews butchered in
concentration camps? Is The Law of Attraction really a law at all? The Secret’s
proponents want to claim for it the unchanging status of a physical law of the
universe. “Just as there is a law of gravity — if you fall off a building it
doesn’t matter whether you’re a good person or a bad person you’re gonna hit the
ground.”25 Thus, if the Law of Attraction is also a physical law, it cannot be
suspended to allow for events such as the Holocaust. Pity the believer in The
Law of Attraction, therefore, who is in the unenviable position of having both
to congratulate a little boy on attracting a bike, and also explain to all those
other unfortunates that, due to their negative feelings, they attracted an
airplane piloted by terrorists, a tsunami, muscular sclerosis, cancer, genocide.
Given the moral defects, the lack of scientific backing, and the various
philosophical shortcomings, how is it that a significant number of people still
believe there’s something to The Law of Attraction? Part of the reason must
certainly be the powerful testimonials coming from celebrity figures such as
Oprah Winfrey, a woman who attributes her success to her mighty powers of
attraction, and not to the stupefyingly enormous Oprah industry which she, and
many thousands of others have worked so hard to put in place.
One might conclude, Well so what? What harm is there in believing in things that
are not literally true as long as the desired result is achieved? The harm is
great, I think, and no one has given voice to these concerns better than W.K.
Clifford in his essay The Ethics of Belief:
The danger to society is not merely that it should believe wrong things, though
that is great enough; but that it should become credulous, and lose the habit of
testing things and inquiring into them, for then it must sink back into
savagery… It may matter little to me, in my cloud-castle of sweet illusions and
darling lies; but it matters much to Man that I have made my neighbors ready to
deceive. The credulous man is father to the liar and the cheat.26
The Law of Attraction cannot admit doubt or skepticism. If one begins to doubt
the power, or even to harbor negative thoughts in one’s unconscious mind, one is
assuredly on the road to ruin.27 The Law of Attraction requires uncritical
acceptance of, and unwavering belief in, a doctrine that has been revealed by
alleged authorities, which is interpreted literally, not metaphorically, and is
at the extreme end of credulity. It is just another kind of magical thinking
and, worse, another brand of fundamentalism.
Resources & notes
1. Joe Vitale and Bob Proctor, The Secret DVD, 2006.
2. Rhonda Byrne, speaking on the Oprah show, 8 February, 2007.
3. Joe Vitale, The Secret DVD, 2006.
4. Assertion: a positive statement, usually made without an attempt to furnish
evidence. (Collins English Dictionary, p. 89)
5. These assertions are listed at www.universallawstoday.com, but they have been
reproduced on dozens of other websites.
6. James Arthur Ray, The Oprah show, 8 February 2007.
7. Jack Canfield, The Secret DVD.
8. In another instance, an advocate of The Law tells us that he posted a picture
of his dream home on what he calls his “vision board”, forgot about it, found
the vision board five years later, and was astounded to discover that the home
he was currently living in matched the one he had visualized. This does sound
amazing, except that he also tells us that he spent an entire year renovating
the house that is currently his dream home. The question, therefore, is this: is
he living in his dream home because he wished it, or because he renovated it?
9. Joe Vitale, The Secret DVD.
10. Michael Beckwith, The Secret DVD.
11. Bob Proctor, The Secret DVD.
12. Esther Hicks, The Secret DVD. Imagine the fellow in the DVD who claims that
“Wealth is a mindset,” speaking to an open-air audience in Calcutta or
Bangladesh or Rwanda. What would the reaction of the crowd be to this message?
The image that instantly leaps to my mind is of an angry mob running down a man
in an Armani suit as he sprints to the safety of his private jet.
13. Michael Beckwith, The Secret DVD. “Powerful in what way?” one wants to ask.
If I affirm, for example, that there is an elephant in my garden shed, by
affirming it have I increased the likelihood of its existence there by 100?
14. Mike Dooley, The Secret DVD.
15. John F. Demartini, The Secret DVD. If disease exists to teach us to be more
loving and grateful, one has to wonder why even dinosaurs got bone cancer.
16. James Arthur Ray, The Secret DVD. A claim such as this suggests that Mr. Ray
has never actually looked through a microscope. If he had, he would have seen
matter, not energy. The Secreteers are fond of saying that everything is energy,
and back this up with the equation E=MC2. Equivalence, however, is not the same
as identity. (No one would confuse wood with heat, or gasoline with flames, or
cars with motion. Another example: ice and water can be converted each into the
other; nevertheless, although you can walk on the former, no number of positive
affirmations will enable you to walk on the latter.) What Einstein’s equation
shows is simply that one can be transmuted into the other under extreme
conditions, such as exist in the core of the sun.
17. Bob Proctor, The Secret DVD. Children who have visited a science center with
a stationary bike attached to a generator soon discover that they barely have
enough energy to power a 40 watt bulb for even a short time, let alone an entire
city for a week. Perhaps Mr. Proctor is referring to brain waves, which are so
weak they require electrodes attached to the skull to measure them, and
therefore seem even more unlikely to provide much illumination. Perhaps Mr.
Proctor is referring to the burning of a body, which would undoubtedly light up
a small section of a city — but not for a week. Perhaps Mr. Proctor is referring
to “psychic” energy which frustratingly, like imaginary energy, cannot be
scientifically measured, tested, quantified, controlled, or studied. Still, no
matter what kind of energy this is, if it is as powerful as Mr. Proctor claims,
I say bring it on — especially if it is devoid of carbon emissions.
18. Alan Wolf, The Secret DVD.
19. “The Secreteers are alluding, obliquely, to the collapse of a wave function
when items in a quantum entangled state are observed. There is no doubt that
unexpected results have been surprising physicists for a hundred years, when it
comes to the very small, and that it is fiendishly difficult to measure
interactions between elementary particles because the measuring apparatus has to
be taken into account. However, it is by no means clear that the collapse of a
wave function in anything more than a convenient mathematical metaphor for
something which we can explain with equations, but not with words (although
David Z. Albert does a creditable job of trying in Quantum Mechanics and
Experience. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992). Furthermore, the
leap from being able to influence an electron going through one of two slits to
being able to influence an entire mail-order universe is unquantifiably vast.
Surprising effects that work reliably well at the very small (such as electron
tunneling, the foundation of semiconductors) utterly fail to work at the very
large (such as BMW tunneling, in which a fully-formed BMW disappears from the
factory and appears in your driveway, merely because you asserted that you
wanted one).” Steve Hansen Smythe, from private email correspondence.
20. The word karma is derived from the Sanskrit verb meaning “to act, do, bring
about,” and means that “one makes something by doing something; one creates by
acting.” Thus karma denotes “the impersonal and transethical system under which
one’s current situation in the world is regarded as the fruit of seeds planted
by one’s behavior and dispositions of the past, and the view that all of one’s
present actions lie similar seeds that will have continuing and determinative
effect on one’s life as they bear fruit in the future.” (William K. Mahony,
“Karman” in The Encyclopedia of Religion, Vol. 8. New York: Macmillan Publishing
Co., 1987, p. 262.)
21. Since individuals are constantly interacting with one another, this means
that there is an inconceivably intricate dance of billions of people (and,
possibly, animals, since many of them are capable of positive and negative
emotions), interacting in ways that fulfill the requirements of The Law at all
times. Surely the composition of such a dance would be a mind-boggling task for
even the most accomplished choreographer. And what happens if I believe in The
Law of Attraction, and reap the benefits from it, but my husband, with whom I
live, doesn’t believe? Or what if he does believe in The Law but is clinically
depressed and is incapable of generating happy feelings? Does he get to live in
my mansion and drive my BMW?
22. A psychotic killer might feel very good upon terminating his victim, but
good feelings can be created by morally questionable activities even by those of
us who are not criminally insane. An example of this is amply demonstrated in
The Secret DVD, in which a girl is shown laughing with glee at her pet — a cat,
who has his head stuck in a small bag and is backing up and shaking his head in
an attempt to get the thing off. The girl thinks this is hilarious, and her
laughter is apparently generating good feelings which will bring more good
things into her life — but what is the experience of the cat? It is one of
distress, and it is this distress which the girl is using to generate her own
positive feelings. Is it ever ethical to use another creature’s discomfort to
further one’s own ends? Who cares? The Law is about feeling good, not about
being good.
23. Rajendra Prasad, Karma Causation and Retributive Morality. New Delhi:
Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, 1989, p. 215.
24. James Arthur Ray, The Oprah show.
25. Michael Beckwith, The Secret DVD.
26. W.K. Clifford. Lectures and Essays, Vol. II. London: Macmillan and Co.,
1879, pp. 185–186.
27. “You end up attracting to you the predominant thoughts that you’re holding
in your awareness, whether those thoughts are conscious or unconscious — that’s
the rub.” Michael Beckwith, The Secret DVD.