Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Flotsam and Jetsam
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Ivan Shmakov
Jun 24, 2012, 2:24:38 AM6/24/12
to
>>>>> John Blomberg <insi...@gmail.com> writes:
> http://www.pledgemusic.com/projects/flotsamandjetsam
> http://www.flotsam-and-jetsam.com/
> New Album: "Ugly Noise"
> Welcome to the Future of Music! We're recording a new album and want
> you to be a part of it!
[...]
I've made a mention of this ongoing project on the Wikipedia
page [1], and hope someone could check if it's correct.
TIA.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=499093194&oldid=493774822
--
FSF associate member #7257
> http://www.pledgemusic.com/projects/flotsamandjetsam
> http://www.flotsam-and-jetsam.com/
> New Album: "Ugly Noise"
> Welcome to the Future of Music! We're recording a new album and want
> you to be a part of it!
[...]
I've made a mention of this ongoing project on the Wikipedia
page [1], and hope someone could check if it's correct.
TIA.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=499093194&oldid=493774822
--
FSF associate member #7257
Eric
Jun 25, 2012, 1:27:41 PM6/25/12
to
If you get caught for rallying support here you will get banned on
Wikipedia. Anything you do is against the WP:Policies.
You'll see. Unless you create a massive personal page with pictures and
rants and phony barnstars, with other nicknames (don't get caught doing that
either), you will be attacked and banned, if you protest. You have to
project a huge image and reputation (image to be feared) to be left alone or
treated with any respect. If you don't protest you will be banned for lack
of collaboration.
Then again you may just be banned for changing punctuation if they think you
are somebody to be afraid of. I have been linked with 20-30 other nicknames
there for editing the same article. They have to find an excuse to ban you
if you change anything they are protecting. These are mostly wimpy,
nerdpack, kids that got the shit kicked out of them, daily, as children, by
bullies, and now they have found a way to return the favour. You do the
world a disfavour by supporting this system in any way.
---------
"Ivan Shmakov" wrote in message news:86d34pj...@gray.siamics.net...
Wikipedia. Anything you do is against the WP:Policies.
You'll see. Unless you create a massive personal page with pictures and
rants and phony barnstars, with other nicknames (don't get caught doing that
either), you will be attacked and banned, if you protest. You have to
project a huge image and reputation (image to be feared) to be left alone or
treated with any respect. If you don't protest you will be banned for lack
of collaboration.
Then again you may just be banned for changing punctuation if they think you
are somebody to be afraid of. I have been linked with 20-30 other nicknames
there for editing the same article. They have to find an excuse to ban you
if you change anything they are protecting. These are mostly wimpy,
nerdpack, kids that got the shit kicked out of them, daily, as children, by
bullies, and now they have found a way to return the favour. You do the
world a disfavour by supporting this system in any way.
---------
"Ivan Shmakov" wrote in message news:86d34pj...@gray.siamics.net...
Ivan Shmakov
Jun 28, 2012, 1:58:43 AM6/28/12
to
>>>>> Eric <ESchn...@invalid.com> writes:
[...]
> If you get caught for rallying support here
Fortunately, I'm /not/ rallying support there.
> you will get banned on Wikipedia.
> Anything you do is against the WP:Policies.
I believe it's not.
[...]
> You do the world a disfavour by supporting this system in any way.
I've never had a problem with this system. Actually, I tend to
think that it's one of only a few "systems" out there that do
really work. (And there're a lot of those that one has to rely
in his or her day to day life that simply don't.)
[...]
> If you get caught for rallying support here
> you will get banned on Wikipedia.
> Anything you do is against the WP:Policies.
[...]
> You do the world a disfavour by supporting this system in any way.
think that it's one of only a few "systems" out there that do
really work. (And there're a lot of those that one has to rely
in his or her day to day life that simply don't.)
Eric
Jun 28, 2012, 5:03:38 PM6/28/12
to
Wanna' prove it?
Once you are marked for death they gonna' bust y'all for looking at the
place. Then your ISP gets involved along with your account. It's a riot.
Better kiss some ass quick or maybe you already have.
----
"Ivan Shmakov" wrote in message news:86vcicf...@gray.siamics.net...
Once you are marked for death they gonna' bust y'all for looking at the
place. Then your ISP gets involved along with your account. It's a riot.
Better kiss some ass quick or maybe you already have.
----
"Ivan Shmakov" wrote in message news:86vcicf...@gray.siamics.net...
Ivan Shmakov
Jun 29, 2012, 9:05:57 AM6/29/12
to
>>>>> Eric <ESchn...@invalid.com> writes:
>>>>> "Ivan Shmakov" wrote in message news:86vcicf...@gray.siamics.net...
[Set Followup-To: news:alt.wikipedia, for obvious reasons.]
>>>>> "Ivan Shmakov" wrote in message news:86vcicf...@gray.siamics.net...
>> I've never had a problem with this system. Actually, I tend to
>> think that it's one of only a few "systems" out there that do really
>> work. (And there're a lot of those that one has to rely in his or
>> her day to day life that simply don't.)
Certainly. No.
[...]
--
A. Because it breaks the logical order of conversation.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
0 new messages