House Democrats voted for child slave labor (you read that right)

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Leroy N. Soetoro

unread,
Sep 25, 2021, 3:00:41 PM9/25/21
to
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/22/house-democrats-voted-
for-child-slave-labor-you-re/

As we careen downhill towards the finish line of reconciliation/debt
ceiling/fiscal 2022 appropriations, things happen that make you wonder.

For instance, last week, Democrats voted for child slave labor (you read
that right).

During a markup of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee’s
portion of reconciliation, Democrats uniformly opposed Republican Rep.
Pete Stauber’s amendment prohibiting taxpayer money from being used to buy
products made or mined by child slave labor.

The amendment also required the secretary of commerce to certify that any
electric vehicles, charging stations, solar panels or other infrastructure
components do not contain minerals sourced with forced child labor.

It’s not clear how anyone could oppose any of this, but the Democrats did.

It is probably worth noting that the minerals mined by children in the
Congo and processed by slaves in China are essential to batteries and
other elements of electric vehicles.

Mr. Stauber – a champion hockey player in college, a pro-labor Republican
and a Minnesota representative sent directly from central casting — argued
unremarkably and accurately that: “The unfortunate truth is that many of
the technologies that Americans enjoy today are made with minerals sourced
by child slaves working in Chinese-run mines in the Congo. … Ending child
labor across the globe should be an easy cause to get behind …”

He’s right. Unfortunately, for children in the Congo, however, the
Democrats are funded in considerable measure by environmentalists, which
means electric vehicles – however, and wherever they’re made – are
sacramental in nature.


Oddly enough, when Mr. Stauber introduced a similar amendment last
Congress, more than a dozen Democrats on the committee supported it.
Naturally, that amendment was stripped by leadership before the
legislation came to the floor.

At the time, Mr. Stauber, who is relatively new to town and therefore not
wholly accommodated to its more horrible aspects, said: “Rather than
continue to rely on nations that exploit child labor, we must hold our
nation to a much higher standard and empower American workers to
responsibly source these critical minerals here under the best
environmental and labor standards in the world. Ending child labor should
not be a partisan effort …”

He’s right again: It shouldn’t be. But it is.

Which Democrats changed their mind about child and slave labor in the last
12 months? Who voted for the amendment last year and against it this year?
Which lawmakers know that it is wrong to subsidize and encourage child and
slave labor but decided to vote with the donors and against their
consciences anyhow?

Fortunately, we have a list. Those who changed their votes include Reps.
Rick Larsen of Washington, John Garamendi of California, Sean Maloney of
New York, Julia Brownley of California, Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts,
Salud Carabajal of California, Tom Malinowski of New Jersey, Antonio
Delgado of New York, Chris Pappas of New Hampshire, and Conor Lamb of
Pennsylvania.

It is worth pointing out that the last one – Mr. Lamb – is running for the
Senate. Let’s hope the good people of Pennsylvania remember this vote when
they vote for their next senator.

It is also worth noting that Mr. Maloney runs the campaign arm for the
House Democrats and is, therefore, part of Democratic leadership. Again,
something else the voters should remember.

A few days before the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee meeting,
Sen. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia suggested that perhaps we should
wait until next year to proceed on reconciliation. The idea was attacked,
sotto voce, by his partisan brethren, mainly because waiting six months
would kill the entire venture.

That’s almost certainly true.

Think about that for a moment, though. If the provisions in the
reconciliation are such good ideas, they will certainly still be good
ideas six months from now. What those who want to rush the process know is
that few of the provisions can withstand any scrutiny, let alone prolonged
scrutiny.

This brings us back to Mr. Stauber’s amendment against child and slave
labor. Given six months to become aware of and educated about the
amendment and what it would do, Americans of all political persuasions
would, of course, be in favor of it and against child and slave labor.

• Michael McKenna, a columnist for The Washington Times, is the president
of MWR Strategies. He was most recently a deputy assistant to President
Trump and deputy director of the Office of Legislative Affairs at the
White House.



--
"LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections
recover with no after effects.

No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

Donald J. Trump, cheated out of a second term by fraudulent "mail-in"
ballots. Report voter fraud: sf.n...@mail.house.gov

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed
dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages