info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Newsom proposes constitutional amendment to restrict gun rights
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Roland
Jun 18, 2023, 8:01:15 PM6/18/23
to
On 13 Jun 2023, David Hartung <shitbag...@shitbags.r.us> posted
some news:z28iM.298849$Yr24....@fx16.iad:
> On 6/13/2023 3:33 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>> David Hartung wrote:
>>>
>>> There are no gun restrictions proposed. There are regulations
>>> *pertaining* to guns, and the proposed regulations are eminently
>>> reasonable.
>>
>> In the USA there is no higher authority than voters collectively. A
>> sufficient number of voters can reinstate slavery.
>
> Unless a sufficient number of voters are willing to revolt and
> overthrow the Constitution, the voters cannot directly reinstate
> slavery. They would first have to elect enough members of Congress to
> pass a constitutional amendment repealing the 13th amendment and
> submit that to the states for ratification. Then they would have to
> elect enough state legislators in enough states to ratify the new
> amendment. It could theoretically happen, but as a practical matter
> it cannot.
You don't know that. We took abortion and shoved it up your ass,
sideways.
> The very idea of constitutional governance, which a Canuckistani
> faggot
There endeth the lesson by the midget.
some news:z28iM.298849$Yr24....@fx16.iad:
> On 6/13/2023 3:33 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>> David Hartung wrote:
>>>
>>> There are no gun restrictions proposed. There are regulations
>>> *pertaining* to guns, and the proposed regulations are eminently
>>> reasonable.
>>
>> In the USA there is no higher authority than voters collectively. A
>> sufficient number of voters can reinstate slavery.
>
> Unless a sufficient number of voters are willing to revolt and
> overthrow the Constitution, the voters cannot directly reinstate
> slavery. They would first have to elect enough members of Congress to
> pass a constitutional amendment repealing the 13th amendment and
> submit that to the states for ratification. Then they would have to
> elect enough state legislators in enough states to ratify the new
> amendment. It could theoretically happen, but as a practical matter
> it cannot.
You don't know that. We took abortion and shoved it up your ass,
sideways.
> The very idea of constitutional governance, which a Canuckistani
> faggot
There endeth the lesson by the midget.
Governor Swill
Jun 18, 2023, 8:33:51 PM6/18/23
to
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:01:13 -0000 (UTC), Roland <rol...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Somebody pretending to be David Hartung posted
>>>> There are no gun restrictions proposed. There are regulations
Swill
--
Reality is an acquired taste - Matthew Perry
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine! Putin is a condom!
Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>
>Somebody pretending to be David Hartung posted
>> On 6/13/2023 3:33 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>> Somebody pretending to be David Hartung wrote:
>>>> There are no gun restrictions proposed. There are regulations
>>>> *pertaining* to guns, and the proposed regulations are eminently
>>>> reasonable.
>>>
>>> In the USA there is no higher authority than voters collectively. A
>>> sufficient number of voters can reinstate slavery.
>>
>> Unless a sufficient number of voters are willing to revolt and
>> overthrow the Constitution, the voters cannot directly reinstate
>> slavery. They would first have to elect enough members of Congress to
>> pass a constitutional amendment repealing the 13th amendment and
>> submit that to the states for ratification. Then they would have to
>> elect enough state legislators in enough states to ratify the new
>> amendment. It could theoretically happen, but as a practical matter
>> it cannot.
>
>You don't know that. We took abortion and shoved it up your ass,
>sideways.
Abortion (which is still legal btw) isn't banned by constitutional amendment. Slavery is.
>>>> reasonable.
>>>
>>> In the USA there is no higher authority than voters collectively. A
>>> sufficient number of voters can reinstate slavery.
>>
>> Unless a sufficient number of voters are willing to revolt and
>> overthrow the Constitution, the voters cannot directly reinstate
>> slavery. They would first have to elect enough members of Congress to
>> pass a constitutional amendment repealing the 13th amendment and
>> submit that to the states for ratification. Then they would have to
>> elect enough state legislators in enough states to ratify the new
>> amendment. It could theoretically happen, but as a practical matter
>> it cannot.
>
>You don't know that. We took abortion and shoved it up your ass,
>sideways.
Swill
--
Reality is an acquired taste - Matthew Perry
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine! Putin is a condom!
Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>
Lou Bricano
Jun 18, 2023, 9:03:25 PM6/18/23
to
On 6/18/2023 5:01 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'3" morbidly obese
convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
> On 13 Jun 2023, David Hartung <shitbag...@shitbags.r.us> posted
> some news:z28iM.298849$Yr24....@fx16.iad:
>
>> On 6/13/2023 3:33 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>> David Hartung wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There are no gun restrictions proposed. There are regulations
>>>> *pertaining* to guns, and the proposed regulations are eminently
>>>> reasonable.
>>>
>>> In the USA there is no higher authority than voters collectively. A
>>> sufficient number of voters can reinstate slavery.
>>
>> Unless a sufficient number of voters are willing to revolt and
>> overthrow the Constitution, the voters cannot directly reinstate
>> slavery. They would first have to elect enough members of Congress to
>> pass a constitutional amendment repealing the 13th amendment and
>> submit that to the states for ratification. Then they would have to
>> elect enough state legislators in enough states to ratify the new
>> amendment. It could theoretically happen, but as a practical matter
>> it cannot.
>
> You don't know that.
I know it. You know it. We all know it. It is inconceivable that a
constitutional amendment to repeal the 13th amendment could pass. It can't
happen. This is settled.
convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
> On 13 Jun 2023, David Hartung <shitbag...@shitbags.r.us> posted
> some news:z28iM.298849$Yr24....@fx16.iad:
>
>> On 6/13/2023 3:33 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>> David Hartung wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There are no gun restrictions proposed. There are regulations
>>>> *pertaining* to guns, and the proposed regulations are eminently
>>>> reasonable.
>>>
>>> In the USA there is no higher authority than voters collectively. A
>>> sufficient number of voters can reinstate slavery.
>>
>> Unless a sufficient number of voters are willing to revolt and
>> overthrow the Constitution, the voters cannot directly reinstate
>> slavery. They would first have to elect enough members of Congress to
>> pass a constitutional amendment repealing the 13th amendment and
>> submit that to the states for ratification. Then they would have to
>> elect enough state legislators in enough states to ratify the new
>> amendment. It could theoretically happen, but as a practical matter
>> it cannot.
>
> You don't know that.
constitutional amendment to repeal the 13th amendment could pass. It can't
happen. This is settled.
Siri Cruise
Jun 19, 2023, 3:48:49 AM6/19/23
to
muck are democracy will go.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.O / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
0 new messages