AGW Propaganda Piece "A Gobal Warning?" Observation 1
Politically Incorrect
relentless assertion that atmospheric CO2 is responsible for any and all
climate change throughout time.
Let's start with the world temperature graph shown several times throughout.
The baseline (X-axis) for this graph uses the temperature of a few decades
ago. That way they can claim that today's temperatures are "rising"
What anyone can also see, is that if you look back at their line, you can
see that from the time the global temperature crosses the X-axis at the end
of the "snowball earth" period, (which itself infers that this is the
"normal", the "correct" temperature) that the "average" global temperature"
over the last 600 million years has been much warmer than "normal"
What one also notices is that from its peak some 55 million years ago, the
global temperature has steadily dropped. Yes it "appears" that this has
recently changed and that temperatures are rising over the last few decades.
The question is... is this a trend or an aberration?
Ouroboros_Rex
"Politically Incorrect" <bill...@tastelessjokes.org> wrote in message
news:-5mdneBV6qIm297a...@comcast.com...
> From the get go, there is something fishy about this program and it's
> relentless assertion that atmospheric CO2 is responsible for any and all
> climate change
You are lying.
Whata Fool
>From the get go, there is something fishy about this program and it's
>relentless assertion that atmospheric CO2 is responsible for any and all
>climate change throughout time.
[snip]
>What anyone can also see, is that if you look back at their line, you can
>see that from the time the global temperature crosses the X-axis at the end
>of the "snowball earth" period, (which itself infers that this is the
>"normal", the "correct" temperature) that the "average" global temperature"
>over the last 600 million years has been much warmer than "normal"
>
>What one also notices is that from its peak some 55 million years ago, the
>global temperature has steadily dropped. Yes it "appears" that this has
>recently changed and that temperatures are rising over the last few decades.
>The question is... is this a trend or an aberration?
And you believe those that say they know the annual
global temperature from 55 or 600 million years ago?
During that time, no telling how many super volcanos
have blown, blacking out the sun for months or years, which
might have something to do with ice ages.
They will say that warm weather this month is GW,
but I know it is just local, just a south wind blowing, and
Indian Summer (again).
Lloyd
<billma...@tastelessjokes.org> wrote:
> From the get go, there is something fishy about this program and it's
> relentless assertion that atmospheric CO2 is responsible for any and all
> climate change throughout time.
>
> Let's start with the world temperature graph shown several times throughout.
>
> The baseline (X-axis) for this graph uses the temperature of a few decades
> ago. That way they can claim that today's temperatures are "rising"
>
> What anyone can also see, is that if you look back at their line, you can
> see that from the time the global temperature crosses the X-axis at the end
> of the "snowball earth" period, (which itself infers that this is the
> "normal", the "correct" temperature) that the "average" global temperature"
> over the last 600 million years has been much warmer than "normal"
>
Gee, everything's been cooling since the Big Bang, Fool.
Politically Incorrect
"Lloyd" <lpa...@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:b694d89d-acb3-4988...@41g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 20, 3:46 pm, "Politically Incorrect"
> <billma...@tastelessjokes.org> wrote:
>> From the get go, there is something fishy about this program and it's
>> relentless assertion that atmospheric CO2 is responsible for any and all
>> climate change throughout time.
>>
>> Let's start with the world temperature graph shown several times
>> throughout.
>>
>> The baseline (X-axis) for this graph uses the temperature of a few
>> decades
>> ago. That way they can claim that today's temperatures are "rising"
>>
>> What anyone can also see, is that if you look back at their line, you can
>> see that from the time the global temperature crosses the X-axis at the
>> end
>> of the "snowball earth" period, (which itself infers that this is the
>> "normal", the "correct" temperature) that the "average" global
>> temperature"
>> over the last 600 million years has been much warmer than "normal"
>>
>
> Gee, everything's been cooling since the Big Bang, Fool.
irrelevant to the topic at hand, fool :P
Politically Incorrect
"Ouroboros_Rex" <i...@casual.com> wrote in message
news:fhvhuo$qkh$1...@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
>
> "Politically Incorrect" <bill...@tastelessjokes.org> wrote in message
> news:-5mdneBV6qIm297a...@comcast.com...
>> From the get go, there is something fishy about this program and it's
>> relentless assertion that atmospheric CO2 is responsible for any and all
>> climate change
>
> You are lying.
I've watched the propaganda piece 3-4 times now....
you?
Server 13
> "Ouroboros_Rex" <i...@casual.com> wrote in message
> news:fhvhuo$qkh$1...@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
>
>>"Politically Incorrect" <bill...@tastelessjokes.org> wrote in message
>>news:-5mdneBV6qIm297a...@comcast.com...
>>
>>>From the get go, there is something fishy about this program and it's
>>>relentless assertion that atmospheric CO2 is responsible for any and all
>>>climate change
>>
>> You are lying.
>
>
> I've watched the propaganda piece 3-4 times now....
>
> you?
Twice, and it specifically mentions other mechanisms for global warming.
However, I apologize for my hasty generalization, you appear to believe what you
said.
If you get to the point of disproving anything in it, I'd be interested to
see that. =)