The lawsuit argues a Portland officer used excessive force when he shot and
killed the woman during a traffic stop in May
10/08/03
MAXINE BERNSTEIN
The family of Kendra S. James filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against the
Portland Police Bureau, the city of Portland and three officers involved in a
traffic stop that led to her fatal shooting.
The lawsuit alleges Officer Scott McCollister used excessive force and caused
her "wrongful death" on May 5 when he shot and killed James, 21, as she tried
to drive away from the traffic stop on North Skidmore Street. It seeks $10
million in economic and punitive damages.
"McCollister's intentional and wrongful act of shooting and killing (James) was
entirely unjustified under the circumstances then existing," the suit states.
"McCollister violated decedent's Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by
using excessive and deadly force when it was not necessary to prevent (her)
escape."
Attorneys Ken Walker and Ernest Warren, representing James' father, Kenneth
James, and James' estate, filed the action in U.S. District Court in Portland.
Members of the Albina Ministerial Alliance, who have been outspoken critics of
the fatal shooting since it occurred, assembled outside the courthouse to show
their support.
Contacted by phone later, Kenneth James said he expects the legal action to
draw more attention to the faulty police actions leading up to the shooting.
But he said nothing will bring back his daughter and he remains disappointed no
criminal charges were filed against the officer who shot her.
"The money has nothing to do with it," Kenneth James said. "I'll never be
satisfied."
In late May, a Multnomah County grand jury found no criminal wrongdoing by
McCollister. He told investigators he feared for his life when he shot James
because he was partially in the car and trying to get her out when she put the
car into drive.
Portland police had no comment about the lawsuit, said Sgt. Brian Schmautz,
bureau spokesman. Robert King, president of the Portland Police Association,
has repeatedly defended the actions of the officers involved, saying James, who
had cocaine in her system, contributed to her death by failing to heed
officers' orders.
The lawsuit comes about a month after McCollister, 28, received a 51/2-month
suspension from Chief Mark Kroeker. Although Kroeker said McCollister's use of
deadly force to protect himself didn't violate bureau policy or state law, he
said the officer never should have put himself in the position in which he had
to unholster and fire his 9 mm handgun.
The legal action also faults McCollister and fellow Officers Rick Bean and
Kenneth Reynolds, who assisted in the traffic stop, for failing to develop a
tactical plan to take James into custody and for failing to provide emergency
medical care to James once she was shot.
"McCollister's act of shooting decedent Kendra Sarie James was without legal
justification or provocation. Decedent had an outstanding misdemeanor arrest
warrant, but even if decedent did have a warrant, McCollister was not justified
in using deadly force to arrest or to prevent the decedent's escape," the suit
says.
The James family lawyers are seeking a jury trial. Warren said Tuesday that
he'd argue at trial that the forensic evidence from the case -- including the
lack of gunshot residue in or on the door frame of the car and the bullet's
trajectory path -- did not support McCollister's account of the shooting.
The family is seeking $2 million in economic damages for the loss of James'
"earning capacity during her life," $5 million in noneconomic damages for the
loss to her father and surviving children, and $3 million in punitive damages
for defendants' "reckless and callous indifference to the value" of James'
life.
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/10656147272
60720.xml
"The gravest abuse of power - and the gravest threats to personal liberty and
security - are those in which the very individuals to whom we look for the
preservation of law and order turn out to be the predators."
No, it's called excessive force.
Sure it doesn't!!!!!!!!!!!! RFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm sure the family would be happy to settle for criminal charges, instead.
"I'm sure the family would be happy to settle for criminal charges,
instead."
Yeah,sure they would! RFLMAO
And I suppose you think the "victim" did nothing wrong? Just an innocent
young woman fleeing from the police? It didn't become "excessive" until
the young lady became uncooperative.
And he hopes that the legal action won't draw any attention to the fact
that his little girl was addicted to cocaine, had a warrant out for her
arrest, and God knows what else the little tramp did that hasn't been
brought to light yet.
Let's face it. She was no angel. And the family probably didn't give a
shit about her before she was killed. But suddenly, after she was
killed, the family pretends to have loved her and portray her to be
daddy's little princess. Why? $$$$$$$$$$$$
When the punishment doesn't fit the crime, I consider it excessive force.
Being an addict isn't a death row offense. It was excessive force.
>Let's face it. She was no angel. And the family probably didn't give a
>shit about her before she was killed. But suddenly, after she was
>killed, the family pretends to have loved her and portray her to be
>daddy's little princess. Why? $$$$$$$$$$$$
>
You obviously have no children because it doesn't matter if they aren't angels.
You love them anyway. I'm sure this man thought she was his little princess
even at her worst.
Like I said...You obviously have no children.
Can DJ would make the same offer to the
court in Salt Lake City, Utah? She states
here on CopWatch that the case involving
the tragic death of her son in 1998 will
be coming to trial sometime in 2004.
DJ made the offer to the oppositions lawyers, last month, Donn.
It also isn't the cops responsibility to get the addict the help that
they need. That responsibility falls on the addict themselves. If they
ether can't or don't want to get the help they need, then it is up to
the people who claim that they love the addict.
If the family loved and cared about her so much, why didn't they try to
get her some help instead of letting it get so far out of control?
> You obviously have no children because
> it doesn't matter if they aren't angels.
> You love them anyway. I'm sure this
>man thought she was his little princess
> even at her worst.
> ---
You obviously missed the point. IT'S NOT THE COPS FAULT THAT THE WOMAN
WAS ALL FUCKED UP ON DRUGS. IT'S NOT THE COPS RESPONSIBILITY TO CARE
FOR THIS WOMAN AND GET HER THE HELP SHE NEEDED FOR HER DRUG ADDICTION.
IF THE FAMILY LOVED THEIR LITTLE PRINCESS SO MUCH, WHY DIDN'T THEY GET
HER SOME HELP BEFORE ALL THIS OCCURRED???
I would think that after having been through a similar situation
yourself, that YOU would see that hind sight is 20/20. But you are
still in denial and refuse to accept even the least bit of
responsibility for what happened to your son. Just like the parents of
this young lady, you blame it ALL on the cops. There was nothing you
could have done for your son prior to the night you called the cops on
him?
>
> Like I said...You obviously have no
> children.
> ---
Like I said.....Parents who allow their children to become so out of
<lol> What is a granola head?
When a child is over the age of eighteen there isn't much you can legally do.
The addict has to want the help and admit themselves to a facility. Addicts
don't feel they have a problem because they aren't in their right mind. It's a
vicious circle.
Ever heard a childless person state " When I have kids, they won't act like
that" ?
Your above comment falls in the same category.
Until you have your own kids and find yourself in the same postition, you can't
truly know what it's like. So, you can judge other parents all you like and it
won't matter on bit.
>It was excessive force.
Ah, you were there. Why didn't you say so?
--
Jafo
> Until you have your own kids and find
> yourself in the same postition, you
> can't truly know what it's like. So, you
> can judge other parents all you like and
> it won't matter on bit.
> ---
Well, Mrs. Know-it-all, I was raised by parents and they obviously did
a better job of rasing me, than you did raising your son. I'm not dead.
I'm not in jail. I'm not on drugs. Can you say the same about your son?
Nope.
She's always there in her mentally contorted
efforts to restore her credibility. She will
confer with a psychic before she deals with
reality:
From: INTHEDOGHOUSE (inthed...@aol.com)
Subject: Re: Diallo Cop's Hiring Stirs Anger
Newsgroups: alt.thebird.copwatch
Date: 2001-07-18 09:35:33 PST
I'm not sure what my beliefs are Brandi. I did see John Edwards, the
psychic from NY, once and he gave me a very accurate reading, but I'm still
not sure what my beliefs are. I know that I will never get over it, and
have quit asking that of myself. I don't know if it's possible to live with
it. I'm still working on that part. As far as religious beliefs, I really
don't know what to believe. I do find great joy in my grandkids and kids.
I still miss y son, tremendously, though. I still have nightmares about the
night he died. I still have many questions that will probably never be
answered, but most of all, I still hate the lies that were told to cover up
the true story about the night he died. Thats what keeps me going in this
lawsuit. That's also what keeps me from being trusting of LE, again. I
suspect, that the Diallos are feeling much the same way that I do. Until,
the lies are revealed, you have no way to go on with your life. It's not
something that I enjoy, and I do wish that I felt differently. I would
much prefer that this was not the way that things were, but it is, so I do
the best I can. I am sorry about your son. No one should have to bury
their children.
DJ
Message-ID: <20010718123511...@ng-cp1.aol.com>
The tickets were a gift. I did not see anyone before or have not seen anyone
since seeing Mr Edward. Make of it what you will. I really don't care. Now,
lets get back to your son.....Why would your son point anything about my life
out? You *do* realize what your post says about who your son is, don't you,
Donn? Leave it to you, to out someone who trusts you. You have a history of
that. Remember Ferrill? The rest of us sure do. Remind me never to tell you
a secret, ol boy.
You think your parents would be proud of your post about Davids brain's being
splattered? Or how about the ones where you have (and still do) cruelly
taunted me on our sons birthday and about his death? I doubt it, Fuqit. If she
is any kind of a Mother she would be mortified. Given a choice of my son and
you, you would lose. Looking at your posts, I would say I raised the better
son. You have shown numerous times what kind of parents raised you, Fuqit and
if I were your Mother, I would be ashamed to my very being at the way you
turned out. I am proud to have been David's Mother and I will love and miss
him every day of my life. He was ten times the man that you are or will ever
be. Sorry but you asked......Now go ahead and start your nasty garbage, like
you didn't deserve such treatment, Mr Denial.
I don't recall posting anything about Davids brains being splattered.
If he had any brains at all, he might still be alive. But you are
welcome to post any evidence where I said anything of the sort.
>Or how about the ones
>where you have (and still do) cruelly
>taunted me on our sons birthday and
>about his death?
How about them?
>I doubt it, Fuqit. If she
>is any kind of a Mother she would be
>mortified.
Yeah yeah yeah.... whatever.....
>Given a choice of my son and
>you, you would lose.
You don't have a choice. Nor would you ever have the choice. But even
if you did, I'd be happy with your decision.
>Looking at your
>posts, I would say I raised the better
>son.
Looking at your posts, I would say that's horse shit.
>You have shown numerous times
>what kind of parents raised you, Fuqit
>and if I were your Mother, I would be
>ashamed to my very being at the way
>you turned out.
Well, you're not my mother (Thank God).
And I just decided to snip the rest of your BS because it ain't worth
reposting. You are obviously a very bitter woman. You also show signs
of jealousy. YOU are the one who wanted to discuss "good relationships"
My mother and I have a wonderful relationship. Not just "good". But
wonderful. If you didn't have that same kind of relationship with your
son, that's your problem. But you don't have to be bitter towards me
just because I did, and still do, have a special bond with my mother.
You can lie all you want to, but just don't expect anyone to believe it.
Anyone who has seen the way you talk about women know that's not true. You
have no respect for women. To you, they are useless unless in the bedroom with
their mouths shut and legs open. That's all you think women are good for. So,
you can talk all you want to about your relationship with your Mother, it won't
change what you have already shown us in here. Have a nice evening, Fuqit. =
)
>> I did, and still do, have a special bond with my mother.
>You can lie all you want to, but just don't expect anyone to believe
>it. Anyone who has seen the way you talk about women know that's
>not true. You have no respect for women. To you, they are useless
>unless in the bedroom with their mouths shut and legs open. That's
>all you think women are good for. So, you can talk all you want to
>about your relationship with your Mother, it won't change what you
>have already shown us in here. Have a nice evening, Fuqit. = >)
Translation: "My mind is already made up, so don't bother trying to
confuse me with the facts."
--
Jafo
Really? Try telling that to your little buddy. She says
differently.......
Â
>From: Debbie (msdi...@aol.com)
>Subject: Re: Question for FUQIT
>View: Complete Thread (17 articles)
>Original FormatNewsgroups:
>alt.thebird.copwatch
>Date: 2001-05-21 20:08:46 PST
>Thank You FUQIT. I've never told you
>this before, but there are several
>things you do that really impress me. I >don't always agree with you or
your
>posts, you're much more "radical" than I >am. BUT... you respect my
right to
>disagree and I never have to worry
>about a personal attack or a long-running >flame war. You always treat
DJ and I
>with the utmost respect, that leads me
>to believe you treat all women with that >same respect. You have a
fantastic
>sense of humor and you make me laugh.
>Remember when I said you were
>keeper? Damn, I'm smart :)
>Debbie
---
>To you,they are useless unless in the
>bedroom with their mouths shut and legs
>open. That's all you think women are
>good for.
Actually, I prefer them with their mouths open. :O
>So you can talk all you want to about
>your relationship with your Mother, it
>won't change what you have already >shown us in here. Have a nice
>evening, Fuqit. =
---
A quick stroll through google revealed that you have used this " You
have no respect for women" motto on several men who didn't agree with
you. Sgt. Rock, Pagan, and myself, just to name a few. Anytime you or
Viken don't agree with someone, you use it.
BTW, I noticed you didn't post any evidence where I said anything about
Davids brains being splattered. Did you forget to post it? I'm fully
prepared to apologize for that statement *IF* I did say it. But if I
didn't say it, you owe me one.
I gave the facts about his disrespect of women and what he thought they were
good for. As far as my mind being made up, about how I feel about Fuqit,
you're right.
That post was made a very long time ago. Long before you showed your true
colors. Long before you showed that we can't be friends with someone who
disagreed with you. She was nice to you because I asked her to give you a
chance. She never trusted you and I wish I would have listened to her when she
said so. So your silly repost is just that.
>>>> I did, and still do, have a special bond with my mother.
>>>You can lie all you want to, but just don't expect anyone to
>>>believe it. Anyone who has seen the way you talk about women
>>>know that's not true. You have no respect for women. To you,
>>>they are useless unless in the bedroom with their mouths shut
>>>and legs open. That's all you think women are good for. So, you
>>>can talk all you want to about your relationship with your Mother,
>>>it won't change what you have already shown us in here. Have a
>>>nice evening, Fuqit. = >)
>>Translation: "My mind is already made up, so don't bother trying to
>>confuse me with the facts."
>I gave the facts about his disrespect of women and what he thought
>they were good for. As far as my mind being made up, about how I
>feel about Fuqit, you're right.
Ever since your first Usenet post you've had the attitude of "Facts?
We ain't got no facts! We don't need no facts! I don't have to show
you any stinking facts!"
--
Jafo
You weren't here for my first post, Jafo.
>>>>Translation: "My mind is already made up, so don't bother trying to
>>>>confuse me with the facts."
>>>I gave the facts about his disrespect of women and what he thought
>>>they were good for. As far as my mind being made up, about how I
>>>feel about Fuqit, you're right.
>>Ever since your first Usenet post you've had the attitude of "Facts?
>>We ain't got no facts! We don't need no facts! I don't have to show
>>you any stinking facts!"
>You weren't here for my first post, Jafo.
Are you implying that it was sensible and based upon reason rather
than emotional need, and that you've only gone bad afterwards?
--
Jafo
Why don't you find it and ASSume that you understand the thoughts behond it,
>>>You weren't here for my first post, Jafo.
>>Are you implying that it was sensible and based upon reason rather
>>than emotional need, and that you've only gone bad afterwards?
>Why don't you find it and ASSume that you understand the thoughts
>behond it, Jafo.
Did you miss the point, or are you just evading it?
--
Jafo
Did you miss that I answered your question with the same kind of seriousness
that you did? If you want to be a smart ass and ask insulting questions, you
should expect the same in return.
>DJ, where is the post that you claim I made about davids brains being
>splattered? I want to see it.
Rather than go to the trouble of typing something in, DJ is free to
choose from any of her previous canned responses that can be found
at www.cheetah.net/jafo/assholes/bonmots.html
Just trying to help. :)
--
Jafo
Then look for it. I don't care to see it again.
Oh...I see.....You were so closeminded that it would never occur to you that it
wouldn't be a post that I would care to look at again, much less search out,
right. Don't bother answering Jafo. I really don't think you have anything
more to say that I care to listen to on this subject.
>>>DJ, where is the post that you claim I made about davids brains
>>>being splattered? I want to see it.
>>Rather than go to the trouble of typing something in, DJ is free to
>>choose from any of her previous canned responses that can be found
>>at www.cheetah.net/jafo/assholes/bonmots.html
>>
>>Just trying to help. :)
>Oh...I see.....You were so closeminded that it would never occur to
>you that it wouldn't be a post that I would care to look at again,
>much less search out, right. Don't bother answering Jafo. I really
>don't think you have anything more to say that I care to listen to
>on this subject.
Once again you make an assertion and then flee when asked to back it
up. Thank you for proving my point. :-D
--
Jafo
>>DJ, where is the post that you claim I made about davids brains being
>>splattered? I want to see it.
>Then look for it. I don't care to see it again.
Once again you make an assertion and then flee when asked to back it
up. :-D
Kinda makes it look as if you were lying when you accused him of it,
doesn't it? You owe either a quote of the remark and a pointer to
where readers can find it or an apology for a false accusation.
--
Jafo
Just as with men, there are some women who
deserve no respect. DJ plays the routine
that being a woman somehow gives her a
privilege that can not be shared.
She enters the game of hardball and then
wants to re-set the rules. After all, she
is a "victim."
DCI
Typical DJ.
DCI
She didn't understand it, Jafo. There,
for her, is a special place in her
emotional fabric that does not require
comprehension.
DCI
In this most recent plethora of emotionally
based postings by DJ, she has made some rather
quotable bon mots that might be worthy of
addition to her special website.
DCI
Are you gonna tell the cops who shot David to prove they were in the
wrong when they shot him because you don't want to go through the night
in question again? Sounds kind of silly doesn't it? Then why in the
hell tell me to go look for something that you say I said?
Listen, bitch. I've had just about enough of your false accusations
and lies about me. I have given you every opportunity to provide the
post. It's not up to me to look for it. You are the one who brought it
up. You look for it. It's pretty obvious that you aren't going to post
it. You say it's because you don't want to see it again. That's
bullshit. Truth is that it doesn't exsist. I never said it. That's why
you won't post it. You're a lying peice of shit cunt. You've been
doing this shit to me ever since I apologized to DCI and refused to side
with you any longer. You accuse me of something, I call you on it. Then
you give some lame ass excuse about why you aren't going to post it, and
tell me to go look for it. I don't work for you, bitch. I should go
ahead and make a comment about his brains being splattered if I'm going
to be accused of it. But I won't. I will say this though..... I don't
feel the least bit sorry for you. You deserve the heartaches, pain and
depression that comes with losing a child. You deserve to be depressed
around the hoidays. If you're going to lie and falsely accuse me, then
yes, you do deserve it. I also hope you lose your upcoming lawsuit. I
hope the judge and jury laugh at you. When you do lose, rest assured
I'll be laughing my ass off at you too. Ignorant bitch.
Search Result 3
From: FUQIT (RxRu...@webtv.net)
Subject: Re: Goodbye CopWatchers
View: Complete Thread (41 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: alt.thebird.copwatch
Date: 2002-06-02 12:49:00 PST
Did ya'll know that DJ has 36 different versions of how david go his
brains splattered?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=RxRunner%40webtv.net++%22brains%22&hl=en
&lr=&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d&selm=17158-3CFA6DDE-521%40storefull-2337.public.la
wson.webtv.net&rnum=3
From: RxRu...@webtv.net (FUQIT)
Newsgroups: alt.thebird.copwatch
Subject: Re: Still waiting on ex to say something intelligent.
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:27:11 -0500 (CDT)
Organization: WebTV Subscriber
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <29886-3C...@storefull-2336.public.lawson.webtv.net>
References: <20020410110511...@mb-fa.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.webtv.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (WebTV)
Content-Type: Text/Plain; CharsetISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-WebTV-Signature: 1
ETAtAhUAr7SF31xEioJTzexri7fQ1KQEUlcCFFVtYiysUyTariI6lFYFfciD6Ku2
Content-Disposition: Inline
BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!! ? You gotta be kidding! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
?????????????????????????
?????????????????DJ
=========================
=============
Is that what you said when david's body was riddled with bullet wounds?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=29886-3CB4AE2F-69%40storefull-2336.pu
blic.lawson.webtv.net&output=gplain
From: RxRu...@webtv.net (FUQIT)
Newsgroups: alt.thebird.copwatch
Subject: Re: Interpreting Glenn v. City of Tyler
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 15:27:11 -0600 (CST)
Organization: WebTV Subscriber
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <28632-3CA...@storefull-2334.public.lawson.webtv.net>
References: <a569c00a.02033...@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.webtv.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (WebTV)
Content-Type: Text/Plain; CharsetISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-WebTV-Signature: 1
ETAtAhQVWGXxfUXMlI3KlfjcKEZXVD23wQIVAK+9RVGARPmo+CEHQ75kBTsqSNSn
Content-Disposition: Inline
Re: Interpreting Glenn v. City of Tyler
Group: alt.thebird.copwatch Date: Sun, Mar 31, 2002, 7:50am (CST-2)
From: e...@ausi.com (EX)
inthed...@aol.com (INTHEDOGHOUSE) wrote in message
news:<20020330205543...@mb-fp.aol.com>...
Subject: Re: Interpreting Glenn v. City of Tyler
From: e...@ausi.com (EX)
Date: 3/30/02 6:59 AM Mountain Standard Time
Message-id: <a569c00a.02033...@posting.google.com>
inthed...@aol.com (INTHEDOGHOUSE) wrote in message
news:<20020329115422...@mb-bj.aol.com>...
Subject: Re: Interpreting Glenn v. City of Tyler
From: e...@ausi.com (EX)
Date: 3/29/02 9:32 AM Mountain Standard Time
Message-id: <a569c00a.02032...@posting.google.com>
inthed...@aol.com (INTHEDOGHOUSE) wrote in message
news:<20020328185359...@mb-bd.aol.com>...
Subject: Re: Interpreting Glenn v. City of Tyler
From: RxRu...@webtv.net (FUQIT)
Date: 3/28/02 12:37 PM Mountain Standard Time
Message-id: <15322-3CA...@storefull-2331.public.lawson.webtv.net>
--WebTV-Mail-12654-4358
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
The bitch was too fat. Thats why the cuffs wouldn't fit. If she would
get up off her trailer trash ass and do something every once in awhile
they might have fit. ? Her whole " case " or even life's story would
be better off being discussed on The Jerry Springer Show rather than in
a discussion group for true victims of police brutality.
????If you are going to flame at least do it like an adult. Your
juvenile fat jokes and F words are for babies....widdle bitty Jewewmy,
got his feewings huwt, and now he's gonna said some bad woowds to us,
and call us fatty wattys. Geesh! Grow up! At least Donn uses wit and
sarcasm, to insult.
(Hey, anyone wanna bet that I get a F you for this?)
?????????????????????????
???????????????????????DJ
Stop it DJ, he might take his ball and go home.
EX
Oh, he has balls? = )
????????????????????????DJ
Just his boyfriends bouncing off his chin.
EX
UGH! Didn't like the visual that just gave me.
?????????????????????????
?????????????????DJ
Sorry. Juvenile humor is all he understands.
EX
=========================
============
I wonder if David still has any balls left. I mean do you think they
have decomposed yet?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=28632-3CA77F2F-426%40storefull-2334.p
ublic.lawson.webtv.net&output=gplain
From: RxRu...@webtv.net (FUQIT)
Newsgroups: alt.thebird.copwatch
Subject: Re: Al Sharpton Files $1B Defamation Suit
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 03:36:57 -0500 (CDT)
Organization: WebTV Subscriber
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <15603-3D...@storefull-2337.public.lawson.webtv.net>
References: <20020725224540...@mb-mi.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.webtv.net
Mime-Version: 1.0 (WebTV)
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary=WebTV-Mail-9653-108
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-WebTV-Signature: 1
ETAsAhRTFkohQxn4qHRrJiqFQvE4LyHqzwIUf1AccOAO0wU96JlmveXsNBfthN4=
Content-Disposition: Inline
I think he might be sweet on you, Pagan.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0DJ
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
You would think something like that. Because you have no moral fibers.
Just because david was a queer doesn't mean all males are dj. =3D)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=15603-3D410A29-1%40storefull-2337.pub
lic.lawson.webtv.net&output=gplain
My assertion has now been backed up and thanks for proving my point about you
being as subhuman as your little friend Fuqit. I want nothing more to do with
you, Jafo. I associate only with those who have some moral standards. You
proved that you don't qualify.
Where is my apology, Jafo?
But take note at how many times DJ and Viken have accused me of things
over the past two years or so. This is the very first time they have
EVER produced anything that would prove I did what they accused me of.
And DJ didn't fuck around and waste any time posting it either. Which
goes to show that if they REALLY had proof of anything I did, they
wouldn't waste any time proving it.
There was some truth to the comment though. She does have several
different versions of what happened that night.
I'm not sorry that I made the comment. I'm sorry that I denied having
said it, when in fact I did say it. But I'm only human and I am allowed
to make mistakes. The difference between DJ and myself is that when
confronted with the truth, I face it head on and own up to it. Whether
it was accidental or not. She doesn't. She will go to her grave lying
and covering up her lies.
> From: DJ (inthed...@aol.com)
> FormatNewsgroups: alt.thebird.copwatch
> Date: 2002-11-19 13:52:03 PST
>>Subject: REPOST From:
> RxRu...@webtv.net
>
> They were quite sickened by this
> particular post. I think it really
> brought home the point of how much
>has been said and what kind of pressure
>they have exerted in order to get me to >back away from the lawsuit and
the >newsgroup.
> I also included the the gasoline post,
> and the rape post that he just recently
> posted to Phil. They are wondering
> about sanity issues.....I can't imagine
> why they would even wonder.
> DJ
> ---
Just who were you referring to when you said "They" ? :)
This reminds me of a game of elementary school he said/she said. GROW UP please
That was vey nice of you. Proves you are much more mature than the
juvenile delinquent twins. :)
>>Kinda makes it look as if you were lying when you accused him
>>of it, doesn't it? You owe either a quote of the remark and
>>a pointer to where readers can find it or an apology for a false >>accusation.
>Where is my apology, Jafo?
He seems to have made one to everyone else but not to you. I suppose
that arguably he could have managed one, but he did seem to offer some
reasons - maybe sufficient, maybe not - to refuse to give one. While
certainly not claiming any right to speak for Fuqit or to know what's
going on in his head, I suspect that the apology might have been more
forthcoming if you hadn't first tried to play your usual game of
evading the issue by making such replies as "it wouldn't be a post
that I would care to look at again" in regards to a post that you
nontheless didn't mind quoting from. You had to be shamed and
ridiculed into doing the proper research and finally coming up
with the proof.
Bottom line:
The lesson to be learned here is this - If you want to be perceived
as having any sort of ethics at all, then be prepared to take
responsibility for the words you choose to post. Be prepared to
back up your assertions and accusations.
It's an important lesson, not only in Usenet but in life.
Have you learned it yet?
--
Jafo
>>Once again you make an assertion and then flee when asked to back
>>it up. Thank you for proving my point. :-D
>My assertion has now been backed up
Yes it has. So why did you follow your usual course of action by
making an assertion and then backpedaling when asked to back it up?
As with the time a few years back when you accused me of being a
racist, you had to be shamed into doing the right thing. Why do you
keep doing that? Aren't you smart enough to see what that does to
your credibility? Can't you see that something like "I'll have it
first of the week" would have been a better response than the evasive
ones you gave?
>and thanks for proving my point about you being as subhuman as your
>little friend Fuqit.
And now, here we go with the "poor little me" emotional claptrap.
All I did was keep on your ass until you finally did the right thing
and took responsibility for your own words. It's a pity that you had
to be dragged kicking and screaming to this point, but at least you
made it. From the above words, however, it's doubtful that you've
learned the needed lesson from it.
Christ, dealing with you is like raising a child.
A developmentally disabled child, at that.
>I want nothing more to do with you, Jafo. I associate only with
>those who have some moral standards. You proved that you don't
>qualify.
You mean that you'd prefer to limit your circle of acquaintances
to those who, like yourself, believe that the seriousness of the
accusation itself carries all of the veracity that's required?
I'm proud to be rejected by any such group.
--
Jafo
No such lesson will be learned.
She's rather continue to babble
on about an idyllic life in which
she plays a role of queen in a
household of the totally dependent.
DCI
Read this story and you'll know why the yahoo group needs to be
supported,it convinced me.This is an example of a cop that just goes too
far. http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_782122.html
Someone just told me that a link to the yahoo group that warns the
public that cops are preying on car sex lovers has been banned at
http://www.cops.com The cops made a big fuss about it which caused
messages by newsreport to be erased.Go there and respond to the topic
Please Report Offensive Posts.Ask the guy to tell you what's offensive
about warning the public?Post a link to the group to show that you
support freedom,we all should support freedom,especially since the
terrorists don't want us to have it.Cops need to find something more
important to get upset about,this just shows how petty some of them are.
Go to the group site and use the 2nd link to post pictures of you having
car or park sex,help to make that group one of the best,give the cops
what they want,if you don't have pictures of you in action then please
make some.
Someone posted a link to this group and I was shocked to read about
those petty cops.They need to get a life and arrest some criminals.Join
the group like I did and post links to help put a stop to their fun.Warn
the public about them.They need to send these cops to fight the
war,make these cops do some real work and let the sweet innocent
children stay home.With all of the threats that America has to deal with
these days,these cops need to leave people alone and let them enjoy
their car sex,it could possibly be the last sex that they have,just my
opinion,remember this is America and I have a right to it.
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/cops_miami_fl
The people that say stupid things like what fuqit has said are not
really that stupid,give them the benefit of the doubt and know they
don't mean it,they're just trying to get a response out of you.
I just made the mistake of responding to a stupid message but it wasn't
to me so I don't feel to bad about responding.
do you put your little quotables in fortune cookies?
DCI
Okay! <lol>