Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Ping: Pothead
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Snit
Aug 9, 2023, 1:19:01 PM8/9/23
to
On Aug 9, 2023 at 8:39:46 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<ub0c02$4ci$3...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
> On 2023-08-07, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> news:uah9ic$ukfo$1...@dont-email.me Thu, 03
>> Aug 2023 22:26:20 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On 2023-08-03, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>> On 2023-08-03, David Brooks <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 03/08/2023 14:28, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On Aug 3, 2023 at 3:13:41 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>>> <p5LyM.414875$AsA....@fx18.iad>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 03/08/2023 06:04, Gremlin wrote:
>>>>>>> [....]
>>>>>>>> Again, no threat implied, written or otherwise. You really *don't
>>>>>>>> know* who you've been fucking with, and antagonizing for as long as
>>>>>>>> you have. If you were a normal functioning adult, You'd have been
>>>>>>>> done like Jenn several years back. And I bet you wouldn't dare show
>>>>>>>> your face anywhere near me. You'd do exactly what another poster
>>>>>>>> described Jenn as doing when her old handle, or mine, comes up. She
>>>>>>>> gets the fuck out of Dodge. She doesn't want to come and dance with
>>>>>>>> me again. You are getting closer and closer to having more in
>>>>>>>> common with her concerning me than you do now, Snit. You really
>>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At some point, the party is going to start, and there's nobody that
>>>>>>>> mutually knows us that can reach out on your behalf once it does.
>>>>>>>> You're going to ride this one all the way, bro. I promise that you
>>>>>>>> will.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *THREAT*!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good catch! Where he denies he makes threats, the fact is he does so
>>>>>> very often.
>>>>>> His threats are a sign of his insecurity and immaturity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> David, maybe you should let Jenn and snit talk to each other? Maybe
>>>>>>>> she can describe the real life hell she experienced at my and my
>>>>>>>> crews command. Or, as his friend, would you prefer him to
>>>>>>>> experience it like she did so he can really relate to her?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I should. Maybe I already did!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know I will not tell!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> David, You know it's just a matter of time before i decide i'm done
>>>>>>>> talking over usenet about this; that I've decided the issue can't
>>>>>>>> be resolved via usenet. You know how I be with these matters. I've
>>>>>>>> given him plenty of chances, so that nobody can accuse me of
>>>>>>>> picking on a disabled person. I've covered all my bases there, and
>>>>>>>> then some. I'm semi confident I won't catch much shit for XXXX if I
>>>>>>>> begin at this point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *THREAT*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is one of his main ways of dealing with his insecurity. He knows
>>>>>> he cannot actually argue his case and it really gets to him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's move on.
>>>>
>>>> I actually do applaud you for trying... AGAIN!
>>>>
>>>>> We can always rally the Pikeys if Gremlin takes things to real-life!
>>>>> ;-)
>>>>
>>>> LOL! And how much of your respective 'party favors' will you each
>>>> partake in for them to "rally"? ;)
>>>>
>>>> I haven't forgotten you also ran from the question I asked you related
>>>> to Gasser's support for his claim that pothead is my sock as based on
>>>> posting frequency to me, 'complete' with the lack of 'support' the
>>>> Stool Master didn't produce to back his 100,000th bogus allegation.
>>>> Sticking more to the 'tech' side of things back then... if you recall I
>>>> suggested you count the numbers of posts written *to* you in a specific
>>>> thread and I'd then disclose my (erroneous) code's answer to that to
>>>> compare. Methinks it'd be a far different scenario than your "Error in
>>>> SC's code" thread ;) That thread is a good reminder of why you should
>>>> be careful putting your faith in Gasser's 'tech skills'... as well as a
>>>> good reminder of what a POS he is for having posted all the crap he did
>>>> to me in that thread when HE was 'in the wrong' (IOW, he failed, AGAIN,
>>>> on the responsibility front). While we don't have 'tech' in common, at
>>>> least we can "share" 'talking about personalities' ;)
>>>
>>> Snit has altered his story, again. Now I am your shill.
>>> I think he is going mad.
>>
>> Is shill an upgrade or demotion from sock? Does anyone have a specific snit
>> definition for shill? Or for sock? I'm trying to compile a snit specific
>> dictionary for the purposes of accurate communications going forward.
>
> Glasser does have his own dictionary... where the terms are 'floating'
> and there's a special 'for me but not for thee' section.
What do you get from such dishonest trolling?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<ub0c02$4ci$3...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
> On 2023-08-07, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> news:uah9ic$ukfo$1...@dont-email.me Thu, 03
>> Aug 2023 22:26:20 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On 2023-08-03, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>> On 2023-08-03, David Brooks <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 03/08/2023 14:28, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On Aug 3, 2023 at 3:13:41 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>>>>> <p5LyM.414875$AsA....@fx18.iad>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 03/08/2023 06:04, Gremlin wrote:
>>>>>>> [....]
>>>>>>>> Again, no threat implied, written or otherwise. You really *don't
>>>>>>>> know* who you've been fucking with, and antagonizing for as long as
>>>>>>>> you have. If you were a normal functioning adult, You'd have been
>>>>>>>> done like Jenn several years back. And I bet you wouldn't dare show
>>>>>>>> your face anywhere near me. You'd do exactly what another poster
>>>>>>>> described Jenn as doing when her old handle, or mine, comes up. She
>>>>>>>> gets the fuck out of Dodge. She doesn't want to come and dance with
>>>>>>>> me again. You are getting closer and closer to having more in
>>>>>>>> common with her concerning me than you do now, Snit. You really
>>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At some point, the party is going to start, and there's nobody that
>>>>>>>> mutually knows us that can reach out on your behalf once it does.
>>>>>>>> You're going to ride this one all the way, bro. I promise that you
>>>>>>>> will.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *THREAT*!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good catch! Where he denies he makes threats, the fact is he does so
>>>>>> very often.
>>>>>> His threats are a sign of his insecurity and immaturity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> David, maybe you should let Jenn and snit talk to each other? Maybe
>>>>>>>> she can describe the real life hell she experienced at my and my
>>>>>>>> crews command. Or, as his friend, would you prefer him to
>>>>>>>> experience it like she did so he can really relate to her?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I should. Maybe I already did!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know I will not tell!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> David, You know it's just a matter of time before i decide i'm done
>>>>>>>> talking over usenet about this; that I've decided the issue can't
>>>>>>>> be resolved via usenet. You know how I be with these matters. I've
>>>>>>>> given him plenty of chances, so that nobody can accuse me of
>>>>>>>> picking on a disabled person. I've covered all my bases there, and
>>>>>>>> then some. I'm semi confident I won't catch much shit for XXXX if I
>>>>>>>> begin at this point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *THREAT*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is one of his main ways of dealing with his insecurity. He knows
>>>>>> he cannot actually argue his case and it really gets to him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's move on.
>>>>
>>>> I actually do applaud you for trying... AGAIN!
>>>>
>>>>> We can always rally the Pikeys if Gremlin takes things to real-life!
>>>>> ;-)
>>>>
>>>> LOL! And how much of your respective 'party favors' will you each
>>>> partake in for them to "rally"? ;)
>>>>
>>>> I haven't forgotten you also ran from the question I asked you related
>>>> to Gasser's support for his claim that pothead is my sock as based on
>>>> posting frequency to me, 'complete' with the lack of 'support' the
>>>> Stool Master didn't produce to back his 100,000th bogus allegation.
>>>> Sticking more to the 'tech' side of things back then... if you recall I
>>>> suggested you count the numbers of posts written *to* you in a specific
>>>> thread and I'd then disclose my (erroneous) code's answer to that to
>>>> compare. Methinks it'd be a far different scenario than your "Error in
>>>> SC's code" thread ;) That thread is a good reminder of why you should
>>>> be careful putting your faith in Gasser's 'tech skills'... as well as a
>>>> good reminder of what a POS he is for having posted all the crap he did
>>>> to me in that thread when HE was 'in the wrong' (IOW, he failed, AGAIN,
>>>> on the responsibility front). While we don't have 'tech' in common, at
>>>> least we can "share" 'talking about personalities' ;)
>>>
>>> Snit has altered his story, again. Now I am your shill.
>>> I think he is going mad.
>>
>> Is shill an upgrade or demotion from sock? Does anyone have a specific snit
>> definition for shill? Or for sock? I'm trying to compile a snit specific
>> dictionary for the purposes of accurate communications going forward.
>
> Glasser does have his own dictionary... where the terms are 'floating'
> and there's a special 'for me but not for thee' section.
What do you get from such dishonest trolling?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
0 new messages