Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Technical query ........
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Snit
Aug 9, 2023, 1:18:25 PM8/9/23
to
On Aug 9, 2023 at 8:56:02 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<ub0cui$4ci$7...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
> On 2023-08-07, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> news:22OyM.63087$PlBb....@fx42.iad Thu,
>> 03 Aug 2023 13:34:54 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 3, 2023 at 12:55:19 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>> <I3JyM.188236$Fgta....@fx10.iad>:
>>
>>>> Snit and I chat more AWAY from here than we do on the Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> There be dragons here!
>>>
>>> Notice how Gremlin all but brags about how much Carroll has manipulated
>>> his thinking.
>>
>> I've asked you to support that statement several times before. I'm still
>> waiting for you to do so. I'm waiting for you to backup what you wrote. You
>> can support your claims of MIDs where what you describe is happening, can't
>> you?
>
> He's still laboring under the delusion that you'll eventually fall for
> his manipulation attempts to convince you that I'm manipulating you.
This could not be more wrong. Gremlin is clueless enough where he will
continue to let you manipulate him even though direct examples are pointed
out. He is simply not very good with dealing with such situations. He will
NEVER get it.
> Chapter one in his playbook: Accuse "others" of what *you're* doing.
That is you projecting.
>
> For some goofy reason he's stupid enough to try this in an archived text
> medium <shrug>.
Again, you are projecting.
>
>> For fairness, because you've demonstrated a gross reading comprehension
>> problem, several times now concerning material I specifically have written,
>> your word alone cannot be accepted. You will need to find atleast one, if
>> not two, regulars, in good standing to back your claim.
>>
>> So, pick an MID you think supports the accusation and share it. We will see
>> what the regulars in good standing think. I'd say this is a fair way to
>> assess your statements. Do you agree or disagree?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<ub0cui$4ci$7...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
> On 2023-08-07, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> news:22OyM.63087$PlBb....@fx42.iad Thu,
>> 03 Aug 2023 13:34:54 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 3, 2023 at 12:55:19 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>>> <I3JyM.188236$Fgta....@fx10.iad>:
>>
>>>> Snit and I chat more AWAY from here than we do on the Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> There be dragons here!
>>>
>>> Notice how Gremlin all but brags about how much Carroll has manipulated
>>> his thinking.
>>
>> I've asked you to support that statement several times before. I'm still
>> waiting for you to do so. I'm waiting for you to backup what you wrote. You
>> can support your claims of MIDs where what you describe is happening, can't
>> you?
>
> He's still laboring under the delusion that you'll eventually fall for
> his manipulation attempts to convince you that I'm manipulating you.
This could not be more wrong. Gremlin is clueless enough where he will
continue to let you manipulate him even though direct examples are pointed
out. He is simply not very good with dealing with such situations. He will
NEVER get it.
> Chapter one in his playbook: Accuse "others" of what *you're* doing.
That is you projecting.
>
> For some goofy reason he's stupid enough to try this in an archived text
> medium <shrug>.
Again, you are projecting.
>
>> For fairness, because you've demonstrated a gross reading comprehension
>> problem, several times now concerning material I specifically have written,
>> your word alone cannot be accepted. You will need to find atleast one, if
>> not two, regulars, in good standing to back your claim.
>>
>> So, pick an MID you think supports the accusation and share it. We will see
>> what the regulars in good standing think. I'd say this is a fair way to
>> assess your statements. Do you agree or disagree?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
0 new messages