Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Hidden Network

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Snit

unread,
Aug 9, 2023, 1:19:53 PM8/9/23
to
On Aug 9, 2023 at 8:12:52 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<ub0adk$3vven$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2023-08-08, pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-08-08, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>> On 2023-08-08, Kelly Phillips <KF...@podcasts.org> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 21:35:26 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2023-08-07, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>>>>>> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> news:ualhtk$1ob2g$2...@dont-email.me Sat, 05
>>>>>> Aug 2023 13:13:24 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2023-08-05, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> news:uaf5v7$gbrh$1...@dont-email.me Thu,
>>>>>>>> 03 Aug 2023 03:12:39 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was baiting snit !
>>>>>>>>> LOL !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My bad, My bad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think my question spun his head around like Linda Blair !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If it didn't, my detailed QA session concerning cloning sure as hell
>>>>>>>> did. He doesn't know which was is up or down. But, naturally, instead
>>>>>>>> of admit he was wrong, he'll convert it to opinions so that he can
>>>>>>>> "agree to disagree" with everyone who wrote about the subject, all
>>>>>>>> without, having to admit he was wrong when he jumped the gun and
>>>>>>>> mistakenly assumed I didn't know what cloning was until Snit arrived.
>>>>>>>> That's really what he wanted people to think!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit's gone off the rails. His behavior as of late, has become quite
>>>>>>> loony. I hope he gets his medication dosage adjusted because something
>>>>>>> has gone amok.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's doing the same thing with that discussion that he did when he was asked
>>>>>> about the floodbot story. At no point did he ever admit he'd done anything
>>>>>> wrong. All the time, he continued to partially quote me and provide his
>>>>>> opinion about what I meant; completely ignoring myself, Ftr, And Apd as he
>>>>>> did so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's literally doing the same thing here, practially following the same
>>>>>> script.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed.
>>>>> According to SC, snit's been playing the same game for 20 years.
>>>>> OMG, how sick is that?
>>>>> Snit has literally wasted a 1/4 of his life trolling.
>>>>
>>>> You'd think he'd be better at it by now.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure he's doing his best, though.
>>>>
>>> Snit's a slow learner.
>>> A REAL SLOW LEARNER.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Most mentally retarded people are.
>
> Mentally retarded people generally don't have a 'psych degree', which
> begs the question as to if it's an act, or not. I think it's obvious his
> reading comprehension issue is *very* real but he also has a massive ego
> and a propensity to accuse "others" of what he's doing as he ignores all
> evidence showing he's doing it. These things may be done as attempts to
> obscure his 'slowness'.
>
> In any event, IMO the learning pales in comparison to the lying, I've
> never met anyone as blatantly and shamefully dishonest as Glasser; it's
> to a point beyond absurdity and one would tend to believe he's aware of
> that, yet, he apparently isn't (as based on his actions). This is why I
> think his FAS issue, along with the confabulation it's noted for, is a
> major component. While FAS isn't his fault, I don't believe, for one
> second, that he can't control the lying because it surfaces on a
> personal level only with his 'opponents', it's absent to the same extent
> in the carefully crafted BS he spews to 'sell' people on the idea that
> none of the above is true.

Notice you accuse me of lying... but only in a way that cannot be quoted.

The whole unquotable lie thing... this is a text forum. Your accusations are
insane.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
0 new messages