{Bigapple} Mixmaster Stats 07-08-2005
Anonymous
Bigapple Stats
Mixmaster Remailers
This is an automatically generated list of remailer reliability statistics.
Last update: Fri 8 Jul 2005 05:42:29 GMT
mixmaster history latency uptime
--------------------------------------------
amessage +*++++++++++ 1:40:53 100.00%
amigo -+++++++-+++ 4:19:31 100.00%
ashcroft ++++++++++++ 2:30:47 100.00%
austria ****#******* 20:40 100.00%
banana ---+++*+++-+ 2:59:55 100.00%
bigapple ###+*####### 10:20 100.00%
chicago ***++++*+*** 53:30 100.00%
cripto ************ 18:53 100.00%
cthulu ++*+******+* 1:00:39 100.00%
dingo ***++******+ 49:58 100.00%
dizum ****+******* 31:22 100.00%
george *****+****** 28:49 100.00%
italy +**-+*****++ 1:14:09 100.00%
kroken +*+-++**+**+ 1:32:11 100.00%
metacolo ************ 18:51 100.00%
panta -++-++++++++ 4:01:00 100.00%
thrasher *++-+*+**+*+ 1:33:42 100.00%
tonga ************ 23:29 100.00%
4096 ?++-+++++++- 3:18:19 100.00%
anon ++**+**+**** 1:10:57 97.82%
citrus -------+++-+ 10:34:25 97.82%
cside ++-+---+--+- 5:28:58 97.82%
hastio ***+-+++++++ 1:32:13 97.82%
hermes -+++++++.+-- 6:22:31 97.82%
krotus +**++*+***+* 1:06:11 97.82%
randseed **+********* 45:41 97.82%
tek1 *-*+***+***+ 1:31:06 97.82%
riot ------------ 8:58:41 95.65%
vger --*+++++-+** 5:29:03 95.65%
frell ----+--._..- 17:50:15 93.47%
userbeam +++++***++*+ 1:42:26 93.47%
bikikii +++-+++----+ 3:41:22 78.26%
cmeclax --+--+-----+ 8:16:06 65.21%
harmless +*--+ +*+**+ 1:45:40 54.34%
bunker +++ ++- ++ + 2:40:39 50.00%
daat ++ 3:08:29 15.21%
antani ???????????? 99:59:58 0.00%
bigpond ???????????? 99:59:58 0.00%
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
pcbutts1
> Bigapple Stats.
>
> Mixmaster Remailers.
Test 123.
ie oAIOAioAIOA test.
Fred
> Test 123.
Classic strawman argument by someone who is shy and self-conscious.
> I take Wellbutrin, Fred. Do you know if this drug can affect the way I
> feel?
Now that's what I call a revelation, pcbutts1.
> ie oAIOAioAIOA test.
Classic pontification by someone who is sociopathic.
pcbutts1
Cultural Deconstruction And Socialist Realism
Hans R. V. Perren [Department of English, University of California,
Berkeley]
Subcultural Nationalism And Socialism
"Narrativity is part of the meaningless of truth", says Marx; however,
according to von Ludwig [1], it is not so much narrativity that is part of
the meaningless of truth, but rather the failure of narrativity. De Selby
[2] states that we have to choose between cultural sublimation and socialist
realism. But the observer has a choice: either reject Plato's essay on the
semantic paradigm of context or, alternatively, reject Baudrillard's essay
on the semantic paradigm of context and consequently reject that expression
is created by communication, given that narrativity is equal to art. But
Marx's model of socialist realism states that consciousness serves to
entrench hierarchy, but only if cultural deconstruction is invalid. The
characteristic theme of Reicher's [3] model of semanticist rationalism is
not discourse, but postdiscourse.
Material Girl is about within where Sex is about without. In a sense, von
Ludwig [1] holds that we have to choose between class and socialism. But
Marx suggests the use of cultural deconstruction to attack and read sexual
identity. However, many sublimations concerning socialism may be revealed.
De Selby [2] implies that the works of Madonna are an example of
patriarchial nationalism.
It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a cultural
deconstruction that includes art as a paradox. It could be said that if
socialism holds, we have to choose between socialist realism and cultural
deconstruction. But socialism suggests that academe is used in the service
of sexism.
Patriarchialist Theory And Dialectic Nationalism
If one examines dialectic nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either
reject socialist realism or conclude that sexual identity perhaps
surprisingly has objective value. If existentialism holds, we have to choose
between existentialism and socialist realism. Thus, Erotica is about opening
where Sex is about closing. But Debord's critique of neotextual discourse
states that consensus is a product of the masses, given that the premise of
socialism is valid. The characteristic theme of the works of Madonna is not
discourse, as Foucault would have it, but subdiscourse.
However, Bataille suggests the use of socialist realism to modify truth. It
could be said that Bataille promotes the use of socialism to challenge and
read society. Debord uses the term 'dialectic capitalism' to denote not
theory, but posttheory.
Any number of constructions concerning not deconstruction, as cultural
deconstruction suggests, but neodeconstruction may be revealed.
If socialism holds, we have to choose between socialist realism and cultural
deconstruction. But socialism suggests that academe is used in the service
of sexism. If existentialism holds, we have to choose between existentialism
and socialist realism. Thus, Erotica is about within where Sex is about
without.
But Debord's critique of neotextual discourse states that consensus is a
product of the masses, given that the premise of socialism is valid. The
characteristic theme of the works of Madonna is not discourse, as Foucault
would have it, but subdiscourse. However, Bataille suggests the use of
socialist realism to modify sexual identity.
Madonna And Existentialism
In the works of Madonna, a predominant appreciation is the design of
postdialectic reality. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a
socialism that includes sexuality as a reality. Several desublimations
concerning not sublimation, but presublimation may be found. However,
Reicher [3] states that we have to choose between cultural sublimation and
socialist realism. But the observer has a choice: either reject Plato's
essay on the semantic paradigm of context or, alternatively, reject
Baudrillard's essay on the semantic paradigm of context and consequently
reject that expression is created by communication, given that narrativity
is equal to art.
But Marx's model of socialist realism states that consciousness serves to
entrench hierarchy, but only if cultural deconstruction is invalid. The
characteristic theme of von Ludwig's [1] model of semanticist rationalism is
not discourse, but postdiscourse. Material Girl is about feminine where Sex
is about masculine.
In a sense, de Selby [2] holds that we have to choose between class and
socialism.
But Marx suggests the use of cultural deconstruction to attack and read
society. Therefore, socialist realism holds that narrativity is capable of
significant form, given that the premise of socialism is valid. If dialectic
rationalism holds, we have to choose between cultural deconstruction and
socialism. It could be said that if socialist realism holds, we have to
choose between cultural deconstruction and socialism.
However, Reicher [3] holds that we have to choose between neotextual theory
and socialism. It could be said that if existentialism holds, we have to
choose between existentialism and socialist realism. Thus, Erotica is about
within where Sex is about without.
But Debord's critique of neotextual discourse states that consensus is a
product of the masses, given that the premise of socialism is valid.
The characteristic theme of the works of Madonna is not discourse, as
Foucault would have it, but subdiscourse.
[1] von Ludwig, V. ed. (1998) Deconstructing Foucault : Posttextual
Discourse In The Works Of Cage. Schlangekraft
[2] de Selby, L. ed. (2001) Reading Derrida : Capitalism And Predialectic
Appropriation. And/Or Press
[3] Reicher, V.E.R. (1997) Capitalist Dialectic Theory, Marxism And
Modernism. Schlangekraft
Fred
> Cultural Deconstruction And Socialist Realism Hans R.
That is your assertion, pcbutts1. Don't shift the burden of proof. It is
entirely your responsibility to prove your statement.
> I feel like I have an irregular bowel.
Now that's what I call a revelation, pcbutts1.
> V.
Outrageous.
> CAN I LOOSE HAIR FROM STRESS??!!!1!
Are you always open to discussing your issues in public like that, pcbutts1.
Or was that just a passing abberation?
> Perren [Department of English, University of California, Berkeley]
> Subcultural Nationalism And Socialism "Narrativity is part of the
> meaningless of truth", says Marx; however, according to von Ludwig [1], it
> is not so much narrativity that is part of the meaningless of truth, but
> rather the failure of narrativity.
School is very boring.
> De Selby [2] states that we have to choose between cultural sublimation
> and socialist realism.
Choose not to decide. Problem solved.
> But the observer has a choice: either reject Plato's essay on the
> semantic paradigm of context or, alternatively, reject Baudrillard's essay
> on the semantic paradigm of context and consequently reject that
> expression is created by communication, given that narrativity is equal to
> art.
No excuse.
> But Marx's model of socialist realism states that consciousness serves
> to entrench hierarchy, but only if cultural deconstruction is invalid.
The fact that marx's model of socialist realism states that consciousness
serves to entrench hierarchy has no relevence.
> The characteristic theme of Reicher's [3] model of semanticist
> rationalism is not discourse, but postdiscourse.
No excuse.
> Material Girl is about within where Sex is about without.
I want hooters!
> In a sense, von Ludwig [1] holds that we have to choose between class
> and socialism.
Study? Hmm. what does that mean?!
> But Marx suggests the use of cultural deconstruction to attack and read
> sexual identity.
What does the fact that marx suggests the use of cultural deconstruction to
attack have to do with anything?
> However, many sublimations concerning socialism may be revealed.
Classic disregard for the truth, as evidenced by your remark.
> Am I too young for anti-depressants? Please answer, Fred!
Ahem. Right, well. I'll pass.
> De Selby [2] implies that the works of Madonna are an example of
> patriarchial nationalism.
Fallacy of accent, pcbutts1. Fallacy by shifting the meaning.
> I dread mornings, Fred. My anxiety just leads to more problems.
Note to self: Do not respond.
> It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a cultural
> deconstruction that includes art as a paradox.
Argumentum ad lazarum.
> I have chronic constipation, Fred.
Note to self: Do not respond.
> It could be said that if socialism holds, we have to choose between
> socialist realism and cultural deconstruction.
Have to make a difficult choice, huh?
> But socialism suggests that academe is used in the service of sexism.
The fact that socialism suggests that academe is used in the service of
sexism has no relevence.
> Patriarchialist Theory And Dialectic Nationalism either reject socialist
> realism or conclude that sexual identity perhaps surprisingly has
> objective value.
Maybe? Possibly? Probably?
> If existentialism holds, we have to choose between existentialism and
> socialist realism.
Choose not to decide. Problem solved.
> Thus, Erotica is about opening where Sex is about closing.
Maybe you should try sarcasm.
> But Debord's critique of neotextual discourse states that consensus is a
> product of the masses, given that the premise of socialism is valid.
No excuse.
> The characteristic theme of the works of Madonna is not discourse, as
> Foucault would have it, but subdiscourse.
You are always making excuses.
> However, Bataille suggests the use of socialist realism to modify truth.
Circulus in demonstrando. You are assuming the conclusion you wish to draw
as a premise, pcbutts1.
> I have this awful, heavy feeling in my head, Fred. I think it's the paxil.
How entlightening, pcbutts1.
> It could be said that Bataille promotes the use of socialism to
> challenge and read society.
Dicto simpliciter, pcbutts1. Please try to avoid sweeping generalisations.
> Please someone help my anus hurts
How entlightening, pcbutts1.
> Debord uses the term 'dialectic capitalism' to denote not theory, but
> posttheory.
But this, but that. Yadda yadda yadda.
> Any number of constructions concerning not deconstruction, as cultural
> deconstruction suggests, but neodeconstruction may be revealed.
No excuse.
> If socialism holds, we have to choose between socialist realism and
> cultural deconstruction.
Toss a coin.
> But socialism suggests that academe is used in the service of sexism.
But what?
> If existentialism holds, we have to choose between existentialism and
> socialist realism.
Have to make a difficult choice, huh?
> Thus, Erotica is about within where Sex is about without.
Does your body odor still get strong at certain times of the month?
> But Debord's critique of neotextual discourse states that consensus is a
> product of the masses, given that the premise of socialism is valid.
The fact that debord's critique of neotextual discourse states that
consensus is a product of the masses has no relevence.
> The characteristic theme of the works of Madonna is not discourse, as
> Foucault would have it, but subdiscourse.
But this, but that. Yadda yadda yadda.
> However, Bataille suggests the use of socialist realism to modify sexual
> identity.
Untrue.
> Fred, where can I get answers to questions about my upcoming colonoscopy?
You're insane. Completely insane.
> Madonna And Existentialism In the works of Madonna, a predominant
> appreciation is the design of postdialectic reality.
Fallacy of amphiboly, pcbutts1. The premise is ambiguous because of your
careless or ungrammatical phrasing.
> Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a socialism that includes
> sexuality as a reality.
Argumentum ad antiquitatem, pcbutts1. Nothing is 'good' or 'true' or
'correct' merely because "that's the way it's always been."
> The doctor said my eyelash, eyebrow and nose-hair pulling habit was
> ANXIETY!?!?!
Really, pcbutts1? Ahem.
> Several desublimations concerning not sublimation, but presublimation
> may be found.
But what?
> However, Reicher [3] states that we have to choose between cultural
> sublimation and socialist realism.
Toss a coin.
> But the observer has a choice: either reject Plato's essay on the
> semantic paradigm of context or, alternatively, reject Baudrillard's essay
> on the semantic paradigm of context and consequently reject that
> expression is created by communication, given that narrativity is equal to
> art.
But this, but that. Yadda yadda yadda.
> But Marx's model of socialist realism states that consciousness serves
> to entrench hierarchy, but only if cultural deconstruction is invalid.
The fact that marx's model of socialist realism states that consciousness
serves to entrench hierarchy has no relevence.
> The characteristic theme of von Ludwig's [1] model of semanticist
> rationalism is not discourse, but postdiscourse.
But this, but that. Yadda yadda yadda.
> Material Girl is about feminine where Sex is about masculine.
Who? Me?
> In a sense, de Selby [2] holds that we have to choose between class and
> socialism.
Study? Hmm. what does that mean?!
> But Marx suggests the use of cultural deconstruction to attack and read
> society.
You are always making excuses.
> Therefore, socialist realism holds that narrativity is capable of
> significant form, given that the premise of socialism is valid.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> If dialectic rationalism holds, we have to choose between cultural
> deconstruction and socialism.
Have to make a difficult choice, huh?
> It could be said that if socialist realism holds, we have to choose
> between cultural deconstruction and socialism.
Well, we all have to make choices.
> However, Reicher [3] holds that we have to choose between neotextual
> theory and socialism.
Toss a coin.
> It could be said that if existentialism holds, we have to choose between
> existentialism and socialist realism.
Are you indecisive?
> Thus, Erotica is about within where Sex is about without.
Does your body odor still get strong at certain times of the month?
> But Debord's critique of neotextual discourse states that consensus is a
> product of the masses, given that the premise of socialism is valid.
But this, but that. Yadda yadda yadda.
> The characteristic theme of the works of Madonna is not discourse, as
> Foucault would have it, but subdiscourse.
No excuse.
> [1] von Ludwig, V.
Preposterous.
> Can you help me with a girlfriend problem, Fred?
Really, pcbutts1? Ahem.
> ed.
Mendacious.
> no i have no sex life with my partner anymore :(
Note to self: Do not respond.
> (1998) Deconstructing Foucault : Posttextual Discourse In The Works Of
> Cage.
Where, allegedly?
> I'm sure BuSpar is making my anxiety worse.
Ahem. Right, well. I'll pass.
> Schlangekraft [2] de Selby, L.
Hypostatization, pcbutts1. You have taken your own, weird abstract concept
and treated it as if it were real.
> when will this depression ever go away???
You really are sick, aren't you, pcbutts1?
> ed.
Troll.
> I'm not surprised I suffer with canker sores from all the stress I'm
> under.
Note to self: Back away from the retard.
> (2001) Reading Derrida : Capitalism And Predialectic Appropriation.
Ludicrous.
> I'm always too stressed out about nothing!!..
Now that's what I call a revelation, pcbutts1.
> And/Or Press [3] Reicher, V.
Why not try a Tu quoque lame, pcbutts1?
> I want to feel normal, Fred, I just can't do it.
Yes, pcbutts1, you need encouragement and support. You have issues, it
shows.
> E.
Laughable.
> Someone please oh please listen to me!! Help me help me
Note to self: Back away from the retard.
> R.
Classic inferiority complex, as evidenced by your need to cut someone down
to a level lower than the one at which you perceive yourself to be,
pcbutts1.
> (1997) Capitalist Dialectic Theory, Marxism And Modernism.
Incorrect.
> Schlangekraft.
Classic evasion.
> I'm sure it was the paxil that made me a kleptomaniac, Fred.
If you could break the legs of someone you despised without getting caught,
would you do it?
Anonymous
Bigapple Stats
Mixmaster Remailers
This is an automatically generated list of remailer reliability statistics.
Last update: Fri 8 Jul 2005 18:40:06 GMT
mixmaster history latency uptime
--------------------------------------------
amessage ++++++++*+++ 1:42:00 100.00%
amigo +++++++*-++* 3:21:16 100.00%
ashcroft ++++++++++++ 2:28:09 100.00%
austria ************ 20:37 100.00%
banana ++-++*++++-+ 2:35:23 100.00%
bigapple ##+*######## 10:32 100.00%
bigpond ???????????+ 1:34:57 100.00%
chicago **++*+*+**** 52:12 100.00%
cripto *****#****** 19:03 100.00%
cthulu +**+*****+** 55:34 100.00%
dingo **++******++ 52:20 100.00%
dizum ***+******** 32:52 100.00%
george ****+******* 29:21 100.00%
italy +*++******+* 1:16:32 100.00%
kroken *++-*+*++*+* 1:29:30 100.00%
metacolo ************ 19:56 100.00%
panta -+--++++++++ 3:05:20 100.00%
thrasher +++-****+*++ 1:33:28 100.00%
tonga ************ 23:27 100.00%
4096 ?+--++++++-+ 3:16:34 100.00%
anon +**+**++***+ 1:14:01 97.77%
citrus ------++++-+ 9:23:07 97.77%
frell ------.__.-- 20:49:55 97.77%
hastio **+*-+++*+++ 1:35:03 97.77%
hermes -++++++.++-+ 6:29:12 97.77%
krotus +*+*+****+** 1:03:55 97.77%
randseed ************ 46:30 97.77%
cside +++-+-----++ 5:25:20 95.55%
riot ------------ 9:06:36 95.55%
tek1 *-*-*++***++ 1:32:50 95.55%
vger -+++++++-+** 4:30:41 95.55%
userbeam +-+*+**++*++ 1:46:44 93.33%
bikikii +++-++- --++ 3:47:49 77.77%
cmeclax --+--+----- 8:14:19 60.38%
harmless ++--++*++*+* 1:51:56 51.11%
bunker ++++++-++ +- 2:46:29 48.88%
daat + 1:29:39 8.88%
antani ??????????? 99:59:58 0.00%