Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

flnews Editor

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Wolfgang Bauer

unread,
Nov 4, 2021, 8:57:15 AM11/4/21
to
Grüß euch.

mit ümläuten

Freundliche Grüße
Wolfgang
--
Sie brauchen einen Computer nicht einzuschalten um festzustellen,
ob Windows installiert ist. Sehen Sie einfach nach,
ob die Aufschrift auf der Reset-Taste noch lesbar ist.

zendar

unread,
Sep 30, 2022, 9:19:46 PM9/30/22
to

reese oreese ritten

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afhtMYkbKL0
"Hand to Hand Combat With Assault Rifle"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buttstroke
A buttstroke or butt-stroking is the act of striking someone with the
buttstock of a rifle, shotgun, or other long gun. It is a common case of
the use of a firearm as a blunt weapon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm_as_a_blunt_weapon

https://www.army.mil/article/240369/school_of_hard_knocks_returns_to_fort_sill_basic_combat_training

https://www.army.mil/article/102719/building_confidence_with_pugil_stick_training



https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/01/21/rittenhouse-huber-lawsuit/
Kyle Rittenhouse named in civil suit filed by parents of man killed in
Kenosha



https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/60
948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

"In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or
unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a);
metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to
the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a
nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood,
plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain,
wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or
other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar
pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or
a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends."



https://abc7.com/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-kenosha-wisconsin/11188161/

"Rosenbaum, who was unarmed, threw an object that appeared to be a plastic
bag at him and missed"


https://www.channel3000.com/i-just-killed-somebody-kenosha-shooter-caught-on-video-shooting-3-people-firing-at-least-9-rounds/



https://video.foxnews.com/v/6185194577001#sp=show-clips
lots of room to run and not panic shoot...


https://nypost.com/2021/08/20/kyle-rittenhouse-dreamed-about-shooting-people-days-before-kenosha-video/



"that guy needed shooting" - Not in America. On to the civil suit!

https://www.newsnationnow.com/banfield/kyle-rittenhouse-blames-former-lawyers-for-proud-boys-photo/


https://www.theverge.com/2012/8/30/3279628/apple-pinch-to-zoom-patent-myth


https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/12/22778801/kyle-rittenhouse-bruce-schroeder-screenshot-zoom-in
Rittenhouse trial judge still baffled by pinch-to-zoom
Judge Schroeder’s Galaxy S20 puts a hurdle in front of the prosecution’s
use of video evidence

On Wednesday, Schroeder stated it was up to the prosecution to prove that
zooming on a video in with an iPad doesn’t alter or manipulate the footage.
“iPads, which are made by Apple, have artificial intelligence in them that
allow things to be viewed through three-dimensions and logarithms,” the
defense said as part of its objection, adding that the iPad “uses artificial
intelligence, or their logarithms, to create what they believe is happening.
So this isn’t actually enhanced video; this is Apple’s iPad programming
creating what it thinks is there, not what necessarily is there.”

Judge Schroeder let the objection stand after giving prosecutors only 20
minutes to find an expert witness to explain how pinch-to-zoom on an iPad
worked. (It should be noted, of course, that iPads do not have any
“logarithms”
that allow video to be viewed in three dimensions or “recreate” parts of an
image that are not there.)




https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/survivor-expected-testify-rittenhouse-trials-2nd-week-81028747
“I thought the defendant was an active shooter,” the 27-year-old Grosskreutz
said. Asked what was going through his mind as he got closer to the
17-year-old
Rittenhouse, he said, “That I was going to die.”




https://www.grgblaw.com/wisconsin-trial-lawyers/how-do-wisconsin-s-self-defense-laws-apply-to-deadly-force

Wisconsin law allows you to threaten or use force against another person when
you reasonably believe that they intend to do you harm or illegally
interfere with
your person. However, you are authorized to use only the force necessary to
prevent the harm or interference from occurring. This means that you may only
use deadly force in self-defense if you reasonably believe that it is
necessary to
prevent someone from killing or doing great bodily harm to you. You are also
permitted to use force to defend a third party if your intervention is
necessary
to protect him or her from harm.

If you provoke an attack, you may not be able to claim legal self-defense
against
the attack unless it is likely to cause your death or great bodily harm.
Even then,
you must attempt every other reasonable option to escape, avoid, or
prevent the
attack before resorting to deadly force yourself. Additionally, you may not be
entitled to a claim of self-defense if you provoked another person’s
attack as an
excuse for you to kill or severely harm that person.


<https://www.google.com/search?q=crimes+%22crossing+state+lines%22&source=hp&ei=WqupYbGqLtyy0PEP1LmSoAI&iflsig=ALs-wAMAAAAAYam5audMf9S2-hJirgb5TpmiI76OwtYj&ved=0ahUKEwixv6aX88b0AhVcGTQIHdScBCQQ4dUDCAk&uact=5&oq=crimes+%22crossing+state+lines%22&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBggAEBYQHjIGCAAQFhAeMgYIABAWEB4yBggAEBYQHjIGCAAQFhAeMgUIABCGAzoECC4QQzoLCC4QxwEQrwEQkQI6BQgAEJECOg4ILhCABBCxAxDHARCjAjoICAAQgAQQsQM6DgguEIAEELEDEMcBENEDOhEILhCABBCxAxCDARDHARDRAzoICC4QsQMQgwE6BAgAEEM6BQguEJECOgoIABCxAxCDARBDOgoILhDHARCvARBDOgcILhCxAxBDOgsIABCABBCxAxDJAzoFCAAQkgM6CAguEIAEELEDOgsILhCABBCxAxCDAToLCAAQgAQQsQMQgwE6BQgAEIAEOgUILhCABDoICAAQgAQQyQM6CAgAEBYQChAeOgUIIRCgAToFCCEQqwJQAFj4OGC-O2gAcAB4AIABnwKIAc0rkgEGMC4yMi43mAEAoAEB&sclient=gws-wiz>


his own mom didn't know where he was...

https://dailysoapdish.com/2021/11/why-wasnt-cvs-clip-allowed-in-kyle-rittenhouse-trial-where-he-says-i-wish-i-had-my-f-ing-ar-id-start-shooting-rounds-at-them-would-it-have-swayed-the-jury/


https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/01/21/rittenhouse-huber-lawsuit/


https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/14/kyle-rittenhouse-proud-boys-bar/



https://www.courthousenews.com/racist-social-media-posts-text-messages-revealed-during-hate-crimes-trial-against-arberys-killers/
Racist social media posts, text messages revealed during hate crimes trial
against Arbery’s killers

Two of the three white men convicted of Ahmaud Arbery’s murder repeatedly
used
racial slurs on social media and in text messages, an FBI witness
testified on
Wednesday in their federal hate crimes trial.

FBI intelligence analyst Amy Vaughan gave several hours of detailed testimony,
walking jurors through more than two dozen instances of racist language and
violent sentiments expressed in the months and years before Arbery’s killing
by Travis McMichael, who fatally shot the 25-year-old Black man, and William
“Roddie” Bryan, who filmed the shooting.



https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/11/rittenhouse-trial-judge-disallows-ipad-pinch-to-zoom-read-the-bizarre-transcript/

When Kenosha County prosecutor Thomas Binger cross-examined murder suspect
Kyle Rittenhouse yesterday, he wanted to show Rittenhouse video on an iPad
and
use a touchscreen feature that phone and tablet owners around the world use
every day: pinch-to-zoom.

Judge Bruce Schroeder's ruling? You shall not pinch.

Schroeder prevented Binger from pinching and zooming after Rittenhouse's
defense
attorney Mark Richards claimed that when a user zooms in on a video,
"Apple's iPad
programming creat[es] what it thinks is there, not what necessarily is
there."
Richards provided no evidence for this claim and admitted that he doesn't
understand
how the pinch-to-zoom feature works, but the judge decided the burden was
on the
prosecution to prove that zooming in doesn't add new images into the video.

The defense flat out LIED and the judge let them get away with it.




0 new messages