Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Occam's razor
13 views
Skip to first unread message
Ernie
Dec 30, 2012, 9:19:42 PM12/30/12
to
It is a principle stating that among competing hypotheses, the one that is
the most simple should be selected. Can anyone honestly say that I have not
brought forth the most simple-minded theory on this newsgroup? Ernie
the most simple should be selected. Can anyone honestly say that I have not
brought forth the most simple-minded theory on this newsgroup? Ernie
William Elliot
Dec 30, 2012, 10:41:23 PM12/30/12
to
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, Ernie wrote:
> It is a principle stating that among competing hypotheses, the one that
What's it?
> It is a principle stating that among competing hypotheses, the one that
> is the most simple should be selected. Can anyone honestly say that I
> have not brought forth the most simple-minded theory on this newsgroup?
%
Dec 30, 2012, 11:01:17 PM12/30/12
to
Graham Cooper
Dec 30, 2012, 11:03:36 PM12/30/12
to
Sir Fred M. McNeill
Dec 30, 2012, 11:41:48 PM12/30/12
to
Graham Cooper
Dec 30, 2012, 11:48:12 PM12/30/12
to
or
A False Sense of Security?
or
We just couldn't be fked testing?
**************************
OCCAAM'S RAZOR! NOW ALL THEORISTS ARE CRAZY PEOPLE!
Herc
--
www.CAMGIRLS.com
Ernie
Dec 31, 2012, 6:21:25 AM12/31/12
to
"William Elliot" <ma...@panix.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.64.12...@panix1.panix.com...
showing all kinds of proof, there are those who still doubt me. Thanks for
asking. Ernie
Marcus (not Farrel)
Dec 31, 2012, 9:44:03 AM12/31/12
to
On Dec 31, 6:12 am, Ernest Primeau <eprimea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The proven liar, crook and forger HUNKY farrela lies again using my name. She did not cure AGA, she robbed people of their money, hair and sex lives at herwww.hairlosshell.consnake oil site. Now let the lying stupid whining cowardly vile HUNKY of shit and convicted child molester go finger herself, again. Ernie
Since you are the proven forger HUNKY farrela and a proven liar of
course you posted it using your name.
We all know you tried to rob people of their money, hair and sex lives
at yours snake oil site but thank goodness nobody was stupid enough to
take any of your advice.
Who wants hair loss tips from someone who is clearly bald?
Marcus
Since you are the proven forger HUNKY farrela and a proven liar of
course you posted it using your name.
We all know you tried to rob people of their money, hair and sex lives
at yours snake oil site but thank goodness nobody was stupid enough to
take any of your advice.
Who wants hair loss tips from someone who is clearly bald?
Marcus
Charlie-Boo
Dec 31, 2012, 7:18:43 PM12/31/12
to
have an alternate theory, you can no longer say that the simplest one
is best, and in fact you are not using the simplest one anymore. So
the theory is correct whether you choose the simplest theory or not.
This is analogous to what I call The Reversed Russell Set RS, which is
RS = { x | x e x }, the set of sets x that do contain themselves. Is
RS e RS ? RS e RS == RS e RS, so RS e RS can be anything. That is,
if RS e RS then RS e RS is justified, and otherwise it is not
justified. Rather than choosing an answer that meets the given
conditions, we choose a question where every answer meets the given
conditions.
C-B
Graham Cooper
Dec 31, 2012, 8:32:49 PM12/31/12
to
On Jan 1, 12:44 am, "Marcus (not Farrel)" <marcuscox2...@gmail.com>
wrote:
there's just 1 side effect!
http://graysshed.com/wolf-man.jpg
wrote:
> On Dec 31, 6:12 am, Ernest Primeau <eprimea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Monday, December 31, 2012 6:21:25 AM UTC-5, Ernie wrote:
> > > "William Elliot" <ma...@panix.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:Pine.NEB.4.64.12...@panix1.panix.com...
>
> > > > On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, Ernie wrote:
>
> > > >> It is a principle stating that among competing hypotheses, the one that
>
> > > > What's it?
>
> > > >> is the most simple should be selected. Can anyone honestly say that I
>
> > > >> have not brought forth the most simple-minded theory on this newsgroup?
>
> > > > What theory?
>
> > > Why, haven't you heard? I have cured male pattern baldness, but despite
>
> > > showing all kinds of proof, there are those who still doubt me. Thanks for
>
> > > asking. Ernie
>
> > The proven liar, crook and forger HUNKY farrela lies again using my name. She did not cure AGA, she robbed people of their money, hair and sex lives at herwww.hairlosshell.consnakeoil site. Now let the lying stupid whining cowardly vile HUNKY of shit and convicted child molester go finger herself, again. Ernie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Monday, December 31, 2012 6:21:25 AM UTC-5, Ernie wrote:
> > > "William Elliot" <ma...@panix.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:Pine.NEB.4.64.12...@panix1.panix.com...
>
> > > > On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, Ernie wrote:
>
> > > >> It is a principle stating that among competing hypotheses, the one that
>
> > > > What's it?
>
> > > >> is the most simple should be selected. Can anyone honestly say that I
>
> > > >> have not brought forth the most simple-minded theory on this newsgroup?
>
> > > > What theory?
>
> > > Why, haven't you heard? I have cured male pattern baldness, but despite
>
> > > showing all kinds of proof, there are those who still doubt me. Thanks for
>
> > > asking. Ernie
>
>
> Since you are the proven forger HUNKY farrela and a proven liar of
> course you posted it using your name.
>
> We all know you tried to rob people of their money, hair and sex lives
> at yours snake oil site but thank goodness nobody was stupid enough to
> take any of your advice.
>
> Who wants hair loss tips from someone who is clearly bald?
>
> Marcus
>
I've been using Regaine for 3 years...
> Since you are the proven forger HUNKY farrela and a proven liar of
> course you posted it using your name.
>
> We all know you tried to rob people of their money, hair and sex lives
> at yours snake oil site but thank goodness nobody was stupid enough to
> take any of your advice.
>
> Who wants hair loss tips from someone who is clearly bald?
>
> Marcus
>
there's just 1 side effect!
http://graysshed.com/wolf-man.jpg
Jasen Betts
Jan 8, 2013, 6:35:27 AM1/8/13
to
On 2013-01-01, Charlie-Boo <shyma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 9:19 pm, "Ernie" <Ernie...@webtv.net> wrote:
>> It is a principle stating that among competing hypotheses, the one that is
>> the most simple should be selected. Can anyone honestly say that I have not
>> brought forth the most simple-minded theory on this newsgroup? Ernie
>
> So the theory is that the best theory is the simplest one. But if you
> have an alternate theory, you can no longer say that the simplest one
> is best, and in fact you are not using the simplest one anymore. So
> the theory is correct whether you choose the simplest theory or not.
Why would you need an alrernate theory?
> On Dec 30, 9:19 pm, "Ernie" <Ernie...@webtv.net> wrote:
>> It is a principle stating that among competing hypotheses, the one that is
>> the most simple should be selected. Can anyone honestly say that I have not
>> brought forth the most simple-minded theory on this newsgroup? Ernie
>
> So the theory is that the best theory is the simplest one. But if you
> have an alternate theory, you can no longer say that the simplest one
> is best, and in fact you are not using the simplest one anymore. So
> the theory is correct whether you choose the simplest theory or not.
the simlest theory that explains all observations and can be used to
make useful testable predictions is to be preferred.
--
⚂⚃ 100% natural
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---
Graham Cooper
Jan 8, 2013, 7:18:14 PM1/8/13
to
On Jan 8, 9:35 pm, Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> wrote:
be trusted.
Friendly - like beer - on tourist VISA.
SO...
Get camera ready for expected great party shots!
All observations fit the theory those kegs are full of beer!
The more complex theory to check the contents anyway for explosives,
weapons, poisons or drugs can safely be discarded!
According to you!
Like I said - BIGGEST CROC OF SH%T IN HISTORY OCCAM'S RAZOR!
It seems like a meta-scientific method..
IT is actually an ANTI-SCIENTIFIC-METHOD
About as reliable as a Judge and Jury.
Occam's Razor is
EVERYTHING IS ALREADY EXPLAINED - DISCARD ALL NEW HYPOTHESIS
which is
THROW OUT ALL EXPERIMENTAL DATA PRESENTED
and use IDIOT PSYCHOLOGY *AGAINST* the people doing the research
instead!
Herc
> On 2013-01-01, Charlie-Boo <shymath...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 30, 9:19 pm, "Ernie" <Ernie...@webtv.net> wrote:
> >> It is a principle stating that among competing hypotheses, the one that is
> >> the most simple should be selected. Can anyone honestly say that I have not
> >> brought forth the most simple-minded theory on this newsgroup? Ernie
>
> > So the theory is that the best theory is the simplest one. But if you
> > have an alternate theory, you can no longer say that the simplest one
> > is best, and in fact you are not using the simplest one anymore. So
> > the theory is correct whether you choose the simplest theory or not.
>
> Why would you need an alrernate theory?
>
> the simlest theory that explains all observations and can be used to
> make useful testable predictions is to be preferred.
>
Like friendly tourists carrying big kegs of beer on the plane are to
>
> > On Dec 30, 9:19 pm, "Ernie" <Ernie...@webtv.net> wrote:
> >> It is a principle stating that among competing hypotheses, the one that is
> >> the most simple should be selected. Can anyone honestly say that I have not
> >> brought forth the most simple-minded theory on this newsgroup? Ernie
>
> > So the theory is that the best theory is the simplest one. But if you
> > have an alternate theory, you can no longer say that the simplest one
> > is best, and in fact you are not using the simplest one anymore. So
> > the theory is correct whether you choose the simplest theory or not.
>
> Why would you need an alrernate theory?
>
> the simlest theory that explains all observations and can be used to
> make useful testable predictions is to be preferred.
>
be trusted.
Friendly - like beer - on tourist VISA.
SO...
Get camera ready for expected great party shots!
All observations fit the theory those kegs are full of beer!
The more complex theory to check the contents anyway for explosives,
weapons, poisons or drugs can safely be discarded!
According to you!
Like I said - BIGGEST CROC OF SH%T IN HISTORY OCCAM'S RAZOR!
It seems like a meta-scientific method..
IT is actually an ANTI-SCIENTIFIC-METHOD
About as reliable as a Judge and Jury.
Occam's Razor is
EVERYTHING IS ALREADY EXPLAINED - DISCARD ALL NEW HYPOTHESIS
which is
THROW OUT ALL EXPERIMENTAL DATA PRESENTED
and use IDIOT PSYCHOLOGY *AGAINST* the people doing the research
instead!
Herc
0 new messages