Swiver
>this group is rather dull, so i'll post yet another dull msg.
Oh goody.
>the movie
>Dogma is really good. i love how they gave the part of God to Alanis
>Morrisette.
Doesn't the Bible refer to God as "He"?
>on the other hand, Jim Carrey as The Grinch was absolutely
>horrible, i mean, what are they trying to accomplish? thats almost as
>bad as that stupid Ja Ja Blinks from Star Wars Episode 1....teh original
>trilogy is soo much better, am i wrong? and Planet of the Apes...the
>best movies in history by far....well im out...later
Terrible.
--
http://ncavalier.port5.com/ - We're back!
"After a lengthy quasi-mystical novitiate, SS recruits were obliged to attend
"neo-pagan ceremonies of a specifically SS religion devised by Himmler himself
and clearly derived from his interests in occultism and the worship of Woden."
-- Francis King, Satan and the Swastika
I thought that was an absolute miscast- I understand what Smith was
trying to achieve in his portrayal of God, but Morrisette was, quite
frankly, shit. Great film, though.
>on the other hand, Jim Carrey as The Grinch was absolutely
> horrible, i mean, what are they trying to accomplish?
Money making from the old american tale. What else?
>thats almost as bad as
> that stupid Ja Ja Blinks from Star Wars Episode 1....teh original
trilogy is
> soo much better, am i wrong?
I vary between my belief as to whether ep 1 is better than return.
>and Planet of the Apes...the best movies in
> history by far....well im out...later
Planet was brilliant. They got progressivly worse, though.
Want decent films? Watch South Park, The Matrix, Batman (& Returns), X-
Men, Monty Python's Holy Grail and Life of Brian, Toy Story 1&2,
American Pie, Transformers: The Movie, Akira, Singin' in the Rain,
Casablanca, Citizen Kane, Naked Gun 1 & 2.5, Fight Club, La Nuit
Americain, Gladiator, The Sixth Sense, The Third Man, Vertigo, The
Seventh Seal, The Pornomatic 5000, anything by Quentin Tarantino, Tim
Burton, The Coen Brothers or Kevin Smith, anything with Jackie Chan,
Harvey Keitel or Steve Buscemi in it... I may remember more later on.
--
b m c ____ will swear for food
icq47130468
______________________________
www.misterridiculous.com/columns
www.savantmag.com
www.tbns.net/atii
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
the current claim is that god is neither he nor she, but an abstract
being that we can't properly realise due to our puny non-morbo human
brains, so we see god via an anthropomorphic personification of how
we'd imagine him to be rather his actual form.
--
b m c ____ will swear for food
icq47130468
______________________________
www.misterridiculous.com.columns
>In article <Xns8FFD6788Ew...@127.0.0.1>,
> ncav...@crosswinds.net (Stephen Morgan) wrote:
>> Doesn't the Bible refer to God as "He"?
>
>the current claim is that god is neither he nor she, but an abstract
>being that we can't properly realise due to our puny non-morbo human
>brains, so we see god via an anthropomorphic personification of how
>we'd imagine him to be rather his actual form.
He can appear however he likes. So can the devil.
--
http://ncavalier.port5.com/ - We're back!
A chubby man with a white beard and a red suit will approach you soon.
Avoid him. He's a Commie.
these days, the devil is apparently a completely abstract being which
merely influences, rather than out and out offers some good reasons for
turning to the darkside.
and people wonder why i gave up on catholicism.
cinema paradiso...
--
b m c ____ will swear for food
icq47130468
______________________________
www.misterridiculous.com/columns
pop slut <they_call...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:90bga2$il7$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
>In article <Xns8FFE60132w...@127.0.0.1>,
> ncav...@crosswinds.net (Stephen Morgan) wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Dec 2000 20:12:41 GMT, pop slut <they_call_him_steve@my-
>deja.com>,
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <Xns8FFD6788Ew...@127.0.0.1>,
>> > ncav...@crosswinds.net (Stephen Morgan) wrote:
>> >> Doesn't the Bible refer to God as "He"?
>> >
>> >the current claim is that god is neither he nor she, but an abstract
>> >being that we can't properly realise due to our puny non-morbo human
>> >brains, so we see god via an anthropomorphic personification of how
>> >we'd imagine him to be rather his actual form.
>>
>> He can appear however he likes. So can the devil.
>
>these days, the devil is apparently a completely abstract being which
>merely influences, rather than out and out offers some good reasons for
>turning to the darkside.
>
>and people wonder why i gave up on catholicism.
Depends. He's the manipulative type, but he'll come and get you if you have
any real power. Then he'll use you to manipulate millions (hello media!).
Catholicism is just Luciferianism in posh clothes. Go CofE.
that's a coen brothers film, is it not? if i wa going to list one of
their films specifically. it would have been blood simple, anyway.
>king pin
kingpin you can only watch once or twice before it's simply not funny
any more. it's the same problem with all their films.
>saving private ryan(why? because of the
> funniest scene where the bloke takes of his helmet on the beach and
gets a
> bullet through his head now thats comedy!!!!!never ming lol i was
rotflmao)
you are a sad strange little boy.
> any way im jason and i am saying hi
> i agree with the slut Quentin Tarantino is a god at directing good
movies
> but ithink hes and equally good actor
he's great but not god. his writing is better than his acting, given he
only seems to be able to cat the one part.
>what do u think of scilence of the
> lambs?
horribly overrated. it was the glorification of a remorseless murderer,
which is wrong. and i fucking hated hannibal (the book, people).
--
b m c ____ will swear for food
icq47130468
______________________________
www.misterridiculous.com.columns
pop slut <they_call...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:90cahe$5bj$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
Swiver
"Swiver" <swi...@cox-internet.com> wrote in message
news:t2durq3...@corp.supernews.com...
> this group is rather dull, so i'll post yet another dull msg. the movie
> Dogma is really good. i love how they gave the part of God to Alanis
> Morrisette. on the other hand, Jim Carrey as The Grinch was absolutely
> horrible, i mean, what are they trying to accomplish? thats almost as bad
as
> that stupid Ja Ja Blinks from Star Wars Episode 1....teh original trilogy
is
> soo much better, am i wrong? and Planet of the Apes...the best movies in
> history by far....well im out...later
>
> Swiver
>
>
Swiver <swi...@cox-internet.com> wrote in message
news:t2krklr...@corp.supernews.com...
don't have the boxsets, but still, they are the ultimate in cheesy
drunken film sessions. they do rock.
>i think you people need
to start
> talking about something interesting and something that you all wont
kill
> each other over. if youd ont, i will be forced to leave this NG, and
i KNOW
> you dont watn that to happen.
snicker...
>btw, did you all hear that joke last
night on
> SNL on weekend update...it was something like: "The gas prices have
gotten
> so high, that the protesting monks have to now set them selves on
fire by
> standing under a magnifying glass". that's really funny, but i have
all the
> respect in the world for those guys who do that, i would give
anything to
> believe that much in something....enough to set myself on fire...if i
had
> that much faith, i would have been dead years ago....anyway, later
i'll assume there was a point to that?
never said you have to, just a handy point to know.
>haven't seen blood
simple
> yet but will do just to see if your right.
i'm a film student. of course i'm right.
> is film everything in your life or would you say that u have
other
> interests like paper folding or airfix model creating
i love it when the children try to act all tough and grown up...
>and as for the
comment
> about little boy well that's just a typical secluded view, that
having read
> your previous posts I would have expected from u.
insert the usual "oh, so hurt" sarcasm bit i usually do here. too lazy
to do it myself thanks to college...
>any way thou who
will
> swear for food what are u tripping on?
it's a literary quote.
> silence of the lambs was not
> overrated it was as shocking as it was entertaining in my opinion.
and if
> I'm the sad strange little boy you must be the fucked up
institutionalised
> toddler.
i expressed an opinion based on the fact that everyone who watches that
film goes on about how cool it was, leaving out the fact that they were
praising a remorseless killer.
and i didn't like it.
i may say more once i've finished filming...
> >and as for the
> comment
> > about little boy well that's just a typical secluded view, that
> having read
> > your previous posts I would have expected from u.
>
> insert the usual "oh, so hurt" sarcasm bit i usually do here. too lazy
> to do it myself thanks to college...
>
oh its good that u r getting an education because damn u need on and its not
always good to just enjoy one form of art ie your films maybe u should
branch out and then maybe you may taake inspiration from other activities
basides trying to replicate the ideas and situations that other more
talented directors/producers what ever u want to call them have tried and
tested
> >any way thou who
> will
> > swear for food what are u tripping on?
>
> it's a literary quote.
>
?
> > silence of the lambs was not
> > overrated it was as shocking as it was entertaining in my opinion.
> and if
> > I'm the sad strange little boy you must be the fucked up
> institutionalised
> > toddler.
>
> i expressed an opinion based on the fact that everyone who watches that
> film goes on about how cool it was, leaving out the fact that they were
> praising a remorseless killer.
>
the ting is if films didnot shock then they would not be memorable and that
film will remain firmly imbeded in the minds of all that see it and if that
is not sucess then what is directing some 15 minute film using a camcorder
and which only gets shown at other friends houses or if your lucky the
college/uni film show allright then
> and i didn't like it.
>
> i may say more once i've finished filming...
o so i suppose all the i deas that u will include in this film will be
totaly original with no copy cat scenes/effects etc
will swear for food (because it makes me feel big and cool)
note he doesn't comment on this...
> > >haven't seen blood
> > simple
> > > yet but will do just to see if your right.
> >
> > i'm a film student. of course i'm right.
> >
> fucking typical womens purogative m always right
shame i'm a lad then, isn't it?
> > > is film everything in your life or would you say that u have
> > other
> > > interests like paper folding or airfix model creating
> >
> > i love it when the children try to act all tough and grown up...
> >
> yeah u would "pop" i bet saying things like this really boosts your
self
> depleting ego
you have no grasp of irony, do you?
> > >and as for the
> > comment
> > > about little boy well that's just a typical secluded view, that
> > having read
> > > your previous posts I would have expected from u.
> >
> > insert the usual "oh, so hurt" sarcasm bit i usually do here. too
lazy
> > to do it myself thanks to college...
> >
> oh its good that u r getting an education because damn u need on
oh, did that hurt...
>and
its not
> always good to just enjoy one form of art ie your films
when did i say this? i just intend to make a living out of films-
christ, it's like saying "you shouldn't paint if you're an artist
because you're limiting yourself".
>maybe u should
> branch out and then maybe you may taake inspiration from other
>activities
yes, hence my 200 strong cd collection and mini-library, to name two...
> basides trying to replicate the ideas and situations that other more
> talented directors/producers what ever u want to call them have tried
and
> tested
when the flaming fucks of megiddo did i rip someone else off? you have
seen none of my work for fucks sake!
> > >any way thou who
> > will
> > > swear for food what are u tripping on?
> >
> > it's a literary quote.
> >
> ?
> > > silence of the lambs was not
> > > overrated it was as shocking as it was entertaining in my opinion.
> > and if
> > > I'm the sad strange little boy you must be the fucked up
> > institutionalised
> > > toddler.
> >
> > i expressed an opinion based on the fact that everyone who watches
that
> > film goes on about how cool it was, leaving out the fact that they
were
> > praising a remorseless killer.
> >
> the ting is if films didnot shock then they would not be memorable and
that
> film will remain firmly imbeded in the minds of all that see it and if
that
> is not sucess then what is directing some 15 minute film using a
camcorder
> and which only gets shown at other friends houses or if your lucky the
> college/uni film show allright then
the fact that it relied on shock for memory should point out that it was
lacking, both narratively and directorally. note that ms foster didn't
return for the sequel?
> > and i didn't like it.
> >
> > i may say more once i've finished filming...
>
> o so i suppose all the i deas that u will include in this film will be
> totaly original with no copy cat scenes/effects etc
>
> will swear for food (because it makes me feel big and cool)
>
sigh...
Swiver
jasondp wrote in message ...
>im afraid I have never seen the original Godzilla movies are you talking
>about the ones where the monsters are just Chinese men in rubber suits if u
>r then I have seen clips and I was left laughing at the tatty costumes.
but
>then again maybe im just uneducated in the realms of monster films question
>r there any good trilogies?
>
>Swiver <swi...@cox-internet.com> wrote in message
>news:t2krklr...@corp.supernews.com...
>> we are still forgetting about all the original Godzilla movies. they are
>> probably one of the best box sets existing. i think you people need to
>start
>> talking about something interesting and something that you all wont kill
>> each other over. if youd ont, i will be forced to leave this NG, and i
>KNOW
>> you dont watn that to happen. btw, did you all hear that joke last night
>on
>> SNL on weekend update...it was something like: "The gas prices have
gotten
>> so high, that the protesting monks have to now set them selves on fire by
>> standing under a magnifying glass". that's really funny, but i have all
>the
>> respect in the world for those guys who do that, i would give anything to
>> believe that much in something....enough to set myself on fire...if i had
>> that much faith, i would have been dead years ago....anyway, later
>>