That is totally irrelevant. Why should you give a shit about what
newsgroups I have posted to?
> You do not meet the age requirements (intellectual or physical) for the
> hallowed halls of AT: get thee hence, child, before someone decides to
> administer a Clue.
Does it say that in the FAQ? I don't think so. And why should age matter?
If my post was not tasteless enough, TELL ME SO. I'm trying to contribute
to the group here. If reading about a kid's house burning down right in
time for christmas isn't amusing for you, then what's wrong (or right with
you)? If you don't want me here, then the hell with you. I have much
better things to do than be on this fucking computer posting irrelevant
messages on these newsgroups. May you be squicked by a thousand bloody
pus-ridden infected horses. And your mother too.
Comprende?
> Proctalgia wrote in message <1dkfevu.hs...@ts1-06.tru.istar.ca>...
> >Jorhae The Paver <Jor...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >I'll say it did, though I'm not sure whether the greater mistake was
> >when you daddy didn't use a condom, or when you posted this piece of
> The lad shows promise and deserves some encouragement, unlike you with your
> miserable attempt at a flame. Could the reason for your vehement reply be
> due to some long repressed trauma involving shool-age boys?
Where the shit did you come from and why is it that you didn't take time to
read the juvenile post that Proctalgia was responding to. A young school
kid does not deserve encouragement here, he doesn't deserve anything here.
He is free to earn it here and I hope he may sometime in the future. On the
other hand, I don't think you ever will earn anything here except the disrespect
of everyone here.