On 14/06/2014 17:49, Uncle Peter wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 17:47:13 +0100, Bod <
bodr...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 14/06/2014 17:37, Uncle Peter wrote:
>>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 13:02:47 +0100, Bod <
bodr...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 14/06/2014 11:54, Uncle Peter wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:27:31 +0100, Bod <
bodr...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14/06/2014 08:19, Uncle Peter wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>> 6.5 :-) That's enough to watch HD videos on Youtube. I don't
>>>>>> download
>>>>>> much at all anyway.
>>>>>> You used to be on 1.5Mbps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which was appalling. And why do you quote HD videos on youtube all
>>>>> the
>>>>> time? That doesn't mean it's fast enough. There are things which
>>>>> need
>>>>> to download before you see them, like a PDF, a webpage, an
>>>>> application,
>>>>> an update, a film .....
>>>>>
>>>> I quote Youtube for the simple reason that I use Youtube 99% of the
>>>> time
>>>> for HD video clips.
>>>
>>> Clips. Can you watch entire films on there? No.
>>>
>> I've told you several times that I don't watch films.
>
> OK, how many full David Attenborough programs are on there?
>