Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Adminspotting T's in US?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

fu...@ccp.uchicago.edu

unread,
Sep 15, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/15/97
to

So...
Anyone here on this side of the pond get their Adminspotting Ts from
wotshername yet? So far, I've sent her the money, along with a note
containing every conceivable way of contacting me, etc. Plus several
e-mails, and e-mails to whichever Brit was dealing with them. No
response. And, of course, I've moved since I ordered. So my address
has changed.

*sigh*

Anyone wanna run over there and poke them repeatedly? I think they've
nodded off.

--Mark, shirtless (not a pretty sight, might I add)


Jonathan H N Chin

unread,
Sep 15, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/15/97
to

fu...@ccp.uchicago.edu writes:


> Anyone here on this side of the pond get their Adminspotting Ts from
>wotshername yet? So far, I've sent her the money, along with a note
>containing every conceivable way of contacting me, etc. Plus several
>e-mails, and e-mails to whichever Brit was dealing with them. No
>response. And, of course, I've moved since I ordered. So my address
>has changed.

<QFX> Bwahahahahaha!!!!! </QFX>

As the Brit in question, all I want to say is: SEP.

Whilst I know nothing about any T-shirts, I am reliably informed that
a dead body has been successfully delivered to an anonymous address in
USA, incurring a measly $300 customs duty in the process.


HTH. HAND.

-jonathan (the Cambridge one)

PS. Oh yeah, although I'm not going to bother to check my outbox,
I'm pretty sure I replied to your email, and that Mary did too.


Kendall Libby

unread,
Sep 15, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/15/97
to

>>>>> "fugue" == fugue <fu...@ccp.uchicago.edu> writes:

fugue> So... Anyone here on this side of the pond get their
fugue> Adminspotting Ts from wotshername yet? So far, I've sent her
fugue> the money, along with a note containing every conceivable way
fugue> of contacting me, etc. Plus several e-mails, and e-mails to
fugue> whichever Brit was dealing with them. No response. And, of
fugue> course, I've moved since I ordered. So my address has changed.

AFAIK, Mary was waiting for them to go through customs (or whatever)..
something about problems with the dead bodies and whatnot, ya know.

K.

fu...@ccp.uchicago.edu

unread,
Sep 15, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/15/97
to

jh...@gilgamesh.rdg.ac.uk (Jonathan H N Chin) said:

>
> fu...@ccp.uchicago.edu writes:
>
>
> > Anyone here on this side of the pond get their Adminspotting Ts from
> >wotshername yet? So far, I've sent her the money, along with a note
> >containing every conceivable way of contacting me, etc. Plus several
> >e-mails, and e-mails to whichever Brit was dealing with them. No
> >response. And, of course, I've moved since I ordered. So my address
> >has changed.
>

> <QFX> Bwahahahahaha!!!!! </QFX>
>
> As the Brit in question, all I want to say is: SEP.
>
> Whilst I know nothing about any T-shirts, I am reliably informed that
> a dead body has been successfully delivered to an anonymous address in
> USA, incurring a measly $300 customs duty in the process.
>

Great! Now if Mary would only respond to my requests so I know that a
live individual has acknowledged my change of shipping address. :)


>
> HTH. HAND.
>
> -jonathan (the Cambridge one)
>
> PS. Oh yeah, although I'm not going to bother to check my outbox,
> I'm pretty sure I replied to your email, and that Mary did too.
>

Hm. Well, I never got Mary's, although I apologize, checking my archives
did turn up a response from you, Jon. I'm not in a rush to get the shirts
or anything. But if Mary could poke her head in and say, "yep, I know
where to ship your shirts", I'd rest a bit easier.

--Mark

P.S. ...hey, if I wasn't worrying about this, I'd have to do something silly
like get work done and close some of these tickets out. :)

Brian L. Naylor

unread,
Sep 16, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/16/97
to

On 15 Sep 1997 12:43:26 -0400, Kendall Libby
<fu...@shore.net> blessed us with the following:

>
>AFAIK, Mary was waiting for them to go through customs (or whatever)..
>something about problems with the dead bodies and whatnot, ya know.

Out of curiosity, (yes, really; I already have my shirt) I wonder what could
be taking them so long in Customs? I made arrangements with a friend in the
UK[1] to have a number of the shirts shipped over and they sailed right
through.[2] I suppose if there's a /really/ large number of them bound for
Mary they might take a closer look or three.

BTW, thanks, jonathan, for making the shirts in the first place. Mine's
provided quite a bit of amusement so far.


[1] this was done before The Mary Connection was announced, so don't infer
any ulterior motives or lack of trust there.
[2] once he remembered to mail them, scatterbrained spod that he is.[3]
[3] and he's "too busy to read news", so I'm safe in calling him names.

--
Brian Naylor bna...@mindspring.com http://www.mindspring.com/~bnaylor
Englishmen, though evil, have a natural tendency toward politeness which
makes them excellent slaves. -- Karl Grunfeld, in The Onion (7/23/97)

Jonathan H N Chin

unread,
Sep 16, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/16/97
to

bna...@mindspring.com (Brian L. Naylor) writes:
>Out of curiosity, (yes, really; I already have my shirt) I wonder what could
>be taking them so long in Customs? I made arrangements with a friend in the
>UK[1] to have a number of the shirts shipped over and they sailed right
>through.[2] I suppose if there's a /really/ large number of them bound for
>Mary they might take a closer look or three.

The box only took a couple of days to clear Customs.
I only sent it ten(?) days ago.

FWIW there were just under a hundred shirts in the box.

In future, if there are going to be similar quantities I
shall let someone else volunteer to print US/Canadian orders.


-jonathan (the Cambridge one--and how exactly is one supposed to "learn"
Matlab without also learning more about maths than one might
wish in a lifetime to do?)

Bruce Murphy

unread,
Sep 16, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/16/97
to

jh...@gilgamesh.rdg.ac.uk (Jonathan H N Chin) writes:

> -jonathan (the Cambridge one--and how exactly is one supposed to "learn"
> Matlab without also learning more about maths than one might
> wish in a lifetime to do?)

Well, you certainly aren't going to learn anything about programming
by using it. I've been convicing people to re-write anything that takes
over a day or so to run in matlab under a better language[1]

*shudder*

I suppose it is VB with numbers for unix...

[1] Typically FORTRAN. Cut one test down to 37 minutes from 18 hours.
--
Packrat (BSc/BE;COSO;Civil Admin)
Nihil illegitemi carborvndvm.

Patrick Gosling

unread,
Sep 16, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/16/97
to

In article <m2afhdh...@neotoma.rattus.uwa.edu.au>,
Bruce Murphy <pac...@tartarus.uwa.edu.au> wrote:
[ matlab ]

>Well, you certainly aren't going to learn anything about programming
>by using it. I've been convicing people to re-write anything that takes
>over a day or so to run in matlab under a better language[1]

Yup. That's precisely the point of matlab - it's great for knocking up
quick tests of nice ideas, but the moment you've got something you want to
do seriously, you bloody well head off and find yourself a proper programming
language.

On the other hand, I'd be interested to look at what kind of performance
the 3rd party matlab compiler thingy gave on real problems ...

-patrick.


Eric Sorenson

unread,
Sep 16, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/16/97
to

Jonathan H N Chin wrote:

] In future, if there are going to be similar quantities I


] shall let someone else volunteer to print US/Canadian orders.

Amen. I'm out of the tee-shirt business entirely now. Getting
on a first name basis with postal workers is not the best
way to prolong one's lifespan.

--
Eric Sorenson - ro...@satanic.org - http://satanic.org/ | alt.fan.xlock-rotor
"I never claimed to be anything but a nice guy and an athlete." - HSThompson
Use SATANIX 1.0, an OS42K. When the Rapture comes, will YOU have root?

Mary J. Alderdice

unread,
Sep 17, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/17/97
to

fu...@ccp.uchicago.edu wrote:

> jh...@gilgamesh.rdg.ac.uk (Jonathan H N Chin) said:

> > Whilst I know nothing about any T-shirts, I am reliably informed that
> > a dead body has been successfully delivered to an anonymous address in
> > USA, incurring a measly $300 customs duty in the process.

Indeed. Jonathon, could you at least pack the body in dry ice next
time? It was quite messy.

> Great! Now if Mary would only respond to my requests so I know that a
> live individual has acknowledged my change of shipping address. :)

I exist! Really! Tho, I'm not sure about the change of shipping
address? Could you please retransmit to me...@gizmo.erols.com (that
would be me) so I can update?

> Hm. Well, I never got Mary's, although I apologize, checking my archives
> did turn up a response from you, Jon. I'm not in a rush to get the shirts
> or anything. But if Mary could poke her head in and say, "yep, I know
> where to ship your shirts", I'd rest a bit easier.

Well. See. I don't normally read this group. :)

-meri

PS: All shirts should be going out on Friday or Saturday, barring
oddness.

--
Mary Alderdice * Network Administrator * Erol's Internet * 703.321.8000
malde...@erols.com * http://hmmm.colo.erols.net/~meri/ * 888.982.2069


0 new messages