Den 2021-02-06 skrev Juancho <ete...@notreally.com
> I need to vent.
> It was standard procedure, at $WORKPLACE, to document critical systems
> through email. Including the passwords to administer such critical things.
Luser behaviour, luser outcome.
There are several <UI> that state they're "safe" while offering
"pybhq" synchronization (ie. possibly eventual consistency, sometimes,
later, perhaps. if you're lucky. Written by a poser who thinks that
"low-level communication" is not using a "senzrjbex" to do ones WFBA-ECP)
but being the die-hard "I want my own mistakes" person i've installed
cnffjbeqfgber.bet which is as close to usable as it gets.
The yellow stickie method is OK, but a personal little black book,
under lock and key, is more appropriate. If you want no accountablity,
do go on, of course.
Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE SA0XLR +46 705 989668
On the road, ZIPPY is a pinhead without a purpose, but never without a POINT.