On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 02:28:05 +0400, Happy Oyster <-*-*.@.*-*-> wrote:
>On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 14:24:05 -0400,
cl...@snyder.on.ca wrote:
>
>>>Do you now see that your approach is somewhat outlandish?
>> Not outlandish at all - and when, as part of my job servicing
>>computers, a drive is found to be disfunctional, the FIRST STEP is to
>>substitute a "known good drive". In virtually every case, it has also
>>been the "final solution".
>
>That has to be analyzed to the to the main facts which still are in the
>background...
>
>1. IF you are in a service company, one thing is for sure in most of the
>cases: the owners brought their computers to you in despair (because
>going to a repair shop costs money!) AFTER having tried all they could
>on their own. So, what you got on the table was already pre-selected.
Nope. My customers call me because their time is valuable
>
>2. To be able to use an other drive, one has to have one. Who has?
Anyone who has an old computer lying around, or has 2 computers, or
who scrapped their old one recently can have a spare drive around. And
as I have stated before - a new one can cost as little as 19 bucks in
Canada - and everythning is cheaper in the USA.
>
>3. To be able to use an other drive, that drive must be mounted into the
>computer, which - for that purpose - must be opened. Who can do that?
Virtually anybody with a screwdriver. Heck half the cases today don't
even need a screwdriver any more.
>
>4. The easiest way to test a drive without opening the computer is to
>try another software. Which, again, excludes a lot of cases in which the
>owners on their own eliminated a great part of possible causes of
>failures.
>
Except you don't know what all software is involved, so you can end up
having to do a complete fresh install of Windows (or whatever your OS
is) to get the software 100% replaced. And it's not going to fix it
anyway, at least 75% of the time - so you are just spinning your
wheels. If it doesn't work when you are done simply installing a
freeware burning program, you don't know if it is a native driver
problem, an interface problem, or the drive (most common)
On the other hand, if a new drive doesn't fix it (less than 25%
chance) then you get into the "difficult" stuff.
>In the end, doing it step by step, most of the owners excluded all BUT
>THE DRIVE. So it is no wonder that in the majority of cases what you got
>onto the table WAS a case of drive failure.
Like I said, you don't have a clue. When my customers' computers give
them trouble, they call ME to get the system back up and running as
soon as possible. At as low an overall cost as possible. Their
computers cost them BIG money when they are not working. In soime
cases several hundred dollars an hour to have a desktop down.