Would it be cleanest to set one up as an
independent network name (I assume its ip address
can be changed from the default of 192.168.1.245
so it won't interfere with the other one)?
Or is one of the confusing repeater or extender or
whatever modes called for instead.
The idea would be to put additional mac addresses
in the 2nd wireless access point, and I guess run
them on a different channel.
--
rhha...@mindspring.com
On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.
"Ron Hardin" <rhha...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:4B043A...@mindspring.com...
> To accommodate more than 50 mac addresses, a 2nd
> wireless access point seems to be called for.
The wireless router should handle more than that, although you may run
out of places to put MAC addresses in if you are using a MAC address
filter. (I've run my Buffalo WHR-G54S with DD-WRT past that, but only
on a mix of wired and wireless clients.)
Some of the Linksys routers and access points lack enough RAM to avoid
memory exhaustion and will crash or "weird out".
Even if you do get 50 wireless clients (!!!!) on one network, it's
very likely that performance will suffer terribly.
William
"Christopher Muto" <mu...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:956dnVz5m8IYy5nW...@speakeasy.net...