http://h18023.www1.hp.com/support/files/server/us/download/22678.html
I hope this is of help to others out there ;-)
-Paul
way old news ...
It was a public service, and the ISO was not publicly available. Bandwith
costs money my friend, and I never "made" any money on it. It just offset
the cost of the additonal bandwidth consumption.
the day that they posted the link to the ISO on thier site, I took down the
autoresponder and started to direct people to the HP site for the DL.
Greed is not a word that anyone i know uses when describing me.
: )
- LC
IIRC, I used to get about $5-$10 for them (inc Management CD and postage
anywhere in the world), though once, someone insisted on paying £40 (Thats
about $70!)
The ISO was not publicly available until SmartStart became Linux-based.
Before that, Compaq had to pay for a Windows license with each CD, and
that's why you could not download the ISO image.
"NuTCrAcKeR" <nutcr...@internationalhacker.org> wrote in message
news:2q2dnYgd9dc...@speakeasy.net...
yah, that sounds about right. In todays terms, the old disks used something
that would be analogus to a PE environment. It was really just a windows
shell that provided the graphic object interface that SS used.
Hi there,
Reading this lot it looks like I may have found my saviour then. We
have (for our sins) just rolled out a load of new Dell servers and as a
result, there is an old Proliant ML350 that I will be taking home for
'training' purposes. I have managed to replace the 3 x 9gb scsi drives
with 3 x 73gb. Now obviously, the old sys partition and utils went with
the old array. I am having a nightmare trying to reconfigure the raid
card.
I have downloaded and created the SS 5.5 CD but the system just hangs
on 'Trying to boot to CD'. Should I be preparing the CD as bootable or
does the iso take care of the boot files?
I have tried the 'erase' utility on fdd but that comes back and tells
me that the 'system has been intentionally locked please run the
SmartStart CD'.
I have tried and tried and tried to find an fdd version of the raid
config util but no luck.
Is this box recoverable with 3 new disks in?
Any help would be greatly appreciated so thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Lockstock.
--
Lockstock
- LC
"Lockstock" <Lockstoc...@news.computerbanter.com> wrote in message
news:Lockstoc...@news.computerbanter.com...
Please ignore my previous post in this thread. I was "incoherent" at
the time. NC is the greatest resource that we have.
Please CD-burn again, but try doing it at a speed of around 12X rather
than full speed.
Jeffrey Alsip
Thank you, Jeffrey
LC, cheers for the pointer. I will give that a go this week and let you
know. Have a good weekend.
Cheers, Lockstock
--
Lockstock
The contents of each of the CDs is as below. Do you think it could just
be a dodgy image from the Compaq/Hp site?
Do you, by any chance, know where I could get an alternative image?
Cheers for your time.
Byron.
Directory of E:\
14/02/2000 16:12 44 AUTORUN.INF
24/08/1995 13:11 1,228,800 BOOT120A.DAT
24/08/1995 13:11 1,228,800 BOOT120B.DAT
24/08/1995 13:11 1,228,800 BOOT120C.DAT
24/08/1995 13:11 1,228,800 BOOT120D.DAT
24/08/1995 13:11 1,228,800 BOOT120E.DAT
24/08/1995 13:11 1,228,800 BOOT120F.DAT
24/08/1995 13:11 1,228,800 BOOT120H.DAT
20/05/2002 17:08 1,474,560 BOOT144A.DAT
20/05/2002 17:10 1,474,560 BOOT144B.DAT
20/05/2002 17:12 1,474,560 BOOT144C.DAT
20/05/2002 17:15 1,474,560 BOOT144D.DAT
27/06/2000 12:44 1,474,560 BOOT144E.DAT
27/06/2000 12:44 1,474,560 BOOT144F.DAT
27/06/2000 12:44 1,474,560 BOOT144G.DAT
27/06/2000 12:44 1,474,560 BOOT144H.DAT
13/10/1997 10:57 2,049 BOOTCAT.BIN
06/08/2002 11:25 <DIR> CIMCDDET
06/08/2002 11:28 <DIR> CPQACU
06/08/2002 10:52 <DIR> CPQADU
06/08/2002 10:54 <DIR> CPQDIAGS
06/08/2002 11:25 <DIR> CPQHLP
16/07/1999 03:13 13 CPQNTSSD.1
16/07/1999 03:13 13 CPQNTSSD.2
16/07/1999 03:13 13 CPQNTSSD.3
16/07/1999 03:13 13 CPQNTSSD.4
17/04/2000 11:04 62 CPQSMST
06/08/2002 12:13 <DIR> CPQSUPSW
06/08/2002 10:55 <DIR> CR3500
06/08/2002 10:57 <DIR> DIAGS
06/08/2002 11:09 <DIR> DIFDATA
06/08/2002 11:30 <DIR> DSKBLDR
17/12/1999 12:01 2,048 ETMBR.DAT
06/08/2002 10:57 <DIR> FFIU
06/08/2002 11:29 <DIR> MSENT
27/08/1998 17:43 16,777,216 NWCDIDX.4CD
06/08/2002 11:28 <DIR> REPFLAT
06/08/2002 11:28 <DIR> RGT
06/08/2002 10:57 <DIR> ROMPAQ
06/08/2002 11:26 <DIR> SCOIMAGE
06/08/2002 11:29 <DIR> SOL1
06/08/2002 15:19 566,458 SSCD.PEZ
12/10/2001 13:39 0 SSHWSUP.TX#
02/08/2002 11:52 3,464 SSHWSUP.TXT
06/08/2002 11:26 <DIR> SSNT40
06/08/2002 11:26 <DIR> SSNT50
06/08/2002 11:27 <DIR> SSNW
06/08/2002 11:27 <DIR> SSSUP
06/08/2002 11:31 1,495,235 SSZIP.EXE
02/11/1998 16:25 889 SWORD400.INI
02/11/1998 16:25 890 SWORD720.INI
06/08/2002 11:09 <DIR> SYSCFG
06/08/2002 11:28 <DIR> UTILS
06/06/2002 17:50 25 VERSION
06/08/2002 11:09 <DIR> VER_INFO
06/08/2002 11:31 <DIR> WIN95
06/08/2002 11:31 8,617,183 WIN95.EXE
32 File(s) 47,863,695 bytes
--
Lockstock
- LC
"Lockstock" <Lockstoc...@news.computerbanter.com> wrote in message
news:Lockstoc...@news.computerbanter.com...
>
Heres a thought, NC, what if one of us took a known good disc and used
it to create a more MODERN iso image? Could this image then be expected
to burn at full speed?
I seem to have gotten into the habit of burning EVERY iso at the slower
speeds. Even when I got the new Fedora Core 5, the week before last, I
still burned the discs at the slow speed...just to avoid the
possibility of making new coasters.
Followed your advice and bingo. Writing at x4, the slowest the drive
will allow, and it worked. At last. Cheers for the pointer.
Now lets see how far I can get from this point before I am back. :)
Cheers.
Lockstock
--
Lockstock
Got it. On the 4th attempt I used the slowest write speed that the
drive will allow and finally I have a boot CD.
Now lets see what else this out beauty throws at me.
Cheers for your help.
Lockstock.
--
Lockstock
My pleasure. As I said before, I have gotten used to burning ANY iso
file (that I expect to be bootable) at the slowest possible speed.
Now when I take a good 5.50 disk and attempt to COPY it onto a blank
disc, I can do so at full speed with no problem. It's just burning from
the iso that constitutes the big bottle-neck.
Jeff
Cheers for your help.
BT
--
Lockstock
Actually, yes.
Run the F10 utilities, and press CTRL+A to get into the advanced menu. Then
run the SCU and edit the settings. There is an option for "headless" or
something to that effect.
However, I would suggest getting a RILOE (or RILOE II) board for your
server, as it taps into the KVM ports on the server, and gives you complete
remote control and administration over the system. Last one i bought on ebay
was $25 about 3 weeks ago.
- LC
With all of the RILOE talk, lately, I am feeling the urge to play with
one myself. Ebay does have several listed...can you tell me the part
number I need for a ProLiant 1600 or 3000?
Jeff
You need a RILOE board, NOT RILOE II :
RILOE compatability Matrix:
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/management/remote-lightsout/server-slot-matrix.html
RILOE II compatablility Matrix:
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/management/riloe2/server-slot-matrix.html
Locate your server on the list, and see what slot you need to install the
board into. Also, note any cabling notes.
- LC