"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
news:6acba75r620hbrn4d...@4ax.com...
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 06:00:06 -0500, G <
seal...@osama-is-dead.net>
wrote:
>CS wrote:
>
>>Today at Costco I found one, which has all of the above, as well as a 3
>>foot
>>extension, for a total of 6 feet of nook/cranny inspection goodness, for
>>$149.99.
>
>
>I hope you are not using it for anything security related. Please don't
>consider any CCTV packages from Costo/Sams for security, I've yanked so
>many out I lost count.
Whats the problem with them? Camera failure or wireless failure?
Do they have a backup RG59 connector or are they simply wireless with
no options?
Gunner, who ran an alarm co for 15 yrs.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Never been a fan of wireless anything for security related stuff.
I can understand a professional having a dim view of Costco or other
consumer type security systems, but the price difference is pretty extreme.
A standard resolution, 0 lux, fixed wired camera with weather resistant
housing:
Consumer camera: $50 to $150
Professional camera: $250 to $1,000
My house, which is a fairly standard detached garage type house, would
require a minimum of 6 cameras if I wanted to deter curious prowlers, 10
cameras if I wanted full coverage around the house for identifying people
and vehicles, and 4 more if I wanted to cover the garage.
Consumer DVR: $150 to $1,000 for 4 and 16 cameras, respectively.
Professional DVR: Shitload of $$$
Also, most professional stuff is way overpriced. The last placed I worked
used Pelco cameras, very nice, but very expensive. Out of 135 cameras, one
would crap out about once every two months. If memory serves, complete
cameras, without housings, were about $300. They were run off of about a
dozen power supplies, recommended by Pelco. These PS's were old school
transformer types, not switching power supplies like nearly every other type
on the planet. While I didn't detect any spikes, my testing rig may not
have been sensitive enough to detect them. Either way, that is what fuses
are for, and they rarely popped.
Shitty $50 cameras would have done the same job, been cheaper to replace,
and probably wouldn't die so quickly anyway.
CS