Re: pee@sent.net is a transphobe.

[KWills]

On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:15:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
<sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:

>On 2/13/22 21:45, KWills wrote:

>>>>>>> Transgender people can be just about everything
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Except for the fact that none such actually exist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> , beginning from trans women up to unique gender identities so
>>>>>>> one but those people themselves can understand it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Woke delusions. How many of these 'gender identities' have you wackos
>>>>>> come up with? I last heard over a hundred.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are as many gender identities as there are people in the world -
>>>>> except people who don't expreience it, and that's vaild too!
>>>>
>>>> But the only thing that matters is what sex someone is, and there are
>>>> only two possibilities. The rest is, again, woke horseshit.
>>>
>>> What about about intersex people?
>>
>> There are a small number of deformed freaks of nature, but less than
>> 0.0000000000000000001% of delusional 'transgenders' fall into this
>> category.
>
>That equals 0 (zero) trans people.

Right! 0 (zero) IS the number of 'trans people'!
--
KWills
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[KWills]

On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:21:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
<sci...@danwin1210.de> wrote:

>On 2/11/22 19:09, % wrote:

>>>>>> KWills
>>>>>> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
>>>>>> counselor.
>>>>>> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
>>>>>> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>

>>>> why is your sex all you talk about
>>> Because I'm pissed by transphobes on Usenet. I think some TERFs are
>>> also somewhere here.
>>
>> why do i have to be a party to your penis issues
>
>Honestly, don't look at my sex and gender,

You only get one of those: sex. And it's male.

> just call me as "Scientific"
>and use my pronouns, which are, of course she and her.

Don't be silly. Only women get she and her. YOU get he and him.

[KWills]

On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:18:55 -0500, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:

>On 2022-02-17 12:36, KWills wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> United as one, yes. So what's the difference?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still three distinct entities. That's the difference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still united as one. There is no difference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If there was no difference there would be just one, not three.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Who are you to decide that?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No need, the definition of the word trinity does it for me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your intentional misunderstanding has nothing to do with the word trinity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no intentional misunderstanding and the 'tri' in 'trinity'
>>>>>>>> means three.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> United in one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THREE united in One.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm glad you agree.
>>>>
>>>> I'm glad YOU do.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm beginning to think you're some kind of atheist troll. Are you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So says the atheist troll.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Admisison noted, atheist troll.
>>>>>
>>>>> That would be you.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for admitting you're a troll. It was becoming increasingly
>>>> obvious.
>>>
>>> So says the troll.
>>
>> Yes, you just did say so.
>
>That is you.

No, it's you.