Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Gay NAMGLA

20 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

yoo...@localhost.com

unread,
Oct 15, 2004, 1:21:29 AM10/15/04
to
On 14-Oct-2004, virism_p...@yahoo.com (Virism Pro_Virism) wrote:

> We were born male.
(snippage)
> ... we also identify as female

fine.

> The North American Man/Girl Love Association

what, exactly, is a "Girl"?

are there age limitations?

if not, how is this legal?

i don't care if you identify as G.W. Bush, if you want to have sex with
females under the age of 18, you're a pedophile. and it ain't legal (altho
the age limit may be 17 in Chicago and NYC).

perhaps if you would be more specific with your charter, you might be able
to rally people to your side.

altho there's not much you can do with the name "Man-Girl Love Ass'n".

however, if you're the female-oriented equivalent of NAMBLA, then you're
just as sick as they are.

yvette

Virism Pro_Virism

unread,
Oct 15, 2004, 10:02:48 AM10/15/04
to
yoo...@localhost.com wrote in message news:<416f5e91$1...@Usenet.com>...

> On 14-Oct-2004, virism_p...@yahoo.com (Virism Pro_Virism) wrote:
>
> > We were born male.
> (snippage)
> > ... we also identify as female
>
> fine.
>
> > The North American Man/Girl Love Association
>
> what, exactly, is a "Girl"?
>
> are there age limitations?
>
> if not, how is this legal?

> i don't care if you identify as G.W. Bush, if you want to have sex with
> females under the age of 18, you're a pedophile.

I hate this gender-bias against males. It isn't fair. WTF is society
more protective of girls than boys? Science has already proven that
little girls are stronger than little boys. Yet the fucked-up society
of humans treats little girls better than little boys. Machimso is
resonsible for this. I hate machismo.

BTW your definition of 'pedophile' is wrong. A pedophile is a person
16 or above who is sexually-attracted to a minor under 14 when the two
are 5 or more years apart.

I just wish that the society of humans would make their rules
regarding treatment of children gender-neutral. Since girl kids are
stronger than boy kids, society should be even more protective of boy
kids.

Ever since humans formed a society, this society has always -- and in
all cultures -- treated girls better than boys. I am a victims of
child sex abuse. My perp was male, however, he followed machimso and
was nicer to girls than boys. I hate this.

The fucked-up society of humans gladly accepts NAMBLA. However, they
would bomb any NAMGLA. This is sexist against boy children.

NAMBLA is heterosexual. NAMGLA [can't exist due to societal protection
of girls] is homosexual.

Virism Pro_Virism

unread,
Oct 15, 2004, 10:03:51 AM10/15/04
to
yoo...@localhost.com wrote in message news:<416f5e91$1...@Usenet.com>...

> however, if you're the female-oriented equivalent of NAMBLA, then you're


> just as sick as they are.

At least NAMGLA is homosexual. NAMBLA is oppresively heterosexual and homophobic.

yoo...@localhost.com

unread,
Oct 15, 2004, 11:58:15 AM10/15/04
to
On 15-Oct-2004, virism_p...@yahoo.com (Virism Pro_Virism) wrote:

> yoo...@localhost.com wrote in message news:<416f5e91$1...@Usenet.com>...
> > On 14-Oct-2004, virism_p...@yahoo.com (Virism Pro_Virism) wrote:
> >
> > > The North American Man/Girl Love Association
> >
> > what, exactly, is a "Girl"?
> >
> > are there age limitations?
> >
> > if not, how is this legal?
>
> > i don't care if you identify as G.W. Bush, if you want to have sex with
> > females under the age of 18, you're a pedophile.
>
> I hate this gender-bias against males. It isn't fair. WTF is society
> more protective of girls than boys? Science has already proven that
> little girls are stronger than little boys. Yet the fucked-up society
> of humans treats little girls better than little boys. Machimso is
> resonsible for this. I hate machismo.

you haven't answered my questions - or pehaps you have by not answering my
questions.

it doesn't matter whether the child is a boy or a girl. it matters that
they are not: (a) grown-up enough to make sexual decisions for themselves;
and (b) of legal age.

this machismo, boy/girl argument is a canard. shame on you.

> BTW your definition of 'pedophile' is wrong. A pedophile is a person
> 16 or above who is sexually-attracted to a minor under 14 when the two
> are 5 or more years apart.

what utter and total bullshit. you're going by the letter of the law. the
spirit of the law - and thus the reason for the law - is to prevent sexual
exploitation of minors by non-minors (note i don't use the word "adult"
becuase there is nothing "adult" about your argument).

if you were 20 and you came after a child of mine that was 16, in my eyes
you'd be a pedophile (and you'd better wear kevlar 24x7).

5 or more years apart, under 14, what bullshit. a kid is a kid.

yvette

Virism Pro_Virism

unread,
Oct 17, 2004, 12:17:48 AM10/17/04
to
yoo...@localhost.com wrote in message news:<416ff3ce$1...@Usenet.com>...

> it doesn't matter whether the child is a boy or a girl. it matters that
> they are not: (a) grown-up enough to make sexual decisions for themselves;
> and (b) of legal age.

Then why do so many cultures tolerate and encourage man-to-boy sex
while violently comdemning man-to-girl sex?


Islam rapes boys:

http://www.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/33.htm

"Homosexuality in Islam is punishable by death but pederasty is
permissible."

Check out homophobic India. Boys are jailed for being raped by
men!!!!!!!

http://www.ageofconsent.com/india.htm

Quotes from site:

"What is obvious is that whilst Indian law sees the use of young girls
as illegal, that of young boys seems to leave them totally
unbothered."

"I want as example the fact that when I was arrested in Bombay (on
false charges, I had opened a case for fraud against an ex-collegue
there), when the police came to know on what charges I had been
arrested on (sex with a 14 year-old), they laughed upraoriously, and
smacked my bum."

"Then the case went to court in Tamil Nadu, where, rather than convict
me, they wanted to arrest the ´victim´! The reason: according to the
testimony of the person who filed the false case, I had sucked the
penis of the boy. The boy therefore penetrated me, therefore in
Indian law, the boy is the one who abused me ! I actually have the
legal minutes stating this."

"I had to intervene so that they did not bother my young friend, who
was being treated very badly indeed. Therefore there is no abuse or
rape or anything punishable if the victim did not either suck you or
get sodomised. There are no laws for ´pedophilia´, since there are no
laws relating to age limits involving boys together."

"My experience is big in this field, and I notice that all cases that
come up are all blackmail cases, in which one complainant in one case
gets a counter case against him accusing him of homosexuality."

yoo...@localhost.com

unread,
Oct 17, 2004, 4:11:37 AM10/17/04
to
On 16-Oct-2004, virism_p...@yahoo.com (Virism Pro_Virism) left us with
this nonsense:

> Islam rapes boys:
>
> http://www.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/33.htm
>
> "Homosexuality in Islam is punishable by death but pederasty is
> permissible."
>
> Check out homophobic India. Boys are jailed for being raped by
> men!!!!!!!
>
> http://www.ageofconsent.com/india.htm
>

other cultures are free to do as they wish. i'm talking about North
America, where pedophilia is a crime (and should be punishable by life in
jail).

you are obviously either: (a) someone who is seriously disturbed; and/or
(b) someone who is trying to bait transgendered people into visiting your
pedophilia sites.

you should know that *every* study done of child molestation where the
sexual identity/orientation of the molesters was known has shown that the
GLBT community has a far lower incidence of child molestation / pedophilia
than the non-GLBT community (i.e., heterosexuals).

so stop trying to bait us and go away. preferably, go to a mental health
center before you hurt some child (or some other child). and if you have
molested a child, then do the rest of the children (and yourself) a favor
and turn yourself in to the police before i find you, you sick f**k.

yvette

Poor Lyle

unread,
Oct 17, 2004, 1:32:45 PM10/17/04
to
L D Blake <n...@any.adr> wrote:

>On 16 Oct 2004 21:17:48 -0700, virism_p...@yahoo.com (Virism Pro_Virism)
>wrote:


>
>>Then why do so many cultures tolerate and encourage man-to-boy sex
>>while violently comdemning man-to-girl sex?
>

>NO SENSIBLE culture tolerates pedophilia. Really... get a clue, some things
>are just plain flat out wrong.

Funny, that's the same thing most people say about homosexuality, abortion, "male/women" <g>


yoo...@localhost.com

unread,
Oct 18, 2004, 2:31:19 AM10/18/04
to

On 17-Oct-2004, virism_p...@yahoo.com (Virism Pro_Virism) wrote:

> yoo...@localhost.com wrote in message news:<41722971$1...@Usenet.com>...


>
> > you are obviously either: (a) someone who is seriously disturbed
>

> I was abused by a heterosexual man when I was a kid. No I do not have
> any 'pedophilia sites'. Only idiots use the supposed 'security' of the
> net to do things they wouldn't do in the real world.

first and foremost, this is why you should get serious therapy right NOW.
it is a known fact that a very large percentage of abused children turn into
abusers. so you're going to propagate the problem. don't propagate the
problem, eliminate it instead.

also, i didn't say you had any "pedophilia sites". don't misquote me. it
was you that offered "links" - not me.

> > you should know that *every* study done of child molestation where the
> > sexual identity/orientation of the molesters was known has shown that
> > the GLBT community has a far lower incidence of child molestation /
> > pedophilia than the non-GLBT community (i.e., heterosexuals).
>

> I already know that. Almost all men who molest boys are heterosexual.
> Where did I say that gay men molest boys? Look at those links I gave
> you they will show to you that all these boy-abusers are purely
> *hetero*sexual men.

don't try to pass yourself off as a gender-variant person. when you're an
abuser you're an abuser, period. you're not hetero, you're not homo, you're
just sick. get help before you hurt someone (or someone hurts you).

and i'm not going to look at any of your "links".

yvette

Lilith

unread,
Oct 18, 2004, 7:02:50 PM10/18/04
to
On 17 Oct 2004 10:19:41 -0700, virism_p...@yahoo.com (Virism
Pro_Virism) wrote:

>yoo...@localhost.com wrote in message news:<41722971$1...@Usenet.com>...


>
>> you are obviously either: (a) someone who is seriously disturbed

>I was abused by a heterosexual man when I was a kid. No I do not have


>any 'pedophilia sites'. Only idiots use the supposed 'security' of the
>net to do things they wouldn't do in the real world.

There. You said it yourself. "Abused" not "used."

--
Lilith

Virism Pro_Virism

unread,
Oct 18, 2004, 7:57:29 PM10/18/04
to
yoo...@localhost.com wrote in message news:<41736371$1...@Usenet.com>...

> first and foremost, this is why you should get serious therapy right NOW.
> it is a known fact that a very large percentage of abused children turn into
> abusers. so you're going to propagate the problem. don't propagate the
> problem, eliminate it instead.

A large percentage of abusers were abused as children. However, most
victims do *not* turn into abusers. I want to kill abusers. Macho men
are boy-abusing pedophiles. I want to kill macho men for what they do
to helpless little boys. Kill them. Rape these pedophiles. Castrate
them. I hate machimso. I want to kill it. I want alter the structure
of the x-sperm of macho men so their daughter are congenitally
deformed.

> and i'm not going to look at any of your "links".

Actually I copied and pasted a mission statement from the NAMBLA
website and changed some of the words [e.g. changed 'NAMBLA' to
'NAMGLA' and 'boy' to 'girl']. I made up the "transgendered" paragraph
on the top of that message. All you'll get from that website is 404
error or 'page not found'.

Shae Guerin

unread,
Oct 19, 2004, 12:52:07 AM10/19/04
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
L D Blake wrote:

>>A large percentage of ... are congenitally deformed.
>
> GET PSYCHIATRIC HELP.... DO IT NOW!

Umm, a sense of humour displayed rather than actually taking this
seriously? Why feed the trolls?


0 new messages