Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Study: Genes Play Role in Women's Orgasms

7 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

August Pamplona

unread,
Jun 8, 2005, 10:50:07 AM6/8/05
to
Hardpan wrote:
> Study: Genes Play Role in Women's Orgasms
>
> By EMMA ROSS,
>
> AP Medical Writer
>
> Tue Jun 7, 2005

[snip]

> But Spector said effects of the twins' shared environmental influences
> did not alter the study results significantly.

We're supposed to believe this is so just because he states it
is so?

August Pamplona
--
Women bring men they like tasks in much the same
way cats put dead mice on their owner's pillows.
- Lola on a.s.s.

a.a. # 1811 apatriot #20 Eater of smut
Proud member of the reality-based community.
The address in this message's 'From' field, in accordance with
individual.net's TOS, is real. However, almost all messages
reaching this address are deleted without human intervention.
In other words, if you e-mail me there, I will not receive your message.

To make sure that e-mail messages actually reach me,
make sure that my e-mail address is not hot.

Dustbin

unread,
Jun 8, 2005, 3:35:40 PM6/8/05
to
August Pamplona wrote:
> Hardpan wrote:
>
>> Study: Genes Play Role in Women's Orgasms
>> By EMMA ROSS,
>> AP Medical Writer
>> Tue Jun 7, 2005
>
>
> [snip]
>
>> But Spector said effects of the twins' shared environmental influences
>> did not alter the study results significantly.
>
>
> We're supposed to believe this is so just because he states it
> is so?
>
It is a matter of logic. There is a lengthy
history of argument on the issue of twins
studies and their value; that does not have to
be restated every time it is referenced.

D.
> August Pamplona

August Pamplona

unread,
Jun 8, 2005, 4:56:40 PM6/8/05
to

You are correct. Mine was a knee jerk response to a suggestion
which was never made that effects of shared environmental influences do
not exist. I was too quick on the send button.

>
> D.
>
>> August Pamplona

Nearl J Icarus

unread,
Jun 9, 2005, 4:23:12 AM6/9/05
to
and Hardpan made the comment...

>Study: Genes Play Role in Women's Orgasms

Yeah, its a lot harder to have one when they're on. (phonetic jokes probably
don't fly very well in AscII).

Hardpan

unread,
Jun 10, 2005, 3:55:29 AM6/10/05
to

It "flys" quite well as a bit of humor, unless someone is of low IQ
or doped up on some drugs.

But, truth to tell, it really is very sad that so many millions of
women simply can't be pleased by their Men, not matter how _hard_
he tries to please her ! <bg>

Nearl J Icarus

unread,
Jun 10, 2005, 6:07:31 AM6/10/05
to
and Hardpan made the comment...

>But, truth to tell, it really is very sad that so many millions of


>women simply can't be pleased by their Men, not matter how _hard_
>he tries to please her ! <bg>

That many? When is it my turn? So many women, so little time.

Lady Veteran

unread,
Jun 10, 2005, 10:20:41 AM6/10/05
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Well it isn't her fault you don't have the equipment.

LV

- ------------------------------------------------------
I rode a tank and held a General's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank

- - - - Rolling Stones - Sympathy for the Devil
- ----------------------------------------
Today's mighty oak is yesterdays nut that held its ground.

- - -unknown
- ----------------------------------------
You are your greatest obstacle.

- - - unknown
- ----------------------------------------
If you are reading this in a group where the message
is cross-posted into more than three groups and subject is being fat,
it means the idiot who started this thread is trolling
me or soc.support.fat-acceptance and I flamed his ass.
I consider the idiots I flame a waste of humanity
and deserving of all of the ill treatment I can
hand them. Idiots who ridicule fat people are worse
then vermin as far as I am concerned. If you don't
want to read my responses, trim the groups to where you want
he message to go and you will not hear from me.Otherwise,
your eyes will burn from the venom in my reply.
- ----------------------------------------


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBQqmhs8r91nvpayIKEQIWwACfS/mDJvdT+Dbypar0XvlfGwMrWpsAn3+f
z1sDQKoGwRp0sI44qpfQtRl/
=ox6f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

the Danimal

unread,
Jun 10, 2005, 1:26:52 PM6/10/05
to
Hardpan wrote:
> But, truth to tell, it really is very sad that so many millions of
> women simply can't be pleased by their Men, not matter how _hard_
> he tries to please her ! <bg>

Well. Before feeling sad for some group of people, perhaps
it would be good to ask them if they feel they have a problem.

Aren't women adults, and aren't they capable of choosing the
men they want? If a woman chooses the man she wants, and she
remains with him, how is that "very sad"?

If she finds him unsatisfactory for any reason, she is free
to dump him and find another man.

What evidence is there, from what women say they want in men,
and the sorts of men they choose and keep, that the topic of
discussion in this thread is as important to them as, say,
a man's height and income? (Indeed, is the topic as important
to women as it is to the men who are maintaining this thread?)

If a man learns how to bring women to orgasm reliably, does
that skill, by itself, result in women flocking to him? I see
nothing to suggest that women make any effort to seek out such
men, and they certainly could if they felt like it.

-- the Danimal

Message has been deleted
0 new messages