Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Poll: Should Zoe be banished?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

robertmaasjr

unread,
May 27, 2003, 8:08:45 PM5/27/03
to
She seems to be upsetting the virgins with her explicit sex talk and
her apparent flaunting of her ablility to have sex whenever she likes.
This voluntary celibacy thing may have been the last staw. Do you
spill water in front of man dying of thirst? I'm staying out of this
but will respect the groups decision.

Crotch Crikets Pnats

unread,
May 27, 2003, 8:30:42 PM5/27/03
to

You kow how I feel about banishing. =)

Teh onlee peeps I wanted banished were teh loud mouth beed bitches.


~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~

Please be advised: I am a bot and u are a parte of my sociology experiment.

Neon Noodle

unread,
May 27, 2003, 11:39:24 PM5/27/03
to

"robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com...

NO Zoe shouldn't be banished,you can't.Reasons are its a public NG,anyone
can be here.And not everyone is the same in there Shyness or problems here.
Oh my Virgin ears (not)Come on,we are mostly adults here aren't we.Sex talk
shouldn't bother anyone that bad,weather you had zero sex or lots.DarkFalz
talks about raping and beating woman,but from what you say what Zoe talks
about is worse?Doesn't make much sense to me.Although I think what Darkfalz
posts is complete bull shit and he should seriously seek help,I wouldn't
call for him to be banished,he can post he has the right,and I or anyone
else can CHOOSE NOT TO READ THE POSTS,his or anyone else's.

Stop crying and deal with it,I don't mind what Zoe posts,I find her and her
posts interesting.As I am sure most do.And besides what would Darkflaz do
without her.

Sometimes life is not fair,including here.

Zoe,I hope you don't buy into this,hang out, this is everybodys sandbox..

NEon

Frank

unread,
May 27, 2003, 9:07:09 PM5/27/03
to

"robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com...

Zoe is not perfect, but starting this kind of threads is the best way to
make yourself look like an asshole, and get her tons of supporting post,
while she's not even the one who needs support the most, as she's admitted
here that she was more or less happy now.


Darkfalz

unread,
May 28, 2003, 1:53:38 AM5/28/03
to
"robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com...

Absolutely, get rid of the un-shy nasty whore. She needs to go back to
making smut.


Chris Wiegert

unread,
May 28, 2003, 2:43:24 AM5/28/03
to

"robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com...

Not like you have the power to banish anyone even if everyone agrees to
it.
BTW I vote she stays.


Asstagon

unread,
May 28, 2003, 3:26:06 AM5/28/03
to

"Neon Noodle" <NeonNoodle...@Hotmail.com> wrote:

> Zoe,I hope you don't buy into this,hang out, this is everybodys sandbox..

And every sandbox is gonna probably have some shit in it. : )


Data888

unread,
May 28, 2003, 4:33:34 AM5/28/03
to

She doesn't bother me one bit. I'd actually prefer her to stay.

Nick

Beowulf Trollshammer

unread,
May 28, 2003, 8:18:38 AM5/28/03
to
grigo...@yahoo.com (robertmaasjr) wrote in
news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com:

Idiot, you can't ban anyone here, this is an *unmoderated* Usenet
newsgroup.

--
"Whining" behaviour doesn't work - or it provides a sort of unhealthy,
secondary support which is rooted in pity rather than sincerity.
--Marc Meunier

robertmaasjr

unread,
May 28, 2003, 8:31:13 AM5/28/03
to
"Frank" <speeed...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3ed40bba$0$23988$626a...@news.free.fr>...

i think it is good to clear the air. personally, i am obviously for
her staying. The only thing i hate about her is that she smokes.

robertmaasjr

unread,
May 28, 2003, 8:32:06 AM5/28/03
to
"Chris Wiegert" <cwie...@shaw.ca> wrote in message news:<gUYAa.91409$Vi5.2...@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>...

Explain the disappearance of lisa, meg, and parker. my 3 worst enemies.

Frank

unread,
May 28, 2003, 9:45:23 AM5/28/03
to

"robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com...

oh come on, don't you take all the credit for it!


Crotch Crikets Pnats

unread,
May 28, 2003, 9:45:47 AM5/28/03
to

true, there are such things as usenet curses.

Thoughtcube

unread,
May 28, 2003, 2:20:51 PM5/28/03
to

"Chris Wiegert" <cwie...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:gUYAa.91409$Vi5.2...@news1.calgary.shaw.ca...
>

That's like the joke "You never lent me your frying pan,
and anyway it was broken when you gave it to me".


Thoughtcube

unread,
May 28, 2003, 2:22:34 PM5/28/03
to

"robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com...
> "Chris Wiegert" <cwie...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:<gUYAa.91409$Vi5.2...@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>...
> > "robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com...
> > > She seems to be upsetting the virgins with her explicit sex talk and
> > > her apparent flaunting of her ablility to have sex whenever she likes.
> > > This voluntary celibacy thing may have been the last staw. Do you
> > > spill water in front of man dying of thirst? I'm staying out of this
> > > but will respect the groups decision.
> >
> > Not like you have the power to banish anyone even if everyone agrees
to
> > it.
> > BTW I vote she stays.
>
> Explain the disappearance of lisa, meg, and parker. my 3 worst enemies.

They came to their senses? ;-)

You don't scare anyone. The funniest post you made in years
is the one talking about banishing me (at least it was that funny
to me). I guess you like to talk about having power as a
substitute for... something.


Thoughtcube

unread,
May 28, 2003, 2:24:00 PM5/28/03
to

"robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com...

Classical trolling, bravo. Lots of people reply with 'oh, you can't
ban people from usenet' (as if that wasn't obvious...) and lots
of others say 'you can't, but I vote to keep her'.

Amusing.


Message has been deleted

robertmaasjr

unread,
May 28, 2003, 5:14:46 PM5/28/03
to
Beowulf Trollshammer <Beo...@lycos.com> wrote in message news:<Xns93895EADE5A7F...@130.133.1.4>...

> grigo...@yahoo.com (robertmaasjr) wrote in
> news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com:
>
> > She seems to be upsetting the virgins with her explicit sex talk and
> > her apparent flaunting of her ablility to have sex whenever she likes.
> > This voluntary celibacy thing may have been the last staw. Do you
> > spill water in front of man dying of thirst? I'm staying out of this
> > but will respect the groups decision.
> >
>
> Idiot, you can't ban anyone here, this is an *unmoderated* Usenet
> newsgroup.

Test me.

fallout

unread,
May 28, 2003, 6:20:51 PM5/28/03
to

"Beowulf Trollshammer" <Beo...@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93895EADE5A7F...@130.133.1.4...

Hi Beowulf, Take his challenge man. Maybe once he bans you and you don't
leave the stupid psycho will shut up about this crap.
tom


robertmaasjr

unread,
May 28, 2003, 9:30:10 PM5/28/03
to
"fallout" <fall...@nospamattbi.com> wrote in message news:<7DaBa.777870$Zo.160978@sccrnsc03>...

You are just jealous because you are not consequential enough to be banned.

robertmaasjr

unread,
May 28, 2003, 9:42:17 PM5/28/03
to
"Thoughtcube" <thoug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bb2qt6$vb5$1...@news.iucc.ac.il>...

> "robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com...
> > "Chris Wiegert" <cwie...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:<gUYAa.91409$Vi5.2...@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>...
> > > "robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com...
> > > > She seems to be upsetting the virgins with her explicit sex talk and
> > > > her apparent flaunting of her ablility to have sex whenever she likes.
> > > > This voluntary celibacy thing may have been the last staw. Do you
> > > > spill water in front of man dying of thirst? I'm staying out of this
> > > > but will respect the groups decision.
> > >
> > > Not like you have the power to banish anyone even if everyone agrees
> to
> > > it.
> > > BTW I vote she stays.
> >
> > Explain the disappearance of lisa, meg, and parker. my 3 worst enemies.
>
> They came to their senses? ;-)
>
> You don't scare anyone. The funniest post you made in years
> is the one talking about banishing me (at least it was that funny
> to me). I guess you like to talk about having power as a
> substitute for... something.

You flew under the radar, my friend. you have no business on this
thread if you are not going to vote.

fallout

unread,
May 29, 2003, 12:28:21 AM5/29/03
to

"robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:33338fd6.0305...@posting.google.com...

Yeah, i'm so jealous.


Gray Loser

unread,
May 29, 2003, 2:39:17 AM5/29/03
to
"Thoughtcube" <thoug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bb2qt6$vb5$1...@news.iucc.ac.il>...

> > Explain the disappearance of lisa, meg, and parker. my 3 worst enemies.


>
> They came to their senses? ;-)
>
> You don't scare anyone. The funniest post you made in years
> is the one talking about banishing me (at least it was that funny
> to me). I guess you like to talk about having power as a
> substitute for... something.

Thoughtcube, pop psychology is not appreciated on this newsgroup.
Cease and desist, or I'll lodge a formal complaint with the moderator.

robertmaasjr

unread,
May 29, 2003, 5:24:55 AM5/29/03
to
"fallout" <fall...@nospamattbi.com> wrote in message news:<F%fBa.780190$Zo.163016@sccrnsc03>...

your honesty is refreshing. I may start a no gays allowed thread to appease you.

The Babaloughesian

unread,
May 29, 2003, 5:39:36 AM5/29/03
to

"robertmaasjr" <grigo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com...

You already did that one last year. This is why it's unfair to compare you
to Forrest Gump. Gump had a memory that went back more than a few weeks and
didn't constantly selectively forget/alter certain memories.


Thoughtcube

unread,
May 29, 2003, 7:05:49 AM5/29/03
to

Gonna banish me from the _thread_, now? You crack me up.


Thoughtcube

unread,
May 29, 2003, 7:06:17 AM5/29/03
to

"Gray Loser" <gray_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:305f1874.0305...@posting.google.com...

LOL :-)


Thoughtcube

unread,
May 29, 2003, 7:05:49 AM5/29/03
to

Gonna banish me from the _thread_, now? You crack me up.


Thoughtcube

unread,
May 29, 2003, 7:06:17 AM5/29/03
to

"Gray Loser" <gray_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:305f1874.0305...@posting.google.com...

LOL :-)


Beowulf Trollshammer

unread,
May 29, 2003, 8:14:29 AM5/29/03
to

> Beowulf Trollshammer <Beo...@lycos.com> wrote in message
> news:<Xns93895EADE5A7F...@130.133.1.4>...
>> grigo...@yahoo.com (robertmaasjr) wrote in
>> news:33338fd6.03052...@posting.google.com:
>>
>> > She seems to be upsetting the virgins with her explicit sex talk
>> > and her apparent flaunting of her ablility to have sex whenever she
>> > likes. This voluntary celibacy thing may have been the last staw.
>> > Do you spill water in front of man dying of thirst? I'm staying out
>> > of this but will respect the groups decision.
>> >
>>
>> Idiot, you can't ban anyone here, this is an *unmoderated* Usenet
>> newsgroup.
>
> Test me.
>

Ok. Just don't hold your breath waiting for me to leave A.S.S.

fallout

unread,
May 29, 2003, 11:26:30 AM5/29/03
to

"The Babaloughesian" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:bb4kgp$5r45p$1...@ID-177202.news.dfncis.de...
i agree. i apologize to all the Forest Gumps out there. ;-)


0 new messages