Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: What if homosexuality was common instead of heterosexuality?
61 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Bill
Mar 18, 2012, 7:55:50 PM3/18/12
to
ForeverRent wrote:
> Let's say some cavemen decided to be gay and to fuck women only for having
> kids. The boys were raised by the men and the girls were raised by the
> women. Would a gay society work?-F.R.
A bit like Sparta then...
--
William Black
"Any number under six"
The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat single
handed with a quarterstaff.
> Let's say some cavemen decided to be gay and to fuck women only for having
> kids. The boys were raised by the men and the girls were raised by the
> women. Would a gay society work?-F.R.
A bit like Sparta then...
--
William Black
"Any number under six"
The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat single
handed with a quarterstaff.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Bill
Apr 1, 2012, 2:46:09 PM4/1/12
to
In article <6Ladnadq9oTwBuXS...@giganews.com>,
anthonybuc...@telus.net says...
>
> On 29/03/2012 7:20 AM, Matt Giwer wrote:
> >
>
> Except for women's role in raising, you're close to
> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
> networking in the working world later on. Girls of similar
> age were encountered only during holidays at home or on
> the infrequent mixing of boys' and related girls' schools,
> until Oxford or Cambridge.
Women at University is a twentieth century idea.
--
William Black
When you hear the words 'Our people are our greatest asset' then it's
time to leave.
anthonybuc...@telus.net says...
>
> On 29/03/2012 7:20 AM, Matt Giwer wrote:
> > On 03/18/2012 05:33 PM, ForeverRent wrote:
> >> Let's say some cavemen decided to be gay and to fuck women only for
> >> having
> >> kids. The boys were raised by the men and the girls were raised by the
> >> women. Would a gay society work?-F.R.
> >
> > Maybe Neanderthals did.
> >> Let's say some cavemen decided to be gay and to fuck women only for
> >> having
> >> kids. The boys were raised by the men and the girls were raised by the
> >> women. Would a gay society work?-F.R.
> >
> >
>
> Except for women's role in raising, you're close to
> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
> networking in the working world later on. Girls of similar
> age were encountered only during holidays at home or on
> the infrequent mixing of boys' and related girls' schools,
> until Oxford or Cambridge.
Women at University is a twentieth century idea.
--
William Black
When you hear the words 'Our people are our greatest asset' then it's
time to leave.
Bill
Apr 1, 2012, 2:49:09 PM4/1/12
to
In article <4f789d4e$0$20582$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
Ah don't I wish it were true.
However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> > you're close to
> > relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
> > The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
> > where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
> > into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
> > to contacts that formed the basis for very important
> > networking in the working world later on.
>
>
> Keeping that in mind the British upper class is almost extinct.
> > you're close to
> > relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
> > The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
> > where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
> > into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
> > to contacts that formed the basis for very important
> > networking in the working world later on.
>
>
>
Ah don't I wish it were true.
However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
Bill
Apr 1, 2012, 7:24:33 PM4/1/12
to
In article <memo.2012040...@tg001a0001.blueyonder.co.uk>,
ric...@gadsden.name says...
>
>
> It's really the rich people from *working* class backgrounds who can't
> get their kids in - and even then, it depends on how they behave; David
> Beckham's sons would be entirely acceptable at Eton; Wayne Rooney's
> wouldn't, even though they are from pretty similar backgrounds.
Actually Eaton is the one place they would be welcome.
If you get the child's name down early enough anyway.
There's no 'Common Entrance' at Eton.
ric...@gadsden.name says...
>
>
> It's really the rich people from *working* class backgrounds who can't
> get their kids in - and even then, it depends on how they behave; David
> Beckham's sons would be entirely acceptable at Eton; Wayne Rooney's
> wouldn't, even though they are from pretty similar backgrounds.
Actually Eaton is the one place they would be welcome.
If you get the child's name down early enough anyway.
There's no 'Common Entrance' at Eton.
Bill
Apr 1, 2012, 8:11:09 PM4/1/12
to
> In article <MPG.29e2f40e3...@news.eternal-september.org> on Mon,
> rather different.
That's quite possible, but it doesn't change the fact the if Roony's
spawn has been put down for Eton at birth then, assuming someone pays
the fees, he will go there.
Eton is, famously, the first 'Comprehensive school'.
> 2 Apr 2012 00:24:33 +0100, black...@gmail.com (Bill) wrote:
>
> > In article <memo.2012040...@tg001a0001.blueyonder.co.uk>,
> > ric...@gadsden.name says...
> > >
> > >
> > > It's really the rich people from *working* class backgrounds who
> > > can't
> > > get their kids in - and even then, it depends on how they behave;
> > > David
> > > Beckham's sons would be entirely acceptable at Eton; Wayne
> > > Rooney's
> > > wouldn't, even though they are from pretty similar backgrounds.
> >
> > Actually Eaton is the one place they would be welcome.
> >
> > If you get the child's name down early enough anyway.
> >
> > There's no 'Common Entrance' at Eton.
>
> I suspect the attitudes from the teachers and other pupils would be
>
> > In article <memo.2012040...@tg001a0001.blueyonder.co.uk>,
> > ric...@gadsden.name says...
> > >
> > >
> > > It's really the rich people from *working* class backgrounds who
> > > can't
> > > get their kids in - and even then, it depends on how they behave;
> > > David
> > > Beckham's sons would be entirely acceptable at Eton; Wayne
> > > Rooney's
> > > wouldn't, even though they are from pretty similar backgrounds.
> >
> > Actually Eaton is the one place they would be welcome.
> >
> > If you get the child's name down early enough anyway.
> >
> > There's no 'Common Entrance' at Eton.
>
> rather different.
That's quite possible, but it doesn't change the fact the if Roony's
spawn has been put down for Eton at birth then, assuming someone pays
the fees, he will go there.
Eton is, famously, the first 'Comprehensive school'.
Bill
Apr 1, 2012, 9:14:44 PM4/1/12
to
In article <4f78f50d$0$25108$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
@tampabay.rr.com says...
Why Matt, I've offended you, I'm so glad...
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/giwer-matt/
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On 04/01/2012 02:49 PM, Bill wrote:
> > In article<4f789d4e$0$20582$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> > @tampabay.rr.com says...
> >>
> >
> >>> you're close to
> >>> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
> >>> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
> >>> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
> >>> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
> >>> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
> >>> networking in the working world later on.
> >>
> >>
> >> Keeping that in mind the British upper class is almost extinct.
> >>
> >
> > Ah don't I wish it were true.
> >
> > However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
> > are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
>
> Posts just to see your name are always a waste of bandwidth.
> On 04/01/2012 02:49 PM, Bill wrote:
> > In article<4f789d4e$0$20582$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> > @tampabay.rr.com says...
> >>
> >
> >>> you're close to
> >>> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
> >>> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
> >>> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
> >>> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
> >>> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
> >>> networking in the working world later on.
> >>
> >>
> >> Keeping that in mind the British upper class is almost extinct.
> >>
> >
> > Ah don't I wish it were true.
> >
> > However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
> > are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
>
Why Matt, I've offended you, I'm so glad...
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/giwer-matt/
Message has been deleted
Bill
Apr 5, 2012, 7:38:27 PM4/5/12
to
In article <4f7e24ef$0$16311$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On 04/01/2012 09:14 PM, Bill wrote:
> > In article<4f78f50d$0$25108$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
>
Do you deny the truth of anything posted there?
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On 04/01/2012 09:14 PM, Bill wrote:
> > In article<4f78f50d$0$25108$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> > @tampabay.rr.com says...
> >> On 04/01/2012 02:49 PM, Bill wrote:
> >>> In article<4f789d4e$0$20582$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> >>> @tampabay.rr.com says...
> >>>>> you're close to
> >>>>> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
> >>>>> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
> >>>>> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
> >>>>> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
> >>>>> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
> >>>>> networking in the working world later on.
> >>>> Keeping that in mind the British upper class is almost extinct.
> >>> Ah don't I wish it were true.
> >>> However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
> >>> are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
> >> Posts just to see your name are always a waste of bandwidth.
>
> > Why Matt, I've offended you, I'm so glad...
>
> > http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/giwer-matt/
>
> The nizkooks? How stupid.
> >> On 04/01/2012 02:49 PM, Bill wrote:
> >>> In article<4f789d4e$0$20582$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> >>> @tampabay.rr.com says...
> >>>>> you're close to
> >>>>> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
> >>>>> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
> >>>>> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
> >>>>> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
> >>>>> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
> >>>>> networking in the working world later on.
> >>>> Keeping that in mind the British upper class is almost extinct.
> >>> Ah don't I wish it were true.
> >>> However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
> >>> are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
> >> Posts just to see your name are always a waste of bandwidth.
>
> > Why Matt, I've offended you, I'm so glad...
>
> > http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/giwer-matt/
>
>
Do you deny the truth of anything posted there?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Bill
Apr 11, 2012, 6:58:32 AM4/11/12
to
In article <4f84fe52$0$22920$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
@tampabay.rr.com says...
We also have the rule of law.
I know you don't approve of then Matt, but that really is your problem.
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On 4/1/2012 2:49 PM, Bill wrote:
> > In article<4f789d4e$0$20582$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> > @tampabay.rr.com says...
> >>
> >
> >>> you're close to
> >>> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
> >>> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
> >>> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
> >>> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
> >>> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
> >>> networking in the working world later on.
> >>
> >>
> >> Keeping that in mind the British upper class is almost extinct.
> >>
> >
> > Ah don't I wish it were true.
> >
> > However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
> > are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
>
> Britain doesn't have rope and lamp posts?
> On 4/1/2012 2:49 PM, Bill wrote:
> > In article<4f789d4e$0$20582$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> > @tampabay.rr.com says...
> >>
> >
> >>> you're close to
> >>> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
> >>> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
> >>> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
> >>> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
> >>> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
> >>> networking in the working world later on.
> >>
> >>
> >> Keeping that in mind the British upper class is almost extinct.
> >>
> >
> > Ah don't I wish it were true.
> >
> > However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
> > are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
>
We also have the rule of law.
I know you don't approve of then Matt, but that really is your problem.
Bill
Apr 11, 2012, 6:58:52 AM4/11/12
to
In article <4f850068$0$1349$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On 4/5/2012 7:38 PM, Bill wrote:
> > In article<4f7e24ef$0$16311$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> Absolutely. And I will add they have threatened the lives of my son and
> my parents as well as mine.
Cite please
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On 4/5/2012 7:38 PM, Bill wrote:
> > In article<4f7e24ef$0$16311$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> my parents as well as mine.
Cite please
Message has been deleted
Bill
Apr 12, 2012, 3:58:25 PM4/12/12
to
In article <4f871441$0$22117$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
@tampabay.rr.com says...
> You would have to contact the Hillsborough County sheriff's office in
> Florida. You might also contact the RCMP. I doubt Bell Canada would have
> kept a record of the complaints.
I'll settle for some pointers to a web page or two.
@tampabay.rr.com says...
> Florida. You might also contact the RCMP. I doubt Bell Canada would have
> kept a record of the complaints.
I'll settle for some pointers to a web page or two.
Bill
Apr 12, 2012, 3:59:06 PM4/12/12
to
In article <4f8714a9$0$22117$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> Revolt against tyranny is always lawful.
What makes you think the UK is a tyranny?
Too many Jews?
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On 4/11/2012 6:58 AM, Bill wrote:
What makes you think the UK is a tyranny?
Too many Jews?
Bill
Apr 14, 2012, 6:09:03 PM4/14/12
to
In article <4f88d2b4$0$22877$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On 4/12/2012 3:58 PM, Bill wrote:
> > In article<4f871441$0$22117$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> Why would you expect crime reports to be on the web?
>
Because you're Matt 'I'm a Nazi bastard who needs shooting' Giwer and
you'd have scanned them and put them on your web page if they really
existed.
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On 4/12/2012 3:58 PM, Bill wrote:
> > In article<4f871441$0$22117$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
>
Because you're Matt 'I'm a Nazi bastard who needs shooting' Giwer and
you'd have scanned them and put them on your web page if they really
existed.
Bill
Apr 16, 2012, 7:15:42 AM4/16/12
to
In article <4f8b8ba3$0$7689$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
@tampabay.rr.com says...
> much. Chutzpah is the very definition of asshole.
>
> Want to justify the totalitarian, jewish, military dictatorship over
> the West Bank next?
>
> I have problem with Jews beyond their malevolent tyranny over millions
> of non-jews. We can go into the gratuitous sadism and your prurient
> interest in it later.
Nope, no evidence there.
So you're still a liar Matt.
@tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> On 4/14/2012 6:09 PM, Bill wrote:
> > Because you're Matt 'I'm a Nazi bastard who needs shooting' Giwer and
> > you'd have scanned them and put them on your web page if they really
> > existed.
>
> Because you are an off-topic, izziehugging asshole, thank you very
> On 4/14/2012 6:09 PM, Bill wrote:
> > Because you're Matt 'I'm a Nazi bastard who needs shooting' Giwer and
> > you'd have scanned them and put them on your web page if they really
> > existed.
>
> much. Chutzpah is the very definition of asshole.
>
> Want to justify the totalitarian, jewish, military dictatorship over
> the West Bank next?
>
> I have problem with Jews beyond their malevolent tyranny over millions
> of non-jews. We can go into the gratuitous sadism and your prurient
> interest in it later.
Nope, no evidence there.
So you're still a liar Matt.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
a425couple
Mar 30, 2012, 9:07:18 AM3/30/12
to
"Matt Giwer" <jul...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message...
Should we suggest that story line to the Mastroiannis? *
(Perhaps they already thought of it,, explains Wiley?)
A species (or sub-species) that lasted a long time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal
*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B.C._(comic_strip)
"B.C. is a daily American comic strip created by cartoonist Johnny Hart.
Set in prehistoric times, it features a group of cavemen and anthropomorphic
animals from various geologic eras. --- Hart died -- 2007.
The strip was then produced by Hart's grandsons Mason Mastroianni
and Mick Mastroianni "
> On 03/18/2012 05:33 PM, ForeverRent wrote:
>> Let's say some cavemen decided to be gay and to fuck women only for
>> having
>> kids. The boys were raised by the men and the girls were raised by the
>> women. Would a gay society work?-F.R.
>
> Maybe Neanderthals did.
Woah! What a concept to think about!
>> Let's say some cavemen decided to be gay and to fuck women only for
>> having
>> kids. The boys were raised by the men and the girls were raised by the
>> women. Would a gay society work?-F.R.
>
> Maybe Neanderthals did.
Should we suggest that story line to the Mastroiannis? *
(Perhaps they already thought of it,, explains Wiley?)
A species (or sub-species) that lasted a long time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal
*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B.C._(comic_strip)
"B.C. is a daily American comic strip created by cartoonist Johnny Hart.
Set in prehistoric times, it features a group of cavemen and anthropomorphic
animals from various geologic eras. --- Hart died -- 2007.
The strip was then produced by Hart's grandsons Mason Mastroianni
and Mick Mastroianni "
Matt Giwer
Mar 31, 2012, 10:18:51 AM3/31/12
to
have never been drawn pregnant. There is probably a lot more evidence.
--
If they US supports self-determination for Jews does it also support
self-determination for Mormons?
-- The Iron Webmaster, 4385
http://www.giwersworld.org/holo/nizgas3.html a4
Sat Mar 31 10:15:57 EDT 2012
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Richard Gadsden
Apr 1, 2012, 8:05:00 PM4/1/12
to
In article <MPG.29e2f40e3...@news.eternal-september.org> on Mon,
2 Apr 2012 00:24:33 +0100, black...@gmail.com (Bill) wrote:
2 Apr 2012 00:24:33 +0100, black...@gmail.com (Bill) wrote:
> In article <memo.2012040...@tg001a0001.blueyonder.co.uk>,
> ric...@gadsden.name says...
> >
> >
> > It's really the rich people from *working* class backgrounds who
> > can't
> > get their kids in - and even then, it depends on how they behave;
> > David
> > Beckham's sons would be entirely acceptable at Eton; Wayne
> > Rooney's
> > wouldn't, even though they are from pretty similar backgrounds.
>
> Actually Eaton is the one place they would be welcome.
>
> If you get the child's name down early enough anyway.
>
> There's no 'Common Entrance' at Eton.
> ric...@gadsden.name says...
> >
> >
> > It's really the rich people from *working* class backgrounds who
> > can't
> > get their kids in - and even then, it depends on how they behave;
> > David
> > Beckham's sons would be entirely acceptable at Eton; Wayne
> > Rooney's
> > wouldn't, even though they are from pretty similar backgrounds.
>
> Actually Eaton is the one place they would be welcome.
>
> If you get the child's name down early enough anyway.
>
> There's no 'Common Entrance' at Eton.
I suspect the attitudes from the teachers and other pupils would be
rather different.
--
rather different.
Richard Gadsden
"I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death
your right to say it" - Attributed to Voltaire
Matt Giwer
Apr 1, 2012, 8:38:26 PM4/1/12
to
On 04/01/2012 02:49 PM, Bill wrote:
> In article<4f789d4e$0$20582$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> @tampabay.rr.com says...
>>
>
>>> you're close to
>>> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
>>> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
>>> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
>>> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
>>> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
>>> networking in the working world later on.
>>
>>
>> Keeping that in mind the British upper class is almost extinct.
>>
>
> Ah don't I wish it were true.
>
> However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
> are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
> @tampabay.rr.com says...
>>
>
>>> you're close to
>>> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
>>> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
>>> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
>>> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
>>> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
>>> networking in the working world later on.
>>
>>
>> Keeping that in mind the British upper class is almost extinct.
>>
>
> Ah don't I wish it were true.
>
> However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
> are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
Posts just to see your name are always a waste of bandwidth.
--
In ancient history the term "believed to be" is a
technical term meaning bullshit.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 4389
http://www.giwersworld.org a1
Sun Apr 1 20:37:53 EDT 2012
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
T.J. Swoboda
Apr 7, 2012, 7:38:50 AM4/7/12
to
On Mar 18, 2:33 pm, "ForeverRent" <hesacoponthee...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Let's say some cavemen decided to be gay and to fuck women only for having
> kids. The boys were raised by the men and the girls were raised by the
> women. Would a gay society work?-F.R.
https://groups.google.com/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/d1a95a091849bac5/83807e5197078cda?hl=en#83807e5197078cda
> Let's say some cavemen decided to be gay and to fuck women only for having
> kids. The boys were raised by the men and the girls were raised by the
> women. Would a gay society work?-F.R.
Matt Giwer
Apr 10, 2012, 11:45:21 PM4/10/12
to
On 4/1/2012 2:49 PM, Bill wrote:
> In article<4f789d4e$0$20582$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> @tampabay.rr.com says...
>>
>
>>> you're close to
>>> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
>>> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
>>> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
>>> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
>>> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
>>> networking in the working world later on.
>>
>>
>> Keeping that in mind the British upper class is almost extinct.
>>
>
> Ah don't I wish it were true.
>
> However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
> are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
> In article<4f789d4e$0$20582$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> @tampabay.rr.com says...
>>
>
>>> you're close to
>>> relatively recent practice in the British upper class.
>>> The boys went to "public", i.e. very private, schools,
>>> where in the fulness of time they were likely to get
>>> into homosexuality with classmates, sometimes leading
>>> to contacts that formed the basis for very important
>>> networking in the working world later on.
>>
>>
>> Keeping that in mind the British upper class is almost extinct.
>>
>
> Ah don't I wish it were true.
>
> However a look at the government front bench indicates that the bastards
> are as rich, powerful and prevalent as ever
Matt Giwer
Apr 10, 2012, 11:54:15 PM4/10/12
to
On 4/5/2012 7:38 PM, Bill wrote:
> In article<4f7e24ef$0$16311$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
> In article<4f7e24ef$0$16311$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
Matt Giwer
Apr 12, 2012, 1:43:23 PM4/12/12
to
On 4/11/2012 6:58 AM, Bill wrote:
Message has been deleted
Matt Giwer
Apr 13, 2012, 9:28:13 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/12/2012 3:58 PM, Bill wrote:
> In article<4f871441$0$22117$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
to me if you want to throw a hissy fit over it.
> In article<4f871441$0$22117$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>, jull43
Why would you expect crime reports to be on the web?
I really do not care if you are convinced or not. Makes no difference
to me if you want to throw a hissy fit over it.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
0 new messages