Kaka
Michaela Mackenzie
> PandoraElpis wrote:
> > August Pamplona wrote:
> > > PandoraElpis wrote:
> > > > Mxsmanic wrote:
> > > >> nSCOURGE writes
> > > Jesus fucking Christ, write in English. You are not fooling anyone.
>
> > Get over your personal entanglements, asshole, *you're* not fooling
> > anyone.
>
> > The only one having a problem with this is *you*.
>
> Lol, he just tends to get a little bitchy when someone tries
justify the 'm' word(which seems to have a conveniently floating
> definition when appealed to by apologists).
Bla bla bla. Wouldn't be surprised if the pair of you weren't the same
creatures posting under different silly names. Time to concentrate
more on how to get laid rather than how you keep yourselves from
getting any.
- Michaela
> > > August Pamplona
PandoraElpis
Michaela Mackenzie wrote:
> On Dec 14, 6:14 pm, nSCOURGE wrote:
> > PandoraElpis wrote:
> > > August Pamplona wrote:
> > > > PandoraElpis wrote:
> > > > > Mxsmanic wrote:
> > > > >> nSCOURGE writes
> > > > Jesus fucking Christ, write in English. You are not fooling anyone.
> >
> > > Get over your personal entanglements, asshole, *you're* not fooling
> > > anyone.
> >
> > > The only one having a problem with this is *you*.
> >
> > Lol, he just tends to get a little bitchy when someone tries
> justify the 'm' word(which seems to have a conveniently floating
> > definition when appealed to by apologists).
>
> Bla bla bla. Wouldn't be surprised if the pair of you weren't the same
> creatures
Blah, blah, blah, anyone who agrees with you is a pupp.
This argument isn't any more compelling ad-nauseum, than the first
time you posed it(btw, starting a new thread is a *very* subtle touch,
lol).
> posting under different silly names. Time to concentrate
> more on how to get laid rather than how you keep yourselves from
> getting any.
But isn't that what ASS is all about?
Circulating means for self-defeatism(I'm sure you implied this
countless times over the years)?
And since when do you sympathize with anyones problems, or even
acknowledge them as 'real'(let alone give practical, genuine advice),
rather than an artifice of free-will?
If free will is the sole determinant of fate, then what mediates
conflicting wills then, when they collide along zero-sum axes?
Bah!
Your pretensed law-of-attraction absurdities represents the most
spurious, selfish and sociopathic ideology ever regurgitated into ASS
(yes, even more than Darkfalz') .
Neither are your lectures on self-determination and personal
responsibility very credible, being mocked from your ivory tower.
You reap too much privilege from the social contracts and
responsibilities borne by others, to deny the reciprocity
underpinnings that cohere all human sociality.
No reasonably self-aware individual - not even you - is this obtuse.
But, like everyone else you are bound to a blind self interest that
mediates chance and opportunity, which in your case finds expression
in a protectionist usenet crusade to preserve a favorable status-quo
through the only means at your disposal - sophistry and equivocation.
This whole disgenuine, new-age ideology you affect is nothing more
than a opportunistic pretext for your apologies, which work to
obfuscate real problems that entail (usually)zero-sum solutions in
sexual conflict.
I don't blame you for this, as males don't make for sympathetic victims
(for reasons I have already detailed - given that male competitive
dilemma evades consensus sympathy due to its inverse implications in
the fitness landscape and implicit female antagonisms).
In fact, I pity any woman who is deprived of preferential diversion to
usenet, lol.
Now if you'll excuse me, anticipation of your nonsensical, rambling
retorts has put me in the sudden mood for fruit cake...
> - Michaela
> > > > August Pamplona
nSCOURGE
Uh, oh.
i've been demoted to a mere 'creature'.
And brandishing the pink whip appeal to consequence(don't think that
way or you won't geet laid, lol).
Come to think of it, I don't think you've ever instructed the group on
this specific topic(getting laid).
So, please, elucidate.
Give us: Michaela's seduction secrets, lol.
> - Michaela
> > > > August Pamplona
Bernd Jendrissek
> And brandishing the pink whip appeal to consequence(don't think that
> way or you won't geet laid, lol).
Are you, in fact, getting laid?
> Come to think of it, I don't think you've ever instructed the group on
> this specific topic(getting laid).
She doesn't market her position with that frame. Maybe she should?
nSCOURGE
wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2:53 am, nSCOURGE <nre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > And brandishing the pink whip appeal to consequence(don't think that
> > way or you won't geet laid, lol).
>
> Are you, in fact, getting laid?
Not at the moment, no.
Point taken.
August Pamplona
I know realize that the writing style which Pandora reminded me
of was nSCOURGE's and Pandora indeed appears to be posting from various
proxies. It could be anyone trying to hide the originating IP. So yeah,
it would not be surprising if Pandora was nSCOURGE's sockpuppet.
August Pamplona
--
If you could prove religious beliefs with the scientific
method, it would be science.....and nobody would believe it.
- Stephen Colbert
a.a. # 1811 apatriot #20 Eater of smut
Proud member of the reality-based community.
The address in this message's 'From' field, in accordance with
individual.net's TOS, is real. However, almost all messages
reaching this address are deleted without human intervention.
In other words, if you e-mail me there, I will not receive your message.
To make sure that e-mail messages actually reach me,
make sure that my e-mail address is not hot.
nSCOURGE
Preys on your mind does it, lol.
> August Pamplona
> --
> If you could prove religious beliefs with the scientific
> method, it would be science.....and nobody would believe it.
> - Stephen Colbert
>
> a.a. # 1811 apatriot #20 Eater of smut
> Proud member of the reality-based community.
>
> The address in this message's 'From' field, in accordance with
> individual.net's TOS, is real. However, almost all messages
> reaching this address are deleted without human intervention.
> In other words, if you e-mail me there, I will not receive your message.
>
> To make sure that e-mail messages actually reach me,
> make sure that my e-mail address is not hot.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -