demographics
Extrya
> Sex: (yes please) male
> Age: 35
> Education: year 11, college
> Occupation: driver
> First born/middle/last born: first/only
> Virgin/not virgin: not
my ex was a venn diagram
Sex: Female
Age: Old
Education: collige gradiate
Occupation: tech support
First born/middle/last born: middle
Virgin/not virgin: not virgin
Gray Loser
Age: 26
Education: grad student
Occupation: tech support (and during the school year, RA and TA)
First born/middle/last born: first
Virgin/not virgin: yes
fallout
"Janithor" <Jani...@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:3EDEE379...@pacbell.net...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
>
Sex:
Age: Very Old
Education: BS
Occupation: IT Project Mgr.
First born/middle/last born: last
Virgin/not virgin: not
>
Virgo Cluster
news:<k1budv4rj4btvbeei...@4ax.com>...
Car: Toyota Corolla
Year: 1986
Mileage: 181,000 miles
gas tank: less than 1/5 full right now
first/second/third...: my second owned car
car a virgin when purchased?: No -- had 100,000 miles on it
future?: probably replace with teenager when it gets 21 years old
Virgo Cluster
"[8 Last Suppers] (#8) Robert Greene, sixteenth-century English
dramatist and pamphleteer: expired after consuming too much
Rhenish wine and pickled herring at an author's gala luncheon."
<< Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless
Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 98 >>
Neon Noodle Version 2.0
"Janithor" <Jani...@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:3EDEE379...@pacbell.net...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
Sex: Male
Age: 31 and counting
Education: HS and various Firefighting courses
Occupation: Bum,Firefighter,Material Handler
First born/middle/last born: Last Born,
Virgin/not virgin: Not a virgin.
NeOn
Celaine
Age: 41
Education: HS, some college
Occupation: Benefits analyst
First born/middle/last born: First
Virgin/not virgin: Honorary, maybe. It's been that long.
Frank
"Janithor" <Jani...@pacbell.net> a écrit dans le message de
news:3EDEE379...@pacbell.net...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> Sex:
male
> Age:
26
> Education:
degree in philosophy.
> Occupation:
suicidal unemployed student.
> First born/middle/last born:
last of 2
> Virgin/not virgin:
not. oh btw, I thought that there were more virgins on this NG...
Celaine
Arrggghh. Just realized I'm probably the grandma of the group. I
thought at least Gray Loser would be in my age group - referencing the
"gray" part. Gotta go take my Geritol, my Doan's Little Pill and get
a fresh Depends...
fallout
"Celaine" <celai...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:df0b4c3a.03060...@posting.google.com...
Nah, i'm probably the oldest here. i'll be 50 in October. Damn that sounds
so old.
tom
Neon Noodle Version 2.0
"fallout" <fall...@nospamattbi.com> wrote in message
news:jG0Ea.40788$d51.96253@sccrnsc01...
Your going to be 50?You don't look that old in your picture on the
gallery,or is it a very old picture?
Neon
fallout
"Neon Noodle Version 2.0" <NeonNoo...@Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eLidnbU2uYZ...@comcast.com...
years old. It was taken on my 45th birthday.
With illness and all i look more my age now (more gray in the beard and
fuller in the face) . i'll try to post an up to date photo soon.
tom
Virgo Cluster
news:<df0b4c3a.03060...@posting.google.com>...
> Arrggghh. Just realized I'm probably the grandma of the group.
> I thought at least Gray Loser would be in my age group - referencing
> the "gray" part. Gotta go take my Geritol, my Doan's Little Pill
> and get a fresh Depends...
Off the top of my head I can't think of any girls who are older
than you, but there are several guys in here who are older than
you. I'm 44, fallout is about a year older than me, Dale Greer is
about two years older than me, Robert Maas is 58, and I'm sure
there are others because the first three I mentioned are actually
in the gallery and Maas is pretty much an a.s.s. legend who still
pops in from time to time.
Virgo Cluster
"[10 Famous Drug Addicts] (#4) Clive of India: opium addiction."
<< Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless
Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 234 >>
fallout
"Virgo Cluster" <gamma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd95baf2.03060...@posting.google.com...
Actually i'm about 5 years older than you Virgo.
i really hate getting old btw.
tom
Gray Loser
*grin*
The "gray" in my name refers not to my hair color, but to my outlook,
prospects, etc.
Anyway, 41 isn't that old... I think there are quite a few guys here
who are in their 40's.
Davide
Gray Loser <gray_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
305f1874.03060...@posting.google.com...
If you're very shy, you're screwed at 15, 20 , 30, 40, 50 years old. Age
doesn't matter. I don't want to live my life again.
Virgo Cluster
> Sex: (yes please) male
I guess since a lot of others have been posting their stats
in this thread I'll risk Frank's wrath and post mine as well.
(I've already posted my car's stats.)
Sex: male
Age: 44
Education: Ph.D. (math)
Occupation: teach/research
First born/middle/last born: first born of 3, all males [1]
Virgin/not virgin: not (as of May 1991, at age 32)
[1] My wife is the last born of 3, all females.
(This is for bhp's folder on me.)
Virgo Cluster
"[10 Famous Drug Addicts] (#6) Czar Nicholas II, the last Russian
czar, spent the final two years of his reign high on a cocktail
of addictive drugs. He took cocaine for colds, opium and morphine
for stomach complaints, and hallucinogens, obtained from a
herbalist. Visitors were shocked by his appearance and remarked
on his dull eyes, dilated pupils, hollow cheeks, vacant smile,
and his apparent lack of concern about the impending crisis."
NotSoShyVol
> Sex: Male
> Age: 31 and counting
<snip>
I don't see the original post, but anyway...
Me:
Sex: M
Age: 27 (but I tend to dress and act like I'm 22 -- intentionally ;) )
Education: some college
Occupation: Network engineer (with a telecom company)
First/middle/last born: Only child
Virgin: Yes
-NSSV ;)
--
notsoshyvol at hotmail dot com ** web site coming back eventually
"It has to start somewhere, it has to start sometime, what better
place than here, what better time than now" -RATM, "Guerilla Radio"
Jean Louise
NotSoShyVol wrote:
>
> I don't see the original post, but anyway...
>
> Me:
>
> Sex: M
> Age: 27 (but I tend to dress and act like I'm 22 -- intentionally ;) )
How does a 22 yo guy dress as opposed to a 27 year old? That's only a
five-year age difference!
Virgo Cluster
news:<ve6pp65...@corp.supernews.com>...
** NotSoShyVol **
>> Age: 27 (but I tend to dress and act like
>> I'm 22 -- intentionally ;) )
** Jean Louise **
> How does a 22 yo guy dress as opposed to a 27 year old?
> That's only a five-year age difference!
I was wondering about this myself. I mean, 22 is basically
just out of college and 27 is ... basically just out of college.
You're not going to have gray hair at 27 (well, most people
aren't), you're not going to be wearing reading glasses, you're
not going to look much older (e.g. no eye wrinkles yet), etc.
But then I was generally thought to be in high school until
well past 30, so maybe for normal people there is a difference.
I was about to add something, but since I've already posted
about it ---> <http://tinyurl.com/dsew>.
Virgo Cluster
"[10 Aphrodisiacs] (#2) Menstrual blood as a food or drink
additive (Germany, eighteenth century)."
<< Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless
Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 21 >>
Gray Loser
>
> >
> > I don't see the original post, but anyway...
> >
> > Me:
> >
> > Sex: M
> > Age: 27 (but I tend to dress and act like I'm 22 -- intentionally ;) )
>
> How does a 22 yo guy dress as opposed to a 27 year old? That's only a
> five-year age difference!
22 is college age. People dress differently in college than at 27,
when they're usually working adults.
Rober...@yahoogroups.com
From: celai...@yahoo.com (Celaine)
Arrggghh. Just realized I'm probably the grandma of the group.}}
So what's your problem? If you wanted to be friends with me, I wouldn't
reject you just because of your age. But you'd probably reject me for
one reason or another. Women my own age reject me because I don't look
my age, so they mistakenly believe they are too old for me. Women
younger than me reject me when they find out how old I really am.
When I was in my 30's and I went to a singles party, I met a woman who
was 54, and I was attracted to her, but she refused to have anything to
do with me because I was too young. When I was around 40 and posted an
ad in a singles magazine, and got a response, and met the woman who
responded, she took one look at me and called me a liar because I said
my true age but I looked ten years younger and she didn't believe my
true age. When I was a child, I wasn't allowed to have anything to do
with the neighbor closest to my age, 3 years younger than me, because
she was closer to my sister's age. Last year I met somebody one year
younger than me, but she refused to have anything to do with me because
she's way too old for me.
Gilda Radner said it best: "There's always something"
Right now, the one that hurts most is Heather Thompson, who has refused
to meet me for more than four years, despite her feelings for me
(shrine for me on her computer, containing stuff I've written that
sexually arouses her). I still want to meet that woman who has such
feelings for me.
Virgo Cluster
news:<REM-2003...@Yahoo.Com>...
> Women my own age reject me because I don't look my age,
> so they mistakenly believe they are too old for me.
Hey, this is my pet hangup! Go find your own! :)
Virgo Cluster
"[7 Alleged Famous Sex Offenders] (#6) Errol Flynn. Charged with
statutory rape of two under age fans in 1942, and acquitted."
<< Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless
Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 47 >>
WishList
> Last year I met somebody one year
> younger than me, but she refused to have anything to do with me because
> she's way too old for me.
HUH? You are 58 .. so how old was she? Too old for you? Some how I think
this is not a true story. Pleaes don't post such stuff.
>>
> Right now, the one that hurts most is Heather Thompson, who has refused
> to meet me for more than four years, despite her feelings for me
> (shrine for me on her computer, containing stuff I've written that
> sexually arouses her). I still want to meet that woman who has such
> feelings for me.
How many times have you been told to leave her alone. There was no "shine"
you made that up in your own mind.
WishList
Robert don't get nasty about a typo ..
--
--
"WishList" <He...@There.com> wrote in message
news:bem4hu$ji4$1...@bob.news.rcn.net...
Rober...@yahoogroups.com
From: "WishList" <He...@There.com>
> Last year I met somebody one year
> younger than me, but she refused to have anything to do with me because
> she's way too old for me.
HUH? You are 58 .. so how old was she?}}
Work out the math yourself.
{{Too old for you?}}
Yup, that's what she claimed.
{{Some how I think this is not a true story.}}
Why don't you call her up on the telephone and ask her?
> Right now, the one that hurts most is Heather Thompson, who has refused
> to meet me for more than four years, despite her feelings for me
> (shrine for me on her computer, containing stuff I've written that
> sexually arouses her). I still want to meet that woman who has such
> feelings for me.
{{How many times have you been told to leave her alone. There was no
"shrine" you made that up in your own mind.}}
No, you're a fucking liar! Her former boyfriend told me that, then she
herself later confirmed it to me and told me more about it. Why don't
you ask that former boyfriend yourself whether he was her boyfriend and
whether he saw the shrine on her computer and whether he told me about
it? While you're at it, why don't you ask him whether he sent me those
photos of her which he had taken when they were dating, and whether he
posted some of those same photos of her on a Yahoo club under the name
"Lacey"?
Who exactly told me to leave her alone?? You, a busybody who has no
business telling me what to do regarding somebody you don't know?
Heather is the only woman who has recently said anything sweet to me in
e-mail. She seems to still have some feelings for me, and I surely do
have major feelings toward her. I still want to hold her in my arms and
comfort her, and some other stuff if it's OK with her.
It still hurts me that Heather had to be homeless for a while.
Shyg...@aonmail.at
Age: 21
Education: High School
Occupation: labor
First born/middle/last born: last born
Virgin/not virgin: virgin
Temporal Adept
> From: "WishList" <He...@There.com>
> > Last year I met somebody one year
> > younger than me, but she refused to have anything to do with me because
> > she's way too old for me.
> HUH? You are 58 .. so how old was she?}}
>
> Work out the math yourself.
>
> {{Too old for you?}}
>
> Yup, that's what she claimed.
Maybe she just didn't want to make a connection with you, and used age
as an excuse. And since you spend all your time drooling over teenage
girls, she probably is too old for you.
>
> {{Some how I think this is not a true story.}}
>
> Why don't you call her up on the telephone and ask her?
Because that would be harassing? Besides, anyone is entitled to their
own opinions. And it doesn't sound like a true story.
>
> > Right now, the one that hurts most is Heather Thompson, who has refused
> > to meet me for more than four years, despite her feelings for me
> > (shrine for me on her computer, containing stuff I've written that
> > sexually arouses her). I still want to meet that woman who has such
> > feelings for me.
Obviously, she doesn't have many feelings for you, since she has
declined to meet you.
>
> {{How many times have you been told to leave her alone. There was no
> "shrine" you made that up in your own mind.}}
>
> No, you're a fucking liar! Her former boyfriend told me that, then she
> herself later confirmed it to me and told me more about it. Why don't
> you ask that former boyfriend yourself whether he was her boyfriend and
> whether he saw the shrine on her computer and whether he told me about
> it? While you're at it, why don't you ask him whether he sent me those
> photos of her which he had taken when they were dating, and whether he
> posted some of those same photos of her on a Yahoo club under the name
> "Lacey"?
You have no idea if that is her or her boyfriend or someone else
hoaxing you. Is she interested in meeting you? In corresponding with
you? No? Then leave her alone. She's not interested.
>
> Who exactly told me to leave her alone?? You, a busybody who has no
> business telling me what to do regarding somebody you don't know?
> Heather is the only woman who has recently said anything sweet to me in
> e-mail. She seems to still have some feelings for me, and I surely do
> have major feelings toward her. I still want to hold her in my arms and
> comfort her, and some other stuff if it's OK with her.
Doesn't seem to be, since she isn't setting up a meeting.
>
> It still hurts me that Heather had to be homeless for a while.
She found being homeless to be preferable to living with you.
Rober...@yahoogroups.com
From: tempor...@hotmail.com (Temporal Adept)
Maybe she just didn't want to make a connection with you, and used
age as an excuse.}}
Given she was one year younger than me, saying she was way too old for
me was really a sucky excuse. Shall we agree she's an idiot? Why don't
you telephone her and ask whether she honestly felt herself to be too
old for me, or was just making a flaky excuse?
By the way, a couple months later she tried to commit suidice and ended
up on 72-hour hold as a result. Apparently rejecting friendship with
me, and thereby being totally alone, wasn't exactly healthy for her
mind.
{{And since you spend all your time drooling over teenage girls, she
probably is too old for you.}}
I have no idea where you conceived such a stupid idea. It's totally
false. I've never drooled ever a teenage girl. Perhaps you're
projecting your own drooling on others? I have no way to know. If
you're claiming I'd reject her as being too old for my interest, that's
totally stupid because obviously I didn't reject her, she rejected me.
I thought she was nice looking, and friendly, and we had some rapport,
and so after she let me walk with her two blocks from the library to
where our paths diverged, and then she gave me her phone number, I
thought she might join me in some acquaintance that would become
friendship.
> Why don't you call her up on the telephone and ask her?
{{Because that would be harassing?}}
I don't think calling her up to ask just one question, to confirm what
I posted, would be harassing.
{{And it doesn't sound like a true story.}}
Then your idea of truth is warped. It is true and you're stupid not to
either accept it or check it out.
Regarding Heather Thompson: {{Is she interested in meeting you? In
corresponding with you?}}
I don't really know what's in her mind. She hardly ever can get online,
but did exchange e-mail with me within the past month, and she didn't
say anything nasty about me, so I think maybe she does sometimes want
to e-mail with me.
{{She found being homeless to be preferable to living with you.}}
That's what hurts so much. I think she would have been happy to be with
me, but she blew the chance. Now that she's talking sweet toward me, I
hope finally she decides to give me an in-person try before it's too late.
Temporal Adept
> From: tempor...@hotmail.com (Temporal Adept)
> Maybe she just didn't want to make a connection with you, and used
> age as an excuse.}}
>
> Given she was one year younger than me, saying she was way too old for
> me was really a sucky excuse. Shall we agree she's an idiot? Why don't
> you telephone her and ask whether she honestly felt herself to be too
> old for me, or was just making a flaky excuse?
Hell, no, if she is smart enough not to want anything to do with YOU,
then she isn't an idiot. Probably just one of those many people who
are too polite to look you in the eye and say, "You are a creep, I
want nothing to do with you, leave me alone or I'll call the police."
>
> By the way, a couple months later she tried to commit suidice and ended
> up on 72-hour hold as a result. Apparently rejecting friendship with
> me, and thereby being totally alone, wasn't exactly healthy for her
> mind.
Maybe she would rather be dead than be around you? Maybe you drove
her to try to kill herself.
> {{And since you spend all your time drooling over teenage girls, she
> probably is too old for you.}}
>
> I have no idea where you conceived such a stupid idea. It's totally
> false. I've never drooled ever a teenage girl. Perhaps you're
> projecting your own drooling on others?
I have relationships with people who are of an appropriate age for me.
Relationships that involve mutual attraction, not that you understand
the concept of "mutual attraction".
I have no way to know. If
> you're claiming I'd reject her as being too old for my interest, that's
> totally stupid because obviously I didn't reject her, she rejected me.
She rejected you, not because of your age.
> I thought she was nice looking, and friendly, and we had some rapport,
> and so after she let me walk with her two blocks from the library to
> where our paths diverged, and then she gave me her phone number, I
> thought she might join me in some acquaintance that would become
> friendship.
Not likely, you seem to blow through females pretty quickly when they
don't fit your perverted fantasy of what friends and relationships
are.
>
> > Why don't you call her up on the telephone and ask her?
>
> {{Because that would be harassing?}}
>
> I don't think calling her up to ask just one question, to confirm what
> I posted, would be harassing.
I'm sure she doesn't care to have anyone call her on your behalf.
Creep.
>
> {{And it doesn't sound like a true story.}}
>
> Then your idea of truth is warped. It is true and you're stupid not to
> either accept it or check it out.
It sounds like a fabricated story, which you frequently make, why
waste time checking it out?
>
> Regarding Heather Thompson: {{Is she interested in meeting you? In
> corresponding with you?}}
>
> I don't really know what's in her mind. She hardly ever can get online,
> but did exchange e-mail with me within the past month, and she didn't
> say anything nasty about me, so I think maybe she does sometimes want
> to e-mail with me.
If she did want to e-mail you, she would. If she doesn't, then she
doesn't. Case closed.
>
> {{She found being homeless to be preferable to living with you.}}
>
> That's what hurts so much. I think she would have been happy to be with
> me, but she blew the chance. Now that she's talking sweet toward me, I
> hope finally she decides to give me an in-person try before it's too late.
If she wanted to meet you, she would. She would have already,
actually. If she doesn't, she won't. And you know where my money is.
Chances are "Heather" is some man laughing his ass off at you.
natasha
Age: 19
Education: high school/junior college drop-out
Occupation: zeppline pilot/surfbunny/post-adolescent delinquent
Virgin? Are you kidding?
future: grim
natsaha fatale
None
Picture?
Paul
"natasha" <cherryo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:59989503.03072...@posting.google.com...
Oh, you're just so adorable and cute with your breezy, irreverent humor!
I hope you're not that insufferable in real life. Your smug satisfaction
with yourself (cute misspellings and constant use of slang, even though you
like to throw in some snobbish things from time to time) is nauseating and
not coming across with others as you probably think it is. You're posturing
so that you don't have to show the real you, which would take some guts. I
expect some flippant response, but somewhere deep down you know that I'm
right. Maybe someday you'll feel confident enough to communicate without
the facade. Or maybe I'm misreading you and you really are juvenile and
shallow. I see some potential there, but it's deeply concealed within the
cutesy, pseudo-wordly posturing-which is probably by design. Better stick
to the Mystery Science Theater for the time being. You can probably get
away with your schtick for awhile, but you're going to have to grow up
sometime. And if I'm right about you, you probably are someone who revels
in her "youth".
What it all comes down to is there any "there" there?
Paul
"None" <i-dont-want-to-r...@swissonline.ch> wrote in message
news:3f1a...@news.swissonline.ch...
Hell no! She would never show her picture here. She'd rather hide behind
the facade I mentioned in my last post.
Rober...@yahoogroups.com
news:59989503.03072...@posting.google.com...
> future: grim
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 22:56:18 GMT
From: "Paul" <jott...@earthlink.net>
Oh, you're just so adorable and cute with your breezy, irreverent
humor! I hope you're not that insufferable in real life.}}
I propose that she come to California and meet me in person and then
I'll report to the newsgroup what I think of her in-person, and then
this debate between the two of you will be resolved.
Michaela
> {{"natasha" wrote
> > future: grim
> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 22:56:18 GMT
> From: "Paul" <jott...@earthlink.net>
> Oh, you're just so adorable and cute with your breezy, irreverent
> humor! I hope you're not that insufferable in real life.}}
>
> I propose that she come to California and meet me in person and then
> I'll report to the newsgroup what I think of her in-person, and then
> this debate between the two of you will be resolved.
Now that'll be an unbiased option, right?
ROTFLMAO
- Michaela
WishList
Oh yea,
I'm sure women all over the country are packing their bags right now to go
meet you.
NOT!
Face it Robert ... Not very many women are going to want to meet a 58 year
old man who has not had a job in ten years .. who had his children removed
from his home .. who put in his OpenDiary about wanting to have sex with
13 yearolds.
<Rober...@YahooGroups.Com> wrote in message
news:REM-2003...@Yahoo.Com...
None
> Face it Robert ... Not very many women are going to want to meet a 58 year
> old man who has not had a job in ten years .. who had his children removed
> from his home .. who put in his OpenDiary about wanting to have sex with
> 13 yearolds.
I know one 13 year old I'd have sex with any second if it were legal.
Very smart (I think she currently scores about as well in school as I
did at her age, i.e. near genius) and gorgeous girl. That's the
exception, though.
DudeNEPhx1971
turned into a woman yet :-)
None
>>I know one 13 year old I'd have sex with any second if it were legal.
>>Very smart (I think she currently scores about as well in school as I
>>did at her age, i.e. near genius) and gorgeous girl. That's the
>>exception, though.
> With a small dick, you are better off going for little girls who havent
> turned into a woman yet :-)
Very funny. If anything one of the girls I've slept with (21) complained
about the opposite.
Michaela
(I think she currently scores about as well in school as I
> did at her age, i.e. near genius)
braggart
None
She actually had an assessment on it and was considered to be at least
highly gifted. Personally, I never agreed to see a fucking shrink in
order to be told I'm smart but I scored at least as good as she did.
I know I'm somewhere near Mensa standards and I'm not afraid to say it.
Virgo Cluster
news:<3f2f...@news.swissonline.ch>...
> She actually had an assessment on it and was considered to be at
> least highly gifted. Personally, I never agreed to see a fucking
> shrink in order to be told I'm smart but I scored at least as
> good as she did.
>
> I know I'm somewhere near Mensa standards and I'm not afraid to
> say it.
I'd be very surprised if at least a third of the people here
aren't, and it might be as much as half. With people like
Eric Pepke and Robert Maas around, your admission is kind of
like an adult saying that they're nearly a high school graduate.
Virgo Cluster
"[60 Work-Related Health Problems] (#34) Grocers' Itch."
<< Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless
Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 252 >>
natasha
> "natasha" <cherryo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:59989503.03072...@posting.google.com...
> > Sex: Chyckling
> > Age: 19
> > Education: high school/junior college drop-out
> > Occupation: zeppline pilot/surfbunny/post-adolescent delinquent
> > Virgin? Are you kidding?
> > future: grim
> >
> > natsaha fatale
>
> Oh, you're just so adorable and cute with your breezy, irreverent humor!
> I hope you're not that insufferable in real life. Your smug satisfaction
> with yourself (cute misspellings and constant use of slang, even though you
> like to throw in some snobbish things from time to time) is nauseating
...ahhh, fuck you!
:)
natasha fatale
natasha
I live in California, dude.
natasha fatale
Rober...@yahoogroups.com
From: cherryo...@yahoo.com (natasha)
I live in California}}
Hey, that could be good news, it might actually be feasible for us to
meet in person, depending on what part of California. I'm about 10
miles NW of San Jose. Where are you?
MyWishList
Who has had his kids removed from his home becuase he is unstable and
can't/won't care for them.
<Rober...@YahooGroups.Com> wrote in message
news:REM-2003...@Yahoo.Com...
Rober...@yahoogroups.com
From: "MyWishList" <old....@You.org>
X-Complaints-To: ab...@rcn.com}}
Yeah, a lot of good that'll do. RCN actually condones and supports net
abuse via its anonymous service, as does COTSE. They refuse to take any
action against Mark-RGB and other net abusers on that service. (Recall
Mark-RGB is the person who grossly demeaned CreamGem (Lital Rudoy of
Las Vegas) three years ago via COTSE, then continued to harass me on
IRC from RCN long after that.) So are you Mark-RGB back again under
another anonymous nickname, or just a similar person using RCN the same
as he did? (His dialup is via RCN, which shows up when he runs IRC, but
for NetNews he used to go through COTSE. Apparently you're posting
directly via RCN now.)
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=200005011741.NAA18876%40cotse.com
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=200005011919.PAA19745%40cotse.com
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=200005011931.PAA19903%40cotse.com
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=200005022005.QAA01385%40cotse.com
So was that you who posted all that crap in her name, or are you just
another rat in Mark-RGB's nest?
{{Who has had his kids removed from his home becuase he is unstable and
can't/won't care for them.}}
Not correct. I took good care of my children, protected them from their
abusive mother, protected them from becoming homeless when our
apartment complex was sold and the new owner decided to get rid of all
low-income tenants and remodel the apartments and rent them only to
high-income people. I tried to find low-income housing for us, but
nothing two or three bedrooms was available. For a month I used my
credit cards to keep the three of us in motels while I looked for a
regular place to live. Finally I started looking for one-bedrooms and
studios as a temporary place for us, and found one, but before I could
move us in, a stupid social worker made a horrible mistake, and because
I don't have the money to pay a decent lawyer, and the lawyer appointed
by the court was sleeping with the social worker, I wasn't able to get
my rights and my children's rights protected. Unless somebody has lots
of money, there's not much one can do to protect oneself and one's
children from an abusive social worker. After my children were taken
away, my son was sexually molested by three teenagers in the children's
shelter, something that never happened to either of my children when
they had been with me. I never left either of my children locked in a
room with teenagers, unattended, but Social Services did, and sure
enough my son got sexually abused by the teens. If my children had
stayed with me, they never would have been abused.
So are you going to stop posting lies about me, and post formal
retractions of the lies you already posted?
Parker_wears_dress
Your lawyer slept with the social worker? How are your kids doing now?
Mxsmanic
> With a small dick, you are better off going for little girls who havent
> turned into a woman yet :-)
Most girls are closer to women than little children by the age of 13,
although there is very wide variation at that age.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
Mxsmanic
> I'd be very surprised if at least a third of the people here
> aren't, and it might be as much as half.
I would. By definition, Mensa is 2% of the general population. While
the average IQ of people in this group is probably higher (just being
literate raises the average IQ a little bit), it is not going to be
anywhere near +2 SDs. Most medical doctors are probably around +1.5
SDs, most lawyers a bit below that.
maddman
> Virgo Cluster writes:
>
> > I'd be very surprised if at least a third of the people here
> > aren't, and it might be as much as half.
>
> I would. By definition, Mensa is 2% of the general population. While
> the average IQ of people in this group is probably higher (just being
> literate raises the average IQ a little bit), it is not going to be
> anywhere near +2 SDs. Most medical doctors are probably around +1.5
> SDs, most lawyers a bit below that.
I don't know really. But it anyone's counting I would. I've scored
between 125 and 150 on various IQ tests, and have since I was a kid.
I think the most recent was 138, but that was online so I'm not
holding my breath over that number.
In any case, I've learned that Dilbert's garbage man is right.
Intelligence has a lot less practical application than you'd think.
Virgo Cluster
** Virgo Cluster **
>> I'd be very surprised if at least a third of the people here
>> aren't, and it might be as much as half.
** Mxsmanic **
> I would. By definition, Mensa is 2% of the general population.
> While the average IQ of people in this group is probably higher
> (just being literate raises the average IQ a little bit), it is
> not going to be anywhere near +2 SDs. Most medical doctors are
> probably around +1.5 SDs, most lawyers a bit below that.
Quickly googling (about all I did was google scores 1300 and up
with the words "sat" and "gre" connected with 'OR' and then a few
searches involving "Mensa" and "IQ"), here are some things that
people have posted. I've restricted this to posters who have been
pretty active within the past couple of years.
Joel (mole...@yahoo.com) -- 1410 PSAT
The Babaloughesian -- 1450 SAT
Trance909 -- 710 GMAT
yakima -- qualified for Mensa (a former member?)
Eric Pepke -- 187 IQ (not self-tested); 760/780/780 GRE
EM -- former (current?) Mensa member
Robert Maas -- top 5 Putnam Exam score (1967); qualified for Mensa
gra_gra -- former Mensa member
Dale Greer -- qualified for Mensa
Virgo Cluster -- former Mensa member
Gray Loser -- qualified for Mensa
me (roule...@hotmail.com) -- 1550 SAT
Animeg3282 -- 1300 SAT (750 verbal)
Noah (rab...@hotmail.com) -- 1450 SAT
People I suspect could qualify -- ness (= madwoman), William Parker,
Kali, Real Ketchup, Ram, Kitz, Ely, and probably several others who
are going to be upset because I didn't think of them.
Virgo Cluster
"[10 Vertically Challenged Heads of State] (#4) Attilla the Hun --
four feet, six inches."
<< Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless
Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 199 >>
Kali
news:dd95baf2.03081...@posting.google.com...
SAT 1470, I don't know offhand what I made on each part, but math was
better than verbal. And you should be proud of me Virgo, I just decided
to get a minor in math. It's not too much extra work over and beyond what
I've already done.
Beowulf Trollshammer
news:dd95baf2.03081...@posting.google.com:
>
> People I suspect could qualify -- ness (= madwoman), William Parker,
> Kali, Real Ketchup, Ram, Kitz, Ely, and probably several others who
> are going to be upset because I didn't think of them.
>
Kitz??? LOL now that is funny. I think any person qualified for MENSA should
know better about the fundamentals of bivalent logic which she apparently
ignored, considering the gazillion times she contradicted herself and made
fallacious over-generalizations here. :-/
And I'm really surprised that you didn't mention Stephen and Mark Green.
--
"Whining" behaviour doesn't work - or it provides a sort of unhealthy,
secondary support which is rooted in pity rather than sincerity.
--Marc Meunier
William P
news:Xns93D690B0D7458...@10.0.0.1:
> gamma...@yahoo.com (Virgo Cluster) wrote in
> news:dd95baf2.03081...@posting.google.com:
>
>>
>> People I suspect could qualify -- ness (= madwoman), William Parker,
>> Kali, Real Ketchup, Ram, Kitz, Ely, and probably several others who
>> are going to be upset because I didn't think of them.
>>
>
> Kitz??? LOL now that is funny. I think any person qualified for MENSA
> should know better about the fundamentals of bivalent logic which she
> apparently ignored, considering the gazillion times she contradicted
> herself and made fallacious over-generalizations here. :-/
>
> And I'm really surprised that you didn't mention Stephen and Mark
> Green.
Eldorado, mickey, certainly could qualify. And of course the smartest
person in the history of Usenet, Darkfalz.
Mxsmanic
> In any case, I've learned that Dilbert's garbage man
> is right. Intelligence has a lot less practical
> application than you'd think.
That is popular mythology with no basis in fact. The same mythology
holds that physical appearance is unimportant. The real-world evidence,
however, makes it clear that both intelligence and appearance are very
important indeed. It seems that it pleases people to deny reality in
such cases.
Mxsmanic
> Quickly googling (about all I did was google scores 1300 and up
> with the words "sat" and "gre" connected with 'OR' and then a few
> searches involving "Mensa" and "IQ") ...
The SAT is no longer a valid indicator of IQ (I think this changed in
the 1990s, but I don't remember when). I'm not sure about the GRE or
GMAT; I think they still have high correlations.
> ... here are some things that people have posted.
People can post all sorts of things. As a general rule, if someone has
to _tell_ you how smart he is, he's not.
Mxsmanic
> I think any person qualified for MENSA should
> know better about the fundamentals of bivalent logic ...
You confuse intelligence with acquired knowledge; this is a common
error.
Virgo Cluster
news:<Xns93D690B0D7458...@10.0.0.1>...
> Kitz??? LOL now that is funny. I think any person qualified
> for MENSA should know better about the fundamentals of
> bivalent logic which she apparently ignored, considering
> the gazillion times she contradicted herself and made
> fallacious over-generalizations here. :-/
>
> And I'm really surprised that you didn't mention Stephen
> and Mark Green.
I was going by what Kitz said in one post, something about
being tested in school with an IQ in the upper 130's or low
140's. This is from memory, though, so that's why I didn't
include here with the specific claims I listed. I supposed I
could have googled a bit to find where she said this, or even
*if* she said this (it might have simply been an internet IQ
test, which I would have discounted) but I was getting tired
at this point, plus I also had some other things that I needed
to take care of. (Documents for the sale of our house, which
we finally found a buyer for within the past week, filling out
an application for the apartment my wife and I found two days
ago that we're planning to move into soon, and some things
connected with the upcoming Ph.D. Qualifying exams in my
department.)
Mark Green, maybe, although aside from his logically convoluted
posts, I don't recall his saying anything specific about himself
that would lead me to include him (except maybe planning to get
a Ph.D. in computer science at one time). But to be honest,
I forgot about him and his name didn't come up in any of the
posts I looked at.
Stephen rings a bell, but I don't recall anything about him. He
might have been someone who left (or changed identities) before
I got here a year ago. Contrary to popular belief, I have *not*
read every single post in the a.s.s. archive, although I have
read quite a few of them.
Virgo Cluster
"[10 Vertically Challenged Heads of State] (#8) General Franco --
five feet, four inches."
Virgo Cluster
news:<Xns93D6925FC69B9wi...@206.172.150.14>...
> Eldorado, mickey, certainly could qualify. And of course
> the smartest person in the history of Usenet, Darkfalz.
Darkfalz...Ah, yes...and here's the proof! --->
Virgo Cluster
"[10 Vertically Challenged Heads of State] (#9) Queen Anne --
four feet, nine inches."
Leander
This is interesting. Many of these scores are astoundingly high -
*much* higher than what Mensa requires. In my comments below, the
standard deviation for all IQ scores is 15. With this deviation
Mensa's requirement becomes IQ 130.
> Joel (mole...@yahoo.com) -- 1410 PSAT
>
> The Babaloughesian -- 1450 SAT
That corresponds to an IQ of 149 or 141 depending on whether the test
was taken before or after 1995.
>
> Trance909 -- 710 GMAT
>
> yakima -- qualified for Mensa (a former member?)
>
> Eric Pepke -- 187 IQ (not self-tested); 760/780/780 GRE
The GRE scores correspond to an IQ of about 154. If that IQ score uses
an SD of 24 (which is quite common, especially in Mensa) it
corresponds perfectly with his GRE score, since 187 (SD 24) = 154 (SD
15).
>
> EM -- former (current?) Mensa member
>
> Robert Maas -- top 5 Putnam Exam score (1967); qualified for Mensa
Actually 1966.
>
> gra_gra -- former Mensa member
>
> Dale Greer -- qualified for Mensa
>
> Virgo Cluster -- former Mensa member
>
> Gray Loser -- qualified for Mensa
Also, Gray Loser reported having almost perfect GRE scores not long
ago, which is much, much more than what Mensa requires (IQ 160, about,
or in other words at the 1 in 30 000 level - Mensa is at the 1 in 50
level).
>
> me (roule...@hotmail.com) -- 1550 SAT
159 or 149, depending.
>
> Animeg3282 -- 1300 SAT (750 verbal)
This would have to be post-1995, so it corresponds to an IQ of 130 -
exactly Mensa's requirement.
>
> Noah (rab...@hotmail.com) -- 1450 SAT
Again, 149 or 141, depending.
> People I suspect could qualify -- ness (= madwoman), William Parker,
> Kali, Real Ketchup, Ram, Kitz, Ely, and probably several others who
> are going to be upset because I didn't think of them.
Darkfalz has mentioned having tested his IQ in the 150s (he didn't say
what the standard deviation of the test was, though), which doesn't
surprise me; he is obviously very smart.
Trance909
If anything, around here we certainly know how to take standardized tests.
Jim Summers87
>however, makes it clear that both intelligence and appearance are very
>important indeed. It seems that it pleases people to deny reality in
>such cases.
Intelligence only works if it's put with a good appearance...intelligent ugly
guys don't go very far with ladies other than the ladies trying to use them to
cheat off of their tests.
Mxsmanic
> This is interesting. Many of these scores are astoundingly high -
> *much* higher than what Mensa requires.
It is more than interesting; it is wildly improbable, when you look at
the distribution of IQ. Why would alt.support.shyness attract such a
crop of super geniuses?
Virgo Cluster
> It is more than interesting; it is wildly improbable, when you
> look at the distribution of IQ. Why would alt.support.shyness
> attract such a crop of super geniuses?
It's generally been my experience that guys above 3 standard
deviations in intelligence have a much higher incidence of
delayed dating success. To some extent this is also true for
girls, but in their case the effect is lessened due to their
ability to attract older guys when they're young.
And yes, I realize that (1) "high IQ implies dating problems" isn't
the same thing as (2) "dating problems implies high IQ", and it's
implication (2) (which I certainly don't believe) that would best
justify the situation here. I suspect the situation here has a lot
to due with the nature of usenet and with the generally high level
of discussion that this group has a history of (which would tend
to keep someone around who is interested in this if they happened
stumble onto this group).
Regarding implication (1), see these two posts --->
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=Sidis&as_uauthors=virgo&filter=0
Virgo Cluster
"[10 Royal Soubriquets] (#3) Alfonso the Fat, thirteenth century
Frankish prince."
<< Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless
Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 319 >>
poppytar
None
> In any case, I've learned that Dilbert's garbage man is right.
> Intelligence has a lot less practical application than you'd think.
It gets in my way about as often as it proves to be helpful.
None
> People I suspect could qualify -- ness (= madwoman), William Parker,
> Kali, Real Ketchup, Ram, Kitz, Ely, and probably several others who
> are going to be upset because I didn't think of them.
>
Yeah. But I don't like them Mensa crowd so I couldn't ever be bothered
about them.
None
> People can post all sorts of things. As a general rule, if someone has
> to _tell_ you how smart he is, he's not.
Or just lazy like me to actually come up with stuff that would implicate
he's so smart.