Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: The Sagnac Effect Explained... For Real Physicists Only
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Poutnik
Sep 14, 2014, 8:08:10 AM9/14/14
to
Dne 14.9.2014 v 13:45 Dillon Vanmeter napsal(a):
> Poutnik wrote:
>
>> Dne 14.9.2014 v 13:30 Dillon Vanmeter napsal(a):
>>
>>> This is true. As soon you add rotation to Relativity, it crashes.
>>> Relativity, as said in advance, is a theory involving translation only,
>>> not rotation. One needs to have extensive experience with motion in
>>> ordere to realize it.
>>>
>>> The most posters in this forum are incompetence, weekend coffee-table
>>> relativists.
>>
>> Like this one, who would seem surpriced, that it applies to rotation as
>> well. Truth is, most posters did not cross simplicity of linear
>> application.
>
> I told you, people like you are idiots. There is nothing in Relativity
> that suggests rotation. Stop forcing me to repeat that. Is obvious. You
> have no prerequisites.
>
You know manners even less than Relativity,
and You know near nothing about Relativity.
--
Poutnik
> Poutnik wrote:
>
>> Dne 14.9.2014 v 13:30 Dillon Vanmeter napsal(a):
>>
>>> This is true. As soon you add rotation to Relativity, it crashes.
>>> Relativity, as said in advance, is a theory involving translation only,
>>> not rotation. One needs to have extensive experience with motion in
>>> ordere to realize it.
>>>
>>> The most posters in this forum are incompetence, weekend coffee-table
>>> relativists.
>>
>> Like this one, who would seem surpriced, that it applies to rotation as
>> well. Truth is, most posters did not cross simplicity of linear
>> application.
>
> I told you, people like you are idiots. There is nothing in Relativity
> that suggests rotation. Stop forcing me to repeat that. Is obvious. You
> have no prerequisites.
>
You know manners even less than Relativity,
and You know near nothing about Relativity.
--
Poutnik
0 new messages