From http://hepcsolutions.com/interactive/2004/may15alert.htm
Were You Damaged by Schering's Interferon?
May 15, 2004
Hi Lloyd:
Well, things are finally coming together for this class action suit!
From what I understand, we now have many people signed up.
I, personally, now receive about 40-60 emails and 3-6 phone calls
EVERY DAY from people out there who have been injured by
PEG-Intron/Rebatron. This treatment affects different people in
different ways. I have talked to people who have gone blind or deaf,
have muscle/bone/nerve conditions, diabietis, thyroid problems, on and
on.
Thank you for all your help. Please continue to refer people to either
Patrick Catalano at 619-233-3565 or myself at AGia...@AOL.com or
707-537-7871.
Annie G.
If you have been damaged by interferon you should help straighten out
the manner in which it is prescribed.
By filling out the form below, you will be represented by the most
competent attorney's in this field.
You can help others in the future to be properly informed as to the
success rate and the warnings.
You can help yourself by being compensated for the damage done to you
by this treatment that is worse than the disease. You can bring the
truth out, the truth that interferon is a drug looking for a disease
to cure and hepatitis c is not it!
This class action suit is perhaps the best effort we can make in our
fight for public awareness of Hepatitis C!
After all, we all know about Erin Brocovich, Ed Masery, her attorney
has joined with my attorney, Patrick Catalano to sue Schering Plough
in a class action suit involving interferon and its disabling side
effects.
If you have been damaged by schering's interferon or peg intron, fill
out the form and mail it to the address on the form.
If you have any questions, send me a email at Lloyd <at>
hepatitiscfree.com
or call 877 676 1615.
The goal is not to go against your doctor or a hospital.
This is a class action suit against the manufacture, Schering Plough.
Lloyd Wright
Were you damaged by Schering's interferon?
If so, join us on our Crusade to bring Schering to Justice
Fill out this form and send it to Patrick Catalano.
Hi Lloyd & Felisa:
You were right about Patrick. He has been quietly working like a
mad-man behind the scenes.
I guess tomorrow, he is signing up Ed Masry (Erin Brockovich), to join
forces with us.
I understand that he has enlisted the both of us to come up with a
bunch more names by tomorrow. I hate it when I feel like I have an
"impossible mission", because I hate to fail any mission! I have put
out about 100 emails and have had just a few responses. In the
meantime, I just got a computer up and running, since my other one's
hard drive completely fried! And, I am having a huge "flare-up" of my
interferon injury thing - I can barely walk and can't lift my arm to
scratch my nose!
The thing about me though, is that, no matter how hard the mission, I
never, ever give up! We will find the way. Hopefully, you are having a
little bit more luck than I have in finding some more people. Let me
know if you need me to do anything!
Thank you so very much for helping me so much!!! I couldn't have done
it without you. I owe you a lot - I will also find a way to repay you
both.
Annie G.
CLICK HERE TO PRINT
LAW OFFICES OF PATRICK E. CATALANO
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
SAN DIEGO OFFICE
THE KOLL CENTER
501 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 740
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101-3544
(619) 233-3565
FAX (619) 233-9841
(RESPOND TO THE ABOVE)
SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE
781 BEACH STREET, SUITE 333
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94109
(415) 788-0207
FAX (415) 447-0066
ATTORNEY-CLIENT AGREEMENT
I, _____________________________, Plaintiff, agree that The Law
Offices of Patrick E. Catalano, a Professional Corporation, will
represent the interests of the undersigned Plaintiff(s) in pursuit of
a claim against drug manufacturers Peg-Intron/Shering-Plough, for
damages I have suffered.
Fees for legal services rendered by the attorney will be on a
contingency fee basis set forth as follows:
Settlement Before 90 Days Before 40% of Gross Recovery
the First Trial Date in State Court;
In Federal Court, 90 Days Before
the Final Pre-Trial Conference
Settlement Any Time After 90 45% of Gross Recovery
Days Before the First Trial Date
in State Court; In Federal Court,
90 Days Before the Final Pre-Trial
Conference
After Trial Commences 45% of Gross Recovery
If Appeal From Judgment After 50% of Gross Recovery
Trial
I agree that the Law Offices of Patrick E. Catalano may associate
Masry & Vititoe and/or the Law Offices of Charles S. LiMandri, or
other attorneys, who will be sharing the above-referenced fee in the
handling of my case.
The client(s) expressly acknowledges that contingency fee percentages
are not set by law but are negotiable between attorney and client(s).
The client(s) shall be responsible for all costs and disbursements
incurred in connection with this claim/lawsuit including, but not
limited to, copying charges, postage, travel and telephone. Upon
receipt of any money, including partial settlements, or upon
termination of the attorney-client relationship, whichever occurs
first, the client(s) will be billed for all costs and disbursements.
In the case of complete or partial settlements, attorneys’s fees as
above and costs, will become due.
The client(s) agrees to cooperate and assist with responding to all
discovery requests in this case. The client(s) agree to provide
complete written or electronic responses to all questions within their
knowledge and capacity in a timely manner and agrees to provide
verifications as requested. The client(s) agrees to work with the
attorney to answer questions requiring the attorney’s assistance. The
client(s) agrees to pay the attorney the sum of $250.00 per hour, plus
costs and expenses, for all services required as a result of any
failure by client(s) to cooperate and assist. Client(s) agrees to
reimburse attorney for any sanctions imposed by the Court which are
caused by any failure by client(s) to cooperate and assist in a timely
manner.
If client(s) discharges attorney prior to the termination of the
matter, all costs advanced by attorney and/or incurred will be paid
within thirty (30) days of discharge.
Attorney is specifically hereby given a lien on the claim or cause of
action, on any sum recovered by way of settlement or payment of any
claim and/or on any judgment that may be recovered for the sum
mentioned above as the fee plus any unreimbursed costs which have been
advanced, and attorney shall have all general, possessory, or
retaining liens, and all special or charging liens, or liens of any
nature, known to law.
The attorney is to receive the applicable percentage of the gross
recovery. In addition, the attorney is to receive reimbursement for
all disbursements and costs advanced on client’s behalf.
The client(s) authorizes the attorney to retain, on an hourly basis,
such consultants which the attorney, in his opinion, considers
necessary to pursue or protect the client’s interests.
It is agreed that if a settlement offer is tendered in the case by
Defendants and Law Offices of Patrick E. Catalano believes that the
offer is in good faith and settlement should be accepted and
communicates this position to client(s), and client(s) does not agree
to the settlement offer, Law Offices of Patrick E. Catalano may
require client(s) to advance the reasonable costs of trial in the
case.
The client(s) agrees that the attorney, at the attorney’s election,
may withdraw from the representation if, in the opinion of the
attorney, further litigation would be contrary to client’s best
interest.
This agreement covers only the handling of the above-mentioned
matters, including the handling of lawsuits relating to the
above-mentioned matters. Any other matters handled by the attorney for
the client(s) are not included in the above fee and client(s) shall
pay attorney additional compensation for such matters.
Attorney has made no warranties as to the successful termination of
any matters for which attorney is rendering services on behalf of
client(s), and all expressions made by attorney relative thereto are
matter of attorney’s opinion only.
LAW OFFICES OF PATRICK E. CATALANO
Dated:__________________________ By:__________________________
Patrick E. Catalano
Client (Print Name)
Dated:__________________________ By:__________________________
Client (Sign Name)
By:__________________________________
Address:________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
Telephone:
____________________ home
____________________ work
____________________ cell
Facsimile: ____________________
e-mail ____________________
Any additional information regarding your circumstances:
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
CLICK HERE TO PRINT
Hepatitis C Solutions
I have been following this for a couple of months now in my own hep c group, a
couple of websites are up on this topic as well. I'v not posted them in here
for fear of the flames. I am interested to see the outcome. I was curious, are
these lawyers ambulance chasers, or.... are there people out there who have
been seriously damaged by long term sides? I'v always thought this would be an
issue, long ago I thought these things.... but I'm a bit pessimistic that way.
Kim
>>
>>
>>
>>Hepatitis C Solutions
>
>I have been following this for a couple of months now in my own hep c group, a
>couple of websites are up on this topic as well. I'v not posted them in here
>for fear of the flames. I am interested to see the outcome. I was curious, are
>these lawyers ambulance chasers, or.... are there people out there who have
>been seriously damaged by long term sides? I'v always thought this would be an
>issue, long ago I thought these things.... but I'm a bit pessimistic that way.
>
>
>Kim
>
>
Yeah, I just stumbled across it and posted it because I thought it
might be of interest. I think even on the brochures it says a small
number of people suffer long term damage and a few die from treatment.
When I read that I thought how long before the lawsuits begin... I
don't know what to make of it either.
Hi Tom,
In the group I frequent, one guy has myathis gravis which his team has
determined is a direct result of IFN, and another girl had Raynauds disease.
Both did not clear. Many have thyroid dysfunctions now, and are clear. So, I
don't know how this would play out. The risks are clearly stated on the inserts
of all the treatment products. In anycase, I will be following this suit for
the sake of my own personal interest.
Take Care,
Kim
<elmoe...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:7698-412...@storefull-3252.bay.webtv.net...
partial settlements, attorneysâ?Ts fees as above and costs, will
become due.
The client(s) agrees to cooperate and assist with responding to all
discovery requests in this case. The client(s) agree to provide complete
written or electronic responses to all questions within their knowledge
and capacity in a timely manner and agrees to provide verifications as
requested. The client(s) agrees to work with the attorney to answer
questions requiring the attorneyâ?Ts assistance. The client(s)
agrees to pay the attorney the sum of $250.00 per hour, plus costs and
expenses, for all services required as a result of any failure by
client(s) to cooperate and assist. Client(s) agrees to reimburse
attorney for any sanctions imposed by the Court which are caused by any
failure by client(s) to cooperate and assist in a timely manner.
If client(s) discharges attorney prior to the termination of the matter,
all costs advanced by attorney and/or incurred will be paid within
thirty (30) days of discharge.
Attorney is specifically hereby given a lien on the claim or cause of
action, on any sum recovered by way of settlement or payment of any
claim and/or on any judgment that may be recovered for the sum mentioned
above as the fee plus any unreimbursed costs which have been advanced,
and attorney shall have all general, possessory, or retaining liens, and
all special or charging liens, or liens of any nature, known to law.
The attorney is to receive the applicable percentage of the gross
recovery. In addition, the attorney is to receive reimbursement for all
disbursements and costs advanced on clientâ?Ts behalf.
The client(s) authorizes the attorney to retain, on an hourly basis,
such consultants which the attorney, in his opinion, considers necessary
to pursue or protect the clientâ?Ts interests.
It is agreed that if a settlement offer is tendered in the case by
Defendants and Law Offices of Patrick E. Catalano believes that the
offer is in good faith and settlement should be accepted and
communicates this position to client(s), and client(s) does not agree to
the settlement offer, Law Offices of Patrick E. Catalano may require
client(s) to advance the reasonable costs of trial in the case.
The client(s) agrees that the attorney, at the attorneyâ?Ts
election, may withdraw from the representation if, in the opinion of the
attorney, further litigation would be contrary to clientâ?Ts best
interest.
This agreement covers only the handling of the above-mentioned matters,
including the handling of lawsuits relating to the above-mentioned
matters. Any other matters handled by the attorney for the client(s) are
not included in the above fee and client(s) shall pay attorney
additional compensation for such matters.
Attorney has made no warranties as to the successful termination of any
matters for which attorney is rendering services on behalf of client(s),
and all expressions made by attorney relative thereto are matter of
attorneyâ?Ts opinion only.
"BDH" <bh...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:AO2Wc.36631$PG2.4...@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
Hey BDH, good to see ya, and I'm happy to hear you won the coveted SVR!
I agree with your post about this class-action suit. Yes, the warnings about
Schering's product (and all the others) are quite clear, so IMHO no one
should be jumping on the lawsuit bandwagon in this one. Also, many of the
lingering or permanent sides of peg-interferon and ribavirin are identical
to some hepatitis C symptoms, and there was never any guarantee that
successful tx would get rid of the hep C symptoms. This looks like just
another greedy law firm and a bunch of people looking for easy money.
Bottomfeeders all.
Waterspider
Dear Waterspider,
As your attorney I must inform you that your attitude toward the legal
profession is false, outrageous, patently untrue, and in fact
tortious. I must therefore discontinue representation of you in your
defense against child pornography charges and instead begin a class
action law suit on behalf of all attorneys against you and your
estate. Please note that if you try to move your trailer house it
will be viewed as an attempt to hide your assets, regardless of the
fact that you owe over $3000 on a trailer house that is worth only
$2500.
Sincerely,
Waterspider's Lawyer
Thank you for your patience, and I'm sorry it took this long to get it
straightened out.
Elmo's Colon
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 16:36:05 -0500, elmoe...@webtv.net said:
>suit on behalf of all attorneys against you and your estate. Please note
>that if you try to move your trailer house it will be viewed as an
>Re: Were You Damaged by Schering's Interferon?
>
>Group: alt.support.hepatitis-c Date: Sun, Aug 22, 2004, 4:21pm From:
>waterspid...@law.com (Waterspider's Lawyer)
>On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 19:01:27 GMT, "Waterspider"
>Hi Elmo,
>no one should be jumping on the lawsuit bandwagon in this one. Also,
>many of the lingering or permanent sides of peg-interferon and ribavirin
>I just saw this ( I've been lurking now and then since I cleared the
><water...@moonshine.net> said:
>"BDH" <bh...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>virus) I won't be signing up for this myself, it doesn't seem right. We
>all new going in, the treatment was going to have side affects ...
>against child pornography charges and instead begin a class action law
>attempt to hide your assets, regardless of the fact that you owe over
>I agree with your post about this class-action suit. Yes, the warnings
>about Schering's product (and all the others) are quite clear, so IMHO
>$3000 on a trailer house that is worth only $2500.
>Sincerely,
>Elmo
>////////////////
>are identical to some hepatitis C symptoms, and there was never any
>I would have thought Cody would just dump his c-drive on us rather than
>start trolling the ng; ie David, David's Liver, David's Spleen, and now
>news:AO2Wc.36631$PG2.4...@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
>possibly long lasting.
>Yes, I cleared using Scherings tx and it was tough but I would do it
>again if it was the only tx available ... knowing there was a chance of
>Waterspider's Lawyer
>long lasting sides.
>Long lasting side effects???Kill the dragon??? The only choice is kill
>the dragon.
>Brian
>Hey BDH, good to see ya, and I'm happy to hear you won the coveted SVR!
>As your attorney I must inform you that your attitude toward the legal
>profession is false, outrageous, patently untrue, and in fact tortious.
>I must therefore discontinue representation of you in your defense
>Waterspider's Lawyer. ahahahahahahahaha Here's another thunderblast
>for ya, Cody....rrrriiiiiiippppppppppp!!!!!!!
> >I agree with your post about this class-action suit. Yes, the warnings
about
> >Schering's product (and all the others) are quite clear, so IMHO no one
> >should be jumping on the lawsuit bandwagon in this one. Also, many of the
> >lingering or permanent sides of peg-interferon and ribavirin are
identical
> >to some hepatitis C symptoms, and there was never any guarantee that
> >successful tx would get rid of the hep C symptoms. This looks like just
> >another greedy law firm and a bunch of people looking for easy money.
> >Bottomfeeders all.
> >Waterspider
>
> Dear Waterspider,
> As your attorney I must inform you that your attitude toward the legal
> profession is false, outrageous, patently untrue, and in fact
> tortious. I must therefore discontinue representation of you in your
> defense against child pornography charges and instead begin a class
> action law suit on behalf of all attorneys against you and your
> estate. Please note that if you try to move your trailer house it
> will be viewed as an attempt to hide your assets, regardless of the
> fact that you owe over $3000 on a trailer house that is worth only
> $2500.
> Sincerely,
> Waterspider's Lawyer
My learned friend,
Your conclusions about my opinion of the legal profession are poorly
researched, lack evidence and are unfounded. You should be advised that I
have the greatest respect and admiration for most members of the legal
profession; it's just the bottomfeeders that I abhor. Even if I did have a
poor opinion of all lawyers, that would not constitute grounds for legal
action because, in my country and under the law of my country, lawyers are
not part of a visible minority and therefore cannot be victim to prejudice.
You must be smoking your torts again, because you never defended me, or
attempted to defend me, on child pornography charges because I was never
accused, charged or even investigated on child pornography or anything
related to such an offense. Don't you remember that I don't even *like*
children?
You may recall that I once solicited your professional advice on the matter
of the validity of percieved threats made via a Usenet newsgroup. You may
recall that I was somewhat taken aback by your reply of, "Fuck 'em if they
can't take a joke," and relieved you of your duties on my behalf.
About my modular home (all right, it's a freakin' trailer), you may be
disappointed to learn that there is no longer a mortgage held against it; it
is fully paid and has been for several years now. As for moving it, that
would be beyond my means because it is permanently attached to a foundation
and has undergone considerable reconstruction to accommodate two large decks
and an addition. Moving it, in short, would require an act of God, and we
both know how likely that is.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I hope your confusion is
resolved. I remain, yours truly,
Waterspider
I also seem to remember you doing a shot of interferon, forgetting, and
doing another one the same night. Yikes!
Spidey
Now let me see if I have this right. People take tx to get rid of
hep-c. Tx gets rid of the virus but not the symtoms. If the viral
load of the virus is no indicator of present or future liver damage,
then why is tx used to reduce the viral load.
Ron
>Now let me see if I have this right. People take tx to get rid of
>hep-c. Tx gets rid of the virus but not the symtoms. If the viral
>load of the virus is no indicator of present or future liver damage,
>then why is tx used to reduce the viral load.
Huh? Some of the symptoms of HCV are caused by liver damage. The liver
will, to a degree, slowly heal itself once the virus is dead, so those
symptoms are likely to go away at some future date, unless the damage
was too substantial for the liver to completely recover. But if the
virus has already caused damage in other organs, those may not heal that
fast, or ever. You still want to kill the virus so it doesn't do even
more damage. Not that complicated, or am I missing something?
Thomas
--
To reach me, complete my last name in the address.
>I agree with your post about this class-action suit. Yes, the warnings about
>Schering's product (and all the others) are quite clear, so IMHO no one
>should be jumping on the lawsuit bandwagon in this one. Also, many of the
>lingering or permanent sides of peg-interferon and ribavirin are identical
>to some hepatitis C symptoms, and there was never any guarantee that
>successful tx would get rid of the hep C symptoms. This looks like just
>another greedy law firm and a bunch of people looking for easy money.
>Bottomfeeders all.
Another agreement here. Especially if that lawyer really has a
connection to the Brokovich case, he's one of the worst bottomfeeders
there is. If you read up on the real case instead of the Hollywood
version, you'll see what I mean.
http://www.fumento.com/erinforbes.html
Ron was actually pointing out the same thing, in response to another
person's "shoot from the hip" nonsense.
David
That's the wrong mindset. Never let the truth get in the way of suing
somebody. If anything, it was the sides that made you do it.
I don't think "my lawyer" is Cody; I think he's one of our other missing
trolls, likely the anonymous one.
;-)
Spidey
I'm not so sure... the *ass tricks* are missing. I don't know if Cody would be
bothered with that kind of nonsense.
Kim
Double Huh? Did I attribute my quote to the wrong person? That was Ron
posting, or wasn't it? Maybe Ron would be the right person to explain
what he meant...
>On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 21:59:43 -0500, David <been...@donethat.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 21:39:34 -0400, Thomas Wagner <to...@capecod.com>
>>said:
>>
>>>On 22 Aug 2004 15:34:27 -0700, smith...@hotmail.com (Ron) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Now let me see if I have this right. People take tx to get rid of
>>>>hep-c. Tx gets rid of the virus but not the symtoms. If the viral
>>>>load of the virus is no indicator of present or future liver damage,
>>>>then why is tx used to reduce the viral load.
>>>
>>>Huh? Some of the symptoms of HCV are caused by liver damage. The liver
>>>will, to a degree, slowly heal itself once the virus is dead, so those
>>>symptoms are likely to go away at some future date, unless the damage
>>>was too substantial for the liver to completely recover. But if the
>>>virus has already caused damage in other organs, those may not heal that
>>>fast, or ever. You still want to kill the virus so it doesn't do even
>>>more damage. Not that complicated, or am I missing something?
>>>
>>>Thomas
>>
>>Ron was actually pointing out the same thing, in response to another
>>person's "shoot from the hip" nonsense.
>
>Double Huh? Did I attribute my quote to the wrong person? That was Ron
>posting, or wasn't it? Maybe Ron would be the right person to explain
>what he meant...
>
>Thomas
No, you attributed the quote to the right person, but without the
paragraph he was responding to his question seemed like only that and
not what it actually was, which was to point out the obvious answer by
asking his false premise question prompted by the false statement in a
prior paragraph which was not a part of your post.
Please don't make me explain that again. :-)
David