12 Nov 2004
                                                        (Version 1.21
                                                       on 14 Nov 2004)
                                                          (Layout for
                                                      typewriter font)
If there exist, for every 'still-Scientologist,' an estimated two
 hundred Ex-Scientologists, then an ode (song, poem) to them
    - to those who have left the cult and to those who certainly will
      leave it -
is quite in order.
 There are several metaphors, below, which you might enjoy.
 Quite accidentally, you might appreciate the understanding with which
 these have been surrounded.
We start with the ode, which refers to those having freed themselves
     from L. Ron Hubbard's way of looking at people, and from how he
     treats people
           once he forced them to 'think,' that "he must tell
           everyone what to think and do and know and not know," and
           that "everyone must become a Scientologist, and comply with
           him, and made not to see what he actually is, but must be
           made to admire him above all."
                      And that is then supposed to save the planet,
                      not from L. Ron Hubbard.
                      Saving the planet would be to save it and its
                      population FROM L. Ron Hubbard.
           Indeed, inside Scientology you will find some sort of
           miniature North-Korea, complete with unpaid staff and
           gulag camps and gulag rules and enforcement, a complete
           lack of conscience and destruction of compassion,
                             all "to protect the group from all the
                             evil and suppressive persons" who do not
                             like Hubbard's con game and crimes
                             against people, and his tremendous lying
                             and destruction of truth about himself
                             and about his actual intentions,
                       as is well covered on countless web-sites that
                       are dedicated to exposing the cult, even when
                       those are merely scratching the surface of the
                       iceberg...
Now to the 'Ode to Ex-Scientologists,' which, in its metaphors,
 summarizes all the web-sites - including Scientology's own - about
 that cult:
          'Happily they have escaped -
           from laying-batteries,
                 (a model of efficiency - amount of eggs you get
                  per scoop of food - no chicken must refuse;
                  and after all, far more important than a stroll,
                  the future of the species is - and is at stake now
                  too)
           but happily, and free now once again,
           they can enjoy the sun,
           and pick a worm or two.'  *(0)
They HAVE escaped Scientology, but they refuse to face L. Ron Hubbard,
 and they refuse to face earlier and rather similar lies.  *(1)
 Hence the metaphor.
Actually, it is all very confusing (if you happen to read both sides,
 in their newsgroup *(2) for instance):
     The "Scientologists" and the "ex-Scientologists" and their
     newsgroup -
     all the apparencies that - at first glance, and as each intends
     it too - make each side, taken on its own, and at face value,
     seem
"totally right" and "totally genuine." *(2)
     So, as you asked, I once again will unravel the confusion, and
     publish it now,
           so that, if they again confront you with such confusions,
           you get the idea not to bother me, but just to read the
           things I have written.
People have INTENTIONS - what they write and say, does not at all
 necessarily reflect those intentions - so you look at THEM, at their
 intentions, and then you read what words they use to express these.
 *(5)
     Yasser Arafat says "He is the elected head of the Palestinian
     people" and "He fights for a Palestinian state."
     Well, you can be a chicken and just look at the grains he gives
     people to pick,
OR you can look at him, at his intentions,
           and find the actions, the hidden actions as well as the
           refused actions that indeed follow from his intentions,
     should you have any care for people at all, rather than, with the
     one currently called Dalai Lama, "to be friendly."
There are those (category 'one,' we will call them) who DO want to
 face evil,
  and thus the Criminal Minds have to 'catch them' - that is, Criminal
  Minds do make them indeed "fight evil" and "expose evil:"
Only it is the WRONG "evil" that they are given to fight.
And it is made certain that they do not notice that.
           And it is most fiercely enforced: 'They must follow
           command-intention'
                 with a total domination (that they call 'Keeping-
                 Scientology-Working,' a means of total domination)
                 of what to think and what to feel - stamping out any
                 wandering thought or feeling;
                 and they must deny, or label as incorrect, any
                 inadvertent meter read-out of their lie-detectors,
                 and they must refrain from anything that is, as they
                 call it, "off-purpose" or "out-ethics"
                       when it does not directly or indirectly execute
                       the aim of complete domination of all of Earth
                       and of all its governments.
           And the responsible-type Scientologists are only allowed to
           expose very minor evils, that then are blown up to the
           required order of magnitude and hailed and applauded as
           'Big Wins.'
     And those actions then are sold to them as "winning over evil"
     and as "their exposing evil" and "restoring good."  *(3)
There are the others (category 'two' we will call them), who just want
 to have a comfortable or 'happy' life for themselves and others,
(they want to get rid of their headaches, so to speak,)
     but not by protecting life from evil and not by eradicating evil
     - not by facing and exposing Criminal Minds, that means.  *(1)
Both types can be drawn into the cult of Scientology by Hubbard by
 means of his false claims and a tremendous amount of lies,
and by other mechanisms you prefer not to know about.
Category 'one' is more difficult to get out of Scientology, because
 they are more easily believing the accusations and lies thrown at
 them about their
    "Not being good enough and having to improve," and that "They can
     do much better and they can work much harder to help people"
                 - which is true, so any decent and responsible person
                   can see and admit the truth of it, and so it can
                   be used for mind-control, by applying it to a lie
                   that they were made to accept and to follow -
           they are - with methods not unlike those in North Korea -
           accepting, that they must be working much harder, on that,
           what
                 they are tricked, and continuously deceived into
                 believing,
          "is the (only real and efficient and lasting, working) way
           to help people."  *(4)
These - the kind of hard working category of people, baited and
 trapped by the very desire to be responsible - sense a lot of truth,
and exactly that truth, and their desire to help people
           and their knowing very correctly that people are almost
           fully down and are kept down at the bottom of the spiral
           of less and less awareness,
makes them that more susceptible to the lies of L. Ron Hubbard,
           his lies which are precisely designed to play the only
           instrument Hubbard CAN play:
                 The organ of deception and confidence tricks and
                 sleight of mind,
                 backed by a force and Energy that is, again, not
                 something any Scientologist or Ex-Scientologist
                 desires to even imagine exists, but which is
                       very simple to understand by means of
                       Fine Particle Physics. *(0)
Category 'two' (the people of category 'two') who hoped to be helped
 and who believed the glossy lies and promises at face value, and who
 thought to find in Scientology "a safe space" which is "free of
 Criminal Minds," and even "free of lies" (how wrong can one be), they
also after they leave Hubbard's mental terror organization,
 are not interested in truth or in facing and exposing evil and really
 protecting life, even if they say so in order to seem brave,
     - they would not go out and remove a Saddam Hussein, or a Yasser
       Arafat, to give a very current example -
but they are more on a general course of "escaping suffering."
 And they are disposed to accept the lies from the Criminal Minds,
 (lies originating from India, indeed) that
    "they eventually will escape suffering if they behave well and
     friendly, for long enough, to enough people."  *(1)
 They are very kind and friendly and understanding, but you do not
 want these people as friends, and they know that I look rather
 easily through their "friendliness,"
     because as soon as the tiniest breeze raises its head, they
     flee below deck, and blame you for spoiling their sun-bathing,
     and tell each other, that not their inability to stay oriented,
     but, that "you make them vomit."
     And they happily agree on all those lies amongst each other, and
     so they remain what they prefer to be:
          'They can enjoy the sun, and pick a worm or two - and
           please you with their feathers.'
     They are as arrogant as category 'one' - only they are
     'diplomatic' in it,
           they do not have the force to show and defend their
           arrogance openly, but underneath their friendliness and
           love and light,
     they hate anyone who makes them actually look at and thus handle
     life.
           Again, these people are not the friends you want to have,
           but they are very nice and friendly and understanding
                 ...as long as truth is kept at an arm's length, or
                 rather still, at a stone's throw.
They "handle" evil by not feeling it, by not sensing it,
     they "have their own 'reality' or 'their own Universe'," and also
     Hubbard did tell them those lies, that
          "everyone has their own Universe, and then they have a
           common Universe IF they agree with each other."
          (Lies they greedily gobbled up and still consider true,
           despite the use of the telescope by Galilei, now several
           hundred years ago already. And I saw a documentary about
           an off-shore oil-rig, and these people did not seem to
           be drilling into a merely-agreed-upon illusion or 'maya.')
     In other words, by making themselves unaware, they "handle evil,"
     which indeed for a short time may put them in Samahdi (in full
     Euphoria, in "Enlightenment") or into Nirvana,
           till they can not hold off AWARENESS of what exists, and
           they can not keep up destroying their own nature anymore,
their own nature, which is, of course,
to be aware and to be part of life,
                             of what IS, of what really happened and
                             who caused it,
which is truth.
Leonardo truly Been
                                 "Whether the angels play only Bach
                                  praising God, I am not quite sure.
                                           I am sure, however, that
                                      'en famille' they play Mozart."
Karl Barth
_________
Footnotes:
(0)  'Fine Particle Physics To Understand Persistent, Violent
      Psychotics' (27 Feb 2003)
        http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.03022...@posting.google.com&output=gplain
(1)  'What Is Lethargy' {HRI 20041107} (7 November 2004)
        http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.04110...@posting.google.com&output=gplain
(2) 'Koos' FAQ about the psychosis of alt.religion.scientology -
      summarizing eight years of experience with it.
      With some Footnotes by Koos on Small and Fine Particle Physics
       (22 May 2004 - Version 3.6 on 3 Nov 2004)
        http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=989886.0411030007.574f6462%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
(3)  'How a 'scientologist' can get into good standing with the
      society again' (10 Nov 2004)
        http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=989886.0411101259.de9f09c%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
(4)  'Criminal Mind Tom Cruise is "friends" publicly now with
      'scientology'-owner David Miscavige'
       (20 September 2004 - Version 1.3 on 16 Oct 2004)
        http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=989886.041016...@posting.google.com&output=gplain
(5)  'Learning And Reading - Leonardo Da Vinci and Galileo Galilei had
      an excellent command of reading and writing' {HRI 20040811}
       (11 August 2004)
        http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.04081...@posting.google.com&output=gplain
Copyright 2004 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
 and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
 anyone who learns from it, and (even if he can not learn from it)
 who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
 to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
 or religious agenda, but only to educate, and to encourage people
 to judge un-dominated and for themselves about any organizations
 or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
 PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
  (address unreadable for internet robots
   - replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)