Two types of women
Mike
where I'm coming from...
To the women reading this message-- present company excluded :-)
<<clears throat>>
Over the past few years, I have come to learn that there are two types
of women:
The honest type tells you her price up front ($30 for a lap dance or
whatever)
The other type will act like she loves you and will make you pay for
the rest of your life.
...
...
and since she's a woman, the law and everyone else will take her side
(of course).
Isn't the fairer sex truly wonderful?
Disclaimer: I do know of women who don't fall into either category, but
they haven't been truly "tested" yet.
Cheers,
-Mike
John Smith
news:1142387220....@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Disclaimer: I do know of women who don't fall into either category, but
> they haven't been truly "tested" yet.
So a test brings out a true side of a person.
Plonker
would too if I were a woman.
mpit...@comcast.net
just the fact that you think that way.......
ya better stick with the honest woman & give her the 30 bucks for the
lap dance.
at least until you change your "tude" dude :)
see i'm honest and i didn't charge you for a dance...yet ;)however, I
can not stress that.... you are being biast here because I personally
know MANY MANY men, that I could say the same thing about except with
them...
It involves more than a dance (it is sex, but hey..they will do that
for free...lol...lol) and they too can act like they love you and there
are different ways to "pay" for the rest of your life besides
money...that's for sure! and dear sir, I am one woman who surely didnt
have the court on my side....not even close.......almost criminal if
you really look at the case!
but then again.... I haven't been "tested".... naaa 22 years.... long
life battery.... the energizer bunny? Was a woman... she DIED!!! ahhh
haa!
Kitty
If sex is really the only thing you want, you really *are* better off
payng for it up front.
_mL_
or from behind, depending on the preference that day...
mpit...@comcast.net
rich!!!
lol lol lol......lotta dancin' goin on ;)
Kitty
LOL
or he can hang a dollar bill over his beltbuckle with a sign "all you
can eat for under a buck"
_mL_
you bad, Kitty!
i remember a guy who wore a hat that said "free moustache rides"..
(he was married, i guess his wife had a great sense of humor)
John Smith
news:_W3Sf.61671$Ug4.36582@dukeread12...
A friend of mine says that men always pay for sex. No matter what.
Nearl J Icarus
>A friend of mine says that men always pay for sex. No matter what.
Their women pay as well. Look at the men they have to put up with. I figure the
Puritan women had it the worst. They not only had to endure the same hardships
as the men, but they also had to endure the men also.
Lost Lurker
Mike wrote:
>
> Isn't the fairer sex truly wonderful?
>
> Disclaimer: I do know of women who don't fall into either category, but
> they haven't been truly "tested" yet.
>
so, which "type" is your mother, and has she been "tested" yet?
LL
saulgoode
Mike wrote:
> Because this is a divorce group, some of you will probably realize
> where I'm coming from...
>
> To the women reading this message-- present company excluded :-)
>
> <<clears throat>>
>
> Over the past few years, I have come to learn that there are two types
> of women:
>
> The honest type tells you her price up front ($30 for a lap dance or
> whatever)
Dude, where are you going that you have to pay $30 bucks for a lap
dance? Find a place for $20, preferably with lower lighting.
> The other type will act like she loves you and will make you pay for
> the rest of your life.
Maybe. Depends on your choice of women in the first place. It's a
buyer-beware market, remember that.
> ...
> ...
> and since she's a woman, the law and everyone else will take her side
> (of course).
That's changing. As the next generation gets their law degrees, and the
old-schoolers retire, we'll see a swing towards the men as fathers.
Remember that half of tomorrow's lawyers will have been raised in a
divorced home, and many of those by a responsible father or a deadbeat
mother, flushing the myth we've been fed since the '60s.
>
> Isn't the fairer sex truly wonderful?
Mmmm, yes. Esp. the pink parts.
> Disclaimer: I do know of women who don't fall into either category, but
> they haven't been truly "tested" yet.
Again, buyer-beware. Dating isn't cheap, and neither is marrying (and
neither are titty bars). Don't you remember the old adage: "Marry
well." That's good advice, if hard to apply.
- Saul
>
> Cheers,
> -Mike
saulgoode
"Let's play carnival. You sit on my face, I'll guess your weight."
- Saul
_mL_
..and the sex was probably really boring, too!
mpit...@comcast.net
saulgoode wrote:
(and neither are titty bars).
Saul...Saul.... it shocks me that you would say something like that ;)
annie
aw gawd yer killin' me here, ml! heeheee
and it's just what I needed today!
thanks! : )
annie
yeah or worse!!!
(thinking of insanity from specific std's of the time, couple that with
puritanic thinking and.........yech)
John Smith
news:xymSf.6602$%m4....@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
>> or from behind, depending on the preference that day...
>
> aw gawd yer killin' me here, ml! heeheee
> and it's just what I needed today!
> thanks! : )
OK, I am not getting it. What is so funny about it. Can someone explain to
me?
John Smith
news:1142515825.4...@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
That is uncalled for.
>
> LL
>
John Smith
news:1142528491.7...@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
>
> Maybe. Depends on your choice of women in the first place. It's a
> buyer-beware market, remember that.
Indeed. I often wonder, in a free market system, do buyers have more power
or do the sellers commend more power.
>> Isn't the fairer sex truly wonderful?
>
> Mmmm, yes. Esp. the pink parts.
Hahaha. Now the trick (no pun intended) is to take the pink parts without
the hissy fits.
John Smith
<mpit...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1142545904.2...@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Casey
> >>
> >> Isn't the fairer sex truly wonderful?
> >>
> >> Disclaimer: I do know of women who don't fall into either category, but
> >> they haven't been truly "tested" yet.
> >
> > so, which "type" is your mother, and has she been "tested" yet?
>
> That is uncalled for.
Why? Seemed fair to me.
Casey
Kitty
You've never figured ut what goe on a slumber parties, have you?
It's like this, pajamas, Ice Cream, chocolate liquer, talk about boys
and sex followed by giggling outbursts.
Like guys drinking beer and watching sports... kind of.
us...@domain.invalid
>>Maybe. Depends on your choice of women in the first place. It's a
>>buyer-beware market, remember that.
>
>
> Indeed. I often wonder, in a free market system, do buyers have more power
> or do the sellers commend more power.
depends on supply and demand.
I'm finding at 49 that I can be in pretty high demand for some reason.
might be my motto: "ladies come first, and second"
saulgoode
They're full of vampires, no doubt, so bring only as much blood as you
can afford to spill. Titty bars really can be a lot of fun if you do it
right. But they can also rob you blind.
I took gf to one a few months back. She liked it. And the dancer liked
my gf more than she liked me... I worry more about losing her to a
stripper than she should worry about a stripper getting hold of me.
- Saul
Lost Lurker
John Smith wrote:
>
> That is uncalled for.
>
why? If he wants to diminish all women down to 2 types, I think it's a
fair question.
And while you want to pass judgement on my question to him- perhaps
you'd like to answer it, also?? So where does your mom, or sister or
aunt fit into these types?
I mean, really- who are you to decide when a question is called for or
"uncalled for"? <shrugs>
LL
_mL_
>I took gf to one a few months back. She liked it. And the dancer liked
>my gf more than she liked me... I worry more about losing her to a
>stripper than she should worry about a stripper getting hold of me.
Haha, smart stripper knows how you menz like to watch wimmenz...
I'm sure she KNEW that you would be willing to give up more cash to watch her
"interact" w/your gf than you'd give up to have her "interact" just with you!
;-)
John Smith
I have never brought a woman to a titty bar. Although, a woman offered to go
there with me. I get so horny when I go there and no way to release it. Heck
you can't even touch the titties on the girls.
>
>
> - Saul
>
John Smith
>
>>>Maybe. Depends on your choice of women in the first place. It's a
>>>buyer-beware market, remember that.
>>
>>
>> Indeed. I often wonder, in a free market system, do buyers have more
>> power or do the sellers commend more power.
>
> depends on supply and demand.
>
> I'm finding at 49 that I can be in pretty high demand for some reason.
People keep on telling me that the supply of women increases as you grow
older.
>
> might be my motto: "ladies come first, and second"
Women are so complicated! I can never tell if they want to be one, two,
three or what.
John Smith
news:x%qSf.55602$Dh.3835@dukeread04...
Mother is a woman in a separate category.
>
>
>
> Casey
John Smith
>
> John Smith wrote:
>>
>> That is uncalled for.
>>
>
> why? If he wants to diminish all women down to 2 types, I think it's a
> fair question.
Because Mother's are special and are beyond categories.
>
> And while you want to pass judgement on my question to him- perhaps
> you'd like to answer it, also?? So where does your mom, or sister or
> aunt fit into these types?
My Mom was an amazing woman; never took a back seat to anyone, was very
smart. My sister was an angry woman (God rest her soul. Suicide at 38), and
my younger sister is feisty but loving. Aunts are very aggressive and have
more balls than almost all men. They are very old 80+ yo, but very
accomplished in their lives, well travelled, very well respected.
Now, your turn. Where do you fit in these types.
>
> I mean, really- who are you to decide when a question is called for or
> "uncalled for"? <shrugs>
Just the same as you to decide what I should and should not say. <shrugs
back>.
>
> LL
>
Lost Lurker
John Smith wrote:
>
> Mother is a woman in a separate category.
<grins>
so----lemme guess......
the mother of your children falls into this same category(s)?
hey- youre' the one who is making me see these kinds of questions?
heh, I'm thinking, too, my friend... ;-)
LL
(yes, I always try to thinkoutside the box-
you seem determined to stick me into! :-0)
John Smith
>
> John Smith wrote:
>>
>> Mother is a woman in a separate category.
>
> <grins>
>
> so----lemme guess......
>
> the mother of your children falls into this same category(s)?
No, not at all. Night and day. My mother was an amazing woman, the ex-wife
was an amazing women who lost her "amazingness."
>
> hey- youre' the one who is making me see these kinds of questions?
>
> heh, I'm thinking, too, my friend... ;-)
Good. Hey, at least we are friends now :-)
>
>
> LL
> (yes, I always try to thinkoutside the box-
> you seem determined to stick me into! :-0)
No, I was just kidding around. Haven't had a lot of reason to smile in the
last few years, so I try to joke around. I find one joke keeps me happy for
one hour.
mpit...@comcast.net
am i right?
Lost Lurker
John Smith wrote:
>
> My Mom was an amazing woman; never took a back seat to anyone, was very
> smart. My sister was an angry woman (God rest her soul. Suicide at 38), and
> my younger sister is feisty but loving. Aunts are very aggressive and have
> more balls than almost all men. They are very old 80+ yo, but very
> accomplished in their lives, well travelled, very well respected.
>
> Now, your turn. Where do you fit in these types.
<giggles & grins>
Since I *obviously* fit neither of these descriptions by the OP, and
yet, since you seemed to have found no fault with the original
descriptions by the OP, I only question out of curiosity.
People are people. It really is that *simple*. I feel, that to subject
all of women into 2 types, (while it may be the op's personal opinion)
is one matter (which I've noted he has not responded), but for you to
judge my post as "uncalled for" begs responses on a whole 'nother
level.
And for a gentleman who has taken my posts "personally" or not-
depending on your convenience, apparently, - yes, I will speak my mind
to those who choose to quote and respond to me directly, and let the
chips fall where they may.
My advice, words to Ops (on any occasion) are mine alone. I stand by
them on personal experience, and/or things I have learned along this
whole game of *Life* as we know it.
I have no superior knowledge of what is best for anyone, I only post
what I feel at the moment, (and who truly doesn't ;-)
You see, *you* can take my posts personally- or you can take what you
need, and disregard the rest...which (if I'm remotely understanding
UsetNet) is the _whole point_.
All the Best Sugar,
LL
Karma
personal sociological experiments. Just make sure you get paid the
appropiate fee.
HAHA!
Seriously, Mike? Were you drunk, or what lol?
Lost Lurker
ya know that commercial "zoom zoom"? I got the feeling it went right
over his head,
LOL!
BTDT, but I alway appreciate a man who thinks *that way* ;-)
LL
Bill in Co.
what
> you need, and disregard the rest... which, (if I'm remotely understanding
UseNet),
> is the _whole point_.
EXACTLY!!!!
Bill in Co.
>
> 'Test' away, as you say, if you are allowed to carry out your
That's what we're doing here in Usenet!
goldielocks
How so? Hated of women must include; mothers, grandmothers, sisters,
daughters...all women.
Otherwise, it isn't consistent. Why be selective?
*/*
Mike
> John Smith wrote:
> >
> > Mother is a woman in a separate category.
>
> <grins>
>
> so----lemme guess......
>
> the mother of your children falls into this same category(s)?
This is what one mother did:
She kidnapped the child him from the family residence.
She did not allow any contact between the child and his father.
She conveyed this message to the child (aged 4 then) this:
- MY job, and the job of my family and friends, is to prevent you from
being a son.
- YOUR job, dear child, is to fight for your rights as a child and a
son to see your father
- The law won't help you. I won't help you. We'll abuse your father
if he tries to see you.
- DESPITE all this, you must try and fight for your rights to meet and
greet your father.
Whatta woman! Whatta system! They're making the father and child pay,
which I guess is right?! (please note, LL, payment doesn't have to
mean money, and favors don't have to mean sex).
Mike
> John Smith wrote:
> >
> > Mother is a woman in a separate category.
>
> <grins>
>
> so----lemme guess......
>
> the mother of your children falls into this same category(s)?
This is what one mother did:
kato
"goldielocks" <dancing...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1142707860....@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
You'd have to be a sexist to understand.
John Smith
news:1142707860....@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
Do you hate your father just because you may have had bad experiences with
men?
>
> */*
>
Nearl J Icarus
>Do you hate your father just because you may have had bad experiences with
>men?
To some extent I must agree with you there. There was this one girl my ex and I
took under our wing. She walked into the house one day and exclaimed, "I hate
men!" I gave her a little "what the hell" look, since she had included me in
that also. She said, "You're not a man, you're Daddu."
saulgoode
Therein lies the irony. Daddies are men, and mommies are women, and as
such are prone to the same faults as the men and women we date and
marry.
The only difference is that when you realize your parent is one of the
crazier ones, it's tougher to get rid of them. Ever see Irreconciliable
Differences, where little Drew Barrymore tries to divorce herself from
her parents?
- Saul
goldielocks
At this point, I am struggling not to become rude with you. You're
starting to remind me of Sean Hannity...(that's a bad thing.)
No - I don't hate my father. And, I have had a bad experience with one
man.
*/*
goldielocks
I swear, sometimes it's like trying to have a conversation with a very
thick person.
*/*
John Smith
>
> Nearl J Icarus wrote:
>> john_s...@microsoft.com says...
>>
>> >Do you hate your father just because you may have had bad experiences
>> >with
>> >men?
>>
>> To some extent I must agree with you there. There was this one girl my ex
>> and I
>> took under our wing. She walked into the house one day and exclaimed, "I
>> hate
>> men!" I gave her a little "what the hell" look, since she had included me
>> in
>> that also. She said, "You're not a man, you're Daddu."
>
> Therein lies the irony. Daddies are men, and mommies are women, and as
> such are prone to the same faults as the men and women we date and
> marry.
Isn't that the theory in psychology that all our problems start with the
parents? One of the breakthroughs I made in my life 8 years ago was to
forgive my parents and realize that they did the best they could under the
circumstances. It helped me develop a better relationship with them. Then
after having children of my own, I realized just how difficult it is to
raise children. Gave me a new respect for my parents.
It would seem to me that the concept of God must have come out of the
concept of parents to satisfy the childhood need for an omnipotent,
omnipresent, omniscient being. Disclaimer: orgnaized religion is some crazy
shit.
>
> The only difference is that when you realize your parent is one of the
> crazier ones, it's tougher to get rid of them. Ever see Irreconciliable
> Differences, where little Drew Barrymore tries to divorce herself from
> her parents?
Sounds like a funny movie.
>
>
> - Saul
>
John Smith
You asked me why I don't hate my mother if I allegedly hate one woman. I
asked you the same question in reverse and you find that offensive? Don't
ask such questions, if you don't want people asking you such questions.
> No - I don't hate my father. And, I have had a bad experience with one
> man.
So then you should have no problem understanding why I don't hate my mother.
>
> */*
>
Lost Lurker
Mike wrote:
<snipped horror story>
Mike, I am extremely sorry for your pain and circumstances. And
orginally, I did understand your post to be a bit of tongue in cheek,
and venting ;-)
Unfortunately, when it progressed into what it did, I simply felt if I
turned it around a bit, a different perspective may have been looked at
;-)
I'm sure you know that bashing all women (and you did a disclaimer ;-)
eases the pain only temporarily.
My best wishes for you....
LL
Nearl J Icarus
>Isn't that the theory in psychology that all our problems start with the
>parents? One of the breakthroughs I made in my life 8 years ago was to
I don't know about -all-, but it would definitely take a late bloomer to figure
out that our parents have a strong influence on their children.
>forgive my parents and realize that they did the best they could under the
>circumstances. It helped me develop a better relationship with them. Then
>after having children of my own, I realized just how difficult it is to
>raise children. Gave me a new respect for my parents.
Its amazing what a little bit of real life can do for a person. Kinda like Mark
Twain. He once said that when he was 16, he thought his father was so ignorant
that he could barely stand to be around him. But when he was 21, he was amazed
at how much his father had learned in 5 years. (off hand I don't remember
exactly how that quote went, but that is the gist of it).
Ray Gordon
>> >with
>> >men?
>>
>> To some extent I must agree with you there. There was this one girl my ex
>> and I
>> took under our wing. She walked into the house one day and exclaimed, "I
>> hate
>> men!" I gave her a little "what the hell" look, since she had included me
>> in
>> that also. She said, "You're not a man, you're Daddu."
>
> Therein lies the irony. Daddies are men, and mommies are women, and as
> such are prone to the same faults as the men and women we date and
> marry.
Unless you live in Kentucky, I doubt you'll be marrying mom or dad.
John Smith
news:441e8758$0$5467$bb8e...@news.usenetcompany.com...
> john_s...@microsoft.com says...
>
>>Isn't that the theory in psychology that all our problems start with the
>>parents? One of the breakthroughs I made in my life 8 years ago was to
>
> I don't know about -all-, but it would definitely take a late bloomer to
> figure
> out that our parents have a strong influence on their children.
I am a late bloomer for sure. To me it was news that how I related to women
as lovers had something to do with how my mother related to me as a child,
but psychology is not my field.
>
>>forgive my parents and realize that they did the best they could under the
>>circumstances. It helped me develop a better relationship with them. Then
>>after having children of my own, I realized just how difficult it is to
>>raise children. Gave me a new respect for my parents.
>
> Its amazing what a little bit of real life can do for a person. Kinda like
> Mark
> Twain. He once said that when he was 16, he thought his father was so
> ignorant
> that he could barely stand to be around him. But when he was 21, he was
> amazed
> at how much his father had learned in 5 years. (off hand I don't remember
> exactly how that quote went, but that is the gist of it).
Mark Twain had a way with words. This is certainly true. Most teens think
this way.
Gary Duguay
togeather is ,
Prostitute . Easily bought and sold to the highest bidder . But, then again
, I think you may have just described most if not , all women in your post
.
"Mike" <mi...@trivedi.com> wrote in message
news:1142387220....@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Because this is a divorce group, some of you will probably realize
> where I'm coming from...
>
> To the women reading this message-- present company excluded :-)
>
> <<clears throat>>
>
> Over the past few years, I have come to learn that there are two types
> of women:
>
> The honest type tells you her price up front ($30 for a lap dance or
> whatever)
>
> The other type will act like she loves you and will make you pay for
> the rest of your life.
> ...
> ...
> and since she's a woman, the law and everyone else will take her side
> (of course).
>
> Isn't the fairer sex truly wonderful?
>
> Disclaimer: I do know of women who don't fall into either category, but
> they haven't been truly "tested" yet.
>
> -Mike
>
>
shinypenny
> "Mike" <mi...@trivedi.com> wrote in message
> news:1142387220....@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > Because this is a divorce group, some of you will probably realize
> > where I'm coming from...
> >
> > To the women reading this message-- present company excluded :-)
> >
> > <<clears throat>>
> >
> > Over the past few years, I have come to learn that there are two types
> > of women:
> >
> > The honest type tells you her price up front ($30 for a lap dance or
> > whatever)
> >
> > The other type will act like she loves you and will make you pay for
> > the rest of your life.
> > ...
> > ...
> > and since she's a woman, the law and everyone else will take her side
> > (of course).
> >
> > Isn't the fairer sex truly wonderful?
> >
> > Disclaimer: I do know of women who don't fall into either category, but
> > they haven't been truly "tested" yet.
Maybe the problem is that you're the type of man that believes that
relationships are purely transactional?
jen