info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Iron In Metabolic Syndrome
10 views
Skip to first unread message
ironjustice
Sep 5, 2021, 3:36:46 AM9/5/21
to
Serum Ferritin and the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Cross-sectional Studies
Wei Chun Bai Zhang 1, Yang Xing 2, Bing Shao 3
Biomed Environ Sci.
2021 Aug 20;34(8):623-631. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.086.
PMID: 34474722 DOI: 10.3967/bes2021.086
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the dose-response relationship between serum ferritin (SF) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in the two sexes.
Methods: We searched for articles on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and the Web of Science databases that were published from 1950 to 2020. The summary odds ratio ( OR) and 95% confidence interval ( CI) of the association between SF and MetS were estimated using a random-effects model through a meta-analysis. Based on the methods described by Greenland and Longnecker, we explored the dose-response relationship between the two sexes.
Results: This study included 14 studies and 74,710 samples. The results of the classical meta-analysis showed that SF was positively associated with MetS ( OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.59-1.98). Regarding the components of MetS (8 studies included), the results showed that SF was positively associated with abdominal obesity ( OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.24-1.62), elevated fasting plasma glucose ( OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.50-2.25), elevated blood pressure ( OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08-1.26), elevated triglycerides ( OR= 2.09, 95% CI: 1.72-2.54), and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19-1.49). In the linear dose-response meta-analysis, the ORs of males, females, and postmenopausal females were 1.14 (95% CI: 1.13-1.16), 1.32 (95% CI: 1.26-1.39), and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.22-1.47), respectively.
Conclusions: Our study shows that SF is significantly and positively associated with MetS, and the risk in the male population is higher than that in the female population. This finding also supports the recommendation of using SF as an early warning marker of MetS.
Keywords: Dose-response relationship; Meta-analysis; Metabolic syndrome; Serum ferritin.
Copyright © 2021 The Editorial Board of Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. Published by China CDC. All rights reserved.
Who loves ya.
Tom
Jesus Was A Vegetarian!
http://tinyurl.com/2r2nkh
Man Is A Herbivore!
http://tinyurl.com/4rq595
DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
http://tinyurl.com/zk9fk
Wei Chun Bai Zhang 1, Yang Xing 2, Bing Shao 3
Biomed Environ Sci.
2021 Aug 20;34(8):623-631. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.086.
PMID: 34474722 DOI: 10.3967/bes2021.086
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the dose-response relationship between serum ferritin (SF) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in the two sexes.
Methods: We searched for articles on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and the Web of Science databases that were published from 1950 to 2020. The summary odds ratio ( OR) and 95% confidence interval ( CI) of the association between SF and MetS were estimated using a random-effects model through a meta-analysis. Based on the methods described by Greenland and Longnecker, we explored the dose-response relationship between the two sexes.
Results: This study included 14 studies and 74,710 samples. The results of the classical meta-analysis showed that SF was positively associated with MetS ( OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.59-1.98). Regarding the components of MetS (8 studies included), the results showed that SF was positively associated with abdominal obesity ( OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.24-1.62), elevated fasting plasma glucose ( OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.50-2.25), elevated blood pressure ( OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08-1.26), elevated triglycerides ( OR= 2.09, 95% CI: 1.72-2.54), and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19-1.49). In the linear dose-response meta-analysis, the ORs of males, females, and postmenopausal females were 1.14 (95% CI: 1.13-1.16), 1.32 (95% CI: 1.26-1.39), and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.22-1.47), respectively.
Conclusions: Our study shows that SF is significantly and positively associated with MetS, and the risk in the male population is higher than that in the female population. This finding also supports the recommendation of using SF as an early warning marker of MetS.
Keywords: Dose-response relationship; Meta-analysis; Metabolic syndrome; Serum ferritin.
Copyright © 2021 The Editorial Board of Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. Published by China CDC. All rights reserved.
Who loves ya.
Tom
Jesus Was A Vegetarian!
http://tinyurl.com/2r2nkh
Man Is A Herbivore!
http://tinyurl.com/4rq595
DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
http://tinyurl.com/zk9fk
HeartDoc Andrew
Sep 5, 2021, 6:15:13 AM9/5/21
to
iron stores, is by stopping the overeating, which is the original
Adam&Eve sin of gluttony, thereby losing the disease-causing
http://HeartMDPhD.com/VAT
In the interim, I am simply wonderfully hungry (
http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19 ) and hope you, Tom, also have a
healthy appetite too. So now are you ?
...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,
HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://HeartMDPhD.com/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/WonderfullyHungryPresident
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis
HeartDoc Andrew
Sep 6, 2021, 12:43:24 PM9/6/21
to
Tom wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Tom wrote:
>>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>> Tom wrote:
>>>>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>>>> Tom wrote in the subject line:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > "Iron enrichment in fatness"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eating less down to the right amount, which is 32 oz per day, allows
>>>>>> us to avoid over-enrichment of all minerals including iron.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the interim, I am indeed wonderfully hungry (
>>>>>> http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) and hope you, Tom, also have a healthy
>>>>>> appetite too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So how are you ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can't say I'm wonderfully hungry ...
>>>>
>>>> The question was not whether you're able to "say" that you're
>>>> wonderfully hungry.
>>>>
>>>> Nonetheless, you did "say" that you're wonderfully hungry though also
>>>> falsely "saying" that you can't.
>>>>
>>>> We, who are alive, are either living (wonderfully hungry) or dying
>>>> (terribly not hungry).
>>>>
>>>> Those who are living (i.e. not dying) and yet really can't "say" they
>>>> are "wonderfully hungry" are those who are hangry (i.e. they have a
>>>> terrible attitude towards being wonderfully hungry).
>>>>
>>>> While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ), I advise
>>>> that you, Tom, try to write more clearly and unequivocally that you're
>>>> "wonderfully hungry" since we've established here that you are:
>>>>
>>>> So now how are you ?
>>
>> Source:
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.support.diabetes/85ZqCYZ3RjI/NUl2QHogAQAJ
>>
>>> (Those who are living (i.e. not dying) and yet really can't "say")
>>> they are "wonderfully hungry" are those who are hangry"
>>>
>>> Doctor Chung, you do know / have been told, you are confusing?
>>
>> Not by those who are saying they're wonderfully hungry.
>>
>>> In your interview for presidential consideration you seem to forget, being hungry actually makes you .. angry ..
>>
>> Not for those who are saying they're wonderfully hungry.
>>
>>> another Science based bit of evidence which you don't seem to believe.
>>
>> It remain my choice to focus on facts (i.e. what we can prove) instead
>> of beliefs.
>>
>>> You believe taking the food away from already angry folk, terrorists, and they will 'fall into line' ...
>>
>> No.
>>
>> I know that if hangry folks, including terrorists, started saying
>> they're wonderfully hungry, they'd stop terrorizing both themselves and
>> others.
>>
>> Therefore, while wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ),
>> I again advise that you, Tom, really try to write more clearly and
>> unequivocally that you're "wonderfully hungry" since we've established
>> here that you are:
>>
>> So now again, how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry.
Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.support.diabetes/85ZqCYZ3RjI/75m-tK6dAQAJ
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger right now (Luke 6:21a), I note that you, Tom, are
rapture (Luke 17:37) ready and I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD
continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit (Galatians
5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to always say/write
that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways including especially
caring to http://bit.ly/convince_it_forward (per John 15:12) in the
name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HeartDocAndrewToutsHunger (Luke 6:21a) with all
glory ( http://HeartMDPhD.com/Psalm117_ ) to GOD, Who causes us to
hunger (Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a)
thereby removing the http://HeartMDPhD.com/VAT from around the heart
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Tom wrote:
>>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>> Tom wrote:
>>>>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>>>> Tom wrote in the subject line:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > "Iron enrichment in fatness"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eating less down to the right amount, which is 32 oz per day, allows
>>>>>> us to avoid over-enrichment of all minerals including iron.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the interim, I am indeed wonderfully hungry (
>>>>>> http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) and hope you, Tom, also have a healthy
>>>>>> appetite too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So how are you ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can't say I'm wonderfully hungry ...
>>>>
>>>> The question was not whether you're able to "say" that you're
>>>> wonderfully hungry.
>>>>
>>>> Nonetheless, you did "say" that you're wonderfully hungry though also
>>>> falsely "saying" that you can't.
>>>>
>>>> We, who are alive, are either living (wonderfully hungry) or dying
>>>> (terribly not hungry).
>>>>
>>>> Those who are living (i.e. not dying) and yet really can't "say" they
>>>> are "wonderfully hungry" are those who are hangry (i.e. they have a
>>>> terrible attitude towards being wonderfully hungry).
>>>>
>>>> While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ), I advise
>>>> that you, Tom, try to write more clearly and unequivocally that you're
>>>> "wonderfully hungry" since we've established here that you are:
>>>>
>>>> So now how are you ?
>>
>> Source:
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.support.diabetes/85ZqCYZ3RjI/NUl2QHogAQAJ
>>
>>> (Those who are living (i.e. not dying) and yet really can't "say")
>>> they are "wonderfully hungry" are those who are hangry"
>>>
>>> Doctor Chung, you do know / have been told, you are confusing?
>>
>> Not by those who are saying they're wonderfully hungry.
>>
>>> In your interview for presidential consideration you seem to forget, being hungry actually makes you .. angry ..
>>
>> Not for those who are saying they're wonderfully hungry.
>>
>>> another Science based bit of evidence which you don't seem to believe.
>>
>> It remain my choice to focus on facts (i.e. what we can prove) instead
>> of beliefs.
>>
>>> You believe taking the food away from already angry folk, terrorists, and they will 'fall into line' ...
>>
>> No.
>>
>> I know that if hangry folks, including terrorists, started saying
>> they're wonderfully hungry, they'd stop terrorizing both themselves and
>> others.
>>
>> Therefore, while wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ),
>> I again advise that you, Tom, really try to write more clearly and
>> unequivocally that you're "wonderfully hungry" since we've established
>> here that you are:
>>
>> So now again, how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry.
Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.support.diabetes/85ZqCYZ3RjI/75m-tK6dAQAJ
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger right now (Luke 6:21a), I note that you, Tom, are
rapture (Luke 17:37) ready and I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD
continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit (Galatians
5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to always say/write
that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways including especially
caring to http://bit.ly/convince_it_forward (per John 15:12) in the
name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HeartDocAndrewToutsHunger (Luke 6:21a) with all
glory ( http://HeartMDPhD.com/Psalm117_ ) to GOD, Who causes us to
hunger (Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a)
thereby removing the http://HeartMDPhD.com/VAT from around the heart
0 new messages