NOM Sassy for CNotM was:"Nookie Green"
Phaethon
>"melvalena" <Xmelv...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:MPG.18af0e2ee...@newstest2.earthlink.net...
>> In article <Wc-dnSOqvY9...@t-one.net>, a...@first.com says...
>> > "melvalena" <Xmelv...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>> > news:MPG.18aee8e6b...@newstest2.earthlink.net...
>> > > In article <3e4518b7$1...@news.teranews.com>,
>> > > maha...@mailbolt.removethis.com says...
>> > > >
>> > > > Different newsgroups for different purposes. I'm not going to post
>> > things
>> > > > about the cat's litter box behaviour here, that goes in the cat
>groups.
>> > > > Sniping and fighting are not appropriate in this one. Or should not
>be.
>> > > > 'Check your weapons at the door' is a good guideline. Too bad that
>many
>> > > > people like to sneak in their switchblades and garrotes.
>> > > >
>> > > > Mahakala
>> > > > Buddha of Bloody Sick of It
>> > >
>> > > Says the guy with lots of socks stirring the pot.
>> > >
>> > > My guess--> you aren't going to point the finger in the right
>direction
>> > > either.
>> > >
>> > > HINT: there are those among us who can't distinguish between reality
>> > > and fantasy and we're expected to tip toe around them, pretending
>there
>> > > is nothing wrong.
>> > >
>> > > Mel---> not taking any of your crap either.
>> >
>> > No one asked you to tiptoe anything but back out of here.
>> > You squatted, you shat.
>> > Buh bye, troll-Mel.
>> > Sassy, what's with her and the "accusations without proof or backing it
>up"
>> > shit?
>> > Heh... yeah... she's good at it. Just another one to watch your back
>around.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> You going some where?? I'm not.
>> Things were going along in this group just fine until you came back in
>> here stirring things up.
>>
>> We had all but gotten rid of BW and his bullshit. Xteen had quit her
>> hissy fits.
>
>What's funny is it wasn't "him and his bullshit" at all, heh. And it was
>"yours" that caused her to hissy in the first place. You have a problem
>accepting that.
>
>What's sad where you are concerned is that you attacked Christine in the ams
>forum (probably behind her back as I've not SEEN her name in the logs as
>even knowing how ugly of a person you and several others were to her) - when
>all she did in here was defend herself from the attacks done on her first in
>this group by Phaeton - all old news and why are you still stuck on that
>anyway? Because you are too lazy to go back in google and find the stuff
>yourself or.... you want to hang onto this long-proved differently (uh yep),
>dead and gone stuff? Has it really bothered you that you were wrong all this
>time? I'm sorry you didn't see it for how it really was... that
>"fantasy-projection" problem you have that you wish to push off on everyone
>else?
>
>> Yes, thats right. Things were fine. We didn't need or want what you
>> brought in here with you.
>
>Umm... same said of you.
>I was here for years before.
>You have no excuse.
>You were "not right" in the other place and just because you think you were
>in here, heh... google the whole damn year and see just how many "not
>rights" were done, Mel. You won't... because you just really don't want to
>know. Pigshit. Degenerated into pigshit. Sorry I just happened to catch the
>smell...
>
>>
>> You are one of the ones who can't distinguish reality from fantasy.
>
>Projectionism?
>I surely think so.
>
>
>>
>> 1. You actually thought you created this group and owned it and have
>> some sort of say on what goes on in here.
>
>I never thought I created this group.
>I've had that charter and a lot more for years now.
>I do have a say with whom I choose to associate myself with.
>I may ignore you, hug you or fuck you when you try to fuck with me first.
>You really do have nice soft hips, you know that, don't you?
>
>
>> 2. Falling for the lines from BW on how he'd been so mistreated...poor
>> baby...and Xteen too. wahhhh...
>
>
>Prove's a plenty, heh.
>Very poorly mistreated.
>Inappropriate for how one should treat people in general, but worse and
>moreso, ones who called you/them friend.
>
>>
>> 3. Accusing Phaet of starting it all with the PGP
>
>That you can't or haven't found the threads does not make it not so, heh.
>
>
>> 4. Thinking Josie didn't know or understand this group.
>
>Plenty of that there too.
>Isn't that place grande?
>To hide behind percents of things not there, but forgetting those who do not
>respect or use x-no's and who quote whole posts... plenty enough to see
>every SINGLE thing I asked on or about.. and plenty of other places hold
>proof of many other things as well. Uhh, yep, lil doggie... Josie's there.
>
>What's really sad is you can even see how in many posts she just dripped her
>thoughts for Phaeton... always the player, just like I've said, heh, and
>that was done while I was gone. That poor posted love-letter just absolutely
>oozed... with either how much he DID play her or how hard she did fall...
>Sad. Sick and sad.
>
>> 5. Thinking the mommies who followed us in here were not trying to
>> cause trouble.
>
>Every one of them hit heads on the nails.
>Many were absolutely the most decent and perfect "visitors" and they were
>thanked by me, yes.
>One awesome enough to stand up for herself and have voice to call LL the
>spade she... well, let me say... how she saw it back then (and I did not
>even KNOW about this, lol, until coming back online!) and exactly the way it
>played out for many now... heh... I'm only sorry that post wasn't listened
>to more. She knew something, that one.... yep, she surely did.
>
>
>> 6. Thinking a FAQ means anything
>
>Uhhh... well... geee... mel...
>Plenty of definitions laying around to see what *I* think (and have always
>done with group-thoughts and opinions on) - and plenty more all over usenet
>to show what it's for. Do you need anyone to tell YOU what a FAQ means?
>
>I also think you're nasty for what you do to friends and strangers.
>That you don't "play by my same philosophies" is no one's fault. Period.
>You have that right to treat people just as "rightly" as you think you
>should.
>Just as I have the right to decide that I want nothing to do with you. It's
>not hard.
>
>I don't talk to you nor do I try to bait you out into talking to me.
>Your thoughts do not interest me, though they can to anyone else.
>I *used* to think you were "nice, funny, har, har" but frosted shit is still
>just shit with sugar on top.
>In my own humble, or not so humble opinion - as you have been jumping up and
>down all over Storm about, heh, your right to have as well.
>
>I've always encouraged any who did/do like you to please continue on.
>That is indeed their right as well.
>With no hard feelings from me on it - no matter how much you want to sit and
>spin now.
>
>You and Kitt share this part in common. You feel telling others how you
>think or feel is right or good - as it truly is (and was welcomed by me when
>you first emailed me, btw, and I even thanked you, lol) - but you deny
>others the right to have either their own thoughts or opinions or anything
>else, when in my case alone, I stood with proof posted in just other places
>alone to show the discrepancies that caught my eye... and having the right
>to even ask what they meant taken away by you, LL, and Phaeton... something
>got very much lost in the transition from "just your rights" to "anyone
>elses" as well... hmmm.... Heh... that's ok.
>
>I do not give you permission to take away my right to ask what I wish to in
>order to better understand. If you can't help me, then sending me off on
>searches all on my own would have been fine. But working it the way you did,
>playing it the way you played... so many other routes you could have taken
>as well, dear... than the ugly one you did, yep, yep. Just the nature of
>your beast, I guess...
>
>
>> The list goes on and on...you have it all so screwed up and backwards.
>
>Still in denial, I see, that anyone else has the right to see (or better
>yet - haaaa! - have proof) that things were indeed improper - and not
>thought so by only me. That you had the safety of the ams delphi and cot
>private hidey holes to take your evil and ugly words to does not make what
>you did any "better" or "right." That you all got away with what you did
>because to do anything about what you did would have (alas) caused
>controversy, heh, haaaa!!! I'm sorry... but it shows me now just where the
>balls really went.
>
>You've yet to show proof on this old-way-dead-pulped horse - on something
>that was declared dead before you even arrived back by the group moving on,
>and again when you came /waving and Kitt came charging in with the old-shit
>tucked under her arm. So many things asked back when the talking was good
>(and even mattered, whooo!) that you all never answered. So many now
>couldn't give a shit less. (/raises hand and says aol-me too!) - and don't
>twist my love for aolers and webtvers into anything evil either, ok, babe?
>Many nice people "out there"... and we in here don't give a shit how they
>get in, got it? That's for other people and other groups too...
>
>> I did my best to clue you in. I was nice, honest and direct. You are
>> the one who chose to ignore and proceed with your misguided mission to
>> destroy certain people.
>
>Lol... listen to you.
>What makes you think I didn't do my best to "clue you in" as well?
>My email back to you was nice, honest and direct too - but where you fail to
>grasp it is that it said things you didn't want to hear.
>Sorry that your friend deceived you. Sorry she deceived the whole group.
>That she could have come and said the words differently and the whole group
>could have offered her the hugs or advice she was after - too bad she only
>got the ones from... never mind. You keep going back to these things that
>guess you DO need to get out - this is good, okie fine.
>
>But this part here - your "clueing me in", lol... nope. You only told it
>like you say it, took it, felt it, thought it, and denied me the right to
>have or tell it back.With no further attempts from you to even communicate
>where you read (or took) anything wrong... who's fault or problem is that,
>Mel? Not mine. You did not know me. Nor did you know that I have always been
>honest and sincere. Still am. If I tell you to fuck off, you can pretty much
>guarantee I mean that... just as I have enough respect for any that can tell
>me to my face the same. Smile to my face and stab me in the back? I don't
>play that way, Mel, and not many in here do. But there are a few, yes...
>now. You taking just your word as gospel, heh.... that's not my problem.
>
>> To bad you didn't have the TRUTH to back you up.
>
>Truth a'plenty.
>Here's where it's my turn to allow you to drag out your old shit, sigh,
><sorry, group>, and ask you to tell me now, NOW, Mel, what part of the truth
>you are indeed still missing in all of this. There was plenty of time and
>chances given to talk about it then... and over the months this has gone on
>as well. That you just choose to hang onto it, for where there IS no
>resolution for you, Mel... that's not my problem either. What you want
>backed up, sweets?
>
>> You, by your own words and actions have done the damage here.
>> Live with it, like the rest of us have.
>
>Defense to your offense, lol... you just hang onto what you want to believe.
>Not once in the history of this group has "check your weapons at the door"
>meant that if trolling troublemakers came in here one could not grab
>whatever "weapon of choice", lol! You're too funny to try to grab onto that.
>Where ignore (days/weeks/many groups/places of the shit), talking nicely,
>talking longly (whew), and if you just happened to like the assfucking I
>gave you (c'mon, admit it, it turned you on, eh? <wink>)... you can NOT say
>that I did not give you plenty of opportunities to talk TO me.. hell, you
>even had my email address - whatchu bitchin' about?
>
>You think anyone at all has to take the phucks, pokes and jabs? That places
>and dates prove as well, started by "your group"... YOU live with what you
>all have done - to both the cot place and now this one here. Quit whining.
>It makes your face wrinkle in a most unflattering way.
>
>> "The trouble with people is not that they don't know but,
>> that they know so much that ain't so."
>>
>> Yes, Sally. So much of what you KNOW isn't so.
>
>Heh... someone still hung up on the playground name calling schtick, I
>see... what else would one expect, eh?
>I know enough. That's all that matters to me.
>
>> Mel--->being nice got me cr@P from people like you so I'm not gonna tip
>> toe or be 'nice' anymore. I'm going to be HONEST and speak up when I
>> feel like it, ignore when I feel like it and I don't give a flying------
>> what you or yours has to say about it.
>
>When you decide to start being nice, honestly and decently and genuinely
>nice, respecting the rights that others have rights as well, then you tip
>toe up and ask me if I care, ok? Because until then it's pretty much left as
>a flying <fuck, Mel, the word is fuck, okie fine?> from me as far as what I
>care about coming from you. You set the stage and put on the music for this
>one, babe, and you suck at leading too... </waves to Mel> (((hugs Mellow
>too)))
>Sassy, just bean honest too...
Geez, I tried to read the whole thing, honest I did,
but....zzzzz....zzz...zz.......z........
>
--
Phaet
"Somewhere in the swamps of Jersey"