IMPORTANT - A call to all in our "little family" NG ------Re: RFD:rec.crafts.scrapbooks
anal gluestick
Smilingtooo <smiling...@yahoo.com> blurted:
>Maybe if WE all send an email to this guy and tell him to bug off -
>he'll get the hint. I think this is the only way to win this battle
>---the majority rules ---- what do you say gals and guys --- keep our
>group the way it is and lets fight this guy with emails every day -
>SPAM HIM if we must - (his email address is below) -
yes! it'll be fun! really, it will!!!1!
>
>I just sent the following email and will send it every day!!
>
>Bob - in response for discussion - GET A CLUE - WE DO NOT WANT RCS A
>WORLD-WIDE USENET NEWSGROUP - HOW MANY OF US NEED TO EMAIL YOU AND SAY
>BUTT OUT WE ARE NOT INTERESTED!!! GO AWAY!
>
>
>Let's do it!!!! If we don't we are going to have the "world of rif
>raff", all that bickering, dirty mouthed individuals on our front door
>step or in the house!
>
>Maureen in FL &
>"Not smiling right now"
>********************************************************
>
>
>On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:38:48 GMT, Bob Officer
<redacted><xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
>> unmoderated group rec.crafts.scrapbooks
>>
>>This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of a
>>world-wide unmoderated Usenet newsgroup rec.crafts.scrapbooks. This is
>>not a Call for Votes (CFV); you cannot vote at this time. Procedural
>>details are below.
>>
>>Newsgroup line:
>>rec.crafts.scrapbooks The art of scrapbooking and its techniques.
>>
>>RATIONALE: rec.crafts.scrapbooks
>>
>>This group already exists on some servers. It has proven popular and
>>well-used even though it's not carried on many servers, and there seems to
>>be no reason not to turn it into an official Usenet newsgroup. Customers
>>at Usenet providers that only carry the official group list have indicated
>>an interest in reading this group.
>>
>>Current users of rec.crafts.scrapbooks, please note that this group is not
>>carried on some Usenet news servers because it didn't pass its original
>>vote. Some servers chose to create it anyway, but this message begins the
>>formal process of getting it voted on again. Details are in the procedure
>>section below, but basically in a bit less than a month after this
>>message, there will be a vote, and if the vote passes, the group will be
>>made "official" and more sites will carry it, making it easier to find and
>>participate in.
>>
>>This may look like a dumb formality to people who already have access to
>>the group, but not everyone can get to it right now because back when it
>>was first proposed, fewer than 100 people were interested. It seems
>>rather clear that far more than 100 people are interested now, and there's
>>no reason to go back and redo the earlier "missed" step.
>>
>>newsfeed.stanford.edu has seen the following traffic in this group over
>>the past week:
>>
>> 2003-11-04 87 articles
>> 2003-11-03 89 articles
>> 2003-11-02 125 articles
>> 2003-11-01 70 articles
>> 2003-10-31 115 articles
>> 2003-10-30 130 articles
>> 2003-10-29 142 articles
>>
>>This does not count messages crossposted to other extant Big Eight
>>newsgroups. This is clearly enough traffic to warrant a Big Eight
>>newsgroup.
>>
>>CHARTER: rec.crafts.scrapbooks
>>
>>The purpose of the newsgroup is to facilitate open discussion of the craft
>>of scrapbooking. It will provide a global forum to discuss topics
>>concerning scrapbooking, its techniques, vendors, supply sources, and to
>>arrange swaps.
>>
>>The group will be unmoderated.
>>
>>Postings from vendors advertising products and sales related to
>>scrapbooking supplies are welcome, provided they announce the word
>>"vendor" in the subject of their posting.
>>
>>END CHARTER.
>>
>>PROCEDURE:
>>
>>This is a request for discussion, not a call for votes. In this phase
>>of the process, any potential problems with the proposed newsgroups
>>should be raised and resolved. The discussion period will continue
>>for a minimum of 21 days (starting from when the first RFD for this
>>proposal is posted to news.announce.newgroups), after which a Call For
>>Votes (CFV) may be posted by a neutral vote taker if the discussion
>>warrants it. Please do not attempt to vote until this happens.
>>
>>All discussion of this proposal should be posted to news.groups.
>>
>>This RFD attempts to comply fully with the Usenet newsgroup creation
>>guidelines outlined in "How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup" and "How
>>to Format and Submit a New Group Proposal". Please refer to these
>>documents (available in news.announce.newgroups) if you have any
>>questions about the process.
>>
>>DISTRIBUTION:
>>
>>This RFD has been posted directly to the following newsgroups:
>>
>> news.announce.newgroups
>> news.groups
>> rec.crafts.misc
>> rec.crafts.rubberstamps
>> uk.rec.crafts
>>
>>A pointer will be posted to:
>>
>> rec.crafts.scrapbooks
>>
>>If there are other groups that you feel would be interested in this
>>proposal, feel free to either repost this proposal in those groups or post
>>a pointer in those groups referring people to this article.
>>
>>Proponent: Bob Officer bobof...@earthlink.net
>
>Maureen in FL
>aka Smilingtooo
>:-) SMILE BE HAPPY :-)
>www.picturetrail.com/smilingtooo
>smiling...@yahoo.com
>
>Pages complete in 2003: 33
ryannosaurus
<ru...@wankin.cum> blurted:
>In message <pm8rrv02941nfp0kl...@4ax.com> DisiLLusioneD
><RiffRaff@hotmale_with_1969_before_the_at.com> wrote:
>
>>In alt.music.white-power, Rudy <ru...@wankin.cum> typed:
>>
>>>In message <3lmlrvovdsb6ve43m...@4ax.com> Smilingtooo
>>><smiling...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Maybe if WE all send an email to this guy and tell him to bug off -
>>>>he'll get the hint. I think this is the only way to win this battle
>>>>---the majority rules ---- what do you say gals and guys --- keep our
>>>>group the way it is and lets fight this guy with emails every day -
>>>>SPAM HIM if we must - (his email address is below) -
>>>>
>>>>I just sent the following email and will send it every day!!
>>>>
>>>>Bob - in response for discussion - GET A CLUE - WE DO NOT WANT RCS A
>>>>WORLD-WIDE USENET NEWSGROUP - HOW MANY OF US NEED TO EMAIL YOU AND SAY
>>>>BUTT OUT WE ARE NOT INTERESTED!!! GO AWAY!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Let's do it!!!! If we don't we are going to have the "world of rif
>>>>raff", all that bickering, dirty mouthed individuals on our front door
>>>>step or in the house!
>>>
>>>HE MAN WOTS RONG WID RIF? HIS A GUD FREND OF ARSE
>>
>>
>>HE MAN HOW IS THIS ENEMA OF ARSE IN ARE MISTS ?
>
>ENEMAS HOW LICK SPAM!
ITZ ALL tHE FAULT OF TEH AMIDINSTRATION ADN THEY CHOCOLATE POOTER
SUNDAES