Any time I have taken antibiotics, and I've taken a lot of Cipro and flagyl, my nutritionist, an MD, has recommended a probiotic. I was instructed to take the probiotic either 1 hour before or 2 hours after taking the antibiotics. HTH.
:) mgbio
jeff wrote:
> hello, i am in what i suppose can be called remission, but i still don't
> feel quite normal and i am on 40 mg/day of prednisone, which my doctor
> does not want me to taper until the 6MP (which i just began a week ago)
> takes effect.
>
> last time i had a flare, a ten day course of flagyl put me into
> remission for a year and a half. we have already tried flagyl this
> flare and it did not work, but for some reason my doc thinks we should
> give it another go. i am currently taking nature's way probiotics, as
> well as florastor. my doctor does not know i am taking these. should i
> continue with the probiotics and florastor? will the flagyl negate any
> positive effects from these? should i take the florastor and probiotics
> at a different time of the day from the flagyl?
>
> i feel like since beginning the florastor only about a week ago, i have
> been getting a bit better. if the florastor has in fact been helping
> me, will taking the flagyl negate this effect? i am going to take the
> florastor for another 4 days. should i wait until then to begin the
> flagyl. how should i proceed? thanks...
>
> jeff
>
> will the flagyl negate
> any positive effects from these?
In my experience, the answer is yes. Flagyl is a high-powered antibiotic,
and any Lactobacillus bugs swimming around in your gut will probably be dead
meat while you're taking it.
Wayne Marsh Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
wayne...@mac.com
[Wayne Marsh]
> In my experience, the answer is yes. Flagyl is a high-powered antibiotic,
> and any Lactobacillus bugs swimming around in your gut will probably be dead
> meat while you're taking it.
Flagyl has minimal effect on aerobic bacteria such as Lactobacillus
spp.
This Pfizer information sheet discusses how flagyl treatment can
successfully restore lactobacillus flora in the vagina.
http://www.pfizer.com/download/uspi_flagyl_er.pdf
Flagyl is active against anaerobic bacteria, i.e. the kind that live
mostly in the human colon, e.g. bacteroides spp., eubacterium spp.,
etc. Note that 99% of the intestinal flora consist of these colonic
anaerobes: the flora of the other bowel areas added together is less
than 1%.
Taking commercial probiotics, which mostly consist of dairy-derived
aerobes, to counteract the effects of flagyl, will achieve little.
Instead, you should consider the following
1. Being treated with a fecal transfusion from a healthy genetic
relative. By re-establishing an entirely new and healthy bowel
*ecology*, you avoid the problems inherent in the "random carpet
bombing" that is ad-hoc antibiotic treatment.
2. If you must take flagyl, encourage growth of healthy bacteria in
your colon by consuming a healthy diet. Eat foods that contain fibre:
soluble fibre is particularly important, since its long chain
molecules act as "dredge ropes" which scour the surface of the
intestine, dislodging micro-organisms, giving the normal floral
inhabitants of your intestines an opportunity to recolonise.
I find organic rice is particularly effective for the latter. I eat a
mix from my local health food store which consists of
50% Organic long grain rice
35% Organic red rice
15% Organic wild rice
It is most important that the rice not be processed, i.e. had its
hulls removed: that's where the best soluble fibre is. This rice takes
a lot of cooking, and can be bulky in the guts, so I would recommend
eating smaller amounts until you get accustomed to it. And of course,
if you've got any form of structural damage to the bowel, e.g.
strictures, you may have to avoid such fibrous food.
On occasion, I've had stunning results with this rice: after a few
days of eating it, my clinical parameters improve as much as they
would as if I had active disease and had started a course of steroids,
for example. The greatest improvement comes from toilet habits: I find
myself going less frequently, having a much more "solid" experience
when I do, having far fewer problems/pain (25 years of Crohn's has
taken it's toll on my poor behind), dehydrate far less easily, sleep
sounder thus requiring less sleep, more energy, etc, etc, etc.
Alan.
:) mgbio
jeff wrote:
> thanks again mgbio. i have really come to count on your answers to my
> questions. i really appreciate you and others on this ng. thanks again...
>
> jeff
Cipro does have a number of contra-indications or things that you need to be
aware of. Cipro interacts negatively with a number of different minerals.
Most notably calcium, magnesium and I think zinc, also iron if I'm not
mistaken. The instructions say that you should take the Cipro at least 2
hours before taking anything that contains these minerals mentioned or at
least 6 hours after. This gives your body a chance to absorb the cipro and
the cipro can do it's thing without being negated by the minerals which tend
to bind up with it and render it ineffective.
So I tend to use this as a general rule of thumb. If those time periods work
for Cipro and minerals then it might also have some similar effect with
Cipro and probiotics. So I do the same with my probiotics. I take them at
least 2 hours after the cipro or 6 hours before.
I don't know for sure if cipro has any negative effect on the probiotics, or
visa-versa but just in case I'd rather try to maximize the benefits of both.
So I use the specified time periods.
Also, you said you felt that the probiotics seemed to help. I would trust
your intuition on this and continue taking them to see if you continue to
improve. Stopping after 4 days may halt the progress you've made. More and
more evidence is now pointing to the fact that having healthy gut flora can
help a lot of IBD sufferers. But regaining that healthy flora is not always
an easy thing to do.
Good luck whatever you decide to do.
Regards,
Jeff
<jeff> wrote in message
news:2004082219250316807%@news.comcast.giganews.com...
I assume that you eat only brown rice, not white rice?
Thanks.
"Alan Kennedy" <ala...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f72dac0d.0408...@posting.google.com...
[William Kaufman]
> Alan--
>
> I assume that you eat only brown rice, not white rice?
My understanding of the term "brown rice" is that it is actually white
rice. But "brown rice" is the term used to differentiate unprocessed
white rice from processed white rice (known as "white rice").
So, yes, although the "long grain rice" I eat is white in colour
(actually more of a cream colour) it is "brown rice", not "white
rice".
Here are some pictures of the rice I mean
Descriptions and Photos: Rice, Brown
http://www.all-creatures.org/recipes/i-rice-brown.html
While looking for a picture of "brown rice", I also chanced upon this
most interesting page which claims that the nutritional benefits of
brown rice can be increased by soaking.
Soaked brown rice is better for you
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s225249.htm
In the past, I have tried mixing 15% wild rice with ordinary "white
rice" and found that it doesn't provide nearly the same benefit: the
"brown rice" is also required.
Regards,
Alan.
Thanks,
Bill
"Alan Kennedy" <ala...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f72dac0d.04082...@posting.google.com...
Indeed, I do believe that SCD can be effective in the management of
IBD. I refer you to the archives
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22alan+kennedy%22+%22specific+carbohydrate+diet%22
> I assume that you don't since you're
> eating rice, but I'm curious to hear your views about it.
There are a number of things to say in reply.
1. Just because I don't follow a regime personally doesn't imply that
I believe it to be ineffective.
2. As you may have inferred from reading the threads in the archives,
I believe that the SCD works primarily for unknown microbiological
reasons, not the biochemical reasoning which forms the basis of the
diet.
3. I wonder how brown rice would be classified by the SCD? I don't
know the SCD intimately enough to say. Perhaps the complex
carbohydrates in the rice are permitted by SCD? Is not the SCD
primarily concerned with the elimination of simple carbohydrates, i.e.
certain di-saccharides: other simple carbohydrates, e.g.
mono-saccharides such as fructose, are permitted, as are
poly-saccharides.
4. I believe that a diet containing complex carbohydrates is a
fundamental requirement for maintaining a healthy bowel flora. Such
complex carbohydrates are "prebiotics", i.e. food for "probiotics".
I suppose I would summarise by saying that *any* treatment for IBD
that does not take the microbial ecology of the intestine into account
is, at best, based on incomplete data, and at worst, has a high risk
of unpredictable outcomes.
And, it appears more and more, treatments that focus primarily on
intestinal ecology are delivering very promising results: fecal
transfusion, worm therapy, etc. More and more evidence is confirming
that a healthy gut microbial ecology is a fundamental requirement for
a healthy human bowel, which is itself a prerequisite for a human body
to be healthy.
The 10 trillion microbes that occupy the human intestine are really an
unclassified organ of the human body. They are of comparable weight to
the heart, brain, liver, etc, and at least as complex at a molecular
level. We are truly symbiotic with a range of bacterial species upon
which we depend for good health: they depend on us, we depend on them.
And they are very good at defending their turf, i.e. our intestines,
from pathogenic invasion, using a range of "biochemical warfare"
techniques: the role and complexity of bacteriocins (bacterial
antibiotics) in the ecology is only beginning to be understood, for
example.
Pity nobody makes enough money out of this area to spend some of it on
clinical trials: I believe that fecal therapy should among the first
line treatments for a range of bowel conditions: it's effective, fast
and cheap, with a low risk profile if properly administered under
medical supervision.
Alan.
No--in the SCD, both disaccharides and polysaccharides are forbidden, which
means that all starches--including all grains--are on the SCD "illegal"
list. As Elaine Gottschall writes in "Breaking the Vicious Cycle," "Any
cereal grain is strictly and absolutely forbidden, including corn, oats,
wheat, rye, rice, millet, buckwheat, or trticale in any form, whether as
bread, cake, toast, zweiback, crackers, cookies, cereals, flour, or pasta."
Yet you seem to do well with brown rice, and I and others seem to have
experienced a soothing effect from oatmeal (I have Crohn's disease). So
maybe wheat is the culprit for some reason?
I'd be interested in hearing more about your overall diet plan--what foods
you find beneficial and which you find harmful. (By the way--do you have
Crohn's or some other form of IBD?)
4. I believe that a diet containing complex carbohydrates is a
> fundamental requirement for maintaining a healthy bowel flora. Such
> complex carbohydrates are "prebiotics", i.e. food for "probiotics".
Interesting--this is what my gastroenterologist told me. But Gottschall's
theory is that starches, because they are such a digestive challenge and
spend so much time fermenting in the intestines, encourage the growth of
harmful bacteria, not the beneficial ones. But my GI doctor seems to agree
with you--that the carbohydrates encourage the growth of beneficial
bacteria. I suppose that no one has pinned this down definitively.
I do take oral probiotics. I hope that they do some good, although there is
some doubt that the beneficial bugs survive their encounter with stomach
acids and ever reach the intestines. To enhance their chances of getting
past the stomach, I take an enteric-coated brand.
Bill Kaufman
But seriously, although I took some heat you have a much more polished and
learned approach. It's good to see someone who can get the information out
in such scholarly fashion. :-)
My hat is off to you (well if I wore one it would be)
Jeff
"Alan Kennedy" <ala...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f72dac0d.04082...@posting.google.com...