Dotheads and ragheads

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Meteorite Debris

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 6:49:41 PM12/21/09
to
I hate dotheads and RAGHEADS.

Kent Wills

panam...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 6:58:46 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 6:49 pm, Meteorite Debris

<epicurusboth@YOUR_SHOESaapt.net.au> wrote:
> I hate dotheads and RAGHEADS.
>
> Kent Wills

Oh, good grief.

http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/altatheism.html
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/judgedredd.html

Why don't you grow the fuck up, Pangborn?

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 8:03:23 PM12/21/09
to
On Dec 21, 5:49 pm, Meteorite Debris

<epicurusboth@YOUR_SHOESaapt.net.au> wrote:
> I hate dotheads and RAGHEADS.
>
> Kent Wills

Kennie, knock it off already!!

You frigging immature old asshole.

raven1

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 8:41:01 PM12/21/09
to

I hate people who post racist forgeries, like Ken Pangborn.

www.aboutkenpangborn.com

Meteorite Debris

unread,
Dec 21, 2009, 9:44:05 PM12/21/09
to

lostintranslation

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 11:39:38 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 21, 6:49 pm, Meteorite Debris

<epicurusboth@YOUR_SHOESaapt.net.au> wrote:
> I hate dotheads and RAGHEADS.
>
> Kent Wills

OMFG KEN You so lose! You fucking referred to indians and middle
easterns as such on a phone call! You need to be more creative or try
to remember what you say to people. Fucktard.

Greegor

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 8:33:37 PM12/23/09
to
DDM > I hate dotheads and RAGHEADS.

LIT > OMFG KEN  You so lose!  You fucking referred
LIT > to indians and middle easterns as such on a
LIT > phone call!  You need to be more creative or
LIT > try to remember what you say to people.  Fucktard.

You're so devious you pretended you were Ken's
friend for an entire YEAR just to get DIRT on
him and when you got finished all you had
was the same bad attitude.

If you had something real that was this
damning you would have used it long ago.

You're just telling lies and talking trash.

The racist forger is David Moore trying
to frame the target of his TEN YEAR
stalking campaign.

David Daniel Moore AKA David Ulanowski Random DOB 9/26/70 Birth Mother
Judith Ulanowski

http://www.malevolentmoms.info/

Domain ID:D17039630-LRMS
Domain Name:MALEVOLENTMOMS.INFO
Created On:28-Mar-2007 23:12:21 UTC
Last Updated On:28-May-2007 20:36:43 UTC
Expiration Date:28-Mar-2008 23:12:21 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Go Daddy Software Inc (R171-LRMS)
Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:GODA-029624659
Registrant Name:dave moore
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street1:po box 702
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:portage
Registrant State/Province:Indiana
Registrant Postal Code:46368
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.12624786077
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:malevolentm...@gmail.com
Admin ID:GODA-229624659
Admin Name:dave moore
Admin Organization:
Admin Street1:po box 702
Admin Street2:
Admin Street3:
Admin City:portage
Admin State/Province:Indiana
Admin Postal Code:46368
Admin Country:US
Admin Phone:+1.6306609177
Admin Phone Ext.:
Admin FAX:
Admin FAX Ext.:
Admin Email:malevolentm...@gmail.com
Billing ID:GODA-329624659
Billing Name:dave moore
Billing Organization:
Billing Street1:po box 702
Billing Street2:
Billing Street3:
Billing City:portage
Billing State/Province:Indiana
Billing Postal Code:46368
Billing Country:US
Billing Phone:+1.6306609177
Billing Phone Ext.:
Billing FAX:
Billing FAX Ext.:
Billing Email:malevolentm...@gmail.com
Tech ID:GODA-129624659
Tech Name:dave moore
Tech Organization:
Tech Street1:po box 702
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City:portage
Tech State/Province:Indiana
Tech Postal Code:46368
Tech Country:US
Tech Phone:+1.6306609177
Tech Phone Ext.:
Tech FAX:
Tech FAX Ext.:
Tech Email:malevolentm...@gmail.com
Name Server:NS39.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server:NS40.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
=============================================
Moore Linda webpage

http://web.archive.org/web/20070502224835/www.malevolentmoms.info/search/label/Linda+Michelle+Boss+--+Centralia+Missouri

NOTE LOCATION OF REGISTRATION "PORTAGE INDIANA" Note name DAVE
MOORE ;

Linda Michelle Boss of Centralia, Missouri is a 32-year old mother of
four.
In 2006, she began having an extramarital affair with a coworker at
the
SONIC restaurant where she worked, a teenaged boy named Brice Wayne
Windsor.
She then attempted to eradicate her children's father, who has always
been
an involved parent, from their lives, through tactics such as
threats,
attempted baseless restraining orders interference with phone
communication,
violation of parenting time agreements and brainwashing her children
with
lies regarding their father.
In April 2006, Boss attempted to obtain a restraining order which
would have
prevented any contact between the father and the four children. The
grounds
for her request were, in part, (1) that he called police when she and
her
friends threatened him, (2) that he told his daughter that he might
come to
watch her at her school track meet. Understandably, the court denied
her
request for an order of protection.

Boss and Windsor have repeatedly interfered with the father's attempts
to
communicate with his children. Often, one or the other would pick up
the
phone when he called, shout an obscenity or a threat, then hang up the
phone
before he could ask to speak with his children. On one such occasion,
Brice
Windsor answered the phone and stated "When I get done with your wife,
I'm
going to [rape] your daughters" while Boss laughed in the background.
The
daughters were 13 and 12 years of age at the time of this incident.
Postal mail which is sent to the children never seems to make it to
them.
Most notably, after Boss had the telephone service disconnected, a
prepaid
phone card was mailed to the daughter but never reached her.

On multiple occasions, Boss agreed to the father having specific dates
and
times of parenting time with the children, then violated the
agreements and
hid the children from the father when he traveled to pick them up (a
seven-hour drive one way.) As a result of her lack of moral character,
Boss
also became pregnant with an illegitimate child while she was still
married
to her children's father. Although it was physically and medically
impossible for him to have fathered the child, Boss fraudulently
reported
the matter to Social Services and is attempting to obtain child
support for
Jade Elizabeth Windsor, due to Windsor's apparent inability to support
his
own (alleged) child.

Due to her financial irresponsibility, Boss' home was foreclosed on.
The
four children have had to be uprooted from their home for the fourth
time in
as many years, and she has now packed them into a tiny trailer with
Brice
Windsor and his family.

Among Boss' other abusive actions
. Her ten-year old son stated that he was hungry. Boss told him "fend
for
yourself." The child then tried to cook dinner for himself and
severely
burned himself. The mother did not seek treatment.
. Left her daughter home alone with a broken leg so that she could
meet
Brice Windsor for her affair.
. Left six-year old child home without supervision while having an
extramarital affair.
. Inability to keep a job for any length of time, due to her inability
to
get along with anyone.
-----------------
Hometown
Centralia, Missouri
Birthdate October 12, 1974

Occupation
SONIC carhop, gas station clerk

Claims to shame
Repeated violations of parenting agreements;
extramarital affair with teenaged boy in front of children;
parental alienation/brainwashing of children;
numerous instances of child abuse and neglect;
became pregnant from her affair while still married

Audio
Linda Boss brags about bad legal advice

=======================================================

Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 12:53:01 -0500
From: "Joseph M. O'Connor" <jmo...@geocities.com>
Reply-To: jmo...@geocities.com

To: PangK <Pa...@aol.com>
Subject: Re: I'm dying to know. References:
<89a8b040.34fea...@aol.com>

[ ... ]

DDM> Oh, and btw....you might want to give a message to your friend
oconner.
DDM> He's been gloating around the newsgroups about having gotten me
fired
DDM> from my job....I should clarify the situation a little. I'm a
DDM> consultant....meaning that I get sent to various companies to do
work
DDM> for a prescribed amount of time. In this case it was Saralee. My
DDM> contract was to be finished at the end of January....jmoc's
antics
DDM> simply caused it to end about eight days early. I was never a
Saralee
DDM> employee and therefore they CANNOT fire me. I am an employee of
a
DDM> consulting agency, which FWIW had me working again at another
company
DDM> within two days. I only bring this up because I hear you and
friends
DDM> rubbing it in about my "unemployment", and think it's kinda odd.

=======================================================


http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2007/06/10/news/porter_county/...

Sunday, June 10, 2007 | No comments posted.
Sex offender accused of not registering

PORTAGE | A sex offender who police say was evicted from his Portage
home on
May 22 and then failed to notify police of a new address within 72
hours as
is required by law has been arrested on a felony charge of failure to
register as a sex offender.

Battery | Todd Yates, 28, 2970 Monnier St., Portage; ****David Moore,
36,
Calumet City*****; Paul Dimiceli, 30, Dyer; Johnathan Brandon, 18,
2104
Lapine St., Portage; Nicholas Mandich, 23, 309 Kraus Drive,
Valparaiso;
Derek Nowacki, 27, 1018 S. 22nd St., Chesterton; Jeffery Knight, 40,
717
George St., Valparaiso; Devena Anderson, 31, East Chicago; David
Carlson,
40, 644 N. Calumet, Valparaiso; Roger Reese, 53, 3461 Sunnyside,
Portage.

ARRESTS
> Monday through Friday [ June 4 to June 8 ]
> Battery David Moore, 36, Calumet City

> David Daniel Moore court records: David D. Moore
> DOB 9/26/70 850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, IL
> case 64D 060706FD 4989 Monday June 4th 2007
> Class D Felony, Assault on somebody under 14 years old
> pretrial February 8th 8:30 hearing on March 12th 1PM
> The North Porter County complex is in Portage, Indiana

David Daniel Moore AKA David Ulanowski Random
DOB 9/26/70 Birth Mother Judith Ulanowski

Front Left pine tree and tree on blvd

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&source=hp&q=850+buffalo+Ave+calumet+city+il&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=850+Buffalo+Ave,+Calumet+City,+Cook,+Illinois+60409&gl=us&ei=Cg0JS_bfD5HcnAfB86jECw&ved=0CAoQ8gEwAA&layer=c&cbll=41.609743,-87.543141&panoid=27qn964f3YuYlnTel1Ajbg&cbp=12,331.49,,0,5&ll=41.609827,-87.543139&spn=0,359.986289&z=16&iwloc=A

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&source=hp&q=850+buffalo+Ave+calumet+city+il&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=850+Buffalo+Ave,+Calumet+City,+Cook,+Illinois+60409&gl=us&ei=Cg0JS_bfD5HcnAfB86jECw&ved=0CAoQ8gEwAA&ll=41.609827,-87.543139&spn=0,359.986289&z=16&iwloc=A&layer=c&cbll=41.609743,-87.543141&panoid=27qn964f3YuYlnTel1Ajbg&cbp=12,310.44,,1,-2.84

Front Right pine tree stop sign

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&source=hp&q=850+buffalo+Ave+calumet+city+il&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=850+Buffalo+Ave,+Calumet+City,+Cook,+Illinois+60409&gl=us&ei=Cg0JS_bfD5HcnAfB86jECw&ved=0CAoQ8gEwAA&ll=41.610036,-87.543268&spn=0,359.986289&z=16&iwloc=A&layer=c&cbll=41.610035,-87.543144&panoid=rYEoxftRFv4FwEiaAOtB9A&cbp=12,231.09,,1,2.33

Right Side with bird feeder

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&source=hp&q=850+buffalo+Ave+calumet+city+il&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=850+Buffalo+Ave,+Calumet+City,+Cook,+Illinois+60409&gl=us&ei=Cg0JS_bfD5HcnAfB86jECw&ved=0CAoQ8gEwAA&layer=c&cbll=41.610041,-87.543427&panoid=ssBgaV699LhRbRwB3VQXiA&cbp=12,182.6,,0,1.47&ll=41.610036,-87.543526&spn=0,359.986289&z=16&iwloc=A

Right Rear door

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&source=hp&q=850+buffalo+Ave+calumet+city+il&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=850+Buffalo+Ave,+Calumet+City,+Cook,+Illinois+60409&gl=us&ei=Cg0JS_bfD5HcnAfB86jECw&ved=0CAoQ8gEwAA&ll=41.610052,-87.543783&spn=0,359.986289&z=16&iwloc=A&layer=c&cbll=41.610046,-87.543672&panoid=dbNKFw4mF91KGFYRKK_mxQ&cbp=12,137.6,,1,1.47


Parcel details

http://198.173.15.21/ccao/ParcelDetails.asp?PIN=30182330330000

Map

http://198.173.15.21/ccao/MapIndex.asp?action=parcel&PIN=30182330330000

Photo

http://198.173.15.21/AssessorPics/GeoSpan/30182330330000.jpg

http://www.cookcountyassessor.com/data/searchflat/ParcelImage.asp?pin=30182330330000

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&q=850+Buffalo+Avenue,+Calumet+City,+Illinois&um=1&ie=UTF-8&split=0&gl=us&ei=892_SafUOI-mM6KZ9J8N&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&resnum=1&ct=title

Dave's Adoptive Mother Janet M Moore 68 Calumet City, IL

http://www.public-records-now.com/Search/SearchResults.aspx?vw=people&input=name&fn=Janet&mn=M&ln=Moore&city=Calumet%20City&state=IL

http://www.public-records-now.com/Search/SearchResults.aspx?vw=people&input=name&fn=David&mn=D&ln=Moore&city=Calumet%20City&state=IL

http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=850+buffalo+ave&where=Calumet+City%2C+IL

Dave's Birth Mother Judith A ULANOWSKI 71 Johnstown, PA

http://www.whitepages.com/search/FindPerson?firstname=judith&name=ulanowski&where=Johnstown%2C+PA

http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=116+donald+lane&where=Johnstown%2C+PA

http://www.ancestry.com/facts/Ulanowski-family-history.ashx

Ulanowski Name Meaning and History
Polish: habitational name for someone from any of various places in
Poland called Ulany, Ulanów, or Ulanowice. The places are named with
the Polish personal name Ulan.


http://198.173.15.21/ccao/ParcelDetails.asp?PIN=30182330330000

Cook County Assessor's Office: Property Search Details
Property Index Number: 30-18-233-033-0000
View Property Picture
View Property Map
Address : 850 Buffalo Ave
City : Calumet City
Township : Thornton
Neighborhood : 61
Taxcode : 37030
Assessed Valuation
2008
First Pass Assessment 2007
Board of Review Certified
Land Assessed Value 3,025
2,521
Building Assessed Value 16,434
14,957
Total Assessed Value 19,459
17,478
Estimated Market Value 121,619
109,238
Property Characteristics
Class: 2-11
Description : Two to Six Apartments, Over 62 Years
Residence Type Two Story
Use Multi Family
Apartments Two
Exterior Construction Masonry
Full Baths 2
Half Baths 0
Basement1 Partial and Rec Room
Attic None
Central Air No
Number of Fireplaces 1
Garage Size/Type2 2.5 car detached
Building Square Footage: 1,752
Land Square Footage 6,304
Assessment Pass First Pass
Age: 27
Land Square Footage: 6,304
1 Excluded from Building Square footage, except apartment
2 Excluded from Building Square footage

http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2007/06/10/news/porter_county/docc35ea9cd21c834f1862572f4007bfc11.txt

Sunday, June 10, 2007
ARRESTS
Monday through Friday [ June 4 to June 8 ]
Battery David Moore, 36, Calumet City

David Daniel Moore court records: David D. Moore
DOB 9/26/70 850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, IL
case 64D 060706FD 4989 Monday June 4th 2007
Class D Felony, Assault on somebody under 14 years old
pretrial February 8th 8:30 hearing on March 12th 1PM
The North Porter County complex is in Portage, Indiana
219 759 8219 no e-records, won't fax or e-mail records
paid $2000 bond, Attorney Robert Harper Portage, Indiana
does not have a probation officer pre-trial

Keywords:
850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, Illinois 60409,
INTERNET STALKER CON ARTIST David Daniel Moore,
pathological liar David Daniel Moore,
internet psychopath David Daniel Moore,
hate site, sociopath stalker,pervert,creep
pathological liar David Daniel Moore
abusive real estate agents,deception,hacker,
sexual blackmail David Daniel Moore coward,
tara moreland, Linda Boss, janet m moore,
dawn moore, tara moreland, alias dustin calloway,
alias david miller, ULANOWSKI, alias david boss,
alias jeff johnson, criminal, computer hacker,
criminal hacker, internet stalkers, stalker,
internet harassment,ULANOWSKI, usenet threats
usenet forgery David Daniel Moore, forger,
new zealand hate site, internet libel
website of lies, chicagoland pansies
malicious use of employers computers,
formerly of Sara Lee Corporation, child abuser,
sara lee corporation, never employ this temp,
internet psychopaths, internet addiction,
Birth Mother Judith A Ulanowski, Johnstown, PA,
internet stalking, woman hater, blackmailer,
sexual harassment, stalker, sexual blackmail,
David Daniel Moore bbs blackmail,usmc 29 palms,
discharge for the good of the service,ULANOWSKI,
linda boss, formerly of Sara Lee Corporation,
short term contract programmer lotus,ULANOWSKI,
David Moore lives in his mommy's basement,
850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, Illinois 60409,
birth mother judith a ulanowski johnstown pa
adoptive mother janet m moore calumet city, il
temp worker, lotus consultant, temp worker,
short term contracts,IP address trickery,
casino software consultant moral terpitude,
computer identity forgery, mommys basement,
anonymous remailer stalkers, office disruption,
anonymous remailer abusers, coalition forces,
David Daniel Moore basement dweller,ULANOWSKI,
off shore website avid Daniel Moore,
new zealand, ULANOWSKI, malaysia website,
David Daniel Moore employer computer abuse,
obsessive compulsive disorder, ULANOWSKI,
AKA David ULANOWSKI Random,

Director

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 10:46:18 PM12/23/09
to
In article <7f9d85c8-c195-4031...@j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>

Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> DDM > I hate dotheads and RAGHEADS.
>
>

Flush.

raven1

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 8:27:48 AM12/24/09
to
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:33:37 -0800 (PST), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>The racist forger is David Moore trying
>to frame the target of his TEN YEAR
>stalking campaign.

Kenny was caught in the act. Give it up, already.

krp

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 9:23:19 AM12/24/09
to

"raven1" <quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:r0r6j5d1d9fgroh7h...@4ax.com...

BULLSHIT!

raven1

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 11:44:02 AM12/24/09
to
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:23:19 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
wrote:

Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.

Greegor

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 12:31:40 PM12/24/09
to
raven1, This ""proof"" is where the forger ""forgot""
and posted as Ken, is that right? LOL

How is that unlike the religious person
who sees Jesus in a Potato Chip and
claims it proves God's existance?

Have you ever gone over to READ alt.privacy.anon-server
to see what Dave U Random has been up to?
Our little Davey Moore, AKA David ULANOWSKI Random
is the DARLING of the anonymous remailer community!
Davey's racist FORGERIES and SPORGERIES
will bring the anonymous remailer community
lots of attention.

krp

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 2:18:12 PM12/24/09
to

"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2e8fcc98-8e9a-4fe8...@a6g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

> raven1, This ""proof"" is where the forger ""forgot""
> and posted as Ken, is that right? LOL
>
> How is that unlike the religious person
> who sees Jesus in a Potato Chip and
> claims it proves God's existance?
>
> Have you ever gone over to READ alt.privacy.anon-server


His problem is that the posters there use words that are too BIG for him to
understand. He starts to read a post on APAS and by the 3rd sentence he has
a nosebleed!!!

Director

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 5:27:43 PM12/24/09
to
In article <2i67j5hda49k51nu3...@4ax.com>
raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>
>

Flush.

Director

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 11:06:57 PM12/24/09
to

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 6:19:31 AM12/25/09
to
On Dec 24, 10:44 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:23:19 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >"raven1" <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote in message

> >news:r0r6j5d1d9fgroh7h...@4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:33:37 -0800 (PST), Greegor
> >> <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>The racist forger is David Moore trying
> >>>to frame the target of his TEN YEAR
> >>>stalking campaign.
>
> >> Kenny was caught in the act. Give it up, already.
>
> >BULLSHIT!
>
> Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.

Kennie obviously is scared of what LIT will reveal.

Not that it would surprise those who know what a creep Kennie is.

Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm

Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com

Greegor

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 8:58:56 PM12/25/09
to
Moe > Kennie obviously is scared of what LIT will reveal.
Moe > Not that it would surprise those who know
Moe > what a creep Kennie is.

Kim (LIT) spent an ENTIRE YEAR posing as Ken's
friend to get DIRT on him, and all she got was
more of the same bad attitude.

If she had some damning evidence, she would

krp

unread,
Dec 26, 2009, 3:51:36 AM12/26/09
to

"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8f4c5dc1-39c6-416c...@m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...

> Moe > Kennie obviously is scared of what LIT will reveal.
> Moe > Not that it would surprise those who know
> Moe > what a creep Kennie is.
>
> Kim (LIT) spent an ENTIRE YEAR posing as Ken's
> friend to get DIRT on him, and all she got was
> more of the same bad attitude.


I am wondering WHEN she is going to KICK MY ASS on the military service
issue as she PROMISED.

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 26, 2009, 7:48:21 AM12/26/09
to
On Dec 25, 7:58 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moe > Kennie obviously is scared of what LIT will reveal.
> Moe > Not that it would surprise those who know
> Moe > what a creep Kennie is.
>
> Kim (LIT) spent an ENTIRE YEAR posing as Ken's
> friend to get DIRT on him, and all she got was
> more of the same bad attitude.

And you would know that how grag?

Unless you yourself have a close relationship with LIT, you wouldn't
know WHAT LIT actually has or doesn't have.

>
> If she had some damning evidence, she would
> have used it long ago.

Projection noted.

" Damning evidence" like what you and Kennie claim exists for Moore,
Sullivan, Wills and myself yet seem incapable of providing said "
evidence"?

Greg you yourself are big on the leading questions act and the
misleading accusations, so your hypocrisy reeks here.

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 26, 2009, 7:50:24 AM12/26/09
to
On Dec 26, 2:51 am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message

(( Shrugs)) I did that already with you, you pissant liar.

LIT is welcome to add to the demise of your credibility.

krp

unread,
Dec 26, 2009, 9:42:18 AM12/26/09
to

"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:09fd1b6b-5799-4c48...@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...

On Dec 25, 7:58 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Moe > Kennie obviously is scared of what LIT will reveal.
> Moe > Not that it would surprise those who know
> Moe > what a creep Kennie is.
>
> Kim (LIT) spent an ENTIRE YEAR posing as Ken's
> friend to get DIRT on him, and all she got was
> more of the same bad attitude.

MOE> And you would know that how grag?

SHE ADMITTED IT, BIMBO!

Greegor

unread,
Dec 26, 2009, 8:41:00 PM12/26/09
to
Moe > Kennie obviously is scared of what LIT will reveal.
Moe > Not that it would surprise those who know
Moe > what a creep Kennie is.

G > Kim (LIT) spent an ENTIRE YEAR posing as Ken's
G > friend to get DIRT on him, and all she got was
G > more of the same bad attitude.

Moe >  And you would know that how grag?

Moe > SHE ADMITTED IT, BIMBO!

Moe, Are you a fan of Sherlock Holmes?

Just wondering...

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 1:04:53 AM12/27/09
to

Sherlock Holmes is a fictional character Greg.

Jim Butcher's Harry Dresden is more my style as to sleuths.

Greegor

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 1:24:36 AM12/27/09
to
Moe > Kennie obviously is scared of what LIT will reveal.
Moe > Not that it would surprise those who know
Moe > what a creep Kennie is.

G > Kim (LIT) spent an ENTIRE YEAR posing as Ken's
G > friend to get DIRT on him, and all she got was
G > more of the same bad attitude.

Moe > And you would know that how grag?

Moe > SHE ADMITTED IT, BIMBO!

G > Moe, Are you a fan of Sherlock Holmes?
G > Just wondering...

Moe > Sherlock Holmes is a fictional character Greg.

G > Jim Butcher's Harry Dresden is more my style as to sleuths.

I thought not. Logic escapes you.

Kent Wills

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 2:00:23 AM12/27/09
to

Why are you LYING any claiming Moe wrote what you KNOW Ken wrote?

>
>Just wondering...

I'm wondering why you are so UNABLE to be honest about anything.
OK, I've accepted your claim that it's due to your use and abuse
of illegal drugs, so I don't actually wonder.

A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he
DEMANDS be held to others):

Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT

"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead

Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."


"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser

" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson

Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services

With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."

"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.

--a true story


As of Sunday, Nov. 29, 2009:

Financials
Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT
Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN)
Citation Number:

Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00


$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00

Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over
$8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife.

"I am now a "founded" child abuser for making a
7 year old take a fast cold shower."
-- Gregory Scot "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson bragging in MID
<cu6H6.14493$3c6.3...@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>

In Message-ID:
<c7be6a38-8d1d-4c0a...@n38g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson admitted that by his standards,
he RAPED his ex-wife. The same ex-wife he was twice convicted for
BEATING.

In Message-ID:
<8db2eada-0546-4c1a...@n38g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson admits that his use and abuse of
illegal drugs forced him to LIE about the existence of certain
photographs.

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 3:23:33 AM12/27/09
to

Greg. Arthur Conan Doyle, who crated Sherlock Holmes, got fooled by
photos of " fairies".

These are FICTIONAL characters, grag, not real people.

As for logic, I have yet to see you actually exhibit logical
thinking.

Excuses, yes. Playingthe victim, yes, Accusing others, yes, But no
actual logic from you.

Greegor

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 3:51:53 AM12/27/09
to
G > Moe, Are you a fan of Sherlock Holmes?
G > Just wondering...

Moe > Sherlock Holmes is a fictional character Greg.

G > Jim Butcher's Harry Dresden is more my style as to sleuths.

G > I thought not.  Logic escapes you.

Moe > Greg. Arthur Conan Doyle, who created Sherlock
Moe > Holmes, got fooled by photos of " fairies".

What's your point?

Moe > These are FICTIONAL characters, grag, not real people.

You're the pagan and vampire cop TV show freak.

Moe > As for logic, I have yet to see you
Moe > actually exhibit logical thinking.
Moe >
Moe > Excuses, yes. Playingthe victim,
Moe > yes, Accusing others, yes, But no
Moe > actual logic from you.

Ken gripes at you and you accused him
of picking on your Daddy the vet?

What a big brain fart that one was!

Then Kim joined in cussing at me as if
only a base brat could understand your logic.

Do you two play mumbletypeg together?

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 11:08:23 AM12/27/09
to
On Dec 27, 2:51 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> G > Moe, Are you a fan of Sherlock Holmes?
> G > Just wondering...
>
> Moe > Sherlock Holmes is a fictional character Greg.
>
> G > Jim Butcher's Harry Dresden is more my style as to sleuths.
>
> G > I thought not.  Logic escapes you.
>
> Moe > Greg. Arthur Conan Doyle, who created Sherlock
> Moe > Holmes, got fooled by photos of " fairies".
>
> What's your point?

The obvious went right over your head, didn't it?

>
> Moe > These are FICTIONAL characters, grag, not real people.
>
> You're the pagan and vampire cop TV show freak.

Paganism is a group of RELIGIONS. " Vampire cop TV show freak" is
your usual cheap shot ILLOGICAL attack since you have nothing else.

I have many interests greg. I can like a TV series or a movie or
series of movies or pretty much anything in the entertainment field
without being a " freak".

You see grag, hard as it is for someone as mentally messed up as you
are to understand, most people aren't obsessive.

>
> Moe > As for logic, I have yet to see you
> Moe > actually exhibit logical thinking.
> Moe >
> Moe > Excuses, yes. Playingthe victim,
> Moe > yes, Accusing others, yes, But no
> Moe > actual logic from you.
>
> Ken gripes at you and you accused him
> of picking on your Daddy the vet?

Distortion noted.

>
> What a big brain fart that one was!

Is that what you call your insinuations and false accusations Greg?
Your " brain farts"?

Or is that simply your mind decomposing?

>
> Then Kim joined in cussing at me as if
> only a base brat could understand your logic.

Cussing? Really? Like when Kennie cussed at me?
Greg, you're such a hypocrite it reaches mental illness level.

>
> Do you two play mumbletypeg together?

Do you and Kennie stroke each other off?

Kent Wills

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 4:30:15 PM12/27/09
to
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:08:23 -0800 (PST), womanGoddess
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

[...]

>> Moe > Greg. Arthur Conan Doyle, who created Sherlock
>> Moe > Holmes, got fooled by photos of " fairies".
>>
>> What's your point?
>
> The obvious went right over your head, didn't it?
>

It typically does. When Pangborn wrote, in part, "I would agree
the significance of the difference may be just a wee bit over his
head" in regards to Greg, he was quite accurate.

>>
>> Moe > These are FICTIONAL characters, grag, not real people.
>>
>> You're the pagan and vampire cop TV show freak.
>
> Paganism is a group of RELIGIONS. " Vampire cop TV show freak" is
>your usual cheap shot ILLOGICAL attack since you have nothing else.

I happen to like "Forever Knight" as well. I haven't seen it in
a while, but if it were to air on SyFy, I'd probably tivo it for later
viewing.

>
> I have many interests greg. I can like a TV series or a movie or
>series of movies or pretty much anything in the entertainment field
>without being a " freak".

Greg really likes "Babylon Five." He's never explained how, but
the show factored into his abuse of Lisa's little girl in some way.

>
> You see grag, hard as it is for someone as mentally messed up as you
>are to understand, most people aren't obsessive.
>

Greg is UNABLE to understand that. He admitted in another post
that his obsession with one man has lasted for 10 years.

>>
>> Moe > As for logic, I have yet to see you
>> Moe > actually exhibit logical thinking.
>> Moe >
>> Moe > Excuses, yes. Playingthe victim,
>> Moe > yes, Accusing others, yes, But no
>> Moe > actual logic from you.
>>
>> Ken gripes at you and you accused him
>> of picking on your Daddy the vet?
>
>Distortion noted.
>

Actually, it was another of Greg's MANY lies. You're being far
too kind by calling it a distortion.

>>
>> What a big brain fart that one was!
>
> Is that what you call your insinuations and false accusations Greg?
>Your " brain farts"?
>
> Or is that simply your mind decomposing?
>

In Greg's mind, he is allowed to do it. No one else should ever
use his Modus Operandi, of course.

>>
>> Then Kim joined in cussing at me as if
>> only a base brat could understand your logic.
>
> Cussing? Really? Like when Kennie cussed at me?
> Greg, you're such a hypocrite it reaches mental illness level.

Greg displays characteristic consistent with several forms of
mental illness. While it is *possible* he's doing an Oscar worthy
performance, I believe it's not an act.

>
>>
>> Do you two play mumbletypeg together?
>
> Do you and Kennie stroke each other off?

Ken would LOVE it. Greg might, though the evidence that he's gay
is very weak. I still think Greg simply worded his comments poorly.

Greegor

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 5:43:52 PM12/27/09
to
Moe > These are FICTIONAL characters, grag, not real people.

G > You're the pagan and vampire cop TV show freak.

Moe > Paganism is a group of RELIGIONS.
Moe > " Vampire cop TV show freak" is your
Moe > usual cheap shot ILLOGICAL attack
Moe > since you have nothing else.
Moe >
Moe > I have many interests greg. I can like a
Moe > TV series or a movie or series of movies
Moe > or pretty much anything in the entertainment
Moe > field without being a " freak".
Moe >
Moe > You see grag, hard as it is for someone
Moe > as mentally messed up as you are to
Moe > understand, most people aren't obsessive.

You are not "most people", Moe!

How much obsession does it take to
attach a sig about a vampire cop TV
show that ceased production 13 years ago?

To every message you post, even in
unrelated usenet groups?

yumhuyk

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 6:25:05 PM12/27/09
to
On Dec 27, 4:43 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You are not "most people", Moe!
>
> How much obsession does it take to
> attach a sig about a vampire cop TV
> show that ceased production 13 years ago?
>
> To every message you post, even in
> unrelated usenet groups?

Forever Knight, Bob Larson, Kevin Pangborn, USENET. Its like Moe is
eternally stuck in a time warp to 1995. I guess that's what life is
like when you live in your mom's basement. Has she even seen/read
Twilight? Probably not, since she wouldn't like Christian vampires
anyways.

yours in Christ,
isamu

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 7:20:54 PM12/27/09
to
On Dec 27, 3:30 pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:08:23 -0800 (PST), womanGoddess
>
> <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Moe > Greg. Arthur Conan Doyle, who created Sherlock
> >> Moe > Holmes, got fooled by photos of " fairies".
>
> >> What's your point?
>
> > The obvious went right over your head, didn't it?
>
>      It typically does.  When Pangborn wrote, in part, "I would agree
> the significance of the difference may be just a wee bit over his
> head" in regards to Greg, he was quite accurate.
>
>
>
> >> Moe > These are FICTIONAL characters, grag, not real people.
>
> >> You're the pagan and vampire cop TV show freak.
>
> > Paganism is a group of RELIGIONS. " Vampire cop TV show freak" is
> >your usual cheap shot ILLOGICAL attack since you have nothing else.
>
>      I happen to like "Forever Knight" as well.  I haven't seen it in
> a while, but if it were to air on SyFy, I'd probably tivo it for later
> viewing.

It airs regularly on the Chiller TV channel. Occasionally Chiller
also airs eps of Moonlight and even the 1991 version of Dark Shadows
( a series I found unintentionally funny).

Right now I'm interested in " The Dead Zone" and " Bones"

>
>
>
> >  I have many interests greg. I can like a TV series or a movie or
> >series of movies or pretty much anything in the entertainment field
> >without being a " freak".
>
>      Greg really likes "Babylon Five."  He's never explained how, but
> the show factored into his abuse of Lisa's little girl in some way.
>
>
>
> > You see grag, hard as it is for someone as mentally messed up as you
> >are to understand, most people aren't obsessive.
>
>      Greg is UNABLE to understand that.  He admitted in another post
> that his obsession with one man has lasted for 10 years.
>
>
>
> >> Moe > As for logic, I have yet to see you
> >> Moe > actually exhibit logical thinking.
> >> Moe >
> >> Moe > Excuses, yes. Playingthe victim,
> >> Moe > yes, Accusing others, yes, But no
> >> Moe > actual logic from you.
>
> >> Ken gripes at you and you accused him
> >> of picking on your Daddy the vet?
>
> >Distortion  noted.
>
>     Actually, it was another of Greg's MANY lies.  You're being far
> too kind by calling it a distortion.

Kennie has dissed my father because he hates me. His claim he
respects veterans is an obvious lie.

>
>
>
> >> What a big brain fart that one was!
>
> > Is that what you call your insinuations and false accusations Greg?
> >Your " brain farts"?
>
> > Or is that simply your mind decomposing?
>
>      In Greg's mind, he is allowed to do it.  No one else should ever
> use his Modus Operandi, of course.
>
>
>
> >> Then Kim joined in cussing at me as if
> >> only a base brat could understand your logic.
>
> >  Cussing? Really? Like when Kennie cussed at me?
> > Greg, you're such a hypocrite it reaches mental illness level.
>
>      Greg displays characteristic consistent with several forms of
> mental illness.  While it is *possible* he's doing an Oscar worthy
> performance, I believe it's not an act.

I agree.

>
>
>
> >> Do you two play mumbletypeg together?
>
> > Do you and Kennie stroke each other off?
>
>      Ken would LOVE it.  Greg might, though the evidence that he's gay
> is very weak.  I still think Greg simply worded his comments poorly.
>
> A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
> Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he
> DEMANDS be held to others):
>
> Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
>       (DOB 05/22/1959)
> CRIMINAL COMPLAINT   04/10/1996
>      Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
> OTHER CITATION   04/10/1996
>      Comments: CT 2 SPEED
> Disposition Status
>      GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
>
> "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
>     Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by

> attacking my first wife (deceased).http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead


>
> Me:  "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
> drugs, Greg.  Is the reason for your stalking the members of
> alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
>
> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
> "Of course."
>
> "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
> in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
> the Child Abuse registry, for example."
>    -- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
> abuser
>
> " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
> minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
> minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
> the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
> address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "

>                          April 2000, Gregory "Piggly Wiggly" Hansonhttp://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
>
> Path:
> news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Greegor <greego...@gmail.com>

> <cu6H6.14493$3c6.3516...@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>
>
> In Message-ID:
> <c7be6a38-8d1d-4c0a-a9d8-6f1c8f392...@n38g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>


> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson admitted that by his standards,
> he RAPED his ex-wife.  The same ex-wife he was twice convicted for
> BEATING.
>
> In Message-ID:

> <8db2eada-0546-4c1a-a672-cc2e4c31f...@n38g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>


> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson admits that his use and abuse of
> illegal drugs forced him to LIE about the existence of certain
> photographs.

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 7:24:51 PM12/27/09
to
On Dec 27, 4:43 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moe > These are FICTIONAL characters, grag, not real people.
>
> G > You're the pagan and vampire cop TV show freak.
>
> Moe > Paganism is a group of RELIGIONS.
> Moe > " Vampire cop TV show freak" is your
> Moe > usual cheap shot ILLOGICAL attack
> Moe > since you have nothing else.
> Moe >
> Moe > I have many interests greg. I can like a
> Moe > TV series or a movie or series of movies
> Moe > or pretty much anything in the entertainment
> Moe > field without being a " freak".
> Moe >
> Moe > You see grag, hard as it is for someone
> Moe > as mentally messed up as you are to
> Moe > understand, most people aren't obsessive.
>
> You are not "most people", Moe!

Yes, I am an individual.

>
> How much obsession does it take to
> attach a sig about a vampire cop TV
> show that ceased production 13 years ago?

Not obsession, dumbass. How was Kennie's obsession about a serial
called " Captain Video" that he paid big bucks for to an employee of
a studio?

Interests and fondnesses are not the same as obsessions Greg. I don't
"live" Forever Knight".

>
> To every message you post, even in
> unrelated usenet groups?

My sig is my choice Greg.
You don't like it, tough noogies.

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 7:37:13 PM12/27/09
to
On Dec 27, 5:25 pm, yumhuyk <wostyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 27, 4:43 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You are not "most people", Moe!
>
> > How much obsession does it take to
> > attach a sig about a vampire cop TV
> > show that ceased production 13 years ago?
>
> > To every message you post, even in
> > unrelated usenet groups?
>
> Forever Knight, Bob Larson, Kevin Pangborn,


Who the hell is KEVIN Pangborn?

> USENET.  Its like Moe is
> eternally stuck in a time warp to 1995.

(( rolls eyes)) Yukkie, you don't know me, which I thank the gods.

> I guess that's what life is
> like when you live in your mom's basement.  Has she even seen/read
> Twilight?

Yes. One word.. Crap.

Meyervamps are not legitimate vampires. Sorry but glittering in
sunlight is garbage.

I tried reading the first novel and found it so badly written that I
wondered how the hell that garbage passed the editor. Not only that
but Bella is an idiot and Edward is an obsessive stalker. This is a
bad message to send teenage girls about relationships.

>  Probably not, since she wouldn't like Christian vampires
> anyways.

Twilight is a "Christian vampire" novel? Really?

Are you mistaking "Thirst" for " Twilight" Yukkie?

There is a poem written this year by a woman who claims she is an
energy vampire that aptly shows what REAL compassion is about.
Basically the vampire finds a child by her dead mother on Christmas
eve outside in the cold and even though it hurts him physically, he
brings the child to the Church for safety. He gets burned and is in
agony but he still did the right thing.

" Christian vampire" fiction would be interesting to read but if you
are dumb enough to think that because Meyer is a Mormon what she wrote
is " Christian", you certainly don't know what you are talking about.

Which pretty much describes you Yukkie.

You are such an idiot.

Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm

> yours in Christ,
> isamu

krp

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 8:13:24 AM12/28/09
to

"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cc8cc0d0-2f0d-4dbd...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

On Dec 27, 4:43 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moe > These are FICTIONAL characters, grag, not real people.
>
> G > You're the pagan and vampire cop TV show freak.
>
> Moe > Paganism is a group of RELIGIONS.
> Moe > " Vampire cop TV show freak" is your
> Moe > usual cheap shot ILLOGICAL attack
> Moe > since you have nothing else.
> Moe >
> Moe > I have many interests greg. I can like a
> Moe > TV series or a movie or series of movies
> Moe > or pretty much anything in the entertainment
> Moe > field without being a " freak".
> Moe >
> Moe > You see grag, hard as it is for someone
> Moe > as mentally messed up as you are to
> Moe > understand, most people aren't obsessive.
>
> You are not "most people", Moe!

Yes, I am an individual.

>
> How much obsession does it take to
> attach a sig about a vampire cop TV
> show that ceased production 13 years ago?

MOE> Not obsession, dumbass. How was Kennie's obsession about a serial
MOE> called " Captain Video" that he paid big bucks for to an employee of
MOE> a studio?

Another BLATANT LIE from MAUREEN MCALLISTER. I did NOT pay the
"employee" for the copy I paid the OWNERS of the copyright. Can you grasp
that, Maureen ? I paid the COMPANY not the individual. I have said that
from the start, you just keep LYING and claiming I paid the chap I know who
located the tapes and made the arrangements to get me copies of TWO
episodes. The COMPANY determined the price. Now let see if that PEA SIZED
dried up prune alleged BRAIN of yours can figure this one out. I rather
doubt it. You see the episodes were on KINESCOPE, so they had to RIG UP a
VERY VERY OLD Telecine hookup to a tape deck to make the transfer to TAPE.
Following that so far BIMBO? Now you being a MORON, maybe you could GUESS
that all that cost to do? Tying up an engineer for, say, 4 hours? Well
BIMBO? You are the "BITCH WHO KNOWS EVERYTHING" why don't you give me an
estimate for an ENGINEER at a New York City TV station spending 4 hours to
make the tape? I mean since you DADDY invented Television. <cough>


Greegor

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 2:25:31 PM12/28/09
to
Moe > These are FICTIONAL characters, grag, not real people.

G > You're the pagan and vampire cop TV show freak.

Moe > Paganism is a group of RELIGIONS.
Moe > " Vampire cop TV show freak" is your
Moe > usual cheap shot ILLOGICAL attack
Moe > since you have nothing else.
Moe >
Moe > I have many interests greg. I can like a
Moe > TV series or a movie or series of movies
Moe > or pretty much anything in the entertainment
Moe > field without being a " freak".
Moe >
Moe > You see grag, hard as it is for someone
Moe > as mentally messed up as you are to
Moe > understand, most people aren't obsessive.

G > You are not "most people", Moe!

Moe >  Yes, I am an individual.

Overcompensating, struggling for a unique identity, Moe?

G > How much obsession does it take to
G > attach a sig about a vampire cop TV
G > show that ceased production 13 years ago?

Moe >  Not obsession, dumbass.

How much obsession does it take to use
that sig for YEARS, on every post even in
totally unrelated usenet groups?

How much obsession does it take to

go through two different e-mails showing
your obsession with that 13 year old TV show?

Your very IDENTITY is that TV show??

But YOU accused somebody else of obsession!

Why did you do that, Witchypoo?

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 3:59:42 PM12/28/09
to
G > You are not "most people", Moe!

Moe > Yes, I am an individual.

G > Overcompensating, struggling for a unique identity, Moe?

KBW > Everyone is unique, dullard.

Yet some do the wierdest things to try to establish their uniqueness.

Right, Kent?

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:aK5FVD_b0wsJ:bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/states/Iowa/04-0202.asp.html+04-0202+Iowa&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 12:04:46 PM12/29/09
to
G > You are not "most people", Moe!

Moe > Yes, I am an individual.

G > Overcompensating, struggling for a unique identity, Moe?

KBW > Everyone is unique, dullard.

G > Yet some do the wierdest things to try to establish their
uniqueness.

KBW > Are you referring to the time you threw the frozen
KBW > 20 pound, according to you, turkey at your ex-wife?

Typical Kent Wills deception.

The turkey was thrown by HER
and not at me, but out through the window.

KBW > Or do you mean how you admitted the
KBW > information you post as if it was about
KBW > me was never about me, but some other
KBW > Kent Wills yet still post it as if it
KBW > pertained to me in some way?

Why do you work so hard to deny a
supposed fake identity that you worked
so hart to create?

How could your friend set up fake records
for you if it's not you?

Your comments about the apartment building
that your parents sold out from under your ass
were brilliant, as was the pool video.

How are Janet Rae and Frederick A in Rogers doing?
How are your sister Tiffany J and her husband doing?

Damn, Kent, if you faked all of this you did a good job!

If it's a ""Fake ID"", Kent, then why
would you want to throw away such a good one?

I'm just glad to return all of your kindness, Kent!

Kent Wills

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 1:30:37 PM12/29/09
to
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:04:46 -0800 (PST), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>G > You are not "most people", Moe!
>
>Moe > Yes, I am an individual.
>
>G > Overcompensating, struggling for a unique identity, Moe?
>
>KBW > Everyone is unique, dullard.
>
>G > Yet some do the wierdest things to try to establish their
>uniqueness.
>
>KBW > Are you referring to the time you threw the frozen
>KBW > 20 pound, according to you, turkey at your ex-wife?
>
>Typical Kent Wills deception.

It's so very sad that you see the truth as a deception. It
doesn't come as a surprise, but it's still very sad.

>
>The turkey was thrown by HER

Again you propose she threw it at herself.
I suppose such a thing is possible. She could have thrown it up
in the air in a way that it would come back towards her.
Of course, you'll need to explain how the turkey went through the
window if you're going to continue to present that she threw a frozen
20 pound turkey at herself.
You'll also need to explain how she had the strength to do such a
thing.

>and not at me,

Since YOU threw it (you made the tactic admission, by YOUR
standards, of such already), there is no way she could have thrown it
at you. Further, no one has ever claimed she did.

> but out through the window.

That it went out the window isn't a point of contention.

>
>KBW > Or do you mean how you admitted the
>KBW > information you post as if it was about
>KBW > me was never about me, but some other
>KBW > Kent Wills yet still post it as if it
>KBW > pertained to me in some way?
>
>Why do you work so hard to deny a
>supposed fake identity that you worked
>so hart to create?

I asked you a question. You've once again played the avoidance
game rather than admit why you post information as if it were about me
after you ADMITTED, openly, that it is not.
I understand you didn't intend to allow the truth out. But you
made a mistake and some honesty came forth when you admitted the
information isn't about me. Since you weren't forced in any way, you
can't honestly make the claim that you were tricked or that your
meaning wasn't clear.
Now that you've played the avoidance game, please answer the
question asked, unless you simply can't bring forth enough honesty to
do so.

>
>How could your friend set up fake records
>for you if it's not you?

What are you on about?
Are you still trying to present the LIE that I had someone hack
the courts' database? How many times do you require that LIE be
exposed? Is there an exact number?

>
>Your comments about the apartment building
>that your parents sold out from under your ass
>were brilliant, as was the pool video.

You'll need to be more specific. Those of us who do not use and
abuse illegal drugs as you do (unless you lied) will probably never be
able to understand your delusional rant. I can assure you, it's
beyond my ability to understand.

>
>How are Janet Rae and Frederick A in Rogers doing?

I haven't a clue. As you are already aware, I don't know who
they are. Odds are, I've never seen them.
It is, of course, possible I have seen either or both at some
point in my life, but since we've not been introduced, I wouldn't have
known it.
But by all means, prove your implication that I know them. That
would be a win for you.
If the implication that you are presenting is nothing more than a
drug induced delusion, you'll never be able to prove it to be true.
That will be yet another in a long list of losses for you.

>How are your sister Tiffany J and her husband doing?

Neither of my sisters are named Tiffany, or any alternate spelling
of the name. A truth I pointed out a LONG time ago. Since you read
all of my past posts (unless you lied), you will already KNOW this.
Please explain why you present something you KNOW, unless you
lied, isn't true as if it is true. I would really like to know.
I don't expect you to actually explain it. You'll probably run
and HIDE again.

>
>Damn, Kent, if you faked all of this you did a good job!

Ah, but I didn't. Others, such as you and your implications
about Jan and Fred, added to the story.
It has helped me PROVE people, such as you, are so mentally
deficient that they shouldn't be allowed to do anything without
supervision.

>
>If it's a ""Fake ID"", Kent, then why
>would you want to throw away such a good one?

Double quotation marks still mean nothing, Greg. I realize the
drug induced mental retardation you display on-line isn't an act, but
even you must realize this by now.

>
>I'm just glad to return all of your kindness, Kent!

Pretending for a moment any of your drug induced lies are true,
cite, with MIDs and/or Google links, one time I've posted anything
like the names of your parents and siblings.
I have referenced your claim that your parents disowned you, but
I've not mentioned their names. I've mentioned that evidence suggests
that your brother is more tolerant, but I've not mentioned his name.
If you have any other siblings, I've never made any reference of
any sort to them.
Once again you allowed me to PROVE your admitted use and abuse of
illegal drugs (unless you lied) has made honesty IMPOSSIBLE for you,
unless you make a mistake or are forced.

Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services

--a true story

<cu6H6.14493$3c6.3...@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com>

In Message-ID:
<c7be6a38-8d1d-4c0a...@n38g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>


Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson admitted that by his standards,
he RAPED his ex-wife. The same ex-wife he was twice convicted for
BEATING.

In Message-ID:
<8db2eada-0546-4c1a...@n38g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>

Greegor

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 11:15:12 PM12/29/09
to
G > How could your friend set up fake records
G > for you if it's not you?

KBW > What are you on about?
KBW > Are you still trying to present the LIE
KBW > that I had someone hack the courts'
KBW > database?

It was YOU who claimed that one of your buddies
put your name in those web sites as a joke.

KBW > How many times do you require that LIE be
KBW > exposed? Is there an exact number?

G > Your comments about the apartment building
G > that your parents sold out from under your ass
G > were brilliant, as was the pool video.

KBW > You'll need to be more specific. Those of us who
KBW > do not use and abuse illegal drugs

Standard Kent Wills deception B.

KBW > as you do (unless you lied) will probably never be
KBW > able to understand your delusional rant.

Kent Wills deception C.

KBW > I can assure you, it's
KBW > beyond my ability to understand.

That much I believe.

G > How are Janet Rae and Frederick A in Rogers doing?

KBW > I haven't a clue. As you are already aware,
KBW > I don't know who they are. Odds are, I've
KBW > never seen them.

Strange then how you posted comments
about your involvement in the sale of their
College Drive apartment building...

http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/protest/pickdpP.cgi?dp18100392048000=1&report=WebPublic&fixed=N&sketch=Y&map=Y&photo=Y&

http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large

Notice that KENT made claims re sale of 202 NW College apartment
building
That's geoparcel gp=802415452029

Pay close attention to past owners of 202 NW College Ave.
Kent made affirmative claims about the property online.
Kent's folks sold it in 1994 while Kent lived there!

On 03/30/1999 Sweeney's filed on Kent for UNPAID RENT!

GeoParcel 8024-15-452-029 District/Parcel 181/00392-048-000

http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/protest/pickdpP.cgi?dp18100392048000=1&report=WebPublic&fixed=N&sketch=Y&map=Y&photo=Y&

[ As Collected Sept 13, 2009 ]
Seller: WILLS, FRED A. & JANET R.
Buyer: THE SWEENEY REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST
04/26/1994 135,000 D/Deed 7010/188
-
Seller: SHELDAHL, ERIC A.
Buyer: WILLS, FRED
01/02/1990 130,500 D/Deed 6189/972


A Larger photo:

http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large

Notice that name SWEENEY above?

Check this out!

Iowa Courts Docket and Disposition web site

http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/

Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click

Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection

Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >

Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ******
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969

A list of case numbers will be presented.
Click on the SWEENEY case, 4th one down.

Under the "Filings" tab:

JUDGEMENT DEFAULT BRANDT GREGORY D 08/25/1999 09/01/1999 09/01/1999
Comments: $156.25 7.244% FROM 03/30/99
COMPUTER GENERATED NOTICE 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 05/11/1999
Comments: Notice of Proof of Claim
RETURN OF ORIGINAL NOTICE 04/21/1999 04/23/1999 04/23/1999
Comments: 4/10/99 KENT PERS
37.60
VERIFICATION OF ACCT HAS BEEN FILED 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE SWEENEY RENTALS 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
Comments: UNPAID RENT


KBW > It is, of course, possible I have seen either
KBW > or both at some point in my life, but since
KBW > we've not been introduced, I wouldn't have
KBW > known it.

Your public records are connected.

KBW > But by all means, prove your implication that I
KBW > know them. That would be a win for you.
KBW > If the implication that you are presenting
KBW > is nothing more than a drug induced delusion,

Kent Wills deception B.

KBW > you'll never be able to prove it to be true.

I didn't connect you to Janet Rae and Frederick A.
The public records do.

KBW > That will be yet another in a long list of losses for you.

G > How are your sister Tiffany J and her husband doing?

KBW > Neither of my sisters are named Tiffany, or any
KBW > alternate spelling of the name. A truth I
KBW > pointed out a LONG time ago. Since you
KBW > read all of my past posts (unless you lied),
KBW > you will already KNOW this.
KBW > Please explain why you present something
KBW > you KNOW, unless you lied, isn't true as
KBW > if it is true. I would really like to know.
KBW > I don't expect you to actually explain it.
KBW > You'll probably run and HIDE again.

G > Damn, Kent, if you faked all of this
G > you did a good job!

KBW > Ah, but I didn't.

You claimed that you layed out bread crumbs
to throw off your racist stalker.

Remember?

KBW > Others, such as you and your implications
KBW > about Jan and Fred, added to the story.

KBW > It has helped me PROVE people, such as
KBW > you, are so mentally deficient

You ARE Kent Bradley Wills.

KBW > that they shouldn't be allowed to do
KBW > anything without supervision.

Your parents set you up with a protective trust
to keep you from blowing your family inheritance
on magic beans.

You also had a probation officer until
December 2008.

You ARE Kent Bradley Wills.

G > If it's a ""Fake ID"", Kent, then why
G > would you want to throw away such a good one?

KBW > Double quotation marks still mean nothing, Greg.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes

"scare quotes may indicate that the writer does not accept the usage
of the phrase (or the phrase itself)[3], that the writer feels its use
is potentially ironic, or that the writer feels it is a misnomer. This
meaning may serve to distance the writer from the quoted content."


KBW > I realize the drug induced

Kent Wills stock deception B.

KBW > mental retardation you display
KBW > on-line isn't an act, but even
KBW > you must realize this by now.

G > I'm just glad to return all of your kindness, Kent!

KBW > Pretending for a moment any of your drug
KBW > induced lies are true,

Kent Wills stock deception B.

KBW > cite, with MIDs or Google links, one
KBW > time I've posted anything like the
KBW > names of your parents and siblings.

They're not your relatives you said! Fre Pass!

KBW > I have referenced your claim that your parents disowned you,

Fabrication.

KBW > but I've not mentioned their names.

You're such a humanitarian??

KBW > I've mentioned that evidence suggests
KBW > that your brother is more tolerant,

KBW > but I've not mentioned his name.

KBW > If you have any other siblings, I've never
KBW > made any reference of any sort to them.
KBW > Once again you allowed me to PROVE
KBW > your admitted use and abuse of illegal
KBW > drugs (unless you lied)

Kent Wills stock deception B.

KBW > has made honesty IMPOSSIBLE for you,
KBW > unless you make a mistake or are forced.

You sure seem to be stewing a lot about
people YOU SAY are not your relatives.

Why?

Kent Wills

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 5:23:08 AM12/30/09
to
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:15:12 -0800 (PST), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>G > How could your friend set up fake records
>G > for you if it's not you?
>
>KBW > What are you on about?
>KBW > Are you still trying to present the LIE
>KBW > that I had someone hack the courts'
>KBW > database?
>
>It was YOU who claimed that one of your buddies
>put your name in those web sites as a joke.

Are you claiming I've accused, or am accusing, someone of hacking
the court data base? It appears as if you are.
I've made no such accusation.
You, however, have claimed, many times, directly and through
implication, that I've stated so. When asked to offer proof of your
claim, you always fail to present it.

>
>KBW > How many times do you require that LIE be
>KBW > exposed? Is there an exact number?
>
>G > Your comments about the apartment building
>G > that your parents sold out from under your ass
>G > were brilliant, as was the pool video.
>
>KBW > You'll need to be more specific. Those of us who
>KBW > do not use and abuse illegal drugs
>
>Standard Kent Wills deception B.

There is no such deception, unless you were being deceptive when
you admitted you use and abuse illegal drugs (see sig for the VERBATIM
quote).
You admitted your use and abuse of illegal drugs causes you to
stalk, by the very definition you posted to accuse others of stalking
you, the members of alt.friends. I see you're still under the
influence of those illegal drugs, since you are still stalking the
members of alt.friends.
Given the amount of time that has passed you can't honestly
claim you meant to write something else, or that you misunderstood
what I was asking.
Either you slipped and had some honesty escape, meaning you do
use and abuse illegal drugs, or you lied. An error is no longer an
option for you, given the amount of time and the number of times I've
referenced your admission.

>
>KBW > as you do (unless you lied) will probably never be
>KBW > able to understand your delusional rant.
>
>Kent Wills deception C.

You may LIE as often as you need. To date, your psychological
INABILITY to be honest, except by accident or force, has caused me no
harm. There is no reason to suspect it will do so in the future.
I expect, but certainly can't prove, my exposing the TRUTH about
you, that you're nothing more than a CPS shill seeking to keep
families apart, has caused you harm. I don't have any data, but I'm
sure very few parents are paying any attention to your advice since I
outted you as a CPS shill.
You're welcome.

>
>KBW > I can assure you, it's
>KBW > beyond my ability to understand.
>
>That much I believe.

Since I don't partake of any illegal drugs, you should.

>
>G > How are Janet Rae and Frederick A in Rogers doing?
>
>KBW > I haven't a clue. As you are already aware,
>KBW > I don't know who they are. Odds are, I've
>KBW > never seen them.
>
>Strange then how you posted comments
>about your involvement in the sale of their
>College Drive apartment building...

I posted no such comments.
Feel free to prove I have, or admit another of your drug induced
pathological lies has been exposed.

[snip of information you admit isn't about me]

>
>
>KBW > It is, of course, possible I have seen either
>KBW > or both at some point in my life, but since
>KBW > we've not been introduced, I wouldn't have
>KBW > known it.
>
>Your public records are connected.

No they aren't.
You have managed to prove one of the three different people with
the name Kent Wills you used to claim are me, are connected to a Jan
and Fred. This has never been a point of contention.
The problem you face is that you've admitted I am not the person
you often claim. You didn't mean to admit the truth, but you slipped
and some honesty came out.
Now you're stuck with it.

>
>KBW > But by all means, prove your implication that I
>KBW > know them. That would be a win for you.
>KBW > If the implication that you are presenting
>KBW > is nothing more than a drug induced delusion,
>
>Kent Wills deception B.

I accept your admission, by your own standards, that what you
presented was nothing more than a drug induced delusion.
Thank you for admitting, by your own standards, that which was
already known.

>
>KBW > you'll never be able to prove it to be true.
>
>I didn't connect you to Janet Rae and Frederick A.
>The public records do.

You may present the same lie as often as you want/need. It will
never become the truth.

>
>KBW > That will be yet another in a long list of losses for you.
>
>G > How are your sister Tiffany J and her husband doing?
>
>KBW > Neither of my sisters are named Tiffany, or any
>KBW > alternate spelling of the name. A truth I
>KBW > pointed out a LONG time ago. Since you
>KBW > read all of my past posts (unless you lied),
>KBW > you will already KNOW this.
>KBW > Please explain why you present something
>KBW > you KNOW, unless you lied, isn't true as
>KBW > if it is true. I would really like to know.
>KBW > I don't expect you to actually explain it.
>KBW > You'll probably run and HIDE again.

Did you forget the explanation, Greg?
Why are you presenting something you KNOW isn't true as if it is
true.

>


>G > Damn, Kent, if you faked all of this
>G > you did a good job!
>
>KBW > Ah, but I didn't.
>
>You claimed that you layed out bread crumbs
>to throw off your racist stalker.

I did?
Unless you've been exposed in yet another lie, you'll gladly post
the MID and/or Google link to such a post from me.

>
>Remember?

Nope. I think you made that claim up all by yourself. But do
prove I made the claim, unless it is more of your self supplied PROOF
that you are psychologically UNABLE to be honest, except by accident
or force.
Or are you so stoned you really think Dr. Rabbi Daniel "Doc
Savage" Goldblum is a racist?
While he has dropped hints that he is (his reference to The
Princess as a monkey is a great example), there is nothing I've seen
that would give anyone cause to make the fact claim. If you wish to
provide evidence that he is as you present, I'll examine it.
Since you attribute to me a claim I've never made, you'll offer
nothing and admit your psychological INABILITY to be honest, except by
accident or force, has been exposed once again.

>
>KBW > Others, such as you and your implications
>KBW > about Jan and Fred, added to the story.
>
>KBW > It has helped me PROVE people, such as
>KBW > you, are so mentally deficient
>
>You ARE Kent Bradley Wills.

You claimed I'm not.

>
>KBW > that they shouldn't be allowed to do
>KBW > anything without supervision.
>
>Your parents set you up with a protective trust
>to keep you from blowing your family inheritance
>on magic beans.

According to my parents, they don't have a trust of any sort. I
expect they would know if they have one or not.
To eliminate a possible lie before you post it:
If they have one they're keeping secret, you wouldn't be able to
know about it.
Of course, by YOUR standards, you've already admitted the claim
of their having a trust is a drug induced delusion. Still, why not be
a man and openly admit you've been lying?

>
>You also had a probation officer until
>December 2008.
>

So it wasn't January 2009 when the probation was dismissed? But
you DEMANDED it was. In fact, you strongly implied you'd be at the
courthouse to watch the phantom revocation hearing.
Perhaps you forgot how you LIED and claimed the probation was
discharged a month early (according to you, it was to end in February,
so one month early would be January) because over $1000.00 was still
owed. If you would just be honest, you wouldn't forget what lies
you've posted.

>You ARE Kent Bradley Wills.

You claimed I'm not.

>
>G > If it's a ""Fake ID"", Kent, then why
>G > would you want to throw away such a good one?
>
>KBW > Double quotation marks still mean nothing, Greg.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes
>
>"scare quotes may indicate that the writer does not accept the usage
>of the phrase (or the phrase itself)[3], that the writer feels its use
>is potentially ironic, or that the writer feels it is a misnomer. This
>meaning may serve to distance the writer from the quoted content."
>

Scare quotes are single quotation marks. For example, "this."
You use double quotation marks, or quadruple if you follow
British rules of grammar, which mean absolutely nothing. I even
checked with three ESL teachers. True, you only suggested I ask one,
but I wanted to make sure.
The simple truth is, double quotation marks (quadruple if you're
using British rules) mean absolutely nothing. It's the same as if you
used no quotation marks at all.
If the meaning you are deceptively trying to present now is the
one you always meant, you would have stated so rather than suggest I
ask an ESL teacher. Since you did not, it's clear you are now trying
to LIE your way out of it.
You're failing. Again.

>
>KBW > I realize the drug induced
>
>Kent Wills stock deception B.

The truth I present about you could be seen as stock. Few would


see the truth as a deception.

>


>KBW > mental retardation you display
>KBW > on-line isn't an act, but even
>KBW > you must realize this by now.
>
>G > I'm just glad to return all of your kindness, Kent!
>
>KBW > Pretending for a moment any of your drug
>KBW > induced lies are true,
>
>Kent Wills stock deception B.

The truth I present about you could be seen as stock. Few would


see the truth as a deception.

>


>KBW > cite, with MIDs or Google links, one
>KBW > time I've posted anything like the
>KBW > names of your parents and siblings.
>
>They're not your relatives you said! Fre Pass!

Your parents and siblings are not my relatives. While I've never
stated this before, in direct contrast to the LIE you present above,
I'm doing so now.
Are you really so screwed up you think I've ever claimed to be
related to any member of your family?
I'm sure if we could go back far enough in the history of planet
earth, we would find a common ancestor. This isn't likely to be what
you are deceptively trying to present.


>
>KBW > I have referenced your claim that your parents disowned you,
>
>Fabrication.

I have, in fact, referenced your claim. I'm not presenting any
fabrication that I have. I've actually done it MANY times.
Your LIE that I fabricated my claim about the reference fails.
I'm sure you're very used to failure. You go out of your way to
ensure you'll fail with nearly every post.

>
>KBW > but I've not mentioned their names.
>
>You're such a humanitarian??

Maybe. I'm certainly better than you. But you prove that truth
nearly every day.
And being better than you doesn't mean a great deal.

>
>KBW > I've mentioned that evidence suggests
>KBW > that your brother is more tolerant,
>
>KBW > but I've not mentioned his name.
>
>KBW > If you have any other siblings, I've never
>KBW > made any reference of any sort to them.
>KBW > Once again you allowed me to PROVE
>KBW > your admitted use and abuse of illegal
>KBW > drugs (unless you lied)
>
>Kent Wills stock deception B.

The truth I present about you could be seen as stock. Few would


see the truth as a deception.

>


>KBW > has made honesty IMPOSSIBLE for you,
>KBW > unless you make a mistake or are forced.
>
>You sure seem to be stewing a lot about
>people YOU SAY are not your relatives.

Pointing out your psychological INABILITY to be honest, except by
accident or force, is stewing? Please explain. I would enjoy reading
how you rationalize such a view.

>
>Why?

Why what? Why I expose you for the lying, pro-CPS, scum you are?
I want to ensure no one who is dealing with CPS pays any
attention to the advice you give. Since it is guarantied to result in
the family being torn apart, it's ALWAYS good to PROVE you the lying,
pro-CPS scum you were, are, and will likely always be and help keep
parents from following your advice.
And to think, you could have continued to sabotage parents' cases
without any interference from me. I left ASCPS. You could have gone
about destroying families left and right. But your NEED to PROVE you
want my views, opinions and input was too strong. You HAD to follow me
all over Usenet.
Now you're being exposed as a worthless, pro-CPS LOSER almost
every day.
Enjoy it, Greg. It's clearly what you really wanted.

krp

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 6:00:15 AM12/30/09
to

"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44476528-0f88-4bad...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

>G > How could your friend set up fake records
> G > for you if it's not you?
>
> KBW > What are you on about?
> KBW > Are you still trying to present the LIE
> KBW > that I had someone hack the courts'
> KBW > database?
>
> It was YOU who claimed that one of your buddies
> put your name in those web sites as a joke.
>
> KBW > How many times do you require that LIE be
> KBW > exposed? Is there an exact number?
>
> G > Your comments about the apartment building
> G > that your parents sold out from under your ass
> G > were brilliant, as was the pool video.
>
> KBW > You'll need to be more specific. Those of us who
> KBW > do not use and abuse illegal drugs
>
> Standard Kent Wills deception B.
>

Kent's NOT Kent. Moore is NOT Moore................ <YAWN>

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 9:22:46 AM12/30/09
to
On Dec 28, 1:45 pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:25:05 -0800 (PST), yumhuyk

>
> <wostyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 27, 4:43 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> You are not "most people", Moe!
>
> >> How much obsession does it take to
> >> attach a sig about a vampire cop TV
> >> show that ceased production 13 years ago?
>
> >> To every message you post, even in
> >> unrelated usenet groups?
>
> >Forever Knight,
>
>     Good show.
>
> >Bob Larson,
>
>     Fraud and con man.
>
> >Kevin Pangborn,
>
>      Who is that?

Dunno.

>
> >USENET.  
>
>      Similar to the BBS systems of the '80s and '90s.


>
> >Its like Moe is
> >eternally stuck in a time warp to 1995.  I guess that's what life is
> >like when you live in your mom's basement.  
>

>      You would be the most qualified to know, huh?


>
> >Has she even seen/read
> >Twilight?  
>

>      I don't know about Moe, but I saw it with RiffTrax audio playing.

Ah RiffTrax. Did it improve that turkey?

And yes I tried watching the movie. The teens who go for that crap
have very low standards, that's all I can say :-(

>
> >Probably not, since she wouldn't like Christian vampires
> >anyways.
>

>      I saw no mention of religion in the film.  Granted, I was
> watching while RiffTrax was playing, so it's possible I missed
> something, but I doubt it.

The " Christian vampire" claim is some BS that supposedly since
Edward and Bella DON"T succumb to their "lusts" ( until the third
novel, and from what I've heard it was sadomasochism) then for some
reason it's " Christian". Meyers is also a Mormon, which to some is a
Christian sect, so some others not a Christian sect.

(( Shrugs)) The book was garbage, at best some sort of teenage girl
budding sexual melodrama. Neither Edward nor Bella are three
dimensional characters or even characters any actual intelligent
reader would sympathize with.

Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm

>
> --
> Count your blessings by thinking of those whom you love.

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 9:32:41 AM12/30/09
to
On Dec 28, 7:13 am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

I went by your own words Kennie, You said you paid your buddy for the
copies. also showed that in the seventies the studio you claimed you
got the copies from destroyed their reels. So where the masters that
made your copies actually came from is an interesting question.

Simply put, you did what you accused me of doing.

>Can you grasp
> that, Maureen ?  I paid the COMPANY not the individual.   I have said that
> from the start, you just keep LYING and claiming I paid the chap I know who
> located the tapes and made the arrangements to get me copies of TWO
> episodes. The COMPANY determined the price. Now let see if that PEA SIZED
> dried up prune alleged BRAIN of yours can figure this one out. I rather
> doubt it. You see the episodes were on KINESCOPE, so they had to RIG UP a
> VERY VERY OLD Telecine hookup to a tape deck to make the transfer to TAPE

They destroyed the kinescopes in the late 1970s Kennie.

> Following that so far BIMBO?  Now you being a MORON, maybe you could GUESS
> that all that cost to do?

Your ad hominen insults on me reflect upon you rather than on me
Kennie.
Perhaps if you actually acted like an adult and controlled your
temper you might be seen as more credible than the habitual liar you
are.

> Tying up an engineer for, say, 4 hours?  Well
> BIMBO? You are the "BITCH WHO KNOWS EVERYTHING" why don't you give me an
> estimate for an ENGINEER at a New York City TV station spending 4 hours to
> make the tape? I mean since you DADDY invented Television.  <cough>

You hysteria laden ranting noted and ignored for the BS it is.

FYI Kennie, you assume I don't know how the transfer of kinescopes to
videotape is set up.

It is a simple matter of working equipment and time to transfer. No
different really than what people do no transferring LPs to CDs.

Do try to be rational once in awhile Kennie.

You really sound like you are nuts in your post.

womanGoddess

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 9:35:56 AM12/30/09
to
On Dec 28, 1:25 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moe > These are FICTIONAL characters, grag, not real people.
>
> G > You're the pagan and vampire cop TV show freak.
>
> Moe > Paganism is a group of RELIGIONS.
> Moe > " Vampire cop TV show freak" is your
> Moe > usual cheap shot ILLOGICAL attack
> Moe > since you have nothing else.
> Moe >
> Moe > I have many interests greg. I can like a
> Moe > TV series or a movie or series of movies
> Moe > or pretty much anything in the entertainment
> Moe > field without being a " freak".
> Moe >
> Moe > You see grag, hard as it is for someone
> Moe > as mentally messed up as you are to
> Moe > understand, most people aren't obsessive.
>
> G > You are not "most people", Moe!
>
> Moe >  Yes, I am an individual.
>
> Overcompensating, struggling for a unique identity, Moe?

I have no problem with that Greg.

>
> G > How much obsession does it take to
> G > attach a sig about a vampire cop TV
> G > show that ceased production 13 years ago?
>
> Moe >  Not obsession, dumbass.
>
> How much obsession does it take to use
> that sig for YEARS, on every post even in
> totally unrelated usenet groups?

(( rolls eyes))

A& A, asswipe.

>
> How much obsession does it take to
> go through two different e-mails showing
> your obsession with that 13 year old TV show?

A&A

>
> Your very IDENTITY is that TV show??

Nope.
Seriously, how stupid ARE you Greg?

>
> But YOU accused somebody else of obsession!

When they show it, spend many posts on li, like you and Kennie do,
yes.

>
> Why did you do that, Witchypoo?

You claim what does not exist.

krp

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 11:05:05 AM12/30/09
to

"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0b9f4251-7d92-49aa...@j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...

MOE> I went by your own words Kennie,

Oh BULLSHIT fruitcake.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 7:08:57 PM12/30/09
to
KRP > Kent's NOT Kent. Moore is NOT Moore................ <YAWN>

They all pretend at bravery, too.

[...]

Moe > Not obsession, dumbass.

G > How much obsession does it take to use
G > that sig for YEARS, on every post even in
G > totally unrelated usenet groups?

Moe > A& A, asswipe.

Moe pees standing up, so Frank can leave the seat up.

krp

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 5:14:47 AM12/31/09
to

"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44dbd3a1-2849-4986...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

> KRP > Kent's NOT Kent. Moore is NOT Moore................ <YAWN>

> They all pretend at bravery, too.

I am amused by all the CHEAST BEATING of those two. Their Tarzan yells.
Moore especially loves to pretend to be VERY MACHO. As he does his "BUTCH"
posturing I am always reminded of the cartoon of how Tarzan got his yell.

Tarzan swinging through the jungle goint to rescue Jane. In his MANLY" voice
he yells out "Jane Grab Vine" as he swings to her rescue. Then as he nears
Jane a terrified look comes over his face as he shouts; "NO Jane you grab
VINE" and then you hear the Tarzan yeall; "yooooahhhhhh!" As Jane grabs the
shorter vine.

> [...]

> Moe > Not obsession, dumbass.

> G > How much obsession does it take to use
> G > that sig for YEARS, on every post even in
> G > totally unrelated usenet groups?
>
> Moe > A& A, asswipe.

> Moe pees standing up, so Frank can leave the seat up.

Moe has this mental image of herself as the GREAT AMAZON WARRIOR. She
pictures herself standing in the latrine DEFIANTLY at the urinal with the
"GUYS" and then wonders WHY her ankles smell like PISS!


Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 10:33:12 AM12/31/09
to
KRP > Kent's NOT Kent. Moore is NOT Moore................ <YAWN>

G > They all pretend at bravery, too.

KBW > Claims the man who STRONGLY implied
KBW > he'd be at the courthouse for the phantom
KBW > revocation hearing, yet was a no show.

Kent, Did you show up in January for a hearing
that had been cancelled in December?

-for a person you say you aren't?

Message has been deleted

forevernitefan

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 2:46:45 PM12/31/09
to

Its the truth. I went by what you posted and compared it to the
facts as posted on Wikipedia about the serial.

I''m sorry to read that you consider the truth to be bullshit. But it
would explain your propensity to lie so much.

forevernitefan

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 2:58:43 PM12/31/09
to
On Dec 30, 1:56 pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:32:41 -0800 (PST), womanGoddess

>
> <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> MOE> Not obsession, dumbass. How was Kennie's obsession about a serial
> >> MOE> called " Captain Video" that he paid big bucks for to an employee of
> >> MOE> a studio?
>
> >>   Another BLATANT LIE from MAUREEN MCALLISTER. I did NOT pay the
> >> "employee" for the copy I paid the OWNERS of the copyright.
>
> > I went by your own words Kennie, You said you paid your buddy for the
> >copies.  
>
>      As I'm sure everyone who has ever dealt with Pangborn has noticed
> his stories change.  And not just minor chances, but changes that are
> so great, the context is completely different.

I've noticed him doing so in four subject so far. His "" curse on
Moore" one was pretty simple but he had to change his story once
again.

Liars never can get the specifics of their stores straight.

>     If he would just be honest, he wouldn't trip up on his lies like
> he does.

I doubt he's been honest since he hit puberty, or what in his case
passe