SOCIETY SUCKS
leghairs
im sick of this fuckin shit society and their laws anyway ive had
relationships with really nice boys and ive rescently lost a very
special relationship with a boy because the boy was afraid that society
would not approve of it im 23 and when i met the boy he was 13 now hes
15 and its been 6 months since ive seen him because of the u.s laws why
must us (boylovers) suffer like this there is a difference in forceful
sex and sex that u have in a true relationship sure i look at boys and
wonder if they would like to be friends but then i wonder if they would
think im a freak anyway im a true boylover and proud of it boys are
special and beautiful but enough is enough BOYLOVERS ACROSS THE WORLD
SHALL PREVAIL AND THESE LAWS SHALL GO TO A PLACE THAT MAKES HELL LOOK
LIKE HEAVEN god bless u all and please reply
Denny
I most definitely hear what you are saying!
It's such a shame that those of us who actually CARE about a boy's
well-being are afraid to even talk to him, lest we get "dirty looks" (at
best), or accused of "being a pedophile".
To bad people don't know that "pedophile" literally means "lover of children"!
IUL,
--->Denny
Progressive Life Awareness Network (PLAN):
http://www.awareness.net
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
Male Intergenerational Relationship Support Org. (MIRSO)
http://www.denny.org/mirso.html
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
"Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns,
why should we let them have ideas?" - Joseph Stalin
An Observer
us02...@mindspring.com (Denny) wrote:
>I most definitely hear what you are saying!
>It's such a shame that those of us who actually CARE about a boy's
>well-being are afraid to even talk to him, lest we get "dirty looks" (at
>best), or accused of "being a pedophile".
>To bad people don't know that "pedophile" literally means "lover of children"!
Your implication that only pedophiles "actually CARE about a boy's
well-being" may play well among the pedo me-toos here but is, of
course, not even remotely true.
Regards
Denny
In article <5hpb9e$h...@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>, obse...@observation.net
(An Observer) wrote:
Could you please point out where I have EVER said, "only pedophiles
'actually CARE about a boy's well-being'"?
I was making a point about how the word "pedophile" has changed.
>
>
> Regards
IUL,
--->Denny
Progressive Life Awareness Network (PLAN):
http://www.awareness.net
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
Male Intergenerational Relationship Support Org. (MIRSO)
http://www.denny.org/mirso.html
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world go blind." - Mahatma Gandhi
Denny
In article <5hsvbk$o...@sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com>, obse...@observation.net
(An Observer) wrote:
> us02...@mindspring.com (Denny) wrote:
>
> >Could you please point out where I have EVER said, "only pedophiles
> >'actually CARE about a boy's well-being'"?
>
> I didn't say you 'said' it, I said you implied it -- which you did.
> Here are your words:
>
> "It's such a shame that those of us who actually CARE about a boy's
> well-being are afraid to even talk to him..."
That says nothing about "pedophiles"--I was referring to boy-lovers.
YOU defined "pedophile" according to modern thought.
>
> .... as if the rest of the world didn't care about boys.
Would YOU walk up to a boy on the street who is crying, and even DARE
putting your hand on his shoulder, let alone give him a much-needed hug?
>
>
> Regards
IUL,
--->Denny
Progressive Life Awareness Network (PLAN):
http://www.awareness.net
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
Male Intergenerational Relationship Support Org. (MIRSO)
http://www.denny.org/mirso.html
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
"He who will give up liberty for a bit of safety, neither derserves liberty
nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
An Observer
us02...@mindspring.com (Denny) wrote:
>Could you please point out where I have EVER said, "only pedophiles
>'actually CARE about a boy's well-being'"?
I didn't say you 'said' it, I said you implied it -- which you did.
Here are your words:
"It's such a shame that those of us who actually CARE about a boy's
well-being are afraid to even talk to him..."
.... as if the rest of the world didn't care about boys.
Regards
An Observer
Completely changing the subject Denny wrote:
>Would YOU walk up to a boy on the street who is crying, and even DARE
>putting your hand on his shoulder, let alone give him a much-needed hug?
It is sad that one should have to think twice about providing a
comforting hug to a youngster in need. And yes, while I wouldn’t
hesitate to aid a child in distress, I would indeed think very
carefully about how much affection I showed if I didn’t know the child
personally. Understand that my reluctance to hug a distressed child
would be against my nature.
Kids need hugs when they are sad, or scared, or when they skin their
knee -- and if mommy or daddy isn’t around, the adult caretaker
should be free to provide such comfort. Teachers and day care workers
should be free to hug their young students and charges.
Unfortunately, in the USA, there has been such an overreaction to
the possibility that 1 teacher in 1000 may get some kind of ‘unnatural
thrill’ out of hugging little Suzy, that the blanket policy in many
schools and day care centers is ‘don’t hug for any reason’. Fear of
litigation is another reason for such policies. Past cases of alleged
'molestation' show that parents are frequently quite eager to have
their child included among the alleged victims. In my opinion that
eagerness is driven primarily by a greedy desire to get a piece of a
civil suit settlement. Also, eager interrogators and prosecutors
driven by hopes of career advancing publicity seem quite willing to
manipulate little Johnny or Suzy into false allegations.
It is indeed a sad state of affairs that the natural human tendency to
offer physical comfort to a child in distress has been arrested by an
illogical pedophile phobia and an overly litigious society. The kids
are the losers.
Regards