frank mccoys pedophile jack-off story files
bobandcarole
bobandcarole
Priam wrote:
> On 11 May 2006, "bobandcarole" <bobandc...@webtv.net> wrote:
> >website:
> >http://www.asstr.org/~Frank_McCoy/files.htm
>
> Is this Frank pretending to be bobandcarole? Sheesh, you couldn't
> do a better job of advertising if you paid for it.
>
> "Look everyone! Porn! Right Here on this Website! Hurry, now."
>
> It reminds me of the anti-pedophile websites of the past that used to
> tell people what to avoid. And they listed every pedo porno site
> they could find. It was the primary resource for pedos world-wide.
>
> It looks like bobandcarole have (has) taken over their job.
>
> Priam
Nah, sent it to ahm, they'll bust it up
bobandcarole
bobandcarole wrote:
> website:
> http://www.asstr.org/~Frank_McCoy/files.htm
>
INDEXHTML
bobandcarole
Lamey The Cable Guy wrote:
>
> Let's give em a call and find out.
> >
> >Tell me how long you think it will take for "ahm" to "bust it up"
> >and define "bust it up". If the site is gone within the time you
> >say, then I'll take obnoxious lessions and join your group.
>
> You'll never be welcome in UTB.
Nope, he couldn't pass our initiation, as soon as he swears allegiance
with his right hand on the Anarchists Cookbook he will burst into
flames....:-)
> >
> >If it's still there, then you will be an honorary pedophile.
> >
> You don't call the shots muffin.
bobandcarole
bobandcarole wrote:
> Neusm@n wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 May 2006 18:38:46 -0700, "Nikki@P.U." <Nikki@P.U.> wrote:
> >
> > >Grate Aecive.
> > >
> > >bobandcarole wrote:
> > >> website:
> > >> http://www.asstr.org/~Frank_McCoy/files.htm
> > >>
> >
> > Welcome back kiddo. :-)
> >
> > Newsman
> >
> > P.S. Sorry to see the regular group is such a mess.
>
> Get used to it pedo
>
> Too bad there's people
> > that have nothing better to do than sit in front of their computers and send
> > hate messages to anyone that doesn't think like them. A true sign of
> > insecurity about themselves. Hopefully you'll come up with another place to
> > post or maybe just flood the bastards out of the regular one, LOL!
> >
>
> Fat chance
>
> > Frank: Sorry for hogging your personal space. Just wanted to get a few words
> > in edgewise where Nikki might have a better chance of seeing it. Take care
> > man. ;-)
>
> Take off freak
bobandcarole
Priam wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2006, Lamey The Cable Guy <tean...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Fri, 12 May 2006 01:39:23 +0200 (CEST), Priam
> ><Pr...@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
> >
> >>On 11 May 2006, "bobandcarole" <bobandc...@webtv.net> wrote:
> >>>website:
> >>>http://www.asstr.org/~Frank_McCoy/files.htm
> >>
> >>Is this Frank pretending to be bobandcarole? Sheesh, you couldn't
> >>do a better job of advertising if you paid for it.
> >>
> >>"Look everyone! Porn! Right Here on this Website! Hurry, now."
> >>
> >>It reminds me of the anti-pedophile websites of the past that used to
> >>tell people what to avoid. And they listed every pedo porno site
> >>they could find. It was the primary resource for pedos world-wide.
> >>
> >>It looks like bobandcarole have (has) taken over their job.
> >>
> >>Priam
> >
>
> That's a new approach. Asking instead of assuming.
If you post in favor of the peds you're just as bad as a ped.
>
> I don't molest children; in fact, I detest the little brats. I have no desire
> to have any contact, sexual or otherwise with anyone underaged.
> So, by your definition, I'm a pedophile.
run along, I hear your mother calling
>
> Priam
bobandcarole
Priam wrote:
> On 12 May 2006, "bobandcarole" <bobandc...@webtv.net> wrote:
> >Priam wrote:
> >> On Thu, 11 May 2006, Lamey The Cable Guy <tean...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Fri, 12 May 2006 01:39:23 +0200 (CEST), Priam
> >> ><Pr...@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>On 11 May 2006, "bobandcarole" <bobandc...@webtv.net> wrote:
> >> >>>website:
> >> >>>http://www.asstr.org/~Frank_McCoy/files.htm
> >> >>
> >> >>Is this Frank pretending to be bobandcarole? Sheesh, you couldn't
> >> >>do a better job of advertising if you paid for it.
> >> >>
> >> >>"Look everyone! Porn! Right Here on this Website! Hurry, now."
> >> >>
> >> >>It reminds me of the anti-pedophile websites of the past that used to
> >> >>tell people what to avoid. And they listed every pedo porno site
> >> >>they could find. It was the primary resource for pedos world-wide.
> >> >>
> >> >>It looks like bobandcarole have (has) taken over their job.
> >> >>
> >> >>Priam
> >> >
> >> >Are you a pedo?
> >>
> >> That's a new approach. Asking instead of assuming.
> >
> >If you post in favor of the peds you're just as bad as a ped.
>
> as being for "peds." I don't care what fantasies people have,
> but if they cross the line they deserve whatever they get.
Yep you're a ped
>
> I find your group to be boorish, and your methods are not
> only ineffective but counterproductive.
>
> You really could do some good if your collective heads weren't
> up each other's asses. But you'll never learn.
> >>
> >> I don't molest children; in fact, I detest the little brats. I have no
> >> desire
> >> to have any contact, sexual or otherwise with anyone underaged.
> >> So, by your definition, I'm a pedophile.
> >
> >run along, I hear your mother calling
> >>
> >> Priam
>
> Since you seem to focus almost exclusively on boy groups, does that
> mean that you are a bunch of homosexuals that are opposed to
> pedophilia? Just wondering.
>
> [I'm just making friends right an left here, aren't I?]
I'm quite sure you have no friends, on or off usenet
>
> Priam
bobandcarole
> my best friends are homosexuals.
Why am I not surprised?
There is quite a stigma
> involved in admitting homosexuality, and coming out of
> the closet is not always a wise choice.
Yeah, faggots get their asses beat around here.
>
> It's ironic that many people automatically assume that
> all homosexuals are pedophiles. Perhaps "latent"
> pedophile would be more accurate.
>
> Most homophobic men are "latent" homosexuals, so your
> attitudes towards pedophiles make sense.
Bullshit
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_homosexuality
>
> Priam
BusyGuy
<200605130024...@remailer-debian.panta-rhei.eu.org>, Priam
<Pr...@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
> >> [I'm just making friends right an left here, aren't I?]
> >
> >I'm quite sure you have no friends, on or off usenet
> >>
> >> Priam
>
> Avoiding the question? That's ok, I understand. Some of
> my best friends are homosexuals. There is quite a stigma
> involved in admitting homosexuality, and coming out of
> the closet is not always a wise choice.
>
> It's ironic that many people automatically assume that
> all homosexuals are pedophiles. Perhaps "latent"
> pedophile would be more accurate.
>
> Most homophobic men are "latent" homosexuals, so your
> attitudes towards pedophiles make sense.
Priam, are you a newbie or a nym-shifter?
There are many people who oppose the opinions, orientation and posts of
the regulars in here. That's ok. They are entitled to their views. A
few even post considered, intelligent comments that are expressed as
opinions. To which, of course, they are entitled. And their posts are
generally welcome. Serious, intelligent debate is one of the enjoyable
things about life in general and text-based newsgroup communication in
particular.
But those fucking pus-filled, necrotic, slithering, scum-drinking,
putrescent, moronic trolls that you support (yes, support!) are doing
their best to destroy any newsgroup that they disapprove of. They will
fail if only people like you would JUST FUCKING IGNORE THEM !!!!!!!
Your responses are oxygen to them. They have no real lives of their own
so they live just for your replies. If you read their posts and reply,
you show them that their efforts were not wasted. Kill-file them and
you will not even see their bullshit in the first place. The only time
I see it is when well-meaning but misguided people reply to them and
quote their bullshit all over again.
To the extent that intelligent, moderate comment has dried up here,
those fucking assholes have succeeded in their mission. No amount of
denial from moderates can cover up the sad fact that one or two (plus
dozens of their sock puppets) fucking intolerant, misguided,
ill-informed, control-freak, christian-missionary, hating, nazi morons
have disrupted a group that is, or should be, a source of tolerance,
support and intelligent discourse for people who were born with a
particular outlook on life.
We all have opinions. Millions of people with thousands of opinions.
Why a vanishingly-small minority of people should be allowed to yell "I
hold a different opinion theefore you are WRONG" is beyond my
understanding. But they do. And do they have any real effect? Hell no.
The 99.999% of the world to whom they shout their bullshit will smile
and just go right on holding the same views. But the trolls will never
accept that this is true, they will continue to believe that the person
who shouts loudest, wins the debate. So the best way to eal with them
is to just put cotton wool in your ears.
In every newsgroup (and there are nealry 200,000 of them!) you will
read, over and over and over and...
DON'T FEED THE FUCKING TROLLS !!!
PLEASE !!!!! It's good advice. You might be having fun with them but,
in the process, youy are heping to dry up any real benefit that these
groups have.
Imagine that there are some people, remotely-located so not many people
to talk to face-to-face, or perhaps disabled and confined to home, or
living in a country where they cannot speak the local language so are
restricted to just a few friends, or very busy at their job and their
leisure hours are in the evening or whatever. A dozen different
possibilites. Such people look forward to some intelligent chat in
their chosen newsgroup. Suddenly one or two fucking trolls set out to
disrupt it. If they are ignored, they go away. But now, some
well-meaning people start responding and engaging them in provocative
"you did" "no I didn't" sort of bullshit. Is it any wonder if the
newsgrouo dies? and that is exactly what these fucking morons want! By
replying to them, telling them to go away, you are acrually encouraging
them!
Please please please don't do it! Your fun is helping to kill
newsgroups.
Frank McCoy
>
>Priam wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 May 2006, Lamey The Cable Guy <tean...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Fri, 12 May 2006 01:39:23 +0200 (CEST), Priam
>> ><Pr...@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >>On 11 May 2006, "bobandcarole" <bobandc...@webtv.net> wrote:
>> >>>website:
>> >>>http://www.asstr.org/~Frank_McCoy/files.htm
>> >>
>> >>Is this Frank pretending to be bobandcarole? Sheesh, you couldn't
>> >>do a better job of advertising if you paid for it.
>> >>
>> >>"Look everyone! Porn! Right Here on this Website! Hurry, now."
>> >>
>> >>It reminds me of the anti-pedophile websites of the past that used to
>> >>tell people what to avoid. And they listed every pedo porno site
>> >>they could find. It was the primary resource for pedos world-wide.
>> >>
>> >>It looks like bobandcarole have (has) taken over their job.
>> >>
>> >>Priam
>> >
>> >Are you a pedo?
>>
>> That's a new approach. Asking instead of assuming.
>
>If you post in favor of the peds you're just as bad as a ped.
Now *there* is an argument that's usually used against me by those who *do*
understand that I have no interest in having sex with children; but that I am
very interested in *allowing* children (teenagers, at least) to have sex with
whoever they want to.
They (those who disagree with that philosophy that teenagers should be allowed
to have sex) accuse me of being what they call, "an enabler"; because if what I
advocate was allowed, they *say* "It would enable the real pedophiles to seduce
children." Yeah, right: As if most teenagers would fall all over themselves to
have sex with any adult that showed interest.
Well ... OK ... SOME might ... the ones who have been neglected, scorned,
shunned, and abused by their peers. Proper loving interest from even an old
pedophile might seem like a nice break to somebody like that. THERE, however,
the problem isn't the sexual interest from the old pedophile in a teenager in
the prime of his/her sexuality that's the problem; but the scorn, neglect, and
abuse by peers. Sex won't hurt. Scorn, shunning, neglect, and (of course)
physical, mental, and verbal abuse DOES hurt; by definition.
Out side of the purely imaginary "statutory" abuse, as defined in the Law by
age, there really *isn't* such a thing as "sexual abuse" that isn't *better*
defined as one of the four types of abuse listed above that are truly abusive.
(Physical, mental, verbal abuse; and neglect as abuse.)
If it's not one of those four (IOW: if it didn't and doesn't hurt) then it ain't
really abuse, except in the imagination of the *outsider* wanting to impose
his/her prejudices on the situation; and the only true "victims" are those who
are criminalized for having fun that others consider a sin.
This applies, whether the "crime" is prostitution, blowing your brains out with
drugs, advocating teaching Evolution in schools, base-jumping, drinking, working
on Sunday, reading "subversive material", marrying somebody of a different
"race", criticizing the president, or having sex before you're 21 years old; and
are (supposedly) experienced enough to handle the terrors of intercourse.
But, nobody wants to admit THAT.
>>
>> I don't molest children; in fact, I detest the little brats. I have no desire
>> to have any contact, sexual or otherwise with anyone underaged.
>> So, by your definition, I'm a pedophile.
>
>run along, I hear your mother calling
>>
>> Priam
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
Frank McCoy
>On Fri, 12 May 2006 16:26:26 +0200 (CEST), Priam
><Pr...@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
>>So this is an admission that you can't do shit.
>>
>>"ahm" is either impotent or a figment of your imagination, and
>>Frank will just keep on keeping on.
>
>You keep on thinking that.
And I'll keep right on doing what I do.
>>
>>Making idle threats and claiming powers you don't possess is
>>making you look really lame.
>
>You only see what you wish to see.
>>
>>Lame. Hmmm.
>>
>>Priam
>
>Now that's lame.
As the guy with no legs said to the poor fellow who sprained his ankle.
bobandcarole
You better stick to harrassing women franky..its all you're good at
nobody
HAHAHAHAHAHA...you're such a fucking moron.
Remember me shitbag? I'm still waiting for my groups to disappear, what's
the matter? Too busy cruising usenet for kiddy porn?
bobandcarole
Yes you are
>
> Remember me shitbag?
Nah, you're unmemorable and impotent too....
I'm still waiting for my groups to disappear,
take a look shitbag...boylovers is owned by UTB now
As is afp aon etc..
what's
> the matter? Too busy cruising usenet for kiddy porn?
Thats YOUR crime pedophile
Baal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 May 2006 16:26:26 +0200, Priam wrote:
>>> You don't call the shots muffin.
>
> So this is an admission that you can't do shit.
Of course they can't do shit; never have, never will.
> "ahm" is either impotent or a figment of your imagination, and Frank will
> just keep on keeping on.
These anti-pedo 'hacking' outfits come and go; a few years ago there was
EHAP (Ethical Hackers Against Pedophilia), now some script kiddie claims
to have started another one, HACP (Hackers against Child Pornography.)
I tried to point out to the poor fool that, if he actually is destroying
'pedophile' data as he claims, that this is a criminal offence in and of
itself, in addition to being convicted of possessing child pornography.
Fools never learn.
> Making idle threats and claiming powers you don't possess is making you
> look really lame.
>
> Lame. Hmmm.
Lame is what they do best--it's all they know.
What Frank is doing is perfectly legal; if this were not so, Frank would
have been prosecuted years ago. These "anti-pedo" vigilantes are a
dime-a-dozen. While it's fun to play with them for a little while, after
a time they become tiresome, everyone killfiles them, and they go away.
> Priam
Baal <Ba...@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBRG5YjQjjY4weksDoAQLSXgf9H73AOGy3i9EI/Zg1BRNLicqVjyCU/joW
5fVvQnadRkPgsX7Wd1MbsHmS74pLxX8xjzDHDn2Y9q1xRwX1Xgb5wuzpa4/Z0IXe
Wd/w84AB7/ULpPuxC/0o7A5gwds021JmVBfJBnZR5oSxpBUDQ4er4Q9fCSOu3TD6
9onRlWWUha28adL4TP6SySggY+jMqEwHSGaPFKzCpVk6ikUBQ87LWoHhbnkaUduR
Tl2nHe7Ay1og9GXrsERhiR/kApS05OrfEoIUO/GU9mXx6FyG5QbTc5UoM4vPvU6n
tDuVGZkWOViq6qblZef82CRJCdLAtFA17e8gjC6NjUYEMC3PD9CgIA==
=yc20
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
nonsense
bobandcarole
Baal wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 12 May 2006 16:26:26 +0200, Priam wrote:
>
> >>> You don't call the shots muffin.
> >
> > So this is an admission that you can't do shit.
>
> Of course they can't do shit; never have, never will.
>
> > "ahm" is either impotent or a figment of your imagination, and Frank will
> > just keep on keeping on.
>
> These anti-pedo 'hacking' outfits come and go; a few years ago there was
> EHAP (Ethical Hackers Against Pedophilia), now some script kiddie claims
> to have started another one, HACP (Hackers against Child Pornography.)
>
> I tried to point out to the poor fool that, if he actually is destroying
> 'pedophile' data as he claims, that this is a criminal offence in and of
> itself, in addition to being convicted of possessing child pornography.
> Fools never learn.
>
> > Making idle threats and claiming powers you don't possess is making you
> > look really lame.
> >
> > Lame. Hmmm.
>
> Lame is what they do best--it's all they know.
>
> What Frank is doing is perfectly legal; if this were not so, Frank would
> have been prosecuted years ago. These "anti-pedo" vigilantes are a
> dime-a-dozen. While it's fun to play with them for a little while, after
> a time they become tiresome, everyone killfiles them, and they go away.
>
I'm still here shitbag