The California Chamber of Commerce warns that longer waits for visas
could discourage tourists from visiting California. A San Francisco
attorney reports that many of her immigrant clients are canceling trips
overseas to avoid being trapped outside the U.S. A Sacramento
immigration attorney predicts that the requirements will keep immigrants
and their love ones apart.
This would explain why the U.S. is reluctant to declassify that
section of the report: It doesn't know which Saudi officials can be
trusted with that section!
Red: Communists are a foot.
Orange: Beware of highwaymen.
Yellow: Beware of cowards.
Green: Eco-terrorists in the vicinity.
Blue: Danger of depression.
Purple: Danger of royalists.
Brown: Caution: Polluters!
Tim Bruening wrote:
I would therefore suggest giving those classified pages only to Saudi
officials we are certain can be trusted.
Meanwhile, Hamas has violated its truce by conducting a suicide bombing.
I. It makes Davis and UCD terrorist targets (In May, a letter containing
powder was mailed from overseas to the City Manager's office).
II. Deadly pathogens (such as anthrax, smallpox, Ebola, hantavirus,
ricin toxin, rabies, and drug resistant TB) studied at the lab could
infect the public. This isn't as far fetches as it might seem. The
anthrax spores that were mailed to U.S. Senator Tom Daschle, NBC News
anchor Tom Brokaw, and several others have been genetically matched to
anthrax spores at the Biosafety Level Four lab at Fort Detrick, MD and
several other labs. This strongly indicates that even Level 4 Biosafety
labs can have security breaches. Also, some of the biological agents
are transported to and from BSL4 labs by "common carriers" such as
Federal Express (when the germs absolutely, positively, have to get
there overnight!). On March 19 of this year, a FedEx package containing
tissue infected with live West Nile virus en route to a Texas lab,
popped (due to CO2 pressure from dry ice) in a Columbus, Ohio shipping
center. Cleanup crews were not informed that the sample contained live
West Nile virus.
III. Under the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002, research and accidental releases at the lab will
be kept secret from the public. Thus the public won't be able to know
how much danger it is in.
IV. Moreover, without public oversight, nothing would prevent the lab
from creating biological weapons in violation of the Biological Weapons
Convention.
V. The Homeland Security Department will set research priorities, and
the Defense Department will conduct research and have access to the
lab. This increases the probability that bioweapons will be created.
VI. UCD and Davis will be subjected to a new, alien culture of security
that eschews openness, freedom of movement, creative research, and
socially productive community life.
For more info, see the Stop UCD BioLab Now! website (www.simpalife.com).
Tim Bruening wrote:
I hope they don't think of arming the drones!
Tim Bruening wrote:
A suicide bomber killed 6 at a bus stop in Israel today, while soldiers were
waiting for a bus. He's the smartest suicide bomber I've heard about for a
while (IMHO, its a good idea to target the enemy's military so that it can't
fight back).
Tim Bruening wrote:
> The death toll in the Najaf car bombing is up to 85. Iraqi authorities
> have arrested 19.
The last I heard, it was up to 125.
Where were you that terrible day?
Back in my old apartment in San Francisco. Tonight I'm in a hotel in
New Jersey, you can see the lights that are where the towers used to
be from the front parking lot.
--
Be a counter terrorist perpetrate random senseless acts of kindness
Rave: Immanentization of the Eschaton in a Temporary Autonomous Zone.
We are nothing but sunlight detours, in the road between fusion and eternity.
Tim Bruening wrote:
Yesterday, I saw American flags on the sidewalks in downtown Davis, and
heard "Proud To Be An American" at my dentist's office. My teeth are
great!
I helped to assemble the comics pre-pack for the Sunday Enterprise.
Assemble: To build a male cow.
That last provision doesn't sound like it would be very effective, given
the willingness of Al-Qaida terrorists to commit suicide in spectacular
manners!
32 scientists and editors connected to some of America's most
prestigious scientific journals have agreed to self censor any
scientific advances that might threaten national security.
Tim Bruening wrote:
Israel has vowed to oust Yassar Arafat. IMHO, we should cut off aid to Israel
unless it freezes its settlements and unfreezes Arafat.
In October 2001, the UCD air quality study group, led by James Cahill,
found very high levels of fine metals, sulfuric acid, organic
carcinogens, and very fine insoluble particles such as glass. At the
same time, the EPA was assuring people that the air was safe.
In August, the EPA's inspector general issued a report concluding that
the White House pressured the EPA to issue misleading reassurances that
the air was safe. The White House convinced the EPA to add reassuring
statements and delete cautionary ones by having the National Security
Council control the EPA's communications. In other words, the Bush
Administration hijacked the EPA! For that, Bush should be impeached.
IMHO, forcing the EPA to lie about polluted air that thousands of
patriots are breathing is a "High Crime And Misdemeanor"!
Evidence of such a connection has never been made public, and details
that Cheney has cited to argue for such a connection have been dismissed
by the CIA as not having any basis in truth.
An unnamed senior defense official with access to high-level
intelligence expressed confusion, saying that "There isn't any new
intelligence that would precipitate something like this". Former CIA
counter terrorism specialist was appalled and astounded.
However, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases said
yesterday that designation as a Regional Center of Excellence is not a
precondition for getting a biolab, so UCD is still in the running.
Tim Bruening wrote:
> This just in on CNN: There's a student with a gun inside a school in
> Washington.
This incident has been resolved. The student is in custody.
Where were you that terrible day?
in NH talking on ICQ to my friend in NYC. i was relaying news,
because they weren't getting much. he lives on upper west
side, so wasn't directly affected. i was also passing info
from him on to some friends in Boston who couldn't reach
family members.
lee
--
It is paradoxical that many educators and parents still
differentiate
between a time for learning and a time for play without seeing
the vital
connection between them. -Leo Buscaglia, author (1924-1998)
Oh yeah! It's 11/9... I didn't notice.
Well, that day I got up as normal, went to school as normal, then got
home and went on the computer as normal, then an American contact told
me that planes had crashed into the WTC. I thought he was kidding, so he
told me to go downstairs and turn on the news, which I did, and was
quite suprised.
To be honest, though, I think a far too big a deal was made of it. Not
to disrespect the dead, but have you seen some of the things the IRA did
in the UK, with American backing?
Rowe
doesn't see anyone invading the RoI anytime soon, y'dig...
enigma wrote:
> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in
> news:4142FC7D...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us:
>
> > Three years ago today, I was sleeping in my stepdad's
> > vacation apartment in Florida when he woke me up to tell me
> > about the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and
> > Pentagon. I got the impression that the White House was in
> > danger too.
> >
> > Where were you that terrible day?
>
> in NH talking on ICQ to my friend in NYC. i was relaying news,
> because they weren't getting much. he lives on upper west
> side, so wasn't directly affected. i was also passing info
> from him on to some friends in Boston who couldn't reach
> family members.
What is ICQ?
> enigma wrote:
>
>> Tim Bruening wrote:
>>
>>> Where were you that terrible day?
>>
>> in NH talking on ICQ to my friend in NYC.
>
> What is ICQ?
It's an instant messenger. Vaguely similar to MSN Messenger, but has
been around longer and has a lot more plugins and things. It's now
owned by AOL, though... I'm not sure what's going to happen to it.
Rowe
AOL.....netscape.....microsoft.....what do you think?
=)
Sojo
> Rowe Rickenbacker wrote:
>
>> Tim Bruening wrote:
>>
>>> What is ICQ?
>>
>> It's an instant messenger. <snip> It's now owned by AOL, though...
>> I'm not sure what's going to happen to it.
>
> AOL.....netscape.....microsoft.....what do you think?
AOL, yes. Netscape, yes. Microsoft, no.
I think they're all much of a muchness in the end.
I actually prefer Microsoft to the AOL conglomerate...
It's a shame Apple are best buddies with them, really.
Rowe
>>>
>>>
>>> What is ICQ?
>>
It's whatever you want it to be my child. See, ICQ exists in your
heart and will be there whenever you think good happy thoughts.
I hope this message makes you feel warm and happy inside.
Hylander.
btw, vomitting while laughing isn't fun.
>>>> What is ICQ?
>
> It's whatever you want it to be my child. See, ICQ exists in your
> heart and will be there whenever you think good happy thoughts. I
> hope this message makes you feel warm and happy inside.
Oh, it does, oh mighty Gongawonga.
> btw, vomitting while laughing isn't fun.
Speaking from experience, I imagine?
Rowe
>Hylander wrote:
>
>>>>> What is ICQ?
>>
>> It's whatever you want it to be my child. See, ICQ exists in your
>> heart and will be there whenever you think good happy thoughts. I
>> hope this message makes you feel warm and happy inside.
>
>Oh, it does, oh mighty Gongawonga.
thank you. the little guy sends his regards.
>> btw, vomitting while laughing isn't fun.
>
>Speaking from experience, I imagine?
Actually, more like a "near vomit experience".
Hylander
it's been owned by AOL for *years*. i stopped using the
actual client because the built in advertising drove me buggy
(anyone else hate flashing, blinking, moving ads?).
fortunately Trillian doesn't have *any* ads & all my instant
messenger programs are neatly in one spot & i can see who is
on which service (my Tom is currently online in 7 different
IDs, 3 of which are ICQ <g>)
i actually have 4 ICQ IDs, all of which only have 6 digits...
people keep trying to get me to give them up.
lee
>
> AOL, yes. Netscape, yes. Microsoft, no.
>
> I think they're all much of a muchness in the end.
> I actually prefer Microsoft to the AOL conglomerate...
> It's a shame Apple are best buddies with them, really.
>
> Rowe
AOL tried to shaft me once with over $250 dollars in charges back when
they grew so fast. After numerous calls, waiting sometimes two hours to
be talked to, I put in a dispute with my credit card company and won.
They didn't have a leg to stand on.
The small guy can still win.
Sojo
> Rowe Rickenbacker wrote:
>
>> Tim Bruening wrote:
>>
>>> enigma wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tim Bruening wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Where were you that terrible day?
>>>>
>>>> in NH talking on ICQ to my friend in NYC.
>>>
>>> What is ICQ?
>>
>> It's an instant messenger. Vaguely similar to MSN Messenger, but
>> has been around longer and has a lot more plugins and things. It's
>> now owned by AOL, though... I'm not sure what's going to happen to
>> it.
>
> it's been owned by AOL for *years*.
I know. And I know because I was using ICQ when the changeover happened.
It was about that time that I discovered MSN, and found it easier and
more user-friendly, so stayed with it. I ran them both together for a
while, but I hardly know anyone on ICQ (anymore) who isn't on MSN -
especially since most of them moved to the Microsoft network.
Personally, I prefer Yahoo Messenger, but hardly anyone I know seems to
use that one, unfortunately.
> fortunately Trillian doesn't have *any* ads & all my instant
> messenger programs are neatly in one spot & i can see who is on which
> service (my Tom is currently online in 7 different IDs, 3 of which
> are ICQ <g>)
I used Trillian for a while. Then used Miranda. Miranda is better, IMO.
Yahoo doesn't support third party clients, though, so I just stuck with
the originals. I have MSN, Yahoo, and Skype - MSN nearly always on
"Appear Offline" until an alert appears in the corner saying someone I
want to talk to comes on.
> i actually have 4 ICQ IDs, all of which only have 6 digits... people
> keep trying to get me to give them up.
Wow. I had a 6 digit one, but I forgot the password to it and had lost
the email address ages ago, so I got a new one, but it was longer. The
problem with ICQ numbers is that I can never remember them... if I could
*choose* the number, or it was shorter, then I'd remember it easily -
any numbers over 5 digits I tend to have problems with.
Rowe
> Rowe Rickenbacker wrote:
>
>> AOL, yes. Netscape, yes. Microsoft, no.
>>
>> I think they're all much of a muchness in the end. I actually
>> prefer Microsoft to the AOL conglomerate... It's a shame Apple are
>> best buddies with them, really.
>
> AOL tried to shaft me once with over $250 dollars in charges back
> when they grew so fast.
What were they trying to charge you for?
> After numerous calls, waiting sometimes two hours to be talked to, I
> put in a dispute with my credit card company and won. They didn't
> have a leg to stand on.
>
> The small guy can still win.
Damn right. Good on you. I'm smiling, anyway.
Rowe
>
> What were they trying to charge you for?
>
> Rowe
When they were giving out the floppies and a 30 day trial, the contract
said that it was 30 days or so many hours (I can't remember how many).
Anyway, we used way past the hours but within the 30 days. The contract
did not state that the trial period ended on "whichever comes first" so
naturally I took the longer of which ended up being the 30 days.
They later changed the contract and hid the original one I agreed to.
They made it sound almost the same but it was worded differently...just
enough to change the conditions. Thanks to browser caching they weren't
able to pull that one over on me.
They didn't have a leg to stand on.
One can only guess why I am anti-AOL to this day.
There's few things I hate worse than a slick talking saleman, fine print
or other types of deception which is merely disclaimered to the point of
legal exclusion. Fortunately, their contract was too vague to be binding
to their intentions.
Sojo
> enigma wrote:
Personally, I prefer Yahoo Messenger, but hardly
> anyone I know seems to use that one, unfortunately.
i do :) redenigma
>
>> fortunately Trillian doesn't have *any* ads & all my
>> instant messenger programs are neatly in one spot & i can
>> see who is on which service (my Tom is currently online in
>> 7 different IDs, 3 of which are ICQ <g>)
>
> I used Trillian for a while. Then used Miranda. Miranda is
> better, IMO. Yahoo doesn't support third party clients,
> though, so I just stuck with the originals. I have MSN,
> Yahoo, and Skype - MSN nearly always on "Appear Offline"
> until an alert appears in the corner saying someone I want
> to talk to comes on.
Miranda looks pretty good. i'll probably try it out.
but it's Windoze, i thought you had a Mac?
Yahoo runs ok on Trillian, except when they break it &
Trillian has to make a new patch. it bugs me that they try to
force you to use thier client by breaking it on purpose.
my MSN is usually off. i should put it on appear offline.
it'd be easier to catch my brother online that way... he's
hard to talk to on the phone, his voice is very soft... plus
i'm afraid to call because if his wife answers i'll never get
off the phone. she talks forever!
what's Skype? something else to google....
>
>> i actually have 4 ICQ IDs, all of which only have 6
>> digits... people keep trying to get me to give them up.
>
> Wow. I had a 6 digit one, but I forgot the password to it
> and had lost the email address ages ago, so I got a new
> one, but it was longer. The problem with ICQ numbers is
> that I can never remember them... if I could *choose* the
> number, or it was shorter, then I'd remember it easily -
> any numbers over 5 digits I tend to have problems with.
yeah, i have to ask other people what my ICQs are everytime i
lose them (setting up a new client or computer or after a
crash...), but they all have the same password anyway which is
one of a set of 4 i use for things, so i manage to get it
right eventually :)
lee
> Rowe Rickenbacker wrote:
>
>> Personally, I prefer Yahoo Messenger, but hardly anyone I know
>> seems to use that one, unfortunately.
>
> i do :)
You already know I added you :)
>> I used Trillian for a while. Then used Miranda. Miranda is better,
>> IMO. Yahoo doesn't support third party clients, though, so I just
>> stuck with the originals.
>
> Miranda looks pretty good. i'll probably try it out. but it's
> Windoze, i thought you had a Mac?
Not currently on the net. I use the "Family PC" for communication. It
makes downloads more complicated, but Windows XP seems completely
hopeless as far as communication is concerned. At one point I could
share files, when I expressly typed in the name of my laptop as a
network address, but I can't get it to work anymore, and I think there's
no chance that internet-sharing will ever work.
I can disconnect the modem from the PC, then reconnect it to the Mac,
but the effort doesn't seem worth it when I can just access everything
on here (and risk virus attack, etc etc) and keep my Mac clean with just
what I want on it :)
> Yahoo runs ok on Trillian, except when they break it & Trillian has
> to make a new patch. it bugs me that they try to force you to use
> thier client by breaking it on purpose.
Well, I often think of the amount of spam that I used to get on ICQ when
I used it, and yet there's none of that on Yahoo. It's also unfair to
them if you don't let them have their adverts on - sure, they're a big
company, but they still have to make their money *somewhere*.
> my MSN is usually off. i should put it on appear offline.
That's generally what I do. Unfortunately I have a combination of people
who upset me (unintentionally) and people who I would like to talk to.
Sometimes a person is both, but there it gets complicated. Either way...
I tried to get only the people I am happy talking to on my Yahoo
account, but it didn't work out that way. Oh well. I'm not sure how I
want things now... it's not something I can currently get my head round!
> what's Skype? something else to google....
www.skype.com, or something like that. Sojo posted the address - it's
a messenger, but specialises in VoIP. The company makes it's money from
selling credit to call offline numbers through your VoIP client. Quite
a nice idea, especially since the rates seem competitive.
> i have to ask other people what my ICQs are everytime i lose them
> (setting up a new client or computer or after a crash...), but they
> all have the same password anyway which is one of a set of 4 i use
> for things, so i manage to get it right eventually :)
Hm. I might end up with another ICQ number. We'll see.
Rowe
Do you claim that the U.S. government provided aid to the IRA? If so,
please post proof.
> Rowe Rickenbacker wrote:
>
>> To be honest, though, I think a far too big a deal was made of it.
>> Not to disrespect the dead, but have you seen some of the things
>> the IRA did in the UK, with American backing?
>
> Do you claim that the U.S. government provided aid to the IRA? If
> so, please post proof.
Oh, please.
Are you asking because you couldn't find any,
or because you couldn't be bothered to look?
Rowe
--
I am a hat of justice perched upon the heads of the wicked.
Feel my soft felt lining and quiver, villain!
Did any Presidents sign any orders authorizing aid to the IRA? Did
any CIA agents provide arms and training to IRA personnel?
They turned a blind eye to the IRA fundraising activities for decades;
Sure, it was technically illegal, but that doen't mean much if the law
wasn't enforced, which it wasn't until after 9/11.
--
Autistic Spectrum Code v.1.0
AS! d-(pu)@ s-:+ a42 c+++(++) p+ t-(+++)@ f-(---) S+(++) p@ e++ h+ r++ n--(+) i++(+) P m++() M(++)
ASC Decoder at <http://www32.brinkster.com/ascdecode/>
> Did any Presidents sign any orders authorizing aid to the IRA?
Certainly didn't try to stop it. Passive is almost as bad as active,
in such a situation. Hasn't Bush spoken enough about not standing by
watching the poor innocent people being slain by the evil arabs?
Or is it okay for people to do it in the name of Christianity?
> Did any CIA agents provide arms and training to IRA personnel?
Couldn't tell you.
> Tim Bruening wrote:
>
>> Did any Presidents sign any orders authorizing aid to the IRA?
>
> Certainly didn't try to stop it. Passive is almost as bad as active,
> in such a situation. Hasn't Bush spoken enough about not standing by
> watching the poor innocent people being slain by the evil arabs?
My understanding is that most of this happened before the current
presidential term.
--
Joel
It wasn't dealt with until after the Al Quaida attrocities, so it
extended through two Bush administrations.
Yes - although it was still going on during Clinton's term, I think.
My point was that while the president may be different, the job
description would not have changed so much in that time! Attempting
to stopping people from being killed, either through food/medical
aid or through force is something the USA has been fond of doing for
years, yet it seems the IRA slipped through the net.
>> Do you claim that the U.S. government provided aid to the IRA? If
>> so, please post proof.
>
>Oh, please.
>
>Are you asking because you couldn't find any,
>or because you couldn't be bothered to look?
Actually that's an allegation I hadn't heard before, except from folk
who didn't realise IRA on a tax form was an Individual Retirement Account
(pension scheme).
Some American people did, sure. I don't have figures but it was commonly
said that collections - significant sums - were made during "the struggle"
for "the cause". But did their government ?
Nick
--
"And we will be restoring neurotypicality just as soon as we are sure
what is normal anyway. Thank you". -- not quite DNA
> In article <2r44qtF...@uni-berlin.de>,
> Rowe Rickenbacker <use...@templeofdreams.net> wrote:
>
>>> Do you claim that the U.S. government provided aid to the IRA? If
>>> so, please post proof.
>>
>>Oh, please.
>>
>>Are you asking because you couldn't find any,
>>or because you couldn't be bothered to look?
>
> Actually that's an allegation I hadn't heard before, except from folk
> who didn't realise IRA on a tax form was an Individual Retirement
> Account (pension scheme).
>
> Some American people did, sure. I don't have figures but it was
> commonly said that collections - significant sums - were made during
> "the struggle" for "the cause". But did their government ?
>
> Nick
DeVelera tried to get support from the US government several times and
failed, to the best of my knowledge no one else had any better luck.
Getting money from those who'd left Ireland and their decendents was far
more lucrative for the IRA -- many of those who left Ireland in the 19th
and early 20th centuries were republicans, some even members of the IRB
and IRA.
--
Error: your current version of reality not supported by sanity
2.5. Sanity is shutting down.
Rowe Rickenbacker wrote:
> Tim Bruening wrote:
>
> > Did any Presidents sign any orders authorizing aid to the IRA?
>
> Certainly didn't try to stop it. Passive is almost as bad as active,
> in such a situation. Hasn't Bush spoken enough about not standing by
> watching the poor innocent people being slain by the evil arabs?
>
> Or is it okay for people to do it in the name of Christianity?
>
> > Did any CIA agents provide arms and training to IRA personnel?
>
> Couldn't tell you.
I was imagining the CIA providing arms and money to the IRA in the same
way it provided arms and money to the Nicaraguan Contras and the Afghan
rebels during the 1980s.
This I read in an editorial by M. Gregg Bloche and Jonathan H. Marks,
published in the Sacramento Bee on Feb. 7, and in the New York Times
earlier.