Re: The Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex: A Deadly Fairy Tale

[Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A.]

On Oct 22, 9:21 pm, Global Research E-Newsletter <crgedi...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> The Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex: A Deadly Fairy Tale
>
> By Dr. Doug Henderson and Dr. Gary Null
>
> URL of this article:www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15758
>
> Global Research, October 21, 2009 Progressive Radio Network -
> 2009-10-20
>
> It has been a particularly bad month for the pharmaceutical industrial
> complex in its ongoing litigations in American courts. Among the
> main pharmaceutical headlines, Merck's Gardasil vaccine for HPV,
> now being widely administered to pre-teens, was found to be linked
> to amyltrophic lateral sclerosis, commonly known as Lou Gehrig's
> disease; following a $1.4 billion fine in promoting one of its
> blockbuster drugs Zyprexa off-label, deceptive correspondence was
> uncovered by Eli Lilly gaming the system again by promoting another
> one of its drugs, Cymbalta, off-label for fibromyalgia; AstraZeneca
> was fined $160 million for scamming the Medicaid system in Kentucky
> after being fined $215 million for ripping off Alabama; Glaxo lost
> a Pennsylvania trial for failing to warn doctors and pregnant women
> of the dangers of its antidepressant drug Paxil related to birth
> defects; and Pfizer scored a record-breaking fine of $2.3 billion
> for illegally marketing several drugs over the years: Bextra, Zyvox,
> Geodon and Lyrica. These kinds of charges, among the many others,
> have become a habit for drug makers for the past dozen years.
>
> When we speak of the pharmaceutical industry complex, it does not
> refer solely to private drug manufacturers. The complex, like a
> Matrix that holds captive the health of the nation in medical slavery
> by its own design and manipulation, is a consortium, a spiders' web
> woven with financial attachments throughout the medical profession.
> In addition to the pharmaceutical and medical device firms, this
> complex includes every government health agencythe Food and Drug
> Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the
> National Institutes of Health (NIH), and or course the Department
> of Health and Human Services (HHS)as well as drug lobbying firms
> now employing a large number of former Congresspersons, insurance
> and HMO companies, all of the leading professional medical associations
> such as the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American
> Psychiatric Association (APA), the majority of medical schools and
> their research departments who are heavily funded by drug money,
> many of the most prestigious medical journals, and ultimately all
> of this filtering downward to the physicians who diagnose our
> illnesses and prescribe our medications and treatments.
>
> America is rightly regarded as having led much of the world in many
> qualitative innovations in all fields. That reputation is duly
> deserved.
>
> However, there is a new dynamic at work that is causing this
> reputation to be challenged. We are a nation that prides itself in
> our humanity, our sense of fairness, but today there is a growing
> concern that we are now being monikered as a country held hostage
> to a national security complex, which includes the largest military
> complex in the world, an obscenely expensive healthcare system and
> self-serving bureaucracies and private industries that serve their
> own financial ends. So it is not surprising that after spending
> this year $2.6 trillion on healthcare, we have such little health
> to show for it. There are second world countries where people live
> longer and healthier lives. And we have the worst healthcare among
> developed nations. So what have we received for our $2.6 trillion.
>
> As the current healthcare debate continues to rage over in sundriesthe
> $200 billion net profit health insurance industrythe entire
> deliberation over disease prevention and treatment has been
> overshadowed. And amidst this partisan and ideological anarchy,
> perpetuated by our elected officials, the media, and fueled by the
> pharmaceutical complex, two other areas America excels as a leader
> above all other developed nations is in being the premier breeding
> ground for the pharmaceutical industrial complex's greatest profits
> and, second, as the world's exemplar in medical fraud and corruption.
> The fairy tale of America's health as being best served by drugs
> is a creation of this complex, a lullaby that brings ill citizens
> repeatedly to their doctors and hospitals for diagnosis and treatment,
> or simply to deny healthcare altogether to the uninsured.
>
> The country is pacified by a blind belief that the drugs being
> prescribed to them have been proven safe because our government
> health agencies have our physical health and well-being in their
> best intentions.  This is a lie, an extraordinarily deadly lie.
> Iatrogenesis, medically induced injury and death, is the number one
> cause of death in American medicine annually, since only a small
> percentage of these deaths are actually reported. Each year more
> Americans die from preventable deaths due to our medical system
> than all military causalities in the two world wars combined. This
> is tantamount to medical genocide. One of the major causes of these
> deaths is the overmedication of Americans in all ages. The constant
> need for profits has created an environment that allows the
> pharmaceutical industrial complex to use their enormous financial
> and political clout to literally make normal life experiences into
> new diseases, such as social anxiety disorder, in order to sell its
> drugs. The pharmaceutical industry has been given the authority to
> pathologize life, with the drugging of our children, seniors, etc.
> For example, the leading cause of AIDS deaths today is a result of
> liver failure.
>
> This is not a condition of HIV infection, but a direct result of
> the anti-HIV drug AZT. Is it little wonder then that we are being
> intimidated and frightened into believing that mandatory vaccination
> is being touted even though the science of efficacy and safety,
> even the need, for these new swine flu vaccines is patently unproven.
> It is perhaps one of the largest falsehoods ever perpetuated on
> humanity that dwarfs the sleaze on Wall Street.
>
> If any one of us committed manslaughter, we would be behind bars
> instead of walking a crimson carpet into the offices of our elected
> officials in the Congress and Senate or past the gates guarded by
> the nation's Cerberus, Rahm Emmanuel, to lobby the White House. Yet
> if we are a pharmaceutical executive, or a lobbyist representing a
> drug company who has collected a litany of charges including medical
> fraud, criminal salesmanship, gaming the insurance industries,
> repeated lying to federal officials, and manipulation of data
> regarding life-threatening adverse effects of drugs that have killed
> so many people, we can walk away with a fine, a surge in the stock
> market after a settlement, a financial bonus, and the personal
> satisfaction in not having to apologize so we can continue business
> as usual. This is the power the pharmaceutical industrial complex
> possesses and its usurped right to distain every noble principle
> in the Hippocratic Oath that every physician dedicates her or himself
> to live by, That  I will exercise my art solely for the cure of my
> patients, and will give no drug and perform no operation for a
> criminal purpose.
>
> Every American who is prescribed a drug by a physician has the
> belief that that pill has undergone rigorous trials to scrutinize
> its safety. And when there are known potential adverse effects, we
> blindly assume these are known to the attending physician. However,
> this is a myth perpetuated not only by drug makers, but by our own
> federal health agencies.  A 2003 investigation published in The
> Independent in the UK reported that under pressure from the
> pharmaceutical industry, the FDA routinely conceals information it
> considers commercially sensitive, leaving medical specialists unable
> to assess the true risks [of approved drugs]. One case involved a
> very popular over-the-counter drug, the painkiller ibuprofen. The
> investigators' search uncovered concealed data showing that ibuprofen
> increased heart attack risks by 25 percent. Even Freedom of Information
> (FOI) filings to the FDA do not produce all the information being
> requested. For example, a group of Swiss investigators filed an FOI
> to procure trial data about the musculoskeletal pain drug Celecoxib
> and received back only 16 of the 27 trials conducted on it. A
> separate FOI concerning a similar drug, Valdecoxib, had pages and
> paragraphs deleted because sections of the document were marked as
> trade secrets. An even worse case involving a leaked report concerning
> internal memos and secret FDA reports provided detailed evidence
> that the FDA approved 9 different antidepressants, representing a
> total of 22 studies enrolling 4,250 children, while knowing full
> well that the risk of suicide-related events was twice as high as
> children taking a placebo.  These are just several examples among
> numerous others.
>
> The pharmaceutical industrial complex is perhaps the largest, most
> influential cartel in the world. This becomes evident after considering
> the billions of dollars and other currencies drug companies have
> been forced to pay for a wide variety of corruption charges. Our
> analysis of 724 legal settlements from a random sampling among the
> over one hundred thousand by pharmaceutical corporations totally
> $87 billion is just a small indication about how pervasive Big
> Pharma's criminality since the vast majority of settlements are
> concluded outside of court and remain confidential.
>
> It is extremely difficult to comprehend why the United States
> principle federal health agencies, particularly the FDA and National
> Institutes of Health (NIH), with the specific mandate to provide
> oversight on all pre-approved drug applications and delegated with
> the task to assure drugs are safe or at least specify clearly their
> known dangers, are so reprehensible and inept. There is only one
> rational answer and that is the pharmaceutical industry is the FDA's
> largest client, and this relationship goes much deeper than the FDA
> functioning as an objective regulator investigating pharmaceutical
> products before being released upon the American population. It is
> not to far afield to suggest that as it stands now the US regulatory
> agencies are an extension of corporate America.
>
> As serial offenders of product safety cover-ups for over a decade,
> drugs have injured and killed millions. In the case Merck's Vioxx,
> this one drug has killed 44,000 people and injured 120,000 others.
> Only in America could you kill 44,000 and not go to jail and get a
> raise. Should we assume, therefore, that the pharmaceutical complex
> should be trusted without challenge? We have also been asked to
> believe that the manufacturers were guided by a sense of public
> service. But when examining the top ten drugs sold, the facts reveal
> otherwise. In one example, manufacturers marked up a drug an
> astounding 500,000% over its equivalent generic version.  Six other
> drugs were marked up 2000%. Pharmaceutical companies make profits
> higher than oil companies.
>
> Big Pharma's impact is felt almost everywhere. But nowhere is it
> felt more than in the legal system. In a recently concluded,
> short-term study, we found 724 cases involving Big Pharma in which
> either the case ended in a verdict against the pharmaceutical company
> or the company settled. The number of cases is staggering, as are
> the dollar amounts. These cases cover practically every type of
> civil and criminal case. From products that kill, harm and maim,
> to false claims, to not paying taxes, to patent infringements, to
> bribery, to publishing false scientific journals. Yet, in spite of
> the tens of thousands of lawsuits won against Big Pharma, it still
> conducts business as usual.
>
> Eli Lilly flooded state Medicaid programs with Zyprexa: its superstar,
> antipsychotic drug. In 2003, worldwide sales of Zyprexa grossed
> $4.28 billion, amounting to almost one third of Lilly's total sales.
> In the United States, during the same year, Zyprexa grossed $2.63
> billion. A whopping 70 percent of these sales were directly related
> to government agenciesprincipally Medicaid.
>
> Fast-forward six years to 2009, Eli Lilly pleaded guilty for having
> illegally marketed Zyprexa for an unapproved use to treat dementia,
> and will pay $1.42 billion to settle civil suits and end the criminal
> investigation. Lilly agreed to pay $800 million to settle civil
> suits. It will pay $615 million to resolve the criminal probe, and
> plead guilty to a misdemeanor in violation of the Food, Drug and
> Cosmetic Act for promoting Zyprexa as a dementia treatment.
>
> Did Lilly also know of the possibility that Zyprexa could cause
> diabetes, which was also kept concealed under the protection of the
> FDA? They most certainly did, which makes their behavior all the
> more reprehensible. In 2002, British and Japanese regulatory agencies
> issued a warning that Zyprexa may cause diabetes. In addition, even
> after the FDA issued a similar warning in 2003, Lilly did not pull
> Zyprexa from the market. This becomes all the more understandable
> after it is taken into consideration that Lilly is also the largest
> maker of diabetes medications.
>
> An article by Mike Adams, the Natural News editor, states that Merck
> employees had a hit list of doctors they sought to neutralize. This
> allegation was confirmed when documents that had been secret were
> revealed during a Vioxx court case. The Australian revealed that
> the documents surfaced in the Federal Court in Melbourne and exposed
> the criminal intent of Merck employees who admitted they were going
> to stop funding to institutions and interfere with academic
> appointments.   One Merck employee testified (about the doctors on
> the hit list), We may need to seek them out and destroy them where
> they live. Merck threatened or intimidated at least eight clinical
> investigators, testimony in court revealed. There are other, similar
> stories in which Merck deals with dissent by attempting to destroy
> the lives and careers of academics who don't  review their drugs
> favorably.
>
> Merck is steeped in a well-documented record of criminality. Such
> actions include, but are not limited to, intentionally hiding the
> liver-damaging effects of its cholesterol drug, intentionally
> withholding the release of clinical data that revealed the failures
> of another cholesterol drug; it has dumped vaccine waste and
> manufacturing chemicals into water supplies; it opened up offshore
> banking accounts to avoid paying billions of dollars in U.S. taxes,
> and it was caught in a huge scheme of scientific fraud when it was
> discovered that the company used in-house writers to secretly write
> so-called independent studies that were published in peer-reviewed
> medical journals.
>
> Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which the U.S. Department
> of Justice and the SEC enforce, it is illegal to bribe a foreign
> government official in order to obtain or retain business. Apparently,
> Bristol-Myers and Schering Plough were unaware of this law. According
> to the Associated Press, both drug makers were engaged in influencing
> government officials in Germany and Poland respectively.
>
> Earlier this year, an article in the Boston Business Journal reported
> that a former drug company sales executive pleaded guilty in Boston
> federal court to telling the roughly 100 representatives she
> supervised that they should promote a pain drug for uses she knew
> had been rejected by the FDA. Bextra was the drug she pleaded guilty
> to inappropriately selling. Pfizer has since pulled it from the
> market. According to a press release from U.S. Attorney Michael
> Sullivan's office, Holloway was aware of the FDA's safety concerns,
> but...she nonetheless had her sales staff of approximately 100
> employees sells Bextra for precisely the uses that the FDA refused
> to approve.
>
> The pharmaceutical complex has also infiltrated the majority of
> American medical schools and medical research departments. A recent
> survey in the Journal of the American Medical Association discovered
> that 60% of academic department chairs have personal ties to industry
> (as consultants, board members, or paid speakers), while 66% of the
> academic departments had institutional ties to industry. Researchers
> who receive funding from drug and medical-device manufacturers are
> up to 3.5 times as likely to state their study drug or medical
> device works than are researchers without such funding.
>
> In America, one can hardly turn on the television or pick up a
> newspaper without reading about the hot button issue of health care
> reform. Why such emotion?  Why are, seemingly, rational people so
> intransigent and unwilling to budge from their positions? Could
> lobbyists have anything to do with this?
>
> According to OpenSecrets.org, there are 3093 lobbyists in the health
> field and Big Pharma now spends approximately $1.2 million daily
> to persuade Congress to act according to their script. An investigation
> conducted by Medical Verdicts & Law Weekly found that 30 key lawmakers
> are involved in health legislation totaling $11 million in health
> investments.  Three of every four major health firms have at least
> one lobbyist who worked for a congressman. Startlingly, nine lobbyists
> employed by Big Pharma are former congressional staffers who are
> still well-connected to Capitol Hill. The conflicts of interest are
> everywhere. Judd Gregg (R-NH), the Obama nominee for Commerce
> Secretary, who withdrew because of opposition to the Administration's
> agenda, is a senior member of the Health Committee. He revealed
> that he has $254,000-$560,000 in health stocks."
>
> In 2000, Mylan Labs settled a case for $100 million. What the numbers
> don't tell you is the story behind the numbers. In 1998, Mylan
> raised the wholesale price of clorazepate, a generic tranquilizer,
> to $377.00 (for 500 tablets) from $11.36 in one year. This represents
> a 3000% increase on a generic drug.
>
> It was subsequently revealed that Mylan conspired with the main
> manufacturer of the active, indispensible ingredient to have an
> exclusive agreement. The agreement prevented any other manufacturers
> from producing the drug, for without the active ingredient, the
> drug could not be made. Mylan's deception was uncovered and it had
> to pay $100 million to settle an FTC antitrust case.
>
> But Mylan represents only an infinitesimal percentage of such
> examples. In all likelihood, the vast majority of similar cases
> remain undetected.  The FDA's under-regulation and erroneous oversight
> encourages this type of corruption.
>
> Another case included in our study states, TAP [Taketa-Abbott
> Pharmaceutical] Pharmaceutical Products Inc. -- $875,000,000 under
> the False Claims Act. TAP agreed to pay $875 million to resolve
> criminal charges and civil liabilities in connection with its
> fraudulent drug pricing and marketing conduct regarding the drug
> Lupron, according to a press release from the Department of Justice.
>
> Lupron is used by male cancer patients to suppress the production
> of testosterone. Another drug worked as well, so to make Lupron the
> drug of choice for this condition, TAP played dirty by giving
> kickbacks to physicians prescribing the drug, thus ensuring its
> ridiculously high price would be maintained. Even though criminal
> indictments were filed against TAP Pharmaceutical officials, Lupron's
> price remains overly inflated.
>
> Ever wonder why Big Pharma would engage in all manner of illegal
> activity? In light of the steady stream of articles detailing how
> the elderly are oftentimes forced to choose between purchasing their
> medication and buying food, a good place to begin is to examine
> what it costs to make a drug and what Big Pharma sells it for. Life
> Extension magazine conducted an original investigative report in
> which it compared the actual price of a popular drug and how much
> the generic version of its active ingredients costs. Examine these
> figures:
>
> WHAT DRUGS REALLY COST
>
> BRAND NAME CONSUMER PRICE (For 100 tabs/caps) COST OF GENERIC ACTIVE
> INGREDIENT (For 100 tabs/caps) PERCENT MARKUP
>
> Celebrex 100 mg $130.27 $0.60 21,712%
>
> Claritin 10 mg $215.17 $0.71 30,306%
>
> Keflex 250 mg $157.39 $1.88 8,372%
>
> Lipitor 20 mg $272.37 $5.80 4,696%
>
> Norvasc 10 mg $188.29 $0.14 134,493%
>
> Paxil 20 mg $220.27 $7.60 2,898%
>
> Prevacid 30 mg $344.77 $1.01 34,136%
>
> Prilosec 20 mg $360.97 $0.52 69,417%
>
> Prozac 20 mg $247.47 $0.11 224,973%
>
> Tenormin 50 mg $104.47 $0.13 80,362%
>
> Vasotec 10 mg $102.37 $0.20 51,185%
>
> Xanax 1mg $136.79 $0.024 569,958%
>
> Zestril 20 mg $89.89 $3.20 2,809%
>
> Zithromax 600mg $1,482.19 $18.78 7,892%
>
> Zocor 40mg $350.27 $8.63 4,059%
>
> Zoloft 50mg $206.87 $1.75 11,821%
>
> In order to understand how we can spend 2.6 trillion this year on
> healthcare, but not reduce the incidence of cancer, heart disease,
> diabetes, obesity, mental conditions, arthritis, etc., we must
> realize this is a game. With each piece of the puzzle, feeding into
> a single picture of a massively corrupt, unethical, and frequently
> illegal system controlled by relatively few corporations within the
> pharmaceutical complex and the health insurance industry, are the
> ring leaders. They in turn influence thousands of lobbyists, paid-off
> scientists and academicians, and policymakers, especially those who
> rule on important health oversight committees. Health officials and
> legislators in turn solicit expert witnesses, preselected by the
> cartels, to position their drug agendas in the most favorable manner.
> The pharmaceutical cartel also has direct connections with its
> supporting scientific advisory boards and key foundations. These
> foundations, supported by policy think tanks who supply the so-called
> independent experts, then lobby the upper echelon within the FDA,
> NIH, CDC, NIMH, HHS. Ideally they hire former health commissioners
> and legislators previously players in the game to assist those same
> federal agencies to see their drugs guided through the regulatory
> process. Public relations and advertizing firms are contracted to
> give the public impression that these drugs are effective and safe
> for the sole reason they have received official licensing. In
> addition, the cartel creates front organizations with consumer-friendly
> titles whose representatives appear at national conferences and
> seminars beholden to special drug interests. Finally, the drug
> corporations set money aside to be paid out in settlements. With
> the exception of class action suits, the majority of cases for
> injury and death are accompanied by confidentiality clauses to
> prevent public disclosure of data the companies wish to remain
> secret.
>
> This is how the medical system is rigged and it is why we can watch
> 60 Minutes or read the New York Times serving as pharmaceutical
> shills to encourage vaccination, yet refusing to air or print the
> dissenting voices who have the scientific evidence to show it is a
> massive fraud. Therefore, the public is misled every step of the
> way.  Victims of injury, such as the tens of thousands of children,
> now at 1 in 91 children, with autism spectrum disorder, are forced
> to fend for themselves. Parents know far better than the FDA and
> CDC, when their perfectly normal child after a vaccination or a
> series of vaccines shortly thereafter is lost, withdrawn into the
> dark corners of autism. And yet the pediatrician and psychologist
> will say the child must have had a genetic defect. The CDC, FDA and
> NIH, with an orchestrated voice, say it is not the vaccine. Everyone
> within the pharmaceutical industrial complex denies the truth.  Only
> now, during the healthcare debate, are we seeing clearly the rampant
> politics of the pharmaceutical and insurance industries.
>
> The veils are finally being removed. If it were not for the healthcare
> debacle, we might still not know how the game is rigged and why our
> politicians and health officials will not tolerate any real reform
> and accountability at any level.
>
> If we want to clean up American medicine, the corporate shield must
> be removed and politicians, health officials and pharmaceutical
> executives must be held accountable. If they are threatened with
> jail time for manslaughter by pushing dangerous drugs, then we will
> see less life-threatening drugs go to market.
>
> We are in a perfect storm without a life raft. We much take back
> our freedoms of choice and demand legal accountability or nothing
> will change.
>
> Doug Henderson, JD is a legal mediator specializing in civil rights
> and Director of Gary Null and Associates in New York City.
>
> Dr. Gary Null is the host of the nation's longest running public
> radio program on nutrition and natural health and a multi-award-winning
> director of progressive documentary films, including Vaccine Nation
> and Autism: Made in the USA. Dr. Null is also the plaintiff on a
> law suit against the FDA to prevent the launch of the swine flu
> vaccine until safety studies have been thoroughly conducted.
>
> Please support Global Research Global Research relies on the financial
> support of its readers.
>
> Your endorsement is greatly appreciated
>
> Subscribe to the Global Research e-newsletter
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
>
> Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
> responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those
> of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this
> article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for
> Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any
> inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.
>
> To become a Member of Global Research
>
> The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research
> articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title
> are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be
> displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or
> other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
> crgedi...@yahoo.com
>
> www.globalresearch.cacontains copyrighted material the use of which
> has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
> We are making such material available to our readers under the
> provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding
> of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site
> is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
> interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If
> you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair
> use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
>
> For media inquiries: crgedi...@yahoo.com
>
> Copyright Doug Henderson , Progressive Radio Network, 2009
>
> The url address of this article is:
>
> www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15758
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
>
> Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca Web site engine by Polygraphx
> Multimedia ) Copyright 2005-2007
>
> GLOBAL RESEARCH | v | Montreal | Canada

[Dr. Sir Arthur CBE Wholeflaffers]

Good one!

[jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)]

On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 18:19:44 -0800 (PST), "Dr. Sir Arthur CBE
Wholeflaffers" <richard...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, October 22, 2009 at 11:39:10 PM UTC-7, Sir Arthur CBE Wholeflaffers ASA wrote:
>> On Oct 22, 9:21 pm, Global Research E-Newsletter <crgedi...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> > The Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex: A Deadly Fairy Tale
>> >
>> > By Dr. Doug Henderson and Dr. Gary Null
>> >
>> > URL of this article:www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15758
>> >
>> > Global Research, October 21, 2009 Progressive Radi
>> >

>> > It has been a particularly bad mo
>> >

>> > When we speak of the pharmaceu
>> >

>> > America is rightly reg

>> >
>> > However, there is a new dyn
>> >

>> > As the current he
>> >
>> > The country is pa
>> >
>> > This is not a
>> >
>> > If any one of
>> >
>> > Every American who is
>> >
>> > The pharmace
>> >
>> > It is extremely di

>> >
>> > As serial offenders of product safety cover-ups for over a decade,
>> > drugs have inju
>> >

>> > Big Pharma's impa
>> >
>> > Eli Lilly floo
>> >
>> > Fast-forwa
>> >
>> > Did Lilly also kn
>> >
>> > An article by
>> >
>> > Merck is st
>> >
>> > Under the
>> >
>> > Earlier this
>> >
>> > The phar
>> >
>> > In America, one can h
>> >
>> > According to Open
>> >
>> > In 2000, Mylan Labs se
>> >
>> > It was subsequently rev
>> >
>> > But Mylan repr
>> >
>> > Another case incl
>> >
>> > Lupron is used by
>> >
>> > Ever wonder why Bi
>> >
>> > WHAT DRUGS RE
>> > BRAND NAME CO
>> >
>> > Celebrex 100 mg
>> >
>> > Claritin 10 mg
>> >
>> > Keflex 250 mg
>> >
>> > Lipitor 20 m
>> <
>> > Norvasc 10
>> >
>> > Paxil 20
>> >
>> > Prevac
>> >
>> > Prilo
>> >
>> > Pro
>> >
>> > Tenormin 50 mg
>> >
>> > Vasotec 10 m
>> >
>> > Xanax 1
>> >
>> > Zestril
>> >
>> > Zithr
>> >
>> > Zo
>> >
>> > Z
>> >
>> > In order to un
>> >
>> > This is h
>> >
>> > The veils are fin
>> >
>> > If we want to
>> >
>> > We are in a per
>> >
>> > Doug Hend

>> >
>> > Dr. Gary Null is the
>> >

>> > Please supp
>> >
>> > Your endorsement is gr
>> >
>> > Subscribe to the G

>> >
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ---
>> >
>> > Disclaimer: The views expressed in thi
>> >

>> > The CRG grants permi
>> >
>> > www.globalresearch.cacontains copyrighwner.
>> >
>> > For med
>> >
>> > Copyright Doug Hen
>> >
>> > The url address of

>> >
>> > www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15758
>> >
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ---
>> >
>> > Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca Web site engine by Polygraphx
>> > Multimedia ) Copyright 2005-2007
>> >
>> > GLOBAL RESEARCH | v | Montreal | Canada
>
>Good o

NOT a good o

- -

" I don't even have the heart to tell him I've never infested
Arizona."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he lied
from the very beginning, A jew scam, as expected

" My real name's McGill. The jew thing I just do for the homeboys.
They all want a pipe hitting member of the tribe, so to speak."
- Saul Goodman (Bob Odenkirk). "Better Call Saul" (2015)

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"But vhere vill ve be able to vatch gay jews taking black cock up ze
ass?"
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), bemoaning the depletion of jews
in Hollyvood and the effect on his viewing preferences
Message-ID: <84d32dts2ho3gnrb1...@4ax.com>