Abortion Supporters Wish Rape On Pro-Lifers, Cut Out Beating Hearts, Practice On Papayas

[FPP]

https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/02/abortion-supporters-wish-rape-on-pro-lifers-cut-out-beating-hearts-practice-on-papayas/

,talk.abortion

[Ubiquitous]

The abortion industry and its defenders are in total freak-out mode, losing
whatever wits they appeared to have in the process. That’s not a judgment.
It’s a demonstrable fact. It’s almost as if every move they make in the
public square these days is a tragic bumble, merely revealing how flat-out
extreme they truly are.

The evidence is in ample supply. There’s this new video of an abortion
supporter telling a pro-lifer she hopes “someone holds you down and rapes
you.”

Planned Parenthood Protester wishing that a young Pro-Life Warrior
get raped for standing up for unborn babies and being pro-life!

The Evil is on Full Display! pic.twitter.com/99KTLEUQME

— Fr. Frank Pavone ???? (@frfrankpavone) September 30, 2019

There are the revelations in recent California court hearings, of sworn
testimony from abortion industry employees that they deliver babies live in
order to cut out their beating hearts for “scientific research.” And then a
dramatic article appeared recently at Vice.com with this actual title: “I
Learned How to Do an Abortion on a Papaya.” It poses as a serious essay.

Zoey Thill, a New York City abortionist, holds regular classes for anyone who
wants to play at sucking a growing child, limb from limb, out of a warm,
safe, nurturing womb. She does so with a papaya. It’s presented as a super
casual, fun way to spend an evening with like-minded friends. The author of
the story learned about it on Facebook.

‘We’re Not Going to Shame Perforators’

Thill explains the papaya is the perfect teaching tool, as it mimics a cervix
and uterus because of its shape, and it doesn’t matter if you puncture the
wall of a piece of fruit like abortions can do to a uterus. “We’re not going
to shame perforators,” she reassures her newbies.

Thill demonstrates to students the abortion technique and excitedly points
out the black seeds moving through the suction tube. She exults, apparently
in the best clinical language she can muster, “This is a really f-cking good
one.” Remember, she’s a professional abortionist.

The attendees then get to insert their own plastic tubes into a papaya and
attach them to an actual suction machine. They find it all pretty easy. “Next
to me,” the author recounts, “others were doing the same, rejoicing with
every successful extraction. ‘Yes!’ they exclaimed each time.”

Is it common practice to high-five a successful abortion? Apparently. Thill,
who was 38 weeks pregnant on this evening, assured the class, “It’s even more
satisfying when it’s a real abortion.” Yes, she used the words “more
satisfying” in direct reference to a successful abortion. There’s more. Thill
hopes “participants might capture some of the buoyant energy they felt while
extracting seeds.”

Who says such things? Abortionists and their activist defenders, and they do
so without an ounce of shame. Do they not appreciate how drastically out of
step this puts them with regular folk? That’s a rhetorical question.

We Know It’s Murder, and We Don’t Care

The article goes on to speak of a new development among abortion activists.
They are growing terribly impatient with their own leaders using any language
that appears to soften the reality of what abortion is. One attendee
remarked, “[I] believe in an unapologetic abortion rights movement. ”

They complain that too many in their movement have actually acquiesced to the
pro-life movement in seeing abortion as unfortunate. They cite President Bill
Clinton’s “safe, legal, and rare” mantra as the most egregious and damaging
example. They want people to know exactly what abortion does and celebrate
it.

Another equally stunning article laments “the most ardent feminist activists
might find themselves inadvertently apologizing for abortion even as they
fight for the universal right to access it.” Abortion activists are now
opposing the euphemistic term “pro-choice” as an antiquated PR construct to
gloss over what abortion really is. Toni Van Pelt, the president of the
abortion activist National Organization for Women, explains that the movement
is choosing to use the term “pro-abortion” instead, “because there’s nothing
wrong with abortion and there’s nothing wrong with using the term ‘abortion.’
It shouldn’t be stigmatized.”

In fact, this is exactly why Planned Parenthood recently unceremoniously
fired its relatively new president, Leana Wen. She was working to downplay
the organization’s standing as the largest single abortion provider. Why
accentuate the negative, right? Wen’s cautious approach was the exact
opposite of the new and unapologetically celebratory #ShoutYourAbortion and
#SayAbortion campaigns. So she’s now looking for work.

Putting Babies in the Trash After Harvesting Their Limbs

While Planned Parenthood tries to downplay their abortion activity on one
hand, falsely claiming it’s a minuscule fraction of what they do, on the
other they are also extremely proud of what they do to babies. Millions of
tiny humans enter through the front door of a Planned Parenthood clinic warm
and secure in their mother’s wombs with a beating heart and a growing body.
They leave out the back door as trash, alone and in parts. It’s impossible to
make that look virtuous, but these folks try their best.

As the abortion industrial complex grows bolder in telling us what it’s
actually about, it is time for all decent people of conscience to join them.
Stop glossing over what abortion actually is. Cease being reticent about
explaining its reality. It’s time for gentle boldness, to call out what these
people do (and literally exult in) for the dark atrocity it is.

It might seem unsettling, but truth often is. Its tellers should not feel
shame for revealing it. That belongs to the perpetrators. It comes down to
this: Abortion is pure evil. It has its roots in that which is evil, and its
fruit is evil. Celebrating it is evil. (Women who are made to believe it’s
their only option are certainly abortion’s second victim.)

The evilness of the procedure is obvious to anyone who looks at the actual,
physical result of an abortion, even as early as eight weeks of gestation
(graphic warning). Abortion speaks for itself. No, that’s not right. It
screams, and what it says is vile.

This Is Undisputable If You Consider the Facts

Let’s just think about the basic aspects and consequences of the thing.

Abortion is designed and performed for the sole purpose of ending a human
life because at least one person sees that life as problematic. Often, this
is not the mother, but others around her, applying emotional pressure for her
to destroy her own child.

The dead, and clearly human, child is thrown out with today’s trash as if he
were so many used coffee grounds.

The mother is given the false hope that this will be good for her and that
the act itself is righteous.

Abortion turns the natural maternal instinct on its head. The most important,
complex, and powerful life-giving protector in all of nature, the human
mother, is persuaded to become the exact opposite of what she so deeply is.
That is anti-woman if anything is.

The mother is given the false hope that this will be good for her and that
the act itself is righteous.

Doctors who are trained to heal, save life, and take a solemn and sacred oath
to do no harm become those who intentionally destroy life as a regular part
of their practice. They are shamelessly celebrated as brave, moral leaders by
our cultural elites.

A government, tasked with protecting and enhancing the life of every citizen,
instead becomes the defender, funder, and facilitator of those who kill
millions upon millions of tomorrow’s educators, caregivers, inventors,
business owners, job providers, public servants, military members,
philanthropists, and political leaders, not to mention its essential
taxpayers. Such a government is killing its own future.

Anyone offended by abortion is harshly denounced as the enemy of women and
their health. This breaks down quickly because women oppose abortion at about
the same rate as men do, if not more. Thus, abortion activists charge that
billions of pro-life women are the enemies of women’s health. That’s quite
patriarchal.

Death Isn’t Something to Celebrate

A good and moral society does not celebrate death. A good and moral society
does not celebrate those who do. It does not assume a baby is a problem to be
destroyed. It does not tell women in crisis that their only solution lies in
betraying their own natures and ending the glorious, miraculous life that
grows right below her heart.

Abortion is unnatural, dramatically so. It is anti-human. It does not enhance
or enrich our collective humanity.

It comes to her aid, giving her hope and everyday, practical help, before,
at, and after the birth of her child. That’s what the pro-life movement does.
It doesn’t give her a cold, sterile procedure for a fee and wish her well.
That’s what abortionists do. Which is truly more pro-woman?

Abortion is unnatural, dramatically so. It is anti-human. It does not enhance
or enrich our collective humanity. It is vile and it is evil. It springs from
and reveals our worst natures. No amount of anger, violence, name-calling,
knitted “genitalia” caps and profanity screamed from bullhorns during so-
called women’s marches can justify it. It’s a fool’s errand to make what is
inherently wicked seem moral. It’s a soulless people who try.

At this moment of anxious freak-out from the pro-abortion ranks, it’s time a
good and moral people call abortion precisely what it is and do so without
shyness or apology. There is no need to be dramatic. There is no need to
crank up the volume. There is no need for theatrics.

There is only the need to speak truthfully about what abortion does to the
child, the woman, her family, and the nation. Abortion condemns itself. Its
advocates, in their frantic madness, seem set on helping it do so. We should
certainly join them. It’s the right thing to do.

Glenn T. Stanton is a Federalist senior contributor who writes and speaks
about family, gender, and art, is the director of family formation studies at
Focus on the Family, and is the author of the brand new "The Myth of the
Dying Church" (Worthy, 2019). He blogs at glenntstanton.com.