USA.NET has no anti-spam help help help
dolph in california(de-spam)
long distance number. There is no AB...@USA.NET or even
POSTO...@USA.NET
There is a user OFFI...@USA.NET who deserves whatever the anti-spammers
can throw at him/them. They are advertising an unapproved vaccine among
many others.
----
by geocities.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA00091;
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 00:35:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from amzo1 (1Cust196.tnt2.brentwood.ny.da.uu.net [153.35.217.196])
by kiji.momo.it.okayama-u.ac.jp (8.8.5/3.4Wbeta6/TW.07) with SMTP id
RAA08009; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:37:51 +0900
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:37:51 +0900
Message-Id: <1999030108...@kiji.momo.it.okayama-u.ac.jp>
To: offi...@usa.net
Subject: How much is your health worth?
-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeeds.com/ The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
-----------== Over 66,000 Groups, Plus a Dedicated Binaries Server ==----------
Morely Dotes
>
>The only way to have a user removed from USA.NET for spamming is to call a
>long distance number. There is no AB...@USA.NET or even
Not true.
Probably true. However, the required address is "postmaster" so it hardly
matters.
>There is a user OFFI...@USA.NET who deserves whatever the anti-spammers
>can throw at him/them. They are advertising an unapproved vaccine among
>many others.
They're also using a promiscuous relay in Japan, dialing in from UUNET, and
violating at least one Fedeal law as well as the laws of Washington and
California regarding forged headers.
Please post the spammer's contact info (there must be a Web page, phone
number, or something) here along with another copy of the headers, and forward
the original, intact, to abuse...@uu.net
>----
> by geocities.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA00091;
> Mon, 1 Mar 1999 00:35:19 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from amzo1 (1Cust196.tnt2.brentwood.ny.da.uu.net [153.35.217.196])
>by kiji.momo.it.okayama-u.ac.jp (8.8.5/3.4Wbeta6/TW.07) with SMTP id
>RAA08009; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:37:51 +0900
>Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:37:51 +0900
>Message-Id: <1999030108...@kiji.momo.it.okayama-u.ac.jp>
>To: offi...@usa.net
>Subject: How much is your health worth?
--
"Opt-out is a cop-out." - Jerry Bookter
[ Please don't post *and* e-mail. If your software inserts newsgroups header, don't email. ]
This message was tested on small, cute, furry animals
who cried piteously while it was being read to them.
Rahul Dhesi
(Morely Dotes) writes:
>Probably true. However, the required address is "postmaster" so it hardly
>matters.
For your reading enjoyment:
|Date: Wed, 03 Mar 99 20:46:19 PST
|From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER...@rahul.net>
|To: dh...@rahul.net
|Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable
|
| ----- Transcript of session follows -----
|While talking to mxpool01.netaddress.usa.net:
|>>> RCPT To:<postm...@usa.net>
|<<< 552 <postm...@usa.net>... User exceed storage quota
|554 <postm...@usa.net>... Service unavailable
|
| ----- Recipients of this delivery -----
|Bounced, cannot deliver:
| <postm...@usa.net>
|
--
Rahul Dhesi <dh...@spams.r.us.com>
Morely Dotes
That doesn't say "no such user," it says "the postmaster has been mailbombed."
Rather a large difference.