> On 2022-06-25, Liberalism, turning men into women one fag at a time
> <
que...@liberal-cunts.net> wrote:
>> On 25 Jun 2022, "
jecorbe...@yahoo.com"
>> <
jecorbe...@yahoo.com> posted some
>>
news:9cbfb8e8-8829-4792...@googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> "So let me get this straight. A state has the right to restrict
>>> abortions, but doesn't have the right to restrict firearms? Is
>>> that what we have now in these 'United' States?" George Takei
>>> tweeted.
>>
>> George wasn't bright enough to be one of the smart kids. I was
>> impressed that William Shatner didn't stuff him in a bag and chuck
>> him in a wood chipper.
>
> Yes. The States were reluctant to form a Confederation and wanted to
> insure maximum autonomy.
>
> The reulting Fedeal Gov't's powers, therefore, were restricted and
> limited to the 13 or 19 (whatever) powers enumerated in the
> Constitution.
>
> The States, on the other hand, powers were to be manifest and
> unlimited with most powers residing in the States and People.
>
> The right to bear arms is in the Bill of Rights as good old #2 (and
> "well-regulated" in those days meant to be made regular: ie:
> well-equipped) So the Feds have standing in this arena.