The reason Spacebattles has the reputation is does.
Graeme Dice
Need I say more?
Graeme Dice
--
"Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations
which we can perform without thinking about them."
-- Alfred North Whitehead
Spyda
Cool pics.
--
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/spyda
ICQ#: 39921647
_ _ _ _
\\ \\ // //
\\ || || //
_ \\ \\ // //
|________________________\\ \\_// //_____________________________
| ____________________ \\/ \// ____________________________/
| /_\ /_\ /
|_______________________// | | \\_________________________/
_| // /| |\ \\
// //| |\\ \\
// // \___/ \\ \\
// \\
Paradox
--
Paradox
Graeme Dice <grd...@sk.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3A2DE65D...@sk.sympatico.ca...
Graeme Dice
>
> I'd ask, but it would probably be a waste of time....
The entire thread consists of a debate that is solely made up of which
side can create the best looking fleet.
Graeme Dice
>
> Graeme Dice wrote:
> >
> > http://www.spacebattles.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=21032
> >
> > Need I say more?
> >
> > Graeme Dice
> > --
> > "Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations
> > which we can perform without thinking about them."
> > -- Alfred North Whitehead
>
> Cool pics.
Yes, but cool pics do not a victory make.
Spyda
>
> Spyda wrote:
> >
> > Graeme Dice wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.spacebattles.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=21032
> > >
> > > Need I say more?
> > >
> > > Graeme Dice
> > > --
> > > "Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations
> > > which we can perform without thinking about them."
> > > -- Alfred North Whitehead
> >
> > Cool pics.
>
> Yes, but cool pics do not a victory make.
>
Who cares, they still look cool, which is generally what pics are supposed to
look like, hence it being a positive thing.
Spyda
>
> Paradox wrote:
> >
> > I'd ask, but it would probably be a waste of time....
>
> The entire thread consists of a debate that is solely made up of which
> side can create the best looking fleet.
How is it a debate? And at which point do they call it a debate?
Graeme Dice
>
> Graeme Dice wrote:
> >
> > Paradox wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd ask, but it would probably be a waste of time....
> >
> > The entire thread consists of a debate that is solely made up of which
> > side can create the best looking fleet.
>
> How is it a debate? And at which point do they call it a debate?
The forum is called "vs. debates", the thread title is "I regret to
inform you that the Empire is TOAST!". His argument consists of a
rather poorly rendered picture.
Paradox
Just a question here:
"With the Shivans, we had finally met our match. We thought we held them in
Capella, but the explosion of the star opened up a gateway into their space
and thousands of warships poured into the system. They used an uncharted
jumpnode to invade the Sol system. First they layed waste to out cities with
their Hellion-class assault platforms. Then they invaded, slaughtering
billions. The few hundred thousands who survived were killed when they
destroyed Sol. Now the last remenents of the Human Race roam the Galaxy,
searching for a new home...."
This sounds alot like the Dregg from Titan A.E.
--
Paradox
Graeme Dice <grd...@sk.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3A2DECE0...@sk.sympatico.ca...
Chris O'Farrell
> Spyda wrote:
> >
> > Graeme Dice wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.spacebattles.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=21032
> > >
> > > Need I say more?
> > >
> > > Graeme Dice
> > > --
> > > "Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations
> > > which we can perform without thinking about them."
> > > -- Alfred North Whitehead
> >
> > Cool pics.
>
> Yes, but cool pics do not a victory make.
>
Chris O'Farrell
> Spyda wrote:
> >
> > Graeme Dice wrote:
> > >
> > > Paradox wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'd ask, but it would probably be a waste of time....
> > >
> > > The entire thread consists of a debate that is solely made up of which
> > > side can create the best looking fleet.
> >
> > How is it a debate? And at which point do they call it a debate?
>
> The forum is called "vs. debates", the thread title is "I regret to
> inform you that the Empire is TOAST!". His argument consists of a
> rather poorly rendered picture.
>
Its not a serious debate man! Its a picture debate. Like we have certain
things like TGODS, they have certain things like Pic Debates...
Spyda
>
> Spyda wrote:
> >
> > Graeme Dice wrote:
> > >
> > > Paradox wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'd ask, but it would probably be a waste of time....
> > >
> > > The entire thread consists of a debate that is solely made up of which
> > > side can create the best looking fleet.
> >
> > How is it a debate? And at which point do they call it a debate?
>
> The forum is called "vs. debates", the thread title is "I regret to
> inform you that the Empire is TOAST!". His argument consists of a
> rather poorly rendered picture.
>
> Graeme Dice
I think you're taking his boast a little more seriously than he is.
Spyda
>
> > The forum is called "vs. debates", the thread title is "I regret to
> > inform you that the Empire is TOAST!". His argument consists of a
> > rather poorly rendered picture.
> >
> Its not a serious debate man! Its a picture debate. Like we have certain
> things like TGODS, they have certain things like Pic Debates...
I reckon, it's little wonder they don't like us.
Graeme Dice
> > Spyda wrote:
> > >
<snip>
> >
> > The forum is called "vs. debates", the thread title is "I regret to
> > inform you that the Empire is TOAST!". His argument consists of a
> > rather poorly rendered picture.
> >
> Can't take a joke?
> Its not a serious debate man! Its a picture debate. Like we have certain
> things like TGODS, they have certain things like Pic Debates...
I could just as easily point out the current STGOD thread (Which is
mind-numbingly boring right now.) as the reason ASVSers have the
reputation we do. However, I don't see any reason to make that argument
myself.
Graeme Dice
--
"They call it The Force, you know, like it's supposed to be used for
domination andhurting people. They use light sabres - real peaceful
badge of office, those. I remember one whose idea of an appropriate
response in a bar-room brawl was to cut the guy's arm right off
without even a warning or anything. And they call themselves the good
guys?" - Dani, mystic.
Enigma
Ok but there's a few fleets here developed by fellow ASVSers (including
mine) that can wipe them out in a TGOD.
--
Quotes to live by:
"You don't call them women. You call them mentally challenged."
-co-worker
"I got lotsa bombs. You happy?"
-Crazy Ivan
"Shock therapy."
-Tesla Trooper
Dalton
>
> http://www.spacebattles.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=21032
>
> Need I say more?
Makes me appreciate my friends here all the better.
--
Dalton
http://daltonator.net
"This is the sound a doggy makes. Mister Connery?"
"Moo."
*buzz* "No."
"Well, that's the sound your mother made last night!"
---Celebrity Jeopardy
Kynes
>I could just as easily point out the current STGOD thread (Which is
>mind-numbingly boring right now.) as the reason ASVSers have the
>reputation we do. However, I don't see any reason to make that argument
>myself.
I'll make it for you:
The current STGOD is piss-boring. Due to the pussified rules about the
Collective being exempted from participation (oh, until Boydie decides to stop
sulking and come back to the group, of course) and the fact that one of the most
tired plot devices in NG history is being rehashed -- AGAIN -- this STGOD is the
worst ever.
Here're the facts:
1. STGODs are fun because they involve high emotion levels for everyone, which
only comes from dueling with a human foe. Typing "And then I killed TOWNMNBS
again! HEE HEE HEE! orgasm" does not elicit feelings of victory.
2. Just because Boyd is a gigantic weiner doesn't mean unrealistic plot devices
should be concocted to spare his Dorkpire. Further, if you're going to make
rules like that, then ban his participation.
3. Stop fucking talking about Tim Jones. Jesus. He's gone. He's never coming
back. If we keep talking about him, we grant him victory over our minds. The
best way to win is to forget he ever existed.
4. I'll say it again: Boyd, you are a HUGE pussy.
--
LK!
[ ky...@choam.org ] [ ICQ: 795238 ] [ AIM: Kynes23 ]
'transistor' (noun) - $15 part designed to protect a $0.05 fuse.
Aron Kerkhof
> ...Dorkpire...
Whatever grievances anyone might have with Kynes, he *must* be
forgiven just on the basis of that one word. I can't explain humor,
and I know it's a subjective thing, but I want to state for the record
that anyone having a prior knowledge of the history of Kynes vs Boyd,
and who furthermore didn't laugh, and laugh hard, at that one word...
well, that is a person I can never fully trust.
----
'Guess what? I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!' -- Bruce Dickinson
----
Aron Kerkhof
http://www.neolith.org
Kyle
Completely disagree on all points, except number one (But it only
applies to one post). While this isn't the best STGOD it isn't the
worst possible. The problems aren't what you list though what they
are is:
1) Too many participants. This by itself isn't bad, what is bad is
that many don't give a flying fuck what the others are doing. So
they ignore continuity and just do what they want.
2) Too many damn hero's. Everyone wants to be the guy who wins the
war, just write your little section and it comes out better.
3) The whole FAQ thing. It's a tired worn out plot device, it was
much better before that got interjected into the mix. That's why I'm
not going to get involved in that part.
4) Not enough preparation. We should have spent some time and wrote
clear guidelines on what the goal is and what's what.
Now I'll just go over your point about TJ.
1) It's a joke.
2) We invented an enemy, without Boyd we didn't have a "bad guy" so
we made one. TJ is just a name nothing more.
3) Chill
4)
About Boyd.
1) All we're doing is ignoring the Collective.
2) I covered it early on. I said they'd hunkered down and were
fighting a civil war.
3) My character want to attack, but doesn't have to force to do so.
4) Shut up.
5) Now that Boyd is participating the Collective is obviously no
longer off limits, but you have compensate for what earlier posts
said about it (except Chris saying they disappeared, since that's
ridiculous and goes against continuity.)
--
Star Marshall Knopf
Duke of Huito
Commander Third Assault Fleet (Detached)
Commander Milky Way Expeditionary Force
Ship Stats:
Http://kylejk.homepage.com/capships.html
Fighter Stats:
Http://kylejk.homepage.com/fighter.html
Tech Info:
Http://kylejk.homepage.com/tech.html
Kynes
>Completely disagree on all points, except number one (But it only
>applies to one post). While this isn't the best STGOD it isn't the
>worst possible. The problems aren't what you list though what they
>are is:
I would say that the problems *are* what I list, primarily #1. Restated, it's
this. Everyone wanted to have another STGOD but without any problems this time.
So someone gets the idea: "Hey! Let's just invent an enemy!"
Invented enemies lack the intelligence of human enemies. What makes a TGOD fun
is the OTHER PERSON. It's not an excercise in story writing, for god's sake.
It's a way to kick the shit out of the other guy in as inventive a way as you
can imagine. Don't believe me? Go read some of the really old-school ones,
before they had names.
This "let's-please-everyone" stance is boring. All it allows for is everyone to
showcase their plot devices. It reminds me of those alt.tv.startrek.voyager
dorks, patting each other on the back any time any of them farted:
"And then *I* invaded the troll homeworld with *my* giant fleet!"
"Ha, you are a wise one! And then *I* landed a million troops on the troll
homeworld and killed the troll man king with my bizap ray!"
"And then *I* used my newfound ninja skills to kill a million trolls in a
second!"
>About Boyd.
>1) All we're doing is ignoring the Collective.
Which is unrealistic and stupid. Boyd shouldn't be granted protectorate status
just because he needed to spend time being reassured by his mother how handsome
he was. That's dumb.
Phong Nguyen
>Invented enemies lack the intelligence of human enemies. What makes a
>TGOD fun is the OTHER PERSON. It's not an excercise in story writing,
>for god's sake. It's a way to kick the shit out of the other guy in as
>inventive a way as you can imagine. Don't believe me? Go read some of
>the really old-school ones, before they had names.
>
Yeah, that's the best part about TGODing, but I decided to join in
something a little bit different. I was considering controlling both the
Trolls and the CIN to see what would happen. Yeah, it's not as fun as
fighting against a human opponent, but still quite interesting
nevertheless.
>"And then *I* invaded the troll homeworld with *my* giant fleet!"
>
>"Ha, you are a wise one! And then *I* landed a million troops on the
>troll homeworld and killed the troll man king with my bizap ray!"
>
>"And then *I* used my newfound ninja skills to kill a million trolls in
>a second!"
>
Well, at least I'm not doing that :) I'm getting my ass badly kicked.
Jonathan Boyd
ky...@choam.org:
> On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 08:33:26 GMT, Graeme Dice <grd...@sk.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> I could just as easily point out the current STGOD thread (Which is
>> mind-numbingly boring right now.) as the reason ASVSers have the
>> reputation we do. However, I don't see any reason to make that argument
>> myself.
> I'll make it for you:
> The current STGOD is piss-boring. Due to the pussified rules about the
> Collective being exempted from participation
Would you like it if we brought in Kynes and had him permanently killed in
some fashion? I doubt it. All they were doing is the honourable, considerate
thing, and I am very grateful to them for that. No-one could write the
character of Kynes like you do and no-one could write the Collective the way
I do.
> (oh, until Boydie decides to stop sulking and come back to the group, of
> course)
In order to start an activity, one must first begin, much in the same way
that you could not stop acting in an adult manner.
> and the fact that one of the most tired plot devices in NG history is being
> rehashed -- AGAIN -- this STGOD is the worst ever.
> Here're the facts:
> 1. STGODs are fun because they involve high emotion levels for everyone, which
> only comes from dueling with a human foe. Typing "And then I killed TOWNMNBS
> again! HEE HEE HEE! orgasm" does not elicit feelings of victory.
Agreed on this point. Sheppard had a good idea and I was looking forward to
having a nice little one on one with him, the way we used to do things, but
someone's gone and got him back. Actually, that doesn't mean I have to stop.
> 2. Just because Boyd is a gigantic weiner doesn't mean unrealistic plot
> devices should be concocted to spare his Dorkpire. Further, if you're going to
> make rules like that, then ban his participation.
That's it, release your anger. Would you like to try scream therapy next?
> 3. Stop fucking talking about Tim Jones. Jesus. He's gone. He's never coming
> back. If we keep talking about him, we grant him victory over our minds. The
> best way to win is to forget he ever existed.
If you feel you need a victory over him, then I think he's won. Killing Tim
is a tradition that entertains everyone. Except you apparently. And maybe
Elim. Hey, you guys have something in common after all! Doesn't that make
you feel all warm and fluffy inside?
> 4. I'll say it again: Boyd, you are a HUGE pussy.
Or is it that you merely want me to be? Come on Kynes, reveal your true
feeling here. I think we've known each other long enough.
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries, is not "Eureka!" but "That's funny..."' - Isaac Asimov
Jonathan Boyd
Kerkhof at aronk@-spamerific-galactec.com:
> On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 15:34:55 -0700, Kynes <ky...@choam.org> wrote:
>
>> ...Dorkpire...
>
> Whatever grievances anyone might have with Kynes, he *must* be
> forgiven just on the basis of that one word. I can't explain humor,
> and I know it's a subjective thing, but I want to state for the record
> that anyone having a prior knowledge of the history of Kynes vs Boyd,
> and who furthermore didn't laugh, and laugh hard, at that one word...
> well, that is a person I can never fully trust.
I must admit I laughed, and laughed hard, but not until I read this post and
did start thinking. Normally I just ignore the insults or occasionally throw
one back. I forgive him though. Hear that Kynes? I love you! Doesn't I like
you though. If you come within 100km of me, I'll hunt you down and shoot you
like a ferret, or some other low life rodent type scum. Probably by throwing
knives at you. Family tradition. Dad skewers mice with knives. I'm just
following in his footsteps.
Matthew Van Wie
> Our spies intercepted the following random wibbling garbage from Aron
> Kerkhof at aronk@-spamerific-galactec.com:
>
> > On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 15:34:55 -0700, Kynes <ky...@choam.org> wrote:
> >
> >> ...Dorkpire...
> >
> > Whatever grievances anyone might have with Kynes, he *must* be
> > forgiven just on the basis of that one word. I can't explain humor,
> > and I know it's a subjective thing, but I want to state for the record
> > that anyone having a prior knowledge of the history of Kynes vs Boyd,
> > and who furthermore didn't laugh, and laugh hard, at that one word...
> > well, that is a person I can never fully trust.
>
> I must admit I laughed, and laughed hard, but not until I read this post and
> did start thinking. Normally I just ignore the insults or occasionally throw
> one back. I forgive him though. Hear that Kynes? I love you! Doesn't I like
> you though. If you come within 100km of me, I'll hunt you down and shoot you
> like a ferret, or some other low life rodent type scum. Probably by throwing
> knives at you. Family tradition. Dad skewers mice with knives. I'm just
> following in his footsteps.
Psst. Ferrets aern't rodents.
MattV
Kynes
>I must admit I laughed, and laughed hard, but not until I read this post and
>did start thinking. Normally I just ignore the insults or occasionally throw
>one back. I forgive him though. Hear that Kynes? I love you!
I thought a prerequisite to forgiveness was some sort of remorse.
> Doesn't I like
>you though. If you come within 100km of me, I'll hunt you down and shoot you
>like a ferret, or some other low life rodent type scum. Probably by throwing
>knives at you. Family tradition. Dad skewers mice with knives. I'm just
>following in his footsteps.
But then your sister and mother will wither from sexual frustration. You'd do
that to your own family? I thought you were made of kinder stuff than that.
Kynes
>> I'll make it for you:
>
>> The current STGOD is piss-boring. Due to the pussified rules about the
>> Collective being exempted from participation
>
>Would you like it if we brought in Kynes and had him permanently killed in
>some fashion? I doubt it.
Actually, exactly that was done when I was away this summer for weeks at a time
-- the Mars Pact would have elaborate things done to Kynes and if it wasn't for
Graeme, he probably *would* have been killed. But did I bitch like a little
girl? No, I didn't.
> All they were doing is the honourable, considerate
>thing, and I am very grateful to them for that. No-one could write the
>character of Kynes like you do and no-one could write the Collective the way
>I do.
Yeah, it really takes a rocket scientist to add the extra hyphens everywhere.
>> (oh, until Boydie decides to stop sulking and come back to the group, of
>> course)
>
>In order to start an activity, one must first begin, much in the same way
>that you could not stop acting in an adult manner.
"THAT'S IT! I'M LEAVING! NO ONE TRY TO STOP ME BECAUSE I'M GONE FOREVER! I'M
JUST GOING TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS LAST 200-POST THREAD ABOUT MY LEAVING AND THEN
I'M REALLY GONE, FOR AT LEAST TWO WEEKS! NO, DON'T TRY TO STOP ME..."
>> 3. Stop fucking talking about Tim Jones. Jesus. He's gone. He's never coming
>> back. If we keep talking about him, we grant him victory over our minds. The
>> best way to win is to forget he ever existed.
>
>If you feel you need a victory over him, then I think he's won.
Hey. Moron. I'm not the one participating in an elaborate fictional war to kill
him. I was done with him when he left the group. It's putzes like you who
secretly miss him and want to keep his memory alive that bore me.
>Killing Tim
>is a tradition that entertains everyone. Except you apparently.
Sorry, Boyd. But maybe it's that masturbatory STGOD Tim-deaths just can't
compare to the real thing.
>> 4. I'll say it again: Boyd, you are a HUGE pussy.
>
>Or is it that you merely want me to be? Come on Kynes, reveal your true
>feeling here. I think we've known each other long enough.
Your homoerotic tendencies notwithstanding, your younger sister already provides
me with all of the Boyd-loving I could ever need.
Kynes
>>> Doesn't I like you though. If you come within 100km of me, I'll hunt you down
>>> and shoot you like a ferret, or some other low life rodent type scum.
>>> Probably by throwing knives at you. Family tradition. Dad skewers mice with
>>> knives. I'm just following in his footsteps.
>>>
>> But then your sister and mother will wither from sexual frustration. You'd do
>> that to your own family? I thought you were made of kinder stuff than that.
>
>I'm sorry, but you confuse Northern Ireland with America. When you talk to
>someone, the chances are that they're not incestuous/in-bred (apologies to
>any other Americans who may be reading this thread).
This little paragraph here just demonstrates what a lameass you are. Qualifying
your insults with "psst! Hey, just kidding everyone! hey, don't mean to offend
anyone! ow, not the face guys" makes you out to be a whiny bitch. Which you are,
whiny bitch.
Kynes
>> Actually, exactly that was done when I was away this summer for weeks at a
>> time -- the Mars Pact would have elaborate things done to Kynes and if it
>> wasn't for Graeme, he probably *would* have been killed. But did I bitch like
>> a little girl? No, I didn't.
>
>And neither am I.
It was out of fear of your eventual bitching that it was done, since being a
crybaby is more intrinsic to your nature than even your latent stupidity.
>>> All they were doing is the honourable, considerate thing, and I am very
>>> grateful to them for that. No-one could write the character of Kynes like you
>>> do and no-one could write the Collective the way I do.
>
>> Yeah, it really takes a rocket scientist to add the extra hyphens everywhere.
>
>I'll think about that on the flight over to Oxford.
You want a standing ovation, Boyd, or what? Institutional elitism is 1) an
informal argumentative fallacy and 2) not going to get you very far in this
group.
>>> In order to start an activity, one must first begin, much in the same way
>>> that you could not stop acting in an adult manner.
>>
>> "THAT'S IT! I'M LEAVING! NO ONE TRY TO STOP ME BECAUSE I'M GONE FOREVER! I'M
>> JUST GOING TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS LAST 200-POST THREAD ABOUT MY LEAVING AND
>> THEN I'M REALLY GONE, FOR AT LEAST TWO WEEKS! NO, DON'T TRY TO STOP ME..."
>
>I have no intention of stopping you. If leaving is what'll make you happy
>then fine. These things happen. People get more work, get chucked in jail,
>decide that the some people are acting like asses and making debate
>pointless. Not sure which is your reason, but hope you'll be happy away from
>ASVS. I certainly found it quite refreshing.
8==========D
>> But maybe it's that masturbatory STGOD Tim-deaths just can't compare to the
>> real thing.
>
>You view the killing of Tim as masturbatory? Now, who's really missing him?
Yeah, I do view them that way.
>>>> 4. I'll say it again: Boyd, you are a HUGE pussy.
>
>>> Or is it that you merely want me to be? Come on Kynes, reveal your true
>>> feeling here. I think we've known each other long enough.
>
>> Your homoerotic tendencies notwithstanding,
>
>Some would say that such statements are your part are
Great grammar. I'm sure with your Oxford application typed in that fashion,
you'll be a shoo-in, presuming your flight is to interview for a janitorial
position.
>> your younger sister already provides me with all of the Boyd-loving I could
>> ever need.
>
>Which one?
All of them. They used to take turns, but now it's more of a group thing.
Kynes
>> It was out of fear of your eventual bitching that it was done, since being a
>> crybaby is more intrinsic to your nature than even your latent stupidity.
>
>I see. Your opinions are yours and yours to do with as they please. Feel
>free to air them, but don't expect us to accept them as our own.
Who is this mysterious "us?" Can't you just make a statement on your own and
stand by it, Whiny Bitch?
>> Institutional elitism is 1) an informal argumentative fallacy and 2) not going
>> to get you very far in this group.
>
>And where exactly do you think I'm trying to go in this group?
I thought you were trying to leave. Did you get lost on the way out?
>What respect
>I have from people is down to who I am, how I have acted in the past and how
>they view such actions. Some people such as Dalton, Rog, Bjorn and Sheppard,
>I get along well with. Others such as you and Wayne, I don't. I seriously
>doubt that me going to Oxford would change any of that. If it did, I would
>be concerned for the person whose opinion it sways.
Dodge, dodge, dodge. That doesn't change the fact that essentially, your
response to my argument was: "Well, excuse me, but I need to drop the name of a
semi-good British school that I might go to: Oxford. Thank you."
>>> I have no intention of stopping you. If leaving is what'll make you happy
>>> then fine. These things happen. People get more work, get chucked in jail,
>>> decide that the some people are acting like asses and making debate
>>> pointless. Not sure which is your reason, but hope you'll be happy away from
>>> ASVS. I certainly found it quite refreshing.
>
>> 8==========D
>
>Now Kynes, I thought we'd discussed. No need to show the rest fo the group
>that my typing gives you erections. We know you're a horny little devil
>already.
See above.
>> Great grammar. I'm sure with your Oxford application typed in that fashion,
>> you'll be a shoo-in, presuming your flight is to interview for a janitorial
>> position.
>
>Well actually there are 4 applicants for every place in the College I've
>applied to, so my odds of getting in aren't that great. I'm glad to see you
>have such confidence in me though. Much appreciated.
Christ. Is that it? A 25% acceptance ratio? Schools in the U.S. that are
considered "selective" dip around 10-15% acceptance ratio. Truman accepts about
a third of its applicants. I'm sorry, I had this image in my head of Oxford
being somehow comparable to North American institutions. Silly me.
>>>> your younger sister already provides me with all of the Boyd-loving I could
>>>> ever need.
>
>>> Which one?
>
>> All of them. They used to take turns, but now it's more of a group thing.
>
>I see. Are you into child pornography as well, per chance?
Hey, she came on to me first.
Crayz9000
news:B654734E.28BA%jona...@jboyd.co.uk...
> Our spies intercepted the following random wibbling garbage from Kynes at
> ky...@choam.org:
>
> > On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 08:33:26 GMT, Graeme Dice <grd...@sk.sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>
> >> I could just as easily point out the current STGOD thread (Which is
> >> mind-numbingly boring right now.) as the reason ASVSers have the
> >> reputation we do. However, I don't see any reason to make that
argument
> >> myself.
>
>
> > The current STGOD is piss-boring. Due to the pussified rules about the
> > Collective being exempted from participation
>
> Would you like it if we brought in Kynes and had him permanently killed in
considerate
> thing, and I am very grateful to them for that. No-one could write the
> character of Kynes like you do and no-one could write the Collective the
way
> I do.
>
> > course)
>
> that you could not stop acting in an adult manner.
>
being
> > rehashed -- AGAIN -- this STGOD is the worst ever.
>
> > Here're the facts:
>
> > 1. STGODs are fun because they involve high emotion levels for everyone,
which
> > only comes from dueling with a human foe. Typing "And then I killed
TOWNMNBS
> > again! HEE HEE HEE! orgasm" does not elicit feelings of victory.
>
> Agreed on this point. Sheppard had a good idea and I was looking forward
to
> having a nice little one on one with him, the way we used to do things,
but
> someone's gone and got him back. Actually, that doesn't mean I have to
stop.
Read [STGOD] Retribution, Part II. Now you can all take a crack at me.
--
Crayz9000 AKA
Cybernetic Crow
mhm28x12
Web Site: http://crayz9000.htmlplanet.com
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers.
Crayz9000
news:90mnk3$9e6$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <Ob4uOlvVN65V0I...@4ax.com>,> Hell, you want me to try to fix that? I'll go nuts, turn on my allies,
> it'll be great.
Sorry, I just did that. Before I read this post.
Crayz9000
> Our spies intercepted the following random wibbling garbage from
>
> >> The current STGOD is piss-boring.
> >
> > Hell, you want me to try to fix that? I'll go nuts, turn on my allies,
> > it'll be great.
>
> off for this!
Guess you've got even more reason to be pissed at me.
Ryan Spickard
news:Ob4uOlvVN65V0I...@4ax.com...
[snip]
> 1. STGODs are fun because they involve high emotion levels for everyone,
which
> only comes from dueling with a human foe. Typing "And then I killed
TOWNMNBS
> again! HEE HEE HEE! orgasm" does not elicit feelings of victory.
Very true.
[snip]
> 3. Stop fucking talking about Tim Jones. Jesus. He's gone. He's never
coming
> back. If we keep talking about him, we grant him victory over our minds.
The
> best way to win is to forget he ever existed.
Amen!
> 4. I'll say it again: Boyd, you are a HUGE pussy.
hehehe
Ryan Spickard
[snip]
> I must admit I laughed, and laughed hard, but not until I read this post
and
> did start thinking. Normally I just ignore the insults or occasionally
throw
like
> you though. If you come within 100km of me, I'll hunt you down and shoot
you
> like a ferret, or some other low life rodent type scum. Probably by
throwing
> knives at you. Family tradition. Dad skewers mice with knives. I'm just
> following in his footsteps.
What part of the bible is that covered in? :)
Ryan Spickard
[snip]
> I'm sorry, but you confuse Northern Ireland with America. When you talk to
> someone, the chances are that they're not incestuous/in-bred (apologies to
> any other Americans who may be reading this thread).
"Hey all you guys suck monkey balls! Oh, I'm sorry, you illiterate slobs."
Jonathan Boyd
Wie at van...@yahoo.com:
> Jonathan Boyd wrote:
>
>> Our spies intercepted the following random wibbling garbage from Aron
>> Kerkhof at aronk@-spamerific-galactec.com:
>>
>>> On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 15:34:55 -0700, Kynes <ky...@choam.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...Dorkpire...
>>>
>>> Whatever grievances anyone might have with Kynes, he *must* be
>>> forgiven just on the basis of that one word. I can't explain humor,
>>> and I know it's a subjective thing, but I want to state for the record
>>> that anyone having a prior knowledge of the history of Kynes vs Boyd,
>>> and who furthermore didn't laugh, and laugh hard, at that one word...
>>> well, that is a person I can never fully trust.
>>
>> I must admit I laughed, and laughed hard, but not until I read this post and
>> did start thinking. Normally I just ignore the insults or occasionally throw
>> one back. I forgive him though. Hear that Kynes? I love you! Doesn't I like
>> you though. If you come within 100km of me, I'll hunt you down and shoot you
>> like a ferret, or some other low life rodent type scum. Probably by throwing
>> knives at you. Family tradition. Dad skewers mice with knives. I'm just
>> following in his footsteps.
>
> Psst. Ferrets aern't rodents.
Should have said vermin really. Thrice accursed biology...
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or
that phenomenon. I want to know His thought, the rest are details."
Albert Einstein
Jonathan Boyd
ky...@choam.org:
>> I must admit I laughed, and laughed hard, but not until I read this post and
>> did start thinking. Normally I just ignore the insults or occasionally throw
>> one back. I forgive him though. Hear that Kynes? I love you!
> I thought a prerequisite to forgiveness was some sort of remorse.
And you would be right in thinking that.
>> Doesn't I like you though. If you come within 100km of me, I'll hunt you down
>> and shoot you like a ferret, or some other low life rodent type scum.
>> Probably by throwing knives at you. Family tradition. Dad skewers mice with
>> knives. I'm just following in his footsteps.
>>
> But then your sister and mother will wither from sexual frustration. You'd do
> that to your own family? I thought you were made of kinder stuff than that.
I'm sorry, but you confuse Northern Ireland with America. When you talk to
someone, the chances are that they're not incestuous/in-bred (apologies to
any other Americans who may be reading this thread).
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
Jonathan Boyd
ky...@choam.org:
>>> I'll make it for you:
>>> The current STGOD is piss-boring. Due to the pussified rules about the
>>> Collective being exempted from participation
>> Would you like it if we brought in Kynes and had him permanently killed in
>> some fashion? I doubt it.
> Actually, exactly that was done when I was away this summer for weeks at a
> time -- the Mars Pact would have elaborate things done to Kynes and if it
> wasn't for Graeme, he probably *would* have been killed. But did I bitch like
> a little girl? No, I didn't.
And neither am I. I would have understood if they had done that since they
wouldn't have known if I was coming back at all, but I think that in leaving
the Collective alone, they should be applauded not admonished. Actually, now
that I think about it, urging them to attack me in my absence could be
construed as you "bitch[ing] like a little girl" and wanting revenge.
>> All they were doing is the honourable, considerate thing, and I am very
>> grateful to them for that. No-one could write the character of Kynes like you
>> do and no-one could write the Collective the way I do.
> Yeah, it really takes a rocket scientist to add the extra hyphens everywhere.
I'll think about that on the flight over to Oxford.
>>> (oh, until Boydie decides to stop sulking and come back to the group, of
>>> course)
>> In order to start an activity, one must first begin, much in the same way
>> that you could not stop acting in an adult manner.
>
> "THAT'S IT! I'M LEAVING! NO ONE TRY TO STOP ME BECAUSE I'M GONE FOREVER! I'M
> JUST GOING TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS LAST 200-POST THREAD ABOUT MY LEAVING AND
> THEN I'M REALLY GONE, FOR AT LEAST TWO WEEKS! NO, DON'T TRY TO STOP ME..."
I have no intention of stopping you. If leaving is what'll make you happy
then fine. These things happen. People get more work, get chucked in jail,
decide that the some people are acting like asses and making debate
pointless. Not sure which is your reason, but hope you'll be happy away from
ASVS. I certainly found it quite refreshing.
>>> 3. Stop fucking talking about Tim Jones. Jesus. He's gone. He's never coming
>>> back. If we keep talking about him, we grant him victory over our minds. The
>>> best way to win is to forget he ever existed.
>> If you feel you need a victory over him, then I think he's won.
> Hey. Moron. I'm not the one participating in an elaborate fictional war to
> kill him. I was done with him when he left the group. It's putzes like you who
> secretly miss him and want to keep his memory alive that bore me.
<shrug> That's your problem I guess. Don't expect everyone to conform to
your perception of humour.
>> Killing Tim is a tradition that entertains everyone. Except you apparently.
> Sorry, Boyd.
That's quite alright.
> But maybe it's that masturbatory STGOD Tim-deaths just can't compare to the
> real thing.
You view the killing of Tim as masturbatory? Now, who's really missing him?
>>> 4. I'll say it again: Boyd, you are a HUGE pussy.
>> Or is it that you merely want me to be? Come on Kynes, reveal your true
>> feeling here. I think we've known each other long enough.
> Your homoerotic tendencies notwithstanding,
Some would say that such statements are your part are
> your younger sister already provides me with all of the Boyd-loving I could
> ever need.
Which one?
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or
Graeme Dice
>
> Our spies intercepted the following random wibbling garbage from Kynes at
> ky...@choam.org:
>
>
> >> I could just as easily point out the current STGOD thread (Which is
> >> mind-numbingly boring right now.) as the reason ASVSers have the
> >> reputation we do. However, I don't see any reason to make that argument
> >> myself.
>
>
> > The current STGOD is piss-boring. Due to the pussified rules about the
> > Collective being exempted from participation
>
> Would you like it if we brought in Kynes and had him permanently killed in
> thing, and I am very grateful to them for that. No-one could write the
> character of Kynes like you do and no-one could write the Collective the way
> I do.
I'm also a 14th level-cleric. Resurrection baby!
Graeme Dice
--
"If you're asking a Star Trek vs. Star Wars discussion group
their opinion on your potential love life,
perhaps you should just visit the red light district now." --Kynes
Jonathan Boyd
at grd...@sk.sympatico.ca:
>>> I'll make it for you:
>>> The current STGOD is piss-boring. Due to the pussified rules about the
>>> Collective being exempted from participation
>> Would you like it if we brought in Kynes and had him permanently killed in
>> some fashion? I doubt it. All they were doing is the honourable, considerate
>> thing, and I am very grateful to them for that. No-one could write the
>> character of Kynes like you do and no-one could write the Collective the way
>> I do.
>
> I'm also a 14th level-cleric. Resurrection baby!
Not to self: must un-piss-off Lord Dice at some point.
pablo_sa...@my-deja.com
Hell, you want me to try to fix that? I'll go nuts, turn on my allies,
it'll be great.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Phong Nguyen
>In article <Ob4uOlvVN65V0I...@4ax.com>,
> Kynes <ky...@choam.org> wrote:
>> The current STGOD is piss-boring.
>
>Hell, you want me to try to fix that? I'll go nuts, turn on my allies,
>it'll be great.
>
Weren't you planning on that, anyways?
Spyda
8==========D
Anatomically corect and 1:1 scale :)
> >> your younger sister already provides me with all of the Boyd-loving I could
> >> ever need.
> >
> >Which one?
>
> All of them. They used to take turns, but now it's more of a group thing.
LOL!
Even with the gay hat?
--
I like it. besies your fat, ur girl friends fatter, and u suck. grow up.
u say that im immature and stupid?
-Weyoun the Dancing Borg
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/spyda
ICQ#: 39921647
_ _ _ _
\\ \\ // //
\\ || || //
_ \\ \\ // //
|________________________\\ \\_// //_____________________________
| ____________________ \\/ \// ____________________________/
| /_\ /_\ /
|_______________________// | | \\_________________________/
_| // /| |\ \\
// //| |\\ \\
// // \___/ \\ \\
// \\
Jonathan Boyd
>>> time -- the Mars Pact would have elaborate things done to Kynes and if it
>>> wasn't for Graeme, he probably *would* have been killed. But did I bitch
>>> like a little girl? No, I didn't.
>> And neither am I.
> It was out of fear of your eventual bitching that it was done, since being a
> crybaby is more intrinsic to your nature than even your latent stupidity.
I see. Your opinions are yours and yours to do with as they please. Feel
free to air them, but don't expect us to accept them as our own.
>>> Yeah, it really takes a rocket scientist to add the extra hyphens
>>> everywhere.
>> I'll think about that on the flight over to Oxford.
> You want a standing ovation, Boyd,
Wouldn't object to one. Would you like me to prepare a speech as well?
> or what?
You could enthrone me as Supreme Ruler of the World.
> Institutional elitism is 1) an informal argumentative fallacy and 2) not going
> to get you very far in this group.
And where exactly do you think I'm trying to go in this group? What respect
I have from people is down to who I am, how I have acted in the past and how
they view such actions. Some people such as Dalton, Rog, Bjorn and Sheppard,
I get along well with. Others such as you and Wayne, I don't. I seriously
doubt that me going to Oxford would change any of that. If it did, I would
be concerned for the person whose opinion it sways.
>>> "THAT'S IT! I'M LEAVING! NO ONE TRY TO STOP ME BECAUSE I'M GONE FOREVER! I'M
>>> JUST GOING TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS LAST 200-POST THREAD ABOUT MY LEAVING AND
>>> THEN I'M REALLY GONE, FOR AT LEAST TWO WEEKS! NO, DON'T TRY TO STOP ME..."
>> I have no intention of stopping you. If leaving is what'll make you happy
>> then fine. These things happen. People get more work, get chucked in jail,
>> decide that the some people are acting like asses and making debate
>> pointless. Not sure which is your reason, but hope you'll be happy away from
>> ASVS. I certainly found it quite refreshing.
> 8==========D
Now Kynes, I thought we'd discussed. No need to show the rest fo the group
that my typing gives you erections. We know you're a horny little devil
already.
>>> But maybe it's that masturbatory STGOD Tim-deaths just can't compare to the
>>> real thing.
>> You view the killing of Tim as masturbatory? Now, who's really missing him?
> Yeah, I do view them that way.
Do they put something in the water where you live, or is this affliction
restricted solely to you?
>>> Your homoerotic tendencies notwithstanding,
>>
>> Some would say that such statements are your part are
Ah the snippage begins. It must pain you terribly to find something you
can't put an insult to, having to remove it instead.
> Great grammar. I'm sure with your Oxford application typed in that fashion,
> you'll be a shoo-in, presuming your flight is to interview for a janitorial
> position.
Well actually there are 4 applicants for every place in the College I've
applied to, so my odds of getting in aren't that great. I'm glad to see you
have such confidence in me though. Much appreciated.
>>> your younger sister already provides me with all of the Boyd-loving I could
>>> ever need.
>> Which one?
> All of them. They used to take turns, but now it's more of a group thing.
I see. Are you into child pornography as well, per chance?
Jonathan Boyd
>> The current STGOD is piss-boring.
>
> Hell, you want me to try to fix that? I'll go nuts, turn on my allies,
> it'll be great.
I thought that was my job! Thief! Thiever of jobs! I'll have our hands cut
off for this!
Durandal
> Spyda wrote:
> >
> > Graeme Dice wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.spacebattles.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=21032
> > >
> > > Need I say more?
> > >
> > > Graeme Dice
> > > --
> > > "Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations
> > > which we can perform without thinking about them."
> > > -- Alfred North Whitehead
> >
> > Cool pics.
>
> Yes, but cool pics do not a victory make.
>
> Graeme Dice
> --
> "Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations
> which we can perform without thinking about them."
> -- Alfred North Whitehead
You forget who we're dealing with, here.
--
Damien Sorresso
"My statements about your scientific ignorance and technical incompetence
aren't 'assumptions.' They are statements of fact. You have REPEATEDLY proven
yourself to have the scientific knowledge of an iguana."
-Mike Wong to Elim Garak
GILES: "I'm not supposed to have a private life?"
BUFFY: "No! Because you're very very old, and it's...gross."
"What advantages does this motor car have over...say...a train?"
-Homer Simpson
"I'm starting to wonder if whenever Edam bends over there isn't a fight
between
Alves and Boyd as to who places their lips onto the exhaust port first."
-Wayne Poe
"The Brain has threatened to irradiate everything within a 50-block radius
unless the following demands are met:
It wants feet."
-Oni
pablo_sa...@my-deja.com
Jonathan Boyd <jona...@jboyd.co.uk> wrote:
> Our spies intercepted the following random wibbling garbage from
> pablo_sa...@my-deja.com at pablo_sa...@my-deja.com:
>
> >> The current STGOD is piss-boring.
> >
> > Hell, you want me to try to fix that? I'll go nuts, turn on my
allies,
> > it'll be great.
>
> I thought that was my job! Thief! Thiever of jobs! I'll have our
hands cut
> off for this!
Okay, I'll cut off your hands, then you will do so to me, okay?
Well, maybe you'll bite off my hands.
pablo_sa...@my-deja.com
Yeah, but I was gonna wait, but our sovreign lord and master Kynes
wants me to pick up the pace.
Wayne Poe
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Aron Kerkhof wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 15:34:55 -0700, Kynes <ky...@choam.org> wrote:
>
> > ...Dorkpire...
>
> Whatever grievances anyone might have with Kynes, he *must* be
> forgiven just on the basis of that one word. I can't explain humor,
> and I know it's a subjective thing, but I want to state for the record
> that anyone having a prior knowledge of the history of Kynes vs Boyd,
> and who furthermore didn't laugh, and laugh hard, at that one word...
> well, that is a person I can never fully trust.
What they say is true. Age has no meaning on the web! I'm 35, and Kynes
makes me LOL more than anyone, even Cronan! And the bastard is only 17.
"But back here in the gentle hamlet of You'reFuckingStupidBoyd, we take a
more realistic view of language, one which does NOT require us to
overinterpret the pitches of Riker's farts."
----------- Kynes
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Wayne Poe
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
> > 4. I'll say it again: Boyd, you are a HUGE pussy.
> Or is it that you merely want me to be? Come on Kynes, reveal your true
> feeling here. I think we've known each other long enough.
Boyd, Kynes has f*@ked you over more times than even Dalton can archive.
"Oh no! A bunch of pasty-faced geeks who sit inside all day masturbating
to their scale models of Klingon battleships don't agree with me?! Where
DID I leave that bottle of cyanide?"
------------Kynes
Wayne Poe
You know, I was going to use my GIF Animator to create a little movie of
R2D2 blowing up Trek and B5 ships and post them to sb.com....
But who has the frickin' TIME?
:)
Jonathan Boyd
pablo_sa...@my-deja.com at pablo_sa...@my-deja.com:
>>> Hell, you want me to try to fix that? I'll go nuts, turn on my allies,
>>> it'll be great.
>> I thought that was my job! Thief! Thiever of jobs! I'll have our hands cut
>> off for this!
> Okay, I'll cut off your hands, then you will do so to me, okay?
> Well, maybe you'll bite off my hands.
Agreed!
No, wait... There's something not quite right here...
Jonathan Boyd
at lo...@h4h.com:
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
>
>>> 4. I'll say it again: Boyd, you are a HUGE pussy.
>
>> Or is it that you merely want me to be? Come on Kynes, reveal your true
>> feeling here. I think we've known each other long enough.
>
> Boyd, Kynes has f*@ked you over more times than even Dalton can archive.
No, he's tried to. Maybe in your eyes he has, but your view isn't
particularly important to me.
Jonathan Boyd
Spickard at atomik...@excite.com:
>> I'm sorry, but you confuse Northern Ireland with America. When you talk to
>> someone, the chances are that they're not incestuous/in-bred (apologies to
>> any other Americans who may be reading this thread).
> "Hey all you guys suck monkey balls! Oh, I'm sorry, you illiterate slobs."
You do realise I wasn't being entirely serious at the time, right?
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or
Jonathan Boyd
ky...@choam.org:
>>> It was out of fear of your eventual bitching that it was done, since being a
>>> crybaby is more intrinsic to your nature than even your latent stupidity.
>> I see. Your opinions are yours and yours to do with as they please. Feel
>> free to air them, but don't expect us to accept them as our own.
> Who is this mysterious "us?"
The newsgroup perhaps? Who else?
> Can't you just make a statement on your own and stand by it,
To those willing to use their ability to both read and comprehend English,
it should be pretty clear that I generally do. I know you're not naturally
stupid Kynes. You merely _choose_ to be on occasions, for reasons that are
beyond me.
> Whiny Bitch?
Does calling names help sooth the pain, Ian? What was it that caused so much
hurt in your life? Bullied as a child? Rejected by girls? An abusive father?
I guess I shouldn't be too hard on you. I don't know what you've been
through.
>>> Institutional elitism is 1) an informal argumentative fallacy and 2) not
>>> going
>>> to get you very far in this group.
>> And where exactly do you think I'm trying to go in this group?
> I thought you were trying to leave. Did you get lost on the way out?
As I recall, I was gone for 32 days and my sent items folder confirms that.
I didn't say I was gone permanently. I can understand why you might wish to
be rid of me, but since I'm not going to be debating actively, you don't
need to worry about me grinding your pet theories into so many grains of
powder for Weyoun to snort when he feels the need.
>> What respect I have from people is down to who I am, how I have acted in the
>> past and how they view such actions. Some people such as Dalton, Rog, Bjorn
>> and Sheppard, I get along well with. Others such as you and Wayne, I don't. I
>> seriously doubt that me going to Oxford would change any of that. If it did,
>> I would be concerned for the person whose opinion it sways.
> Dodge, dodge, dodge.
No, nobody could possibly tell the truth here, could they. I mean if Ian
Samuel isn't an honest guy, why should anyone else be?
> That doesn't change the fact that essentially, your response to my argument
> was: "Well, excuse me, but I need to drop the name of a semi-good British
> school that I might go to: Oxford. Thank you."
Nonsense. That is merely what you are inferring from what I said. As usual,
you jump to the worst possible conclusion because it suits your agenda.
>>>> I have no intention of stopping you. If leaving is what'll make you happy
>>>> then fine. These things happen. People get more work, get chucked in jail,
>>>> decide that the some people are acting like asses and making debate
>>>> pointless. Not sure which is your reason, but hope you'll be happy away
>>>> from
>>>> ASVS. I certainly found it quite refreshing.
>>> 8==========D
>> Now Kynes, I thought we'd discussed. No need to show the rest fo the group
>> that my typing gives you erections. We know you're a horny little devil
>> already.
> See above.
I fail to see what relevance Oxford has to you being aroused by my typing.
>>> Great grammar. I'm sure with your Oxford application typed in that fashion,
>>> you'll be a shoo-in, presuming your flight is to interview for a janitorial
>>> position.
>>
>> Well actually there are 4 applicants for every place in the College I've
>> applied to, so my odds of getting in aren't that great. I'm glad to see you
>> have such confidence in me though. Much appreciated.
>
> Christ. Is that it? A 25% acceptance ratio? Schools in the U.S. that are
> considered "selective" dip around 10-15% acceptance ratio. Truman accepts
> about a third of its applicants. I'm sorry, I had this image in my head of
> Oxford being somehow comparable to North American institutions. Silly me.
How foolish of me to think you might actually read what I posted and try to
comprehend it. I should have realised you would just twist everything I say
and make it look like I was trying to make a point that I wasn't. How
foolish of me. And after 2 years of seeing you do this.
>>>>> your younger sister already provides me with all of the Boyd-loving I
>>>>> could ever need.
>>>> Which one?
>>> All of them. They used to take turns, but now it's more of a group thing.
>> I see. Are you into child pornography as well, per chance?
> Hey, she came on to me first.
Doge, dodge, dodge. Concession accepted. S is plain for anyone to see, Kynes
openly admits that he likes child pornography.
Jonathan Boyd
>>> do that to your own family? I thought you were made of kinder stuff than
>>> that.
>> I'm sorry, but you confuse Northern Ireland with America. When you talk to
>> someone, the chances are that they're not incestuous/in-bred (apologies to
>> any other Americans who may be reading this thread).
> This little paragraph here just demonstrates what a lameass you are.
> Qualifying your insults with "psst! Hey, just kidding everyone! hey, don't
> mean to offend anyone! ow, not the face guys" makes you out to be a whiny
> bitch. Which you are, whiny bitch.
Uh-huh. You keep telling yourself that and might start to believe it. Of
course you'll be virtually on your own. I imagine Durandal and Poe will
follow your lead, but it's not as if I care much for what they say or think
either.
Wayne Poe
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
> >> Or is it that you merely want me to be? Come on Kynes, reveal your true
> >> feeling here. I think we've known each other long enough.
> >
> > Boyd, Kynes has f*@ked you over more times than even Dalton can archive.
> No, he's tried to. Maybe in your eyes he has, but your view isn't
> particularly important to me.
Your view is particularly myopic, as it's apparent to everyone else BUT
you that Kynes has indeed, shagged you rotten.
Wayne Poe
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
> Uh-huh. You keep telling yourself that and might start to believe it. Of
> course you'll be virtually on your own. I imagine Durandal and Poe will
> follow your lead, but it's not as if I care much for what they say or think
> either.
Other than the fact that you've mentioned my name in about three posts
now....
Jonathan Boyd
at lo...@h4h.com:
>> Uh-huh. You keep telling yourself that and might start to believe it. Of
>> course you'll be virtually on your own. I imagine Durandal and Poe will
>> follow your lead, but it's not as if I care much for what they say or think
>> either.
> Other than the fact that you've mentioned my name in about three posts
> now....
Uh-huh. I've mentioned Hitler's name a few rimes in the past, but that
doesn't mean I care much for his opinions of me. You've mentioned Elim's
name plenty of times, but does that mean what you're saying it means where?
I don't think so.
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or
Jonathan Boyd
>
>> No, he's tried to. Maybe in your eyes he has, but your view isn't
>> particularly important to me.
>
> Your view is particularly myopic, as it's apparent to everyone else BUT
> you that Kynes has indeed, shagged you rotten.
As I've already said, you're entitled to your opinion. I won't presume to
know what everyone else thinks on the matter.
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
Jonathan Boyd
ky...@choam.org:
>>> This little paragraph here just demonstrates what a lameass you are.
>>> Qualifying your insults with "psst! Hey, just kidding everyone! hey, don't
>>> mean to offend anyone! ow, not the face guys" makes you out to be a whiny
>>> bitch. Which you are, whiny bitch.
>>
>> Uh-huh. You keep telling yourself that and might start to believe it. Of
>> course you'll be virtually on your own. I imagine Durandal and Poe will
>> follow your lead, but it's not as if I care much for what they say or think
>> either.
>
> Why do you keep talking about Wayne, out of curiosity? Is he even reading this
> thread? Honestly, Boyd. He's engaged. Back off.
A paragraph makes more sense read in its entirety, rather than focusing ona
single word.
Jonathan Boyd
Spickard at atomik...@excite.com:
>>> "Hey all you guys suck monkey balls! Oh, I'm sorry, you illiterate slobs."
>> You do realise I wasn't being entirely serious at the time, right?
> You mean you're apology wasn't entirely serious?
<groan>
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or
Jonathan Boyd
at lo...@h4h.com:
>>> Your view is particularly myopic, as it's apparent to everyone else BUT
>>> you that Kynes has indeed, shagged you rotten.
>> As I've already said, you're entitled to your opinion. I won't presume to
>> know what everyone else thinks on the matter.
> Hello, Mr. Ostrich. Geez, who would have thought that I'd elicit such
> ambivalence from you by pointing out the FACTS from "The Pegasus" which
> alone was enough to destroy all your arguments on the matter. But don't
> worry, no one else noticed.....
I've already said that I'm not getting involved in debates with people who
refuse to look at the facts and accept them. 2 years ago, I thought you were
a good debater. Things have changed and I'm sorry to have lost someone I
considered a skilled opponent. You still have those skills, but you've lost
any sense of honour or desire for the truth.
> "Logic doesn't enter inot my relationship with God in the slightest."
>
> --------Jonathan Boyd
Oh, what a surprise, you've resurrected those quotes. I do hope they keep
you entertained.
Jonathan Boyd
at lo...@h4h.com:
>>> Other than the fact that you've mentioned my name in about three posts
>>> now....
>> Uh-huh. I've mentioned Hitler's name a few rimes in the past, but that
>> doesn't mean I care much for his opinions of me.
> I don't remember the last "rime"
Oh look everyone, I made a typo! I must be really dumb according to Wayne
Poe.
> you've mentioned Hitler, but the correlatiom between you mentioning him and I
> in this context simply isn't there. Considering the fact that someone who died
> 40 years before you were born wouldn't have an opinion of you either way
> further muddles the issue. Try again.
Funny how you left out Elim. Would that be because me mentioning him defeats
your argument before you can even type it.
>> You've mentioned Elim's name plenty of times, but does that mean what
>> you're saying it means where? I don't think so.
> "Does that mean what you're saying it means where?"
That should have said 'here', not 'where'. Typo.
> Jesus H Christ with a stutter, you're going to COLLEGE?
No, I"m currently finishing my A-Levels in a grammar school and will be off
to university next year. College is for vocational courses which are
somewhere below a degree and many offer A-levels to people who dropped out
of school when they were 16, rather than continuing until they were 18. Some
schools however do not provide facilities for teaching A-Levels, so in some
cases, students have no choice but to go to college.
> You'd bettter hope they have a remedial English class there on par with "See
> Spot run."
Uh-huh. I believe I've told you before how good my results in English were.
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
Jonathan Boyd
Admiral Ancaris at nsm...@trib.com:
> Has anyone ever done a "reversed roles" TGOD? Where two fierce rivals play
> eith their opponents forces (as defined by the "creator" of said force) and,
> no matter how much they may hate them, they have to try to win with them???
>
> *shrugs* Just an Idea
Hmm, don't think it's ever happened before. Not enough incentive for people
to win really. Unless there was an award at stake.
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or
Jonathan Boyd
ky...@choam.org:
>>> This little paragraph here just demonstrates what a lameass you are.
>>> Qualifying your insults with "psst! Hey, just kidding everyone! hey, don't
>>> mean to offend anyone! ow, not the face guys" makes you out to be a whiny
>>> bitch. Which you are, whiny bitch.
>>
>> Uh-huh. You keep telling yourself that and might start to believe it. Of
>> course you'll be virtually on your own. I imagine Durandal and Poe will
>> follow your lead, but it's not as if I care much for what they say or think
>> either.
>
> Why do you keep talking about Wayne, out of curiosity?
I would have thought that pretty obvious from the comments I've made.
> Is he even reading this thread?
The fact that he ahs replied in it would suggest so, yes.
> Honestly, Boyd. He's engaged. Back off.
I'm sorry if I'm intruding on your territory. I thought you marked it out by
urinating on the ground, but apparently not.
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
Jonathan Boyd
ky...@choam.org:
>>>> I see. Your opinions are yours and yours to do with as they please. Feel
>>>> free to air them, but don't expect us to accept them as our own.
>>> Who is this mysterious "us?"
>> The newsgroup perhaps? Who else?
> I see. So you ARE making faulty assumptions about everyone's opinion.
No. Read what I said. Now point out where I stated what everyone's opinion
was. Come on. I'm waiting. Can't? Any idea why? What's that? Yes, well done!
It's because I never made that claim. There now, the truth isn't so hard to
say is it? Don't you feel much better now?
> You may not have noticed this, Boyd, but the only people involved in this
> thread fall into two categories.
That's nice. Did I make any claims to the contrary? Don't believe so. I
merely said that you shouldn't expect the newsgroup, by which I meant the
denizens of ASVS as opposed to just people in this thread, to accept and
conform to your opinions.
> I will add parenthetical statements to help you figure out who's who:
> 1. People who have palms so hairy that they wear gloves in July. (You.)
Now Kynes, you're getting to an age where people will start to consider you
an adult. Can't we leave such childish insults/attempts at humour behind?
> 2. People who think you're a whiny bitch. (Everyone else.)
Do you really think that, or do you merely say it to try and annoy me? And
should I really expect an honest answer from you?
>>> Can't you just make a statement on your own and stand by it,
>>
>> To those willing to use their ability to both read and comprehend English,
>> it should be pretty clear that I generally do.
> ^^^^^^
> Except in situations like this sentence? "It should be clear to everyone
> involved that we are great!" What the fuck are you talking about, Boyd?
I thought it pretty obvious, but I'll explain it anyway. I was referring to
your request that I 'make a statement on [my] own and stand by it' and
saying that 'I generally do,' by which I meant that I generally do make
statements of my own and stand by them.
Is that any clearer?
>>> Whiny Bitch?
>>
>> Does calling names help sooth the pain, Ian? What was it that caused so much
>> hurt in your life? Bullied as a child? Rejected by girls? An abusive father?
> You know, Boyd, it's one thing to idolize me. I can understand that. You're
> clearly lacking in role models.
I'm quite secure in myself that I donšt feel a need to model myself after
someone.
> But it's really lame to just steal my insults.
Steal your insults? I don't recall doing that. In fact the bit you snipped
(funny how you always seem to do that in order to give you an excuse to
attack someone) showed that I wasn't insulting you, but saying we really
don't know what's going on in your life. You could be lashing out at people
because something is wrong at home. Didn't want people to think you were
pure venom.
> How about next you tell me, in your own muted, dorkish way, to "eat poop?"
Why bother with saying something like that to me? Calling me a dork isn't
going to have any effect on me. It's the ASVS equivalent of giving someone a
bouquet of flowers and a box of chocolates, compared to some of the things
said here.
> And it's "soothe," by the way.
I'm quite aware of that. Sadly I'm not as good a typist as I would like and
couldn't be arsed proof-reading things, so mistake crop up occasionally.
>> I didn't say I was gone permanently. I can understand why you might wish to
>> be rid of me, but since I'm not going to be debating actively, you don't
>> need to worry about me grinding your pet theories into so many grains of
>> powder for Weyoun to snort when he feels the need.
> Look, Boyd's been to Spacebattles school. Now every time he loses a debate,
> he'll just say "Well, I'm only here for the TGODs anyway chaps! Ha ha, don't
> take yourselves so seriously! dum de doo..."
Awfully cynical aren't you? How can I lose debates I'm not going to be
participating in? You seem to have trouble accepting the truth from people?
Why do you think that I am lying? Do you expect such behaviour to be normal?
Do you consider such behaviour to be normal? Is it normal for you? Would you
have been lying in my position?
>>> That doesn't change the fact that essentially, your response to my argument
>>> was: "Well, excuse me, but I need to drop the name of a semi-good British
>>> school that I might go to: Oxford. Thank you."
>> Nonsense. That is merely what you are inferring from what I said. As usual,
>> you jump to the worst possible conclusion because it suits your agenda.
>
> KYNES: You use too many hypens.
> BOYD: I'll think about that on the way to Oxford.
> Anyone reading the thread, feel free to chime in: does it seem like Boyd is
> trying to compensate for the wish he got from the Genie of the Small Genitals
> Lamp?
To be honest, I did it just to irritate you. I was curious about what you
would say.
>>>>> 8==========D
>>>> Now Kynes, I thought we'd discussed. No need to show the rest fo the group
>>>> that my typing gives you erections. We know you're a horny little devil
>>>> already.
>>> See above.
>> I fail to see what relevance Oxford has to you being aroused by my typing.
> Hey, I don't mean to disturb your obsession with trying to make yourself feel
> good because you've got an interview at a school somewhere, but I wasn't
> talking about that.
I have no need to make myself feel good by boasting to you or anyone else.
There are reasons enough in my life for me to be joyful without having to
say a word.
>>> Christ. Is that it? A 25% acceptance ratio? Schools in the U.S. that are
>>> considered "selective" dip around 10-15% acceptance ratio. Truman accepts
>>> about a third of its applicants. I'm sorry, I had this image in my head of
>>> Oxford being somehow comparable to North American institutions. Silly me.
>> How foolish of me to think you might actually read what I posted and try to
>> comprehend it.
> 1 in 4 isn't 25%?
> I am in serious shit for my math final tomorrow.
Oh look, avoiding the point again. Originally I thought it was deliberate,
but maybe I did overestimate your intelligence. So which is it Kynes?
Incomprehensible moron, or lying little strawman-maker?
If I was trying to make an argument that it was an amazingly good
university, I would have pointed out that some courses only have a 13%
acceptance ratio. However I didn't and anyone with an ounce of common sense
reading this would see that I was showing that the chances of be getting in
weren't great.
>>> Hey, she came on to me first.
>> Doge, dodge, dodge. Concession accepted. S is plain for anyone to see, Kynes
>> openly admits that he likes child pornography.
> My motto: "The younger they are, they tighter they are."
Uh-huh. Okay...
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
Kynes
>> You'd bettter hope they have a remedial English class there on par with "See
>> Spot run."
>
>Uh-huh. I believe I've told you before how good my results in English were.
Hey Wayne, aren't you impressed? I know I am!
--
-LK!
[ ky...@choam.org ] [ ICQ: 795238 ] [ AIM: Kynes23 ]
"Calling it a chasm between idiotic fanboys that spend 10 hours creating a
.jpg of a Starfury to masterbate to and those that enjoy laughing at them
would be more appropriate."
- Wayne Poe
Kynes
>>> The newsgroup perhaps? Who else?
>
>> I see. So you ARE making faulty assumptions about everyone's opinion.
>
>No. Read what I said. Now point out where I stated what everyone's opinion
>was. Come on. I'm waiting. Can't? Any idea why? What's that? Yes, well done!
>It's because I never made that claim. There now, the truth isn't so hard to
>say is it? Don't you feel much better now?
So, when you say "don't expect us to agree," referring to the entire newsgroup,
you don't mean to speak... for the newsgroup... right.
>> You may not have noticed this, Boyd, but the only people involved in this
>> thread fall into two categories.
>
>That's nice. Did I make any claims to the contrary? Don't believe so.
BOYD: "Oh, Kynes, you may think I have genitals comparable to a badly-endowed
flea, but don't expect us to agree!"
KYNES: "Who's us?"
BOYD: "The gentle people in this group, who love me so much!"
KYNES: "The only people weighing in on this issue think you're a dickfore."
BOYD: "Did I ever claim otherwise?"
KYNES: "Yes. Now get me a soda."
BOYD: "OK, sorry, don't get mad."
>> I will add parenthetical statements to help you figure out who's who:
>
>> 1. People who have palms so hairy that they wear gloves in July. (You.)
>
>Now Kynes, you're getting to an age where people will start to consider you
>an adult. Can't we leave such childish insults/attempts at humour behind?
I understand why the comment above would provoke "coming-of-age" remarks from
you, but please, spare me the gross double-entendres about your monoparticipant
sex life.
>> 2. People who think you're a whiny bitch. (Everyone else.)
>
>Do you really think that, or do you merely say it to try and annoy me?
Yes, Boyd. Every night, when I go to bed, I lay awake thinking of how I will
irritate the pro-ST side. Then I wax my moustache and kick some babies. Christ.
Get over your persecution complex.
>>> To those willing to use their ability to both read and comprehend English,
>>> it should be pretty clear that I generally do.
>
>> ^^^^^^
>
>> Except in situations like this sentence? "It should be clear to everyone
>> involved that we are great!" What the fuck are you talking about, Boyd?
>
>I thought it pretty obvious, but I'll explain it anyway. I was referring to
>your request that I 'make a statement on [my] own and stand by it' and
>saying that 'I generally do,' by which I meant that I generally do make
>statements of my own and stand by them.
Wow. You didn't just miss the point, you missed the soundtrack and narration by
Ringo Starr.
>>>> Whiny Bitch?
>>>
>>> Does calling names help sooth the pain, Ian? What was it that caused so much
>>> hurt in your life? Bullied as a child? Rejected by girls? An abusive father?
>
>> You know, Boyd, it's one thing to idolize me. I can understand that. You're
>> clearly lacking in role models.
>
>I'm quite secure in myself that I don¹t feel a need to model myself after
>someone.
Maybe you should. Someone who can construct a sentence, for example.
>> But it's really lame to just steal my insults.
>
>Steal your insults? I don't recall doing that.
Boyd, your saying that I don't have much luck with girls isn't just absurd, it's
stupid. Either you actually believe that I have trouble with women (in which
case you're going to have to argue down a lot of counter-evidence) or you're
stealing my insults. Which is it?
>In fact the bit you snipped
>(funny how you always seem to do that in order to give you an excuse to
>attack someone) showed that I wasn't insulting you, but saying we really
>don't know what's going on in your life. You could be lashing out at people
>because something is wrong at home. Didn't want people to think you were
>pure venom.
I'm not even at home. I'm at university 1000 miles from my home. It could be
nuclear winter there for all I know. All I am sure of is that my mother just
signed a three-book contract that she's fairly pleased about, my father
continues to amass his collection of DVDs, and my brother has fallen for some
girl.
>> How about next you tell me, in your own muted, dorkish way, to "eat poop?"
>
>Why bother with saying something like that to me? Calling me a dork isn't
>going to have any effect on me. It's the ASVS equivalent of giving someone a
>bouquet of flowers and a box of chocolates, compared to some of the things
>said here.
Here, we see Boyd attempting a blatant crowd appeal:
"Hey, I think the people on ASVS are made of tougher stuff than that! Huh folks!
Am I right? Am I right?" [making gimme gestures to crowd while forcing smile]
>> And it's "soothe," by the way.
>
>I'm quite aware of that. Sadly I'm not as good a typist as I would like and
>couldn't be arsed proof-reading things, so mistake crop up occasionally.
Could you be "arsed" to press the spellcheck key, or would that interfere with
your busy schedule of church retreats and self-gratification?
>> Look, Boyd's been to Spacebattles school. Now every time he loses a debate,
>> he'll just say "Well, I'm only here for the TGODs anyway chaps! Ha ha, don't
>> take yourselves so seriously! dum de doo..."
>
>Awfully cynical aren't you?
To the bitter end.
>How can I lose debates I'm not going to be
>participating in?
You tell me. Didn't you just jump into the [TREK] thread? I count several posts
by you there already. Hmm. Are you lying or just incapable of remembering your
intentions minute to minute?
>> KYNES: You use too many hypens.
>> BOYD: I'll think about that on the way to Oxford.
>
>> Anyone reading the thread, feel free to chime in: does it seem like Boyd is
>> trying to compensate for the wish he got from the Genie of the Small Genitals
>> Lamp?
>
>To be honest, I did it just to irritate you. I was curious about what you
>would say.
Oh, gee, I'm so irritated. Boyd's going to go to some British university. That
really gets my knickers in a knot! Chap!
>> Hey, I don't mean to disturb your obsession with trying to make yourself feel
>> good because you've got an interview at a school somewhere, but I wasn't
>> talking about that.
>
>I have no need to make myself feel good by boasting to you or anyone else.
Then why this elaborate self-defense thread? Let your ego take the hit. Don't
reply to this message.
>>> How foolish of me to think you might actually read what I posted and try to
>>> comprehend it.
>
>> 1 in 4 isn't 25%?
>
>> I am in serious shit for my math final tomorrow.
>
>Oh look, avoiding the point again.
BOYD: Well, if I get in, I'll be one hot mama! Only 1 in 4 do!
KYNES: 25%? Geez, I was wrong about Oxford.
BOYD: Missing the point! Missing the point!
KYNES: Be quiet and shine my shoes.
BOYD: Yes m'Lord.
>> My motto: "The younger they are, they tighter they are."
>
>Uh-huh. Okay...
Blistering! May I use that in rebuttals.txt? Or is that statement actually
classified as armament in Northern Ireland, thus preventing its export to my
hard drive?
Kynes
>>> I'm sorry, but you confuse Northern Ireland with America. When you talk to
>>> someone, the chances are that they're not incestuous/in-bred (apologies to
>>> any other Americans who may be reading this thread).
>
>> This little paragraph here just demonstrates what a lameass you are.
>> Qualifying your insults with "psst! Hey, just kidding everyone! hey, don't
>> mean to offend anyone! ow, not the face guys" makes you out to be a whiny
>> bitch. Which you are, whiny bitch.
>
>Uh-huh. You keep telling yourself that and might start to believe it. Of
>course you'll be virtually on your own. I imagine Durandal and Poe will
>follow your lead, but it's not as if I care much for what they say or think
>either.
Why do you keep talking about Wayne, out of curiosity? Is he even reading this
thread? Honestly, Boyd. He's engaged. Back off.
--
LK!
[ ky...@choam.org ] [ ICQ: 795238 ] [ AIM: Kynes23 ]
'transistor' (noun) - $15 part designed to protect a $0.05 fuse.
Kynes
>> > ...Dorkpire...
>>
>> Whatever grievances anyone might have with Kynes, he *must* be
>> forgiven just on the basis of that one word. I can't explain humor,
>> and I know it's a subjective thing, but I want to state for the record
>> that anyone having a prior knowledge of the history of Kynes vs Boyd,
>> and who furthermore didn't laugh, and laugh hard, at that one word...
>> well, that is a person I can never fully trust.
>
>What they say is true. Age has no meaning on the web! I'm 35, and Kynes
>makes me LOL more than anyone, even Cronan! And the bastard is only 17.
Thanks folks! Thank you, no, thank you! I'll be here all week! Incidentally,
this record is available in the foyer!
Kynes
>>> I see. Your opinions are yours and yours to do with as they please. Feel
>>> free to air them, but don't expect us to accept them as our own.
>
>> Who is this mysterious "us?"
>
>The newsgroup perhaps? Who else?
I see. So you ARE making faulty assumptions about everyone's opinion. You may
not have noticed this, Boyd, but the only people involved in this thread fall
into two categories. I will add parenthetical statements to help you figure out
who's who:
1. People who have palms so hairy that they wear gloves in July. (You.)
2. People who think you're a whiny bitch. (Everyone else.)
>> Can't you just make a statement on your own and stand by it,
>
>To those willing to use their ability to both read and comprehend English,
>it should be pretty clear that I generally do.
^^^^^^
Except in situations like this sentence? "It should be clear to everyone
involved that we are great!" What the fuck are you talking about, Boyd?
>> Whiny Bitch?
>
>Does calling names help sooth the pain, Ian? What was it that caused so much
>hurt in your life? Bullied as a child? Rejected by girls? An abusive father?
You know, Boyd, it's one thing to idolize me. I can understand that. You're
clearly lacking in role models. But it's really lame to just steal my insults.
How about next you tell me, in your own muted, dorkish way, to "eat poop?"
And it's "soothe," by the way.
>I didn't say I was gone permanently. I can understand why you might wish to
>be rid of me, but since I'm not going to be debating actively, you don't
>need to worry about me grinding your pet theories into so many grains of
>powder for Weyoun to snort when he feels the need.
Look, Boyd's been to Spacebattles school. Now every time he loses a debate,
he'll just say "Well, I'm only here for the TGODs anyway chaps! Ha ha, don't
take yourselves so seriously! dum de doo..."
>> That doesn't change the fact that essentially, your response to my argument
>> was: "Well, excuse me, but I need to drop the name of a semi-good British
>> school that I might go to: Oxford. Thank you."
>
>Nonsense. That is merely what you are inferring from what I said. As usual,
>you jump to the worst possible conclusion because it suits your agenda.
KYNES: You use too many hypens.
BOYD: I'll think about that on the way to Oxford.
Anyone reading the thread, feel free to chime in: does it seem like Boyd is
trying to compensate for the wish he got from the Genie of the Small Genitals
Lamp?
>>>> 8==========D
>
>>> Now Kynes, I thought we'd discussed. No need to show the rest fo the group
>>> that my typing gives you erections. We know you're a horny little devil
>>> already.
>
>> See above.
>
>I fail to see what relevance Oxford has to you being aroused by my typing.
Hey, I don't mean to disturb your obsession with trying to make yourself feel
good because you've got an interview at a school somewhere, but I wasn't talking
about that.
>>> Well actually there are 4 applicants for every place in the College I've
>>> applied to, so my odds of getting in aren't that great. I'm glad to see you
>>> have such confidence in me though. Much appreciated.
>>
>> Christ. Is that it? A 25% acceptance ratio? Schools in the U.S. that are
>> considered "selective" dip around 10-15% acceptance ratio. Truman accepts
>> about a third of its applicants. I'm sorry, I had this image in my head of
>> Oxford being somehow comparable to North American institutions. Silly me.
>
>How foolish of me to think you might actually read what I posted and try to
>comprehend it.
1 in 4 isn't 25%?
I am in serious shit for my math final tomorrow.
>>>>>> your younger sister already provides me with all of the Boyd-loving I
>>>>>> could ever need.
>
>>>>> Which one?
>
>>>> All of them. They used to take turns, but now it's more of a group thing.
>
>>> I see. Are you into child pornography as well, per chance?
>
>> Hey, she came on to me first.
>
>Doge, dodge, dodge. Concession accepted. S is plain for anyone to see, Kynes
>openly admits that he likes child pornography.
My motto: "The younger they are, they tighter they are."
Mike Griffiths
news:yLMvOonPAC4=+SA9uXor...@4ax.com...
> >> Hey, she came on to me first.
> >
> >Doge, dodge, dodge. Concession accepted. S is plain for anyone to see,
Kynes
> >openly admits that he likes child pornography.
>
> My motto: "The younger they are, they tighter they are."
ASVSHN: Kynes Arrested for breaking into IVF clinic. ASVS' resident
limp-wristed atheist says "anything older than conception just aint tight
enough"
MSNBC bunsiess news: "Gurkah Caviar LLC chairman vanishes in mysterious
circumstances"
Ryan Spickard
> Anyone reading the thread, feel free to chime in: does it seem like Boyd
is
> trying to compensate for the wish he got from the Genie of the Small
Genitals
> Lamp?
LOL, its so true :)
[snip]
> >Doge, dodge, dodge. Concession accepted. S is plain for anyone to see,
Kynes
> >openly admits that he likes child pornography.
>
> My motto: "The younger they are, they tighter they are."
LMAO! You sick bastard! LOL :)
Ryan Spickard
news:90oapc$1oj2k$1...@ID-41346.news.dfncis.de...
LMAO!
Ryan Spickard
news:B65510E7.2A3E%jona...@jboyd.co.uk...
> Our spies intercepted the following random wibbling garbage from Ryan
> Spickard at atomik...@excite.com:
> >> I'm sorry, but you confuse Northern Ireland with America. When you talk
to
> >> someone, the chances are that they're not incestuous/in-bred (apologies
to
> >> any other Americans who may be reading this thread).
>
Grand Admiral Ancaris
eith their opponents forces (as defined by the "creator" of said force) and,
no matter how much they may hate them, they have to try to win with them???
*shrugs* Just an Idea
Grand Admiral Ancaris
Phong Nguyen wrote:
> Kynes <ky...@choam.org> wrote in <VssuOvtkzHFq=TZ3T2QX...@4ax.com>:
>
> >Invented enemies lack the intelligence of human enemies. What makes a
> >TGOD fun is the OTHER PERSON. It's not an excercise in story writing,
> >for god's sake. It's a way to kick the shit out of the other guy in as
> >inventive a way as you can imagine. Don't believe me? Go read some of
> >the really old-school ones, before they had names.
> >
> Yeah, that's the best part about TGODing, but I decided to join in
> something a little bit different. I was considering controlling both the
> Trolls and the CIN to see what would happen. Yeah, it's not as fun as
> fighting against a human opponent, but still quite interesting
> nevertheless.
>
> >"And then *I* invaded the troll homeworld with *my* giant fleet!"
> >
> >"Ha, you are a wise one! And then *I* landed a million troops on the
> >troll homeworld and killed the troll man king with my bizap ray!"
> >
> >"And then *I* used my newfound ninja skills to kill a million trolls in
> >a second!"
> >
> Well, at least I'm not doing that :) I'm getting my ass badly kicked.
Wayne Poe
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
> >> Uh-huh. You keep telling yourself that and might start to believe it. Of
> >> course you'll be virtually on your own. I imagine Durandal and Poe will
> >> follow your lead, but it's not as if I care much for what they say or think
> >> either.
>
> > Other than the fact that you've mentioned my name in about three posts
> > now....
>
> Uh-huh. I've mentioned Hitler's name a few rimes in the past, but that
> doesn't mean I care much for his opinions of me.
I don't remember the last "rime" you've mentioned Hitler, but the
correlatiom between you mentioning him and I in this context simply isn't
there. Considering the fact that someone who died 40 years before you were
born wouldn't have an opinion of you either way further muddles the issue.
Try again.
> You've mentioned Elim's name plenty of times, but does that mean what
> you're saying it means where? I don't think so.
"Does that mean what you're saying it means where?" Jesus H Christ with a
stutter, you're going to COLLEGE? You'd bettter hope they have a remedial
English class there on par with "See Spot run."
"It was only perpetuated by the Star wars side. the Star Trek
side kept having to correct them saying that only Kira was pergnant."
---------- Jonathan Boyd
Wayne Poe
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
> >> No, he's tried to. Maybe in your eyes he has, but your view isn't
> >> particularly important to me.
> >
> > Your view is particularly myopic, as it's apparent to everyone else BUT
> > you that Kynes has indeed, shagged you rotten.
> As I've already said, you're entitled to your opinion. I won't presume to
> know what everyone else thinks on the matter.
Hello, Mr. Ostrich. Geez, who would have thought that I'd elicit such
ambivalence from you by pointing out the FACTS from "The Pegasus" which
alone was enough to destroy all your arguments on the matter. But don't
worry, no one else noticed.....
"Logic doesn't enter inot my relationship with God in the slightest."
--------Jonathan Boyd
Wayne Poe
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
> > Hello, Mr. Ostrich. Geez, who would have thought that I'd elicit such
> > ambivalence from you by pointing out the FACTS from "The Pegasus" which
> > alone was enough to destroy all your arguments on the matter. But don't
> > worry, no one else noticed.....
> I've already said that I'm not getting involved in debates with people who
> refuse to look at the facts and accept them.
Then you won't be speaking to yourself anytime soon, since I'm the one that
presented all the uncontested facts, in the above case, which ran counter
to all your speculation and blatantly wrong conclusions.
> 2 years ago, I thought you were a good debater. Things have changed and
> I'm sorry to have lost someone I considered a skilled opponent. You
> still have those skills, but you've lost any sense of honour or desire
> for the truth.
I'm sure you believe that. Projecting is the last bastion for the
desperate.
> > "Logic doesn't enter inot my relationship with God in the slightest."
> >
> > --------Jonathan Boyd
> Oh, what a surprise, you've resurrected those quotes. I do hope they keep
> you entertained.
Not as much as this one:
"It was only perpetuated by the Star wars side. the Star Trek
side kept having to correct them saying that only Kira was pergnant."
---------- Jonathan Boyd
Wayne Poe
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jonathan Boyd wrote:
> >> Uh-huh. I've mentioned Hitler's name a few rimes in the past, but that
> >> doesn't mean I care much for his opinions of me.
>
> > I don't remember the last "rime"
>
> Oh look everyone, I made a typo! I must be really dumb according to Wayne
> Poe.
No comment.
> > you've mentioned Hitler, but the correlatiom between you mentioning him and I
> > in this context simply isn't there. Considering the fact that someone who died
> > 40 years before you were born wouldn't have an opinion of you either way
> > further muddles the issue. Try again.
>
> Funny how you left out Elim. Would that be because me mentioning him defeats
> your argument before you can even type it.
Its a non issue, Boyd. I mention Elim with the same reverence I mention
Jesus. Doesn't mean either one are constantly on my mind, as evidenced by
the fact that I haven't responded to Elim in close to a year. Or any from
Jesus, either.
> >> You've mentioned Elim's name plenty of times, but does that mean what
> >> you're saying it means where? I don't think so.
>
> > "Does that mean what you're saying it means where?"
>
> That should have said 'here', not 'where'. Typo.
So "Does that mean what you're saying it means here?" makes MORE
sense? Boyd, this is NOT a "typo".....
> > Jesus H Christ with a stutter, you're going to COLLEGE?
> No, I"m currently finishing my A-Levels in a grammar school and will be off
> to university next year. College is for vocational courses which are
> somewhere below a degree and many offer A-levels to people who dropped out
> of school when they were 16, rather than continuing until they were 18. Some
> schools however do not provide facilities for teaching A-Levels, so in some
> cases, students have no choice but to go to college.
Hopefully, they'll have classes for undiagnosed dyslexia.
> > You'd bettter hope they have a remedial English class there on par with "See
> > Spot run."
>
> Uh-huh. I believe I've told you before how good my results in English were.
I know what you've said. What you've shown is a different matter.
"By wildly extravagant heroification of Gene Roddenberry, all the
untruths, all the false credit, all the betrayal and perfidious behavior
he wallowed in, has been permitted to be flensed...leaving only this
glowing icon who wouldn't tell a lie or hurt a fly. Yeah, and there are
actually schmucks who think Adolf Hitler made the trains run on time."
---Harlan Ellison; writer of the TOS ep: "City On The Edge Of Forever"
Wayne Poe
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Kynes wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2000 19:55:28 +0000, Jonathan Boyd <jona...@jboyd.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >> You'd bettter hope they have a remedial English class there on par with "See
> >> Spot run."
> >
> >Uh-huh. I believe I've told you before how good my results in English were.
>
> Hey Wayne, aren't you impressed? I know I am!
I sure am I, Kynes! :)
"The door opened, and there was Gene Roddenberry. My first impression was
that this tall, unkempt person recently learned how to dress himself but
hadn't yet quite gotten the knack."
---Herb Solow, Exec in Charge of Production, STAR TREK
Kynes
>>> Uh-huh. I believe I've told you before how good my results in English were.
>>
>> Hey Wayne, aren't you impressed? I know I am!
>
>The intention wasn't to impress you - it was to correct your flawed
>perceptions.
I must also being "perceptually flawed" when I single out sentences like "Does
that mean what you're saying it means where?" and notice that a fleet of trained
monkeys could do better with 19th-century keyboards.
--
LK!
[ ky...@choam.org ] [ ICQ: 795238 ] [ AIM: Kynes23 ]
"High explosives are applicable where truth and logic fail."
- Tyler Micheli
Kynes
>> So, when you say "don't expect us to agree," referring to the entire
>> newsgroup, you don't mean to speak... for the newsgroup... right.
>
>I wasn't speaking for the newsgroup. I was telling you that you couldn't
>speak for it.
"I wasn't speaking for the newsgroup, I was just acting as its unilateral agent
of authority and telling you what you could and couldn't say about it. Naturally
I have this ability, being the ultimate arbiter of the ASVS population."
>> BOYD: "Oh, Kynes, you may think I have genitals comparable to a badly-endowed
>> flea, but don't expect us to agree!"
>>
>> KYNES: "Who's us?"
>>
>> BOYD: "The gentle people in this group, who love me so much!"
>>
>> KYNES: "The only people weighing in on this issue think you're a dickfore."
>>
>> BOYD: "Did I ever claim otherwise?"
>>
>> KYNES: "Yes. Now get me a soda."
>>
>> BOYD: "OK, sorry, don't get mad."
>
>So in other words you don't have a comeback and accept that you were wrong
>in the first place. I accept your apology.
I don't have a "comeback?" What is this, a 4th-grade cafeteria insult war? I'm
not trying to best you in some bizarre verbal contest. I don't think you'd stand
a chance even if I was. What I'm doing is illustrating to anyone watching what a
boring, stupid hypocrite you are.
>>> Now Kynes, you're getting to an age where people will start to consider you
>>> an adult. Can't we leave such childish insults/attempts at humour behind?
>>
>> I understand why the comment above would provoke "coming-of-age" remarks from
>> you, but please, spare me the gross double-entendres about your
>> monoparticipant sex life.
>
>What double-entendres? You really are quite delusional. Can we move on now?
Oooh! Ssssssssassy! You're on fiyah!
>> Yes, Boyd. Every night, when I go to bed, I lay awake thinking of how I will
>> irritate the pro-ST side. Then I wax my moustache and kick some babies.
>> Christ.
>
>It wouldn't surprise me.
I know, and that's what's so pathetically funny about you. You're not making
this shit up. You honestly do believe all this crap you're saying about me, even
though anyone can see what a laughable caricature of reality it is. Like, what a
twisted little world you inhabit. It must be fuckin' scary to be you, that's all
I can say.
>>> I thought it pretty obvious, but I'll explain it anyway. I was referring to
>>> your request that I 'make a statement on [my] own and stand by it' and
>>> saying that 'I generally do,' by which I meant that I generally do make
>>> statements of my own and stand by them.
>>
>> Wow. You didn't just miss the point, you missed the soundtrack and narration
>> by Ringo Starr.
>
>Oh look, you failed to point out where I missed the point.
Wow! I guess I lose the point debate! Whoops, that'll show me! Darn, now I won't
be able to sit on the top monkey bar at recess. Your mastery of playground law
is truly stunning.
>>> I'm quite secure in myself that I don1t feel a need to model myself after
>>> someone.
>
>> Maybe you should. Someone who can construct a sentence, for example.
>
>Oh stop Kynes, the pain! I simply can't take it anymore!
I'll tell you the same thing I told that chick you were pining after last year:
"Take it all, bitch."
>> Boyd, your saying that I don't have much luck with girls isn't just absurd,
>> it's stupid. Either you actually believe that I have trouble with women (in
>> which case you're going to have to argue down a lot of counter-evidence) or
>> you're stealing my insults. Which is it?
>
>As I've told you before, it wasn't an insult. And it was hardly yours to
>begin with. And none of us can really prove anything about each other, or
>even ourselves here.
I can. In this era of digital technology, it would be a crime if I didn't have
at least nominal photographic evidence of everything I claim. Either these
chicks were dating me or I talked total strangers into getting on me for a
picture. I don't even know which I'd admire more.
>> I'm not even at home. I'm at university 1000 miles from my home. It could be
>> nuclear winter there for all I know. All I am sure of is that my mother just
>> signed a three-book contract that she's fairly pleased about, my father
>> continues to amass his collection of DVDs, and my brother has fallen for some
>> girl.
>
>But if something was wrong, you could easily tell us that, clouding the real
>issues. Given the fact that you have frequently lied in the past, I find
>little reason to accept your word on any matter.
What the fuck? When have I EVER brought crap like that into these debates?
Jesus, Boyd, you're a fuckup. You're the one that's always using your personal
troubles as some sort of "Get Out Of Jail Free" card when you start losing
threads. So shut the fuck up before I turn my flow pen sideways and shove it up
your nostril.
>I think you're the one desperately making crowd appeals, begging them to
>laugh as they instead reach for the rotten fruit and vegetables.
Given most of the responses in this thread, if I was going for comedic appeal
(which I'm not -- see above), I'd be dead on. You, on the other hand, just look
like a dink who should bow out while he still has a little dignity left. Your
twisted little Boyd Mind just isn't built for this kind of thing. It's better at
things like:
* Cross-stitching
* Consoling girls when they're having trouble with guys they're actually
attracted to
>> You tell me. Didn't you just jump into the [TREK] thread? I count several
>> posts by you there already. Hmm. Are you lying or just incapable of
>> remembering your intentions minute to minute?
>
>As I've already pointed out, I wasn't debating, merely giving someone some
>information they wanted.
Right, right... uh huh. No, I admire this, you've finally found the most
cowardly way possible to get involved in threads. Now the next time you post
'[TECH] Picard's Eyebrow Raise In "Generations" = 9PW hand phasers', you can
just say "Hey, it was just information! I'm not here to debate, folks!"
>> Oh, gee, I'm so irritated. Boyd's going to go to some British university. That
>> really gets my knickers in a knot! Chap!
>
>Well generally I would say that flinging insults about with abandon would
>suggest that you are in some way irritated.
Right-o! Jolly good! Sporting!
>> Then why this elaborate self-defense thread? Let your ego take the hit. Don't
>> reply to this message.
>
>My ego is just fine. This isn't a self-defence thread.
ATTN: Bureau Of Spelling And Fraudulant Elementary School Graduates
>> BOYD: Well, if I get in, I'll be one hot mama! Only 1 in 4 do!
>> KYNES: 25%? Geez, I was wrong about Oxford.
>> BOYD: Missing the point! Missing the point!
>> KYNES: Be quiet and shine my shoes.
>> BOYD: Yes m'Lord.
>>
>Oh, look, you snipped my explanation again. Too much to hope that you would
>actually use a bit of honesty and decency here I guess.
Your explanation was "Yes m'Lord," to my command to shine my shoes. Who snipped
it? It's right there.
>>> Uh-huh. Okay...
>>
>> Blistering! May I use that in rebuttals.txt? Or is that statement actually
>> classified as armament in Northern Ireland, thus preventing its export to my
>> hard drive?
>
>Did I say it was a rebuttal? No. I simply saw no point in continuing. Some
>delusions are just too bizarre to be explored fully.
Give it up for Jonnnnnnathan Boyd, folks! Next up: Jonathan gives his impression
of a British butler at the Playboy mansion!
--
LK!
[ ky...@choam.org ] [ ICQ: 795238 ] [ AIM: Kynes23 ]
"High explosives are applicable where truth and logic fail."
- Tyler Micheli
Jonathan Boyd
ky...@choam.org:
> On Fri, 08 Dec 2000 11:30:46 +0000, Jonathan Boyd <jona...@jboyd.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>>> So, when you say "don't expect us to agree," referring to the entire
>>> newsgroup, you don't mean to speak... for the newsgroup... right.
>>
>> I wasn't speaking for the newsgroup. I was telling you that you couldn't
>> speak for it.
>
> "I wasn't speaking for the newsgroup, I was just acting as its unilateral
> agent of authority and telling you what you could and couldn't say about it.
> Naturally I have this ability, being the ultimate arbiter of the ASVS
> population."
Oh look, snipped the rest of my argument again. What a surprise. We haven't
seen that tactic in a while, have we? Continue with your delusions. Anyone
who's actually bothering to read these posts know you're just acting the
goat.
>>> BOYD: "Oh, Kynes, you may think I have genitals comparable to a
>>> badly-endowed
>>> flea, but don't expect us to agree!"
>>>
>>> KYNES: "Who's us?"
>>>
>>> BOYD: "The gentle people in this group, who love me so much!"
>>>
>>> KYNES: "The only people weighing in on this issue think you're a dickfore."
>>>
>>> BOYD: "Did I ever claim otherwise?"
>>>
>>> KYNES: "Yes. Now get me a soda."
>>>
>>> BOYD: "OK, sorry, don't get mad."
>> So in other words you don't have a comeback and accept that you were wrong
>> in the first place. I accept your apology.
> I don't have a "comeback?" What is this, a 4th-grade cafeteria insult war?
One would think so form some of your posts. However what I meant was a
counter-argument. A point to counter mine. And I think you're quite aware of
that.
> I'm
> not trying to best you in some bizarre verbal contest. I don't think you'd
> stand a chance even if I was. What I'm doing is illustrating to anyone
> watching what a boring, stupid hypocrite you are.
Of course. Do you think anyone actually believes that? You me, Aron? I
imagine we're the only 3 actually paying attention to these posts. I'm
afraid you won't have any success sullying my reputation Kynes.
>>> I understand why the comment above would provoke "coming-of-age" remarks
>>> from
>>> you, but please, spare me the gross double-entendres about your
>>> monoparticipant sex life.
>> What double-entendres? You really are quite delusional. Can we move on now?
> Oooh! Ssssssssassy! You're on fiyah!
So, no double-entendres then? Good. Oh and what was that you were just
saying about a "4th-grade cafeteria insult war" and me being a "boring,
stupid hypocrite" Perhaps you don;t have the intelligence I've credited you
with. Making such a blatant mistake like this really does take some
stupidity.
>>> Yes, Boyd. Every night, when I go to bed, I lay awake thinking of how I will
>>> irritate the pro-ST side. Then I wax my moustache and kick some babies.
>>> Christ.
>>
>> It wouldn't surprise me.
>
> I know, and that's what's so pathetically funny about you. You're not making
> this shit up. You honestly do believe all this crap you're saying about me,
> even though anyone can see what a laughable caricature of reality it is. Like,
> what a twisted little world you inhabit. It must be fuckin' scary to be you,
> that's all I can say.
Me saying about you? Now what, exactly _have_ I said about you? And what
have _you_ said about _me_? Come on Kynes, who are you trying to fool here?
The group or yourself?
>>> Wow. You didn't just miss the point, you missed the soundtrack and narration
>>> by Ringo Starr.
>>
>> Oh look, you failed to point out where I missed the point.
>
> Wow! I guess I lose the point debate! Whoops, that'll show me! Darn, now I
> won't be able to sit on the top monkey bar at recess. Your mastery of
> playground law is truly stunning.
And of course, yet again unable to back up your allegations, you result to
insults. You're so predictable these days. Maybe you should be the Bot to
replace Neelix.
>>> Maybe you should. Someone who can construct a sentence, for example.
>> Oh stop Kynes, the pain! I simply can't take it anymore!
> I'll tell you the same thing I told that chick you were pining after last
> year:
> "Take it all, bitch."
Is that actually an attempt to anger me? Or hurt me? Or make yourself look
funny? I'm curious as to which aprticular aspect you are failing in.
>>> Boyd, your saying that I don't have much luck with girls isn't just absurd,
>>> it's stupid. Either you actually believe that I have trouble with women (in
>>> which case you're going to have to argue down a lot of counter-evidence) or
>>> you're stealing my insults. Which is it?
>>
>> As I've told you before, it wasn't an insult. And it was hardly yours to
>> begin with. And none of us can really prove anything about each other, or
>> even ourselves here.
>
> I can. In this era of digital technology, it would be a crime if I didn't have
> at least nominal photographic evidence of everything I claim. Either these
> chicks were dating me or I talked total strangers into getting on me for a
> picture. I don't even know which I'd admire more.
But how would we know the photos are of you? Could easily be a friend. A
relative. Photos you lifted off the net. Not that I particular care about
it. If you've found a girl then fine, best of luck to you.
>>> I'm not even at home. I'm at university 1000 miles from my home. It could be
>>> nuclear winter there for all I know. All I am sure of is that my mother just
>>> signed a three-book contract that she's fairly pleased about, my father
>>> continues to amass his collection of DVDs, and my brother has fallen for
>>> some girl.
>> But if something was wrong, you could easily tell us that, clouding the real
>> issues. Given the fact that you have frequently lied in the past, I find
>> little reason to accept your word on any matter.
> What the fuck? When have I EVER brought crap like that into these debates?
Are you talking about me accusing you of lying? If so then how about this:
At the time of the Pegasus and neutronium debate threads (I'm pretty sure it
was in the neutronium threads), we were arguing. You made some points, I
made some counterpoints. You replied to my posts, snipped my points without
putting in any indication they had been removed and then claimed I hadn't
responded. I angrily replied saying that I had made points and you had
simply removed them. You went strangely silent after that and never admitted
to it, despite me continually asking you to and apologise.
Remember now?
> Jesus, Boyd, you're a fuckup. You're the one that's always using your personal
> troubles as some sort of "Get Out Of Jail Free" card when you start losing
> threads.
Care to name an instance? In fact, where have I mentioned that here at all?
Is this just another of your unfounded accusations?
> So shut the fuck up before I turn my flow pen sideways and shove it
> up your nostril.
Yes, physical insults are so effective with the whole Atlantic between us.
Look at my quiver with fear. I'm so jelly-like, maybe I should cut myself up
and serve myself with ice-cream at my little sister's birthday party.
>> I think you're the one desperately making crowd appeals, begging them to
>> laugh as they instead reach for the rotten fruit and vegetables.
> Given most of the responses in this thread, if I was going for comedic appeal
> (which I'm not -- see above), I'd be dead on. You, on the other hand, just
> look like a dink who should bow out while he still has a little dignity left.
> Your twisted little Boyd Mind just isn't built for this kind of thing. It's
> better at things like:
> * Cross-stitching
We had to do sowing for a while in Primary school for some unfathomable
reason. I was terrible at it.
> * Consoling girls when they're having trouble with guys they're actually
> attracted to
I would regard that as something friends do. You do understand this concept
of friendship with girls, rather than just feeling like you have to jump
into bed with all of them?
>>> You tell me. Didn't you just jump into the [TREK] thread? I count several
>>> posts by you there already. Hmm. Are you lying or just incapable of
>>> remembering your intentions minute to minute?
>> As I've already pointed out, I wasn't debating, merely giving someone some
>> information they wanted.
> Right, right... uh huh. No, I admire this, you've finally found the most
> cowardly way possible to get involved in threads. Now the next time you post
> '[TECH] Picard's Eyebrow Raise In "Generations" = 9PW hand phasers', you can
> just say "Hey, it was just information! I'm not here to debate, folks!"
Whatever. I really don't care if you think I'm a coward.
>>> Oh, gee, I'm so irritated. Boyd's going to go to some British university.
>>> That really gets my knickers in a knot! Chap!
>> Well generally I would say that flinging insults about with abandon would
>> suggest that you are in some way irritated.
> Right-o! Jolly good! Sporting!
Okay...
>>> Then why this elaborate self-defense thread? Let your ego take the hit.
>>> Don't reply to this message.
>> My ego is just fine. This isn't a self-defence thread.
> ATTN: Bureau Of Spelling And Fraudulant Elementary School Graduates
Out of curiousity, what are you referring to? 'self-defence'? Interestingly,
Entourage's dictionary says it should be 'defense', but the spell-checker
only recognises 'defence'. I trust the spell-checker more.
>>> BOYD: Well, if I get in, I'll be one hot mama! Only 1 in 4 do!
>>> KYNES: 25%? Geez, I was wrong about Oxford.
>>> BOYD: Missing the point! Missing the point!
>>> KYNES: Be quiet and shine my shoes.
>>> BOYD: Yes m'Lord.
>> Oh, look, you snipped my explanation again. Too much to hope that you would
>> actually use a bit of honesty and decency here I guess.
> Your explanation was "Yes m'Lord," to my command to shine my shoes. Who
> snipped it? It's right there.
I think you'll find that that was actually from your post, as opposed to my
post. Hence my replying to it.
<snip>
Jonathan Boyd
ky...@choam.org:
> On Fri, 08 Dec 2000 11:30:46 +0000, Jonathan Boyd <jona...@jboyd.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>>>> Uh-huh. I believe I've told you before how good my results in English were.
>>>
>>> Hey Wayne, aren't you impressed? I know I am!
>>
>> The intention wasn't to impress you - it was to correct your flawed
>> perceptions.
>
> I must also being "perceptually flawed" when I single out sentences like "Does
> that mean what you're saying it means where?" and notice that a fleet of
> trained monkeys could do better with 19th-century keyboards.
Equating someone making a simple typo with stupidity or a lack of knowledge
of the English language is a rather foolish observation. Have you ever made
a typo?
Jonathan Boyd
at lo...@h4h.com:
<snip>
>>> you've mentioned Hitler, but the correlatiom between you mentioning him and
>>> I
>>> in this context simply isn't there. Considering the fact that someone who
>>> died
>>> 40 years before you were born wouldn't have an opinion of you either way
>>> further muddles the issue. Try again.
>>
>> Funny how you left out Elim. Would that be because me mentioning him defeats
>> your argument before you can even type it.
> Its a non issue, Boyd. I mention Elim with the same reverence I mention
> Jesus. Doesn't mean either one are constantly on my mind, as evidenced by
> the fact that I haven't responded to Elim in close to a year. Or any from
> Jesus, either.
And just because I referred to you in a couple of points doesn't mean you're
always on my mind. It was a rash assumption of the part of Kynes. I don't
hold you responsible for his mistakes.
>>> "Does that mean what you're saying it means where?"
>> That should have said 'here', not 'where'. Typo.
> So "Does that mean what you're saying it means here?" makes MORE
> sense? Boyd, this is NOT a "typo".....
It does make sense taken in context. I probably should have put a comma in,
but it makes sense.
>>> Jesus H Christ with a stutter, you're going to COLLEGE?
>
>> No, I"m currently finishing my A-Levels in a grammar school and will be off
>> to university next year. College is for vocational courses which are
>> somewhere below a degree and many offer A-levels to people who dropped out
>> of school when they were 16, rather than continuing until they were 18. Some
>> schools however do not provide facilities for teaching A-Levels, so in some
>> cases, students have no choice but to go to college.
> Hopefully, they'll have classes for undiagnosed dyslexia.
Who will? And why would that be relevant?
>>> You'd bettter hope they have a remedial English class there on par with "See
>>> Spot run."
>> Uh-huh. I believe I've told you before how good my results in English were.
> I know what you've said. What you've shown is a different matter.
Ah, so making the occassional spelling mistake or typo is evidence of
someone needing remedial English classes now? I guess pretty much the whole
of Usenet should be sent back to school then for this heinous crime.
Jonathan Boyd
at lo...@h4h.com:
>>> Hello, Mr. Ostrich. Geez, who would have thought that I'd elicit such
>>> ambivalence from you by pointing out the FACTS from "The Pegasus" which
>>> alone was enough to destroy all your arguments on the matter. But don't
>>> worry, no one else noticed.....
>> I've already said that I'm not getting involved in debates with people who
>> refuse to look at the facts and accept them.
> Then you won't be speaking to yourself anytime soon, since I'm the one that
> presented all the uncontested facts, in the above case, which ran counter
> to all your speculation and blatantly wrong conclusions.
If you honestly believe that, then you're the one with his head stuck in the
sand.
>> 2 years ago, I thought you were a good debater. Things have changed and
>> I'm sorry to have lost someone I considered a skilled opponent. You
>> still have those skills, but you've lost any sense of honour or desire
>> for the truth.
>
> I'm sure you believe that. Projecting is the last bastion for the
> desperate.
I'm sure you'd know all about that.
>>> "Logic doesn't enter inot my relationship with God in the slightest."
>>>
>>> --------Jonathan Boyd
>
>> Oh, what a surprise, you've resurrected those quotes. I do hope they keep
>> you entertained.
>
> Not as much as this one:
>
> "It was only perpetuated by the Star wars side. the Star Trek
> side kept having to correct them saying that only Kira was pergnant."
>
> ---------- Jonathan Boyd
I'm so happy that I've brought some joy into your life.
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or
Dalton
[snip]
Kynes, you are the cruelest insulter I've seen in a while :)
--
Rob Dalton
http://daltonator.net
"What's a 'dickfore'?"
---Elim Garak
Ryan Spickard
[snip]
> Now Kynes, you're getting to an age where people will start to consider
you
> an adult. Can't we leave such childish insults/attempts at humour behind?
There he goes again...you know Boyd, someone might take you seriously when
you make statments like that if you don't go and start insulting back in the
same post...
Ryan Spickard
[snip]
> >Do you really think that, or do you merely say it to try and annoy me?
>
> Yes, Boyd. Every night, when I go to bed, I lay awake thinking of how I
will
> irritate the pro-ST side. Then I wax my moustache and kick some babies.
LOL, that would make a good quote...
Ryan Spickard
[snip]
> Yes, physical insults are so effective with the whole Atlantic between us.
> Look at my quiver with fear. I'm so jelly-like, maybe I should cut myself
up
> and serve myself with ice-cream at my little sister's birthday party.
Anyone else find that statement very distrubing? So Boyd, how long have you
been having this fantasy of being eaten by children? :)
Ryan Spickard
news:3A31D855...@daltonator.net...
> Kynes wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Kynes, you are the cruelest insulter I've seen in a while :)
I agree, he has a real gift for it. :)
Jonathan Boyd
Spickard at atomik...@excite.com:
>> Yes, physical insults are so effective with the whole Atlantic between us.
>> Look at my quiver with fear. I'm so jelly-like, maybe I should cut myself up
>> and serve myself with ice-cream at my little sister's birthday party.
> Anyone else find that statement very distrubing? So Boyd, how long have you
> been having this fantasy of being eaten by children? :)
Not very long. It seemed to be the natural progression form me eating them.
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or
Ryan Spickard
> Our spies intercepted the following random wibbling garbage from Ryan
> Spickard at atomik...@excite.com:
>
> >> Yes, physical insults are so effective with the whole Atlantic between
us.
> >> Look at my quiver with fear. I'm so jelly-like, maybe I should cut
myself up
> >> and serve myself with ice-cream at my little sister's birthday party.
>
> > Anyone else find that statement very distrubing? So Boyd, how long have
you
> > been having this fantasy of being eaten by children? :)
>
> Not very long. It seemed to be the natural progression form me eating
them.
Ah, so you were the one who has been hiding under bridges and eating
children.
That explains so much...
Kynes
>> "I wasn't speaking for the newsgroup, I was just acting as its unilateral
>> agent of authority and telling you what you could and couldn't say about it.
>> Naturally I have this ability, being the ultimate arbiter of the ASVS
>> population."
>
>Oh look, snipped the rest of my argument again. What a surprise. We haven't
>seen that tactic in a while, have we? Continue with your delusions. Anyone
>who's actually bothering to read these posts know you're just acting the
>goat.
Another lame appeal to authority. Learn to stand on your own one day.
>>> So in other words you don't have a comeback and accept that you were wrong
>>> in the first place. I accept your apology.
>
>> I don't have a "comeback?" What is this, a 4th-grade cafeteria insult war?
>
>One would think so form some of your posts. However what I meant was a
>counter-argument. A point to counter mine. And I think you're quite aware of
>that.
Then call it what it is. That's like a surgeon asking someone if they have an
"owie." It's pathetic and retarded.
>> I'm
>> not trying to best you in some bizarre verbal contest. I don't think you'd
>> stand a chance even if I was. What I'm doing is illustrating to anyone
>> watching what a boring, stupid hypocrite you are.
>
>Of course. Do you think anyone actually believes that? You me, Aron?
Well, I can say with relatively certainty that those three do.
>I
>imagine we're the only 3 actually paying attention to these posts.
Oh, I think the audience is much larger than you realize...
>> I can. In this era of digital technology, it would be a crime if I didn't have
>> at least nominal photographic evidence of everything I claim. Either these
>> chicks were dating me or I talked total strangers into getting on me for a
>> picture. I don't even know which I'd admire more.
>
>But how would we know the photos are of you? Could easily be a friend. A
>relative. Photos you lifted off the net.
That's a pretty elaborate conspiracy, Boyd. If we're going that far, how do you
know that I'm not every poster in this newsgroup? How do you know I'm not some
crazy old man, sitting in my mansion, fucking with you? I think that's cool,
actually. I wish I was that.
>Not that I particular care about
>it. If you've found a girl then fine, best of luck to you.
I have found "a girl" in the same sense that Pol Pot made life difficult for "a
Cambodian."
>> What the fuck? When have I EVER brought crap like that into these debates?
>
>Are you talking about me accusing you of lying?
No.
[snip brainless rant]
>> Jesus, Boyd, you're a fuckup. You're the one that's always using your personal
>> troubles as some sort of "Get Out Of Jail Free" card when you start losing
>> threads.
>
>Care to name an instance? In fact, where have I mentioned that here at all?
>Is this just another of your unfounded accusations?
"Well, gotta go folks! I'll be really busy with school for the next few minutes
so I won't be able to respond to any posts! Debate's over!"
>> So shut the fuck up before I turn my flow pen sideways and shove it
>> up your nostril.
>
>Yes, physical insults are so effective with the whole Atlantic between us.
Good point. Hey, do you remember who it was that was making bizarre comments
about skinning other people like rats? I was going to write them down in my
"Moron Book," but damn, I plum forgot.
>> * Cross-stitching
>
>We had to do sowing for a while in Primary school for some unfathomable
>reason. I was terrible at it.
I would have thought, with the amount of time you spend with your mother, she
would have taught you that kind of thing.
>> * Consoling girls when they're having trouble with guys they're actually
>> attracted to
>
>I would regard that as something friends do. You do understand this concept
>of friendship with girls, rather than just feeling like you have to jump
>into bed with all of them?
I'm a great friend, Boyd. And being able to have platonic relationships with
members of the opposite sex is very important... because eventually, that's what
all my relationships with women will be, save one.
However, I was just noting that I saw you particularly suited for the "sister"
role. The platonic, androgynous guy that every girl feels like she can turn to
when the "guys" in her life are giving her trouble. The kind of guy that says,
"Sure, you can borrow my car to go to the prom. I wasn't going to use it anyway.
No, really, have a good time." "Thanks Jon! You're so sweet. Hey, Rick, did you
hear?"
>> Right, right... uh huh. No, I admire this, you've finally found the most
>> cowardly way possible to get involved in threads. Now the next time you post
>> '[TECH] Picard's Eyebrow Raise In "Generations" = 9PW hand phasers', you can
>> just say "Hey, it was just information! I'm not here to debate, folks!"
>
>Whatever. I really don't care if you think I'm a coward.
"I'm not going to respond to this, but I am going to type something."
>>> My ego is just fine. This isn't a self-defence thread.
>
>> ATTN: Bureau Of Spelling And Fraudulant Elementary School Graduates
>
>Out of curiousity, what are you referring to? 'self-defence'? Interestingly,
>Entourage's dictionary says it should be 'defense', but the spell-checker
>only recognises 'defence'. I trust the spell-checker more.
"I trust Microsoft Outlook Express over a dictionary."
>> Your explanation was "Yes m'Lord," to my command to shine my shoes. Who
>> snipped it? It's right there.
>
>I think you'll find that that was actually from your post, as opposed to my
>post. Hence my replying to it.
Oh, I think you're quite wrong, Boyd. You typed it. Check it out:
On Thu, 07 Dec 2000 01:19:17 +0000, Jonathan Boyd <jona...@jboyd.co.uk> wrote:
> Get me a soda.
Yes m'Lord.
Kynes
>Kynes, you are the cruelest insulter I've seen in a while :)
Thank you. Given that you 1) live in NY state and 2) post here regularly, that's
quite a feat. :D
Dalton
>
> On Sat, 09 Dec 2000 01:59:33 -0500, Dalton <r...@daltonator.net> wrote:
>
> >Kynes, you are the cruelest insulter I've seen in a while :)
>
> Thank you. Given that you 1) live in NY state and 2) post here regularly, that's
> quite a feat. :D
It's a big world.
Jonathan Boyd
ky...@choam.org:
>>> "I wasn't speaking for the newsgroup, I was just acting as its unilateral
>>> agent of authority and telling you what you could and couldn't say about it.
>>> Naturally I have this ability, being the ultimate arbiter of the ASVS
>>> population."
>>
>> Oh look, snipped the rest of my argument again. What a surprise. We haven't
>> seen that tactic in a while, have we? Continue with your delusions. Anyone
>> who's actually bothering to read these posts know you're just acting the
>> goat.
>
> Another lame appeal to authority. Learn to stand on your own one day.
An appeal to authority? And which higher power did I call out to there? And
what is wrong with authority? If you're robbed, you call the police. If
someone libels you, you go to the courts. Authorities exist for a reason.
Just because you can stand on your own doesn't mean that it's necessary or
right. The only purpose it can serve then, is to make you look like the big
macho man who doesn't need anyone. But if that's the way you want to act,
then you're really very small. Very small and weak indeed.
>>> I don't have a "comeback?" What is this, a 4th-grade cafeteria insult war?
>> One would think so form some of your posts. However what I meant was a
>> counter-argument. A point to counter mine. And I think you're quite aware of
>> that.
> Then call it what it is. That's like a surgeon asking someone if they have an
> "owie." It's pathetic and retarded.
Kynes, no matter what I say, you would come out with a response like that.
It's quite irrelevant what I do, because you're not interested in what I'm
saying. You're just interested in crying for attention. Flinging insults
about to try and make other people look dumb and make you look funny. Some
people are easily fooled by that. But that's their problem really. If they
can be that easily manipulated, they'll be the ones to pay for it someday.
>>> I'm not trying to best you in some bizarre verbal contest. I don't think
>>> you'd stand a chance even if I was. What I'm doing is illustrating to anyone
>>> watching what a boring, stupid hypocrite you are.
>> Of course. Do you think anyone actually believes that? You me, Aron?
> Well, I can say with relatively certainty that those three do.
And by what authority do you speak for Aron? And I hardly think you could
speak for me, given the complete lack of understanding of me that you've
demonstrated.
>> I imagine we're the only 3 actually paying attention to these posts.
> Oh, I think the audience is much larger than you realize...
There are more people watching,yes, but how closely? The closer the better I
say. The better to remind them of what you really are.
>>> I can. In this era of digital technology, it would be a crime if I didn't
>>> have at least nominal photographic evidence of everything I claim. Either
>>> these chicks were dating me or I talked total strangers into getting on me
>>> for a picture. I don't even know which I'd admire more.
>> But how would we know the photos are of you? Could easily be a friend. A
>> relative. Photos you lifted off the net.
> That's a pretty elaborate conspiracy, Boyd.
Did I ever say it was a likely one? No. Merely a possibility.
> If we're going that far, how do you know that I'm not every poster in this
> newsgroup? How do you know I'm not some crazy old man, sitting in my mansion,
> fucking with you? I think that's cool, actually. I wish I was that.
If you think you're actually achieving something here against me, I think
you're sorely mistaken. You really don't know what's going on, do you?
>> Not that I particular care about it. If you've found a girl then fine, best
>> of luck to you.
> I have found "a girl" in the same sense that Pol Pot made life difficult for
> "a Cambodian."
Like I said, I'm happy for you.
>>> What the fuck? When have I EVER brought crap like that into these debates?
>> Are you talking about me accusing you of lying?
> No.
Well that really clears things up. I guess you weren't referring to any of
my post then and were just trying to look like the innocent wounded party.
My heart bleeds for you.
> [snip brainless rant]
By that you mean "Snip Boyd once again showing that Kynes is a trolling
liar"?
>>> Jesus, Boyd, you're a fuckup. You're the one that's always using your
>>> personal troubles as some sort of "Get Out Of Jail Free" card when you start
>>> losing threads.
>> Care to name an instance? In fact, where have I mentioned that here at all?
>> Is this just another of your unfounded accusations?
> "Well, gotta go folks! I'll be really busy with school for the next few
> minutes so I won't be able to respond to any posts! Debate's over!"
Ah, putting words between quotation marks. That's devastating evidence. Care
to name a thread? A time? A date? A context?
>>> So shut the fuck up before I turn my flow pen sideways and shove it
>>> up your nostril.
>> Yes, physical insults are so effective with the whole Atlantic between us.
> Good point. Hey, do you remember who it was that was making bizarre comments
> about skinning other people like rats? I was going to write them down in my
> "Moron Book," but damn, I plum forgot.
What a pity.
>>> * Cross-stitching
>> We had to do sowing for a while in Primary school for some unfathomable
>> reason. I was terrible at it.
> I would have thought, with the amount of time you spend with your mother, she
> would have taught you that kind of thing.
Are you drawing on your own family experiences there for comparison with
mine, or is that just a random attempt at annoying me, which, like all your
others, has failed?
>>> * Consoling girls when they're having trouble with guys they're actually
>>> attracted to
>>
>> I would regard that as something friends do. You do understand this concept
>> of friendship with girls, rather than just feeling like you have to jump
>> into bed with all of them?
>
> I'm a great friend, Boyd.
Then you're a very different person of the group than you are on it.
> And being able to have platonic relationships with
> members of the opposite sex is very important... because eventually, that's
> what all my relationships with women will be, save one.
My goodness, aside from the implementing of the Final Solution against Tim,
we actually have something in common.
> However, I was just noting that I saw you particularly suited for the "sister"
> role. The platonic, androgynous guy that every girl feels like she can turn to
> when the "guys" in her life are giving her trouble. The kind of guy that says,
> "Sure, you can borrow my car to go to the prom. I wasn't going to use it
> anyway.
> No, really, have a good time." "Thanks Jon! You're so sweet. Hey, Rick, did
> you hear?"
I see. You are entitled to that opinion. It affects me in no way. It won't
change the relationships I have with people or will have in the future. It
won't affect the fact that there are those I have been friends with and
there are those who would liked to be more than friends with me. It doesn't
affect any aspect of my life at all. Does it, however, affect yours? Do you
feel a need to find people like that? People who play the 'sister' role? Do
you need to make yourself feel big by laughing at them? Do you feel so
insecure that that is necessary?
>>> Right, right... uh huh. No, I admire this, you've finally found the most
>>> cowardly way possible to get involved in threads. Now the next time you post
>>> '[TECH] Picard's Eyebrow Raise In "Generations" = 9PW hand phasers', you can
>>> just say "Hey, it was just information! I'm not here to debate, folks!"
>> Whatever. I really don't care if you think I'm a coward.
> "I'm not going to respond to this, but I am going to type something."
Whatever makes you happy.
>>> ATTN: Bureau Of Spelling And Fraudulant Elementary School Graduates
>> Out of curiousity, what are you referring to? 'self-defence'? Interestingly,
>> Entourage's dictionary says it should be 'defense', but the spell-checker
>> only recognises 'defence'. I trust the spell-checker more.
> "I trust Microsoft Outlook Express over a dictionary."
The dictionary was built into Entourage. In fact it's accessible from all of
Office 2001. Incidentally, I didn't check it until after you said something
was wrong because the spell-checker didn't highlight it is an error earlier.
And the reason I trust the spell checker more is that it's set to UK
English, while their exists the possibility that the dictionary has an
American bias and is therefore wrong. In fact, from typing in the words
'colour' and 'color', I can see that it does indeed have an American bias.
>>> Your explanation was "Yes m'Lord," to my command to shine my shoes. Who
>>> snipped it? It's right there.
>> I think you'll find that that was actually from your post, as opposed to my
>> post. Hence my replying to it.
> Oh, I think you're quite wrong, Boyd. You typed it. Check it out:
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2000 01:19:17 +0000, Jonathan Boyd <jona...@jboyd.co.uk>
> wrote:
>> Get me a soda.
> Yes m'Lord.
Oh, that's mature. If I wanted an argument like that, I would talk to my
little sister. Original insult on my part there? No. Does it speak the
truth? Yes.
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | MSN: EmperorBoyd |Web: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or
Kynes
>> Another lame appeal to authority. Learn to stand on your own one day.
>
>An appeal to authority? And which higher power did I call out to there?
"Anyone who's actually bothering to read your posts..."
Implicitly citing other posters as an authority on my posts.
>And what is wrong with authority? If you're robbed, you call the police.
And if you're fucking stupid, you call 1-800-I-AM-BOYD, apparently.
>If someone libels you, you go to the courts. Authorities exist for a reason.
>Just because you can stand on your own doesn't mean that it's necessary or
>right. The only purpose it can serve then, is to make you look like the big
>macho man who doesn't need anyone. But if that's the way you want to act,
>then you're really very small. Very small and weak indeed.
Unfortunately, Boyd, while you were taking A-Level Boasting, you appear to have
missed out on basic oral advocacy/argumentation. An appeal to authority is a
formal logical fallacy. Tim used to do it all the time. It has nothing to do
with being a "big macho man" and everything to do with the concept of allowing
ideas to stand on their own, since an argument's truth or lack thereof has
nothing to do with its source.
>> Then call it what it is. That's like a surgeon asking someone if they have an
>> "owie." It's pathetic and retarded.
>
>Kynes, no matter what I say, you would come out with a response like that.
>It's quite irrelevant what I do, because you're not interested in what I'm
>saying.
You're right, Boyd. And neither is anyone else.
> You're just interested in crying for attention. Flinging insults
>about to try and make other people look dumb and make you look funny. Some
>people are easily fooled by that. But that's their problem really. If they
>can be that easily manipulated, they'll be the ones to pay for it someday.
LOL. God, this is just sad and pathetic. "You'll pay! YOU'LL ALL PAY FOR THIS
SOMEDAY!" I'm beginning to think that your parents have locked you in your
basement and some of your pent-up aggression is starting to leak out.
>>> Of course. Do you think anyone actually believes that? You me, Aron?
>
>> Well, I can say with relatively certainty that those three do.
>
>And by what authority do you speak for Aron?
If you're trying to get me to implicate Aron in some bizarre counter-Boyd
scheme, you can kiss my ass. I will say that the friends I've got in the group
have all weighed in on this issue and there seems to be consensus on what a
jackass moron you are.
>And I hardly think you could
>speak for me, given the complete lack of understanding of me that you've
>demonstrated.
Boyd, I could build a robot model of you with three hours and a set of Tonka
Toys. You run so ridiculously to type that I often wonder what kind of person
you might have been had your soul not been crushed by authority at such a young
age.
>>> I imagine we're the only 3 actually paying attention to these posts.
>
>> Oh, I think the audience is much larger than you realize...
>
>There are more people watching,yes, but how closely? The closer the better I
>say. The better to remind them of what you really are.
So, you admit you were totally wrong, and that there are people watching. Great,
got it.
>>> But how would we know the photos are of you? Could easily be a friend. A
>>> relative. Photos you lifted off the net.
>
>> That's a pretty elaborate conspiracy, Boyd.
>
>Did I ever say it was a likely one? No. Merely a possibility.
So uh... what's your POINT, nimrod?
>> If we're going that far, how do you know that I'm not every poster in this
>> newsgroup? How do you know I'm not some crazy old man, sitting in my mansion,
>> fucking with you? I think that's cool, actually. I wish I was that.
>
>If you think you're actually achieving something here against me, I think
>you're sorely mistaken. You really don't know what's going on, do you?
I am achieving something. I am achieving the very real feat of amusing myself to
no end at the expense of your time. I don't imagine you're enjoying this
exchange 1/10th of one percent as much as me, but you take as long to read and
reply to it as I do.
In other words, I've timesucked you.
>>> Not that I particular care about it. If you've found a girl then fine, best
>>> of luck to you.
>
>> I have found "a girl" in the same sense that Pol Pot made life difficult for
>> "a Cambodian."
>
>Like I said, I'm happy for you.
Wow, I never would have guessed it, but your envy is palpable even on a
transatlantic scale.
>> [snip brainless rant]
>
>By that you mean "Snip Boyd once again showing that Kynes is a trolling
>liar"?
Yeah, I'm a "trolling liar" because your insane Pegasus calculations, accepted
by no one, didn't hold water when I actually debated them. Look, Boyd, it's not
my fault that your "calculations" were like something a three-year old might
show his mother.
>>> Care to name an instance? In fact, where have I mentioned that here at all?
>>> Is this just another of your unfounded accusations?
>
>> "Well, gotta go folks! I'll be really busy with school for the next few
>> minutes so I won't be able to respond to any posts! Debate's over!"
>
>Ah, putting words between quotation marks. That's devastating evidence. Care
>to name a thread? A time? A date? A context?
Gee. I don't know. LAST FUCKING MONTH? Idiot.
>>>> So shut the fuck up before I turn my flow pen sideways and shove it
>>>> up your nostril.
>
>>> Yes, physical insults are so effective with the whole Atlantic between us.
>
>> Good point. Hey, do you remember who it was that was making bizarre comments
>> about skinning other people like rats? I was going to write them down in my
>> "Moron Book," but damn, I plum forgot.
>
>What a pity.
God, you're dumb. You're just sitting there, meekly dishing out your lame-duck
pseudo-intellectual middlebrow responses like you're actually accomplishing a
competent defense of yourself. You're like an immortal, but stupid, lemming.
>> I would have thought, with the amount of time you spend with your mother, she
>> would have taught you that kind of thing.
>
>Are you drawing on your own family experiences there for comparison with
>mine, or is that just a random attempt at annoying me, which, like all your
>others, has failed?
This is so remniscient of Tim. "Your attempts to do such-and-such will
categoricamlly fail. I will not be moved. Your arguments have been snipped
unread."
>> I'm a great friend, Boyd.
>
>Then you're a very different person of the group than you are on it.
I'm also a great asshole. I can be more than one thing. I'm a great friend to
people I don't think are totally ignorant bastards, like you. I think I've even
got a few good friendships happening on this group, limited as they may be by
the Internet. I'd consider Aron in particular to be a guy I wouldn't mind
sitting on the sofa and playing Madden '99 for a few hours with.
That doesn't mean I have to categorically suck up to anyone with a USENET client
like you do.
>> And being able to have platonic relationships with
>> members of the opposite sex is very important... because eventually, that's
>> what all my relationships with women will be, save one.
>
>My goodness, aside from the implementing of the Final Solution against Tim,
>we actually have something in common.
Yeah, great to know there's common ground. Unfortunately, I think you missed the
"eventually" and the "save one."
>I see. You are entitled to that opinion. It affects me in no way.
So uh, why are you talking to me, Boyd?
>It won't
>change the relationships I have with people or will have in the future. It
>won't affect the fact that there are those I have been friends with and
>there are those who would liked to be more than friends with me.
Tell me the truth, Boyd. Have you ever gotten to second base with a girl? You
can define "second base" really loosely, too. Through the clothing is fine. Ten
sweaters, I don't care. And keep in mind, if you lie, you suffer for eternity.
>It doesn't
>affect any aspect of my life at all. Does it, however, affect yours? Do you
>feel a need to find people like that? People who play the 'sister' role? Do
>you need to make yourself feel big by laughing at them? Do you feel so
>insecure that that is necessary?
"Security" is not an issue with me, Boyd. There are two kinds of people who act
like I do. There is the type you describe: the guys with genuine personality
issues who really do get off on other people's suffering. Then there's the cruel
cynics. I am most firmly planted in the second category.
I would think as much of myself if you didn't even exist.
>The dictionary was built into Entourage. In fact it's accessible from all of
>Office 2001. Incidentally, I didn't check it until after you said something
>was wrong because the spell-checker didn't highlight it is an error earlier.
>And the reason I trust the spell checker more is that it's set to UK
>English, while their exists the possibility that the dictionary has an
>American bias and is therefore wrong. In fact, from typing in the words
>'colour' and 'color', I can see that it does indeed have an American bias.
Great story! [..zzzz..]