info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
I love both SW & ST series!
16 views
Skip to first unread message
Ant
Nov 15, 2019, 5:26:48 PM11/15/19
to
No vs. :P
--
"Thanks for giving me the courage to eat all those ants." --unknown
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org /
/ /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.ma.cx. Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
| |o o| |
\ _ /
( )
--
"Thanks for giving me the courage to eat all those ants." --unknown
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org /
/ /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.ma.cx. Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
| |o o| |
\ _ /
( )
Daniel60
Nov 16, 2019, 9:32:30 PM11/16/19
to
Ant wrote on 16/11/2019 9:26 AM:
> No vs. :P
>
O.K, but which would you prefer to watch, Ant??
And would you distinguish between ST:TOS, ST:TNG, ST:DS9, ST:VOY and
ST:ENT??
For me, it's a case of, virtually, any SF is good SF ... but I think
ST:TOS would be top of my list!! ;-)
--
Daniel
> No vs. :P
>
O.K, but which would you prefer to watch, Ant??
And would you distinguish between ST:TOS, ST:TNG, ST:DS9, ST:VOY and
ST:ENT??
For me, it's a case of, virtually, any SF is good SF ... but I think
ST:TOS would be top of my list!! ;-)
--
Daniel
Ant
Nov 16, 2019, 10:28:28 PM11/16/19
to
Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
> Ant wrote on 16/11/2019 9:26 AM:
> > No vs. :P
> >
> O.K, but which would you prefer to watch, Ant??
Ugh, that's a hard one. I love both equally. :(
> Ant wrote on 16/11/2019 9:26 AM:
> > No vs. :P
> >
> O.K, but which would you prefer to watch, Ant??
> And would you distinguish between ST:TOS, ST:TNG, ST:DS9, ST:VOY and
> ST:ENT??
I prefer the older series. ;)
> For me, it's a case of, virtually, any SF is good SF ... but I think
> ST:TOS would be top of my list!! ;-)
good as the original IMO.
Daniel60
Nov 17, 2019, 4:31:13 AM11/17/19
to
Ant wrote on 17/11/2019 2:28 PM:
> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> Ant wrote on 16/11/2019 9:26 AM:
>>> No vs. :P
>>>
>> O.K, but which would you prefer to watch, Ant??
>
> Ugh, that's a hard one. I love both equally. :(
>
>
>> And would you distinguish between ST:TOS, ST:TNG, ST:DS9, ST:VOY and
>> ST:ENT??
>
> I could never get into DS9. You forgot DSC which I do watch even though
> I prefer the older series. ;)
DSC?? Is that Discovery or whatever the latest incarnation is?? Here in
> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> Ant wrote on 16/11/2019 9:26 AM:
>>> No vs. :P
>>>
>> O.K, but which would you prefer to watch, Ant??
>
> Ugh, that's a hard one. I love both equally. :(
>
>
>> And would you distinguish between ST:TOS, ST:TNG, ST:DS9, ST:VOY and
>> ST:ENT??
>
> I could never get into DS9. You forgot DSC which I do watch even though
> I prefer the older series. ;)
Aus it's only on Pay TV, which I don't have, so couldn't possibly
comment! ;-P
>> For me, it's a case of, virtually, any SF is good SF ... but I think
>> ST:TOS would be top of my list!! ;-)
>
> TOS is rad. Wait, we forgot the JJ's version too. They're pretty but not
> good as the original IMO.
>
or even the Fourth Film .... but JJ's stuff is still a hell of a lot
better than nothing!.
I've never really gotten into the second trilogy or the third trilogy of
SW!!
--
Daniel
Ant
Nov 17, 2019, 3:32:25 PM11/17/19
to
and popular like Star Wars. :)
--
"I discovered that if one looks a little closer at this beautiful world, there are always red ants underneath." --David Lynch
0 new messages